Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • First of all it sounds as if your retailer is very decent and very responsible. This itself is unusual in these kinds of circumstances and I think we need to bear this in mind. The guarantee is not particularly relevant and in fact the dealer had a statutory duty to exercise a certain responsibility for your computer – probably for several years as their obligation under the consumer rights act. The dealer may not have known this and it simply acting out of a sense of moral responsibility and that is even more noteworthy. You've already suggested earlier that you didn't really want to cause problems for your retailer. I think that you will need the help of your retailer as well in order to get information and evidence. I suggest that you proceed against DPD – but before you do that – I suggest that you have a discussion with the retailer. Tell them that this is what you are going to be doing and you would like to have a copy of anything they have which relates to the special instructions which apparently your dealer has already informed you about in relation to where item should be left. Secondly, maybe you should tell your dealer about this site and also about this thread. I can imagine like many dealers who are frequently sending items by means of couriers, they have had things go missing. Tell them that we will be very happy to help them recover money for lost or damaged or stolen items – and that is regardless of whether or not they have purchased insurance. Apart from being very pleased to help your dealer recover items which have been lost by irresponsible parcel delivery companies, I think we need to encourage the complicity between you and them so they will be pleased to support you in your claim against DPD. It will be helpful if you can get a copy of the instructions that you have referred to above, and also if you can get some written evidence of your own instruction that your laptop should be left in a safe place. Have you done the reading on this sub- forum? You will need to do lots of reading of many of the similar stories on this sub- forum. They won't necessarily be against DPD but the principles will broadly be the same. Also read the pinned topics at the top of the sub- forum in order to understand many of the principles involved. Getting your money back but be quick – but your chances of success are better than 90% that you can bank on it taking anything up to a year. Have you got anything in writing from DPD either refusing you or telling you that they won't discuss with you?  
    • Thank you for telling us the text of the letter you had from the police. As we don't seem to have come across this before, it would be really useful for us to see the original please. HB
    • Pasco has recalled 104,000 packs of sliced bread after rat remains were found in at least two packs.View the full article
    • UPDATE I went rooting through an old box of paperwork I have and I've found the original Default Notice. It is dated **/**/201*, however.. The copy of the Default Notice that they sent with the LBC has a completely different date on it 😮 Can they issue 2 default notices for the same debt? Where they have changed the date on the copy, they have also changed the amount owed through failed payments and how much is required to be paid by a certain date. In addition, they sent (with the 1st LBC) a copy of the termination of the agreement, which I cannot find the original. However, the termination date is 3 days after the date given on the (doctored) Default Notice, by which monies are to be paid by. So, they gave until the 'x' date to pay the arrears, then terminated the agreement 3 days later. I bet a dollar to a dime they've doctored the termination date also.
    • Having looked through the paperwork, I note they have sent 3 seperate LBCs. Two are in the name of FCA Automotive (1st one issued 21 Jan 2020, 2nd one 21 Sept 2022) and the last one (issued 12 Sept 2023) is under CA Auto Finance UK Limited. In the first one, they did send a copy of the default notice, but this was not sent with the 2nd LBC and neither was it sent with the last one either. .  A quick look at the default notice and I see it states the agreement start date was not the same day as the original agreement was signed. It's a day different but do not know if that makes any difference. Also, I note we received a letter on the 16 Nov 2023 which states of a 14 day notice of intention to issue claim form. Heard nothing since that, until this court claim arrived. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mutating Corona Virus


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 462 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, tobyjugg2 said:

I will still be having my flu jab at my surgery, but pfiser booster wherever i can get it

I've just seen an article which gave out details of walk-in, pop up centres and buses in one area and it gave out details of which vaccines they were using.  Most were AZ and Pfiser but a few were Pfiser only which would be the obvious choice.  Seems your best bet of getting the vaccine you want is to live in an urban area with low take up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, honeybee13 said:

I understood pharmacies can't give Pfizer jabs because of the low temperature storage they need. So will it be restricted to AZ and other vaccines that don't need super-freezers?

This one confuses me HB.  From what I'm seeing the mobile/walk-in facilities are giving out Pfiser jabs.  If it's easy enough to kit out a bus with the necessary fridge it can't be too difficult to install them elsewhere.  I think it's more the case that they need to hype up/use up the AZ wherever possible.

  • I agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, hightail said:

I've just seen an article which gave out details of walk-in, pop up centres and buses in one area and it gave out details of which vaccines they were using.  Most were AZ and Pfiser but a few were Pfiser only which would be the obvious choice.  Seems your best bet of getting the vaccine you want is to live in an urban area with low take up.

 

these will be vaccinations (mainly intended for younger people) not boosters wont they HT?

 

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

So far yes because boosters (3rd dose) aren't being given out yet.  The article I read was for somewhere like Bolton I think and listed locations, times/dates, whether they were doing first or second jabs (or both) and which vaccines they were using.  It didn't say the Pfiser only centres were reserved for the under 40s.

 

Guessing once 3rd doses are involved there may be restrictions on where you can go so they can force the AZ again.  Guessing again, I'd say it would be worth holding back for a greater chance of the Pfiser.

Edited by hightail
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, tobyjugg2 said:

 

these will be vaccinations (mainly intended for younger people) not boosters wont they HT?

 

 

So Pfizer isn't suitable for that age group. If the centres don't have super-freezers for the doses, I think once they're thawed, they have to be used within about five days and expire after that.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, hightail said:

This one confuses me HB.  From what I'm seeing the mobile/walk-in facilities are giving out Pfiser jabs.  If it's easy enough to kit out a bus with the necessary fridge it can't be too difficult to install them elsewhere.  I think it's more the case that they need to hype up/use up the AZ wherever possible.

 

perhaps the difference between kitting out local surgeries with small refrigerating units to store and dispense vaccines for the next decade, and giving the amount that would have kitted out a surgery in every town - to the private sector for a couple of buses with fridges?

 

Far less scope for 'pals profit' when kit needs to be supplied to surgeries, rather than small capital outlay and lots of ongoing costs

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

The whole thing is going to get very messy once boosters come in.  They've said 'fully vaccinated' will mean the most doses you could have had according to the current protocol at the time.  This will mean two doses for some and three for others.  From the end of September this means a nightclub doorman will be expected to question everyone as to whether they are a candidate for a booster before deciding eligibility to enter. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which is why Vaccine Passports are unworkable in reality, there will always be people behind in jabs, or medically unable to have them for whatever reason.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Imagine the poor 19 year old agency worker who got sent to a temporary job in a care home at the beginning of this year so got jabbed early.  They no longer have that job so probably won't get a booster.  Who decides if they can attend a football match or a gig?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Schools unions are saying that ventilation in schools should be improved before the new term starts.

 

This is blindingly obvious and HMG have had well over a year to organise it but don't seem to have done anything.

 

WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM

Seven unions call on education secretary to improve ventilation to protect children ahead of new term

 

  • I agree 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a depressing read about vaccine hoarding. It isn't how I thought Covax worked, certainly.

 

APNEWS.COM

LONDON (AP) — An international system to share coronavirus vaccines was supposed to guarantee that low and middle-income countries could get...

 

  • Sad 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 17/08/2021 at 14:59, brassnecked said:

Which is why Vaccine Passports are unworkable in reality, there will always be people behind in jabs, or medically unable to have them for whatever reason.

 

and the jabs behind the virus

Masks work similarly through the variants though .....

 

But even limited effectiveness vaccination is important as we will soon see

 

 

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Figures have been released of covid cases from major sporting events this summer. Euro 2020 is in the lead by some margin...

 

WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM

Study paper says England’s progress to final ‘generated a significant risk to public health across the UK’

 

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally - work on ventilating schools and measuring air quality.

 

They've had about 18 months to think about this and it takes a campaign to make them do anything. It's to be hoped they get on with it now.

 

WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM

Department for Education decision comes after campaign by school staff and unions for better ventilation

 

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Ventilation in work places is a hot topic at the moment.

 

There is a complicated calculation to be made, depending on the ventilation in place, to work out how many people can safely be in an office at the same time.

 

If an office has visitors coming in and the the safe limit will be breached, companies are faced with having to send staff to work from home, if there is no alternative to the visitors attending the office.

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simple ventilation systems are breeding grounds ...

Ever seen in one?

 

I remember assessing the state of some for an office move

- 3 ply full enclosure protective suit like used in sewers before I'd touch the inside of the ducting after seeing the state of it, let alone breath stuff thats been through it

I'm not that fussy - but it was disgusting.

 

Needs a really good extraction process after being cleaned - if the air had circulated - it would have been liability

 

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know it's complicated but surely HMG have to try?

 

This is Christina Pagel of Indie Sage.

 

BLOGS.BMJ.COM

England is an anomaly in not undertaking any of the three strategies to prevent transmission in schools, says Christina Pagel The highly...

 

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, unclebulgaria67 said:

if an office has visitors coming in and the the safe limit will be breached, companies are faced with having to send staff to work from home, if there is no alternative to the visitors attending the office.

So is this calculated per room or for the whole building or per business if a company doesn't occupy the whole building?  Serious question. Does it rely on floor space so if a business has meeting rooms which are not normally occupied as office space can visitors not be temporarily accommodated in them for meetings?  Even if a visitor does cause a breach does that really mean employees have to work from home?  Very few visitors to a business are there for a whole day, surely an early lunch break for a couple of office staff would cover in most cases.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have not fully studied this subject, so knowledge fairly basic.

 

 As far as I understand it, it would be building capacity.   But if there is more than one company in a Building they will each have  a capacity limit based on square meters and there will be a capacity for communal areas.

 

It is the ability of the ventilation system to be able to efficiently extract and replace with  fresh air.

 

Most businesses occupying larger offices have a facilities management company looking after such issues, but the business managers responsible for H&S should ask the questions.  There are ready made calculators available.

 

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Too many people are thinking this is a temporary problem that will go away if they do nothing long enough - It isnt.

 

These sort of mitigations need to be implemented to address this AND future outbreaks.

Enough of the shitty working spaces that used to be called sick buildings that damaged health 

- that are now an extreme liability to the nations health.

 

 

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still only 'on hold' until they try to sneak grab your medical data to sell again

 

WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM

A plan to share GP data was set to launch in September, but an online summer campaign has prompted widespread dissent

 

 

Booth said NHS Digital has “made a bunch of public promises and we very much want to see how those promises are delivered. We’ve always said there are fairly legitimate, ethical, research and planning uses that can be made of this data – it just has to be done right.

“The question is, what’s going on behind closed doors right now in terms of people lobbying against those [concessions] or for particular exceptions to them.”

 

and we all know what the populists word is worth to the public

- nowt

Edited by tobyjugg2
  • Like 1

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK

Up to 8,000 tests to be made available each day, Department of Health says

 

Heres another which will need close examination on what they claim they can and what they clearly say they wont do with it

Should have been implemented with CLEAR data protection statements a year ago - so why now?

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, tobyjugg2 said:

so why now?

Maybe because proof of being antibody +ve is an alternative to vaccination status for entry into venues etc.  And with my cynical head on,  they can then claim it isn't so important that they've failed to persuade so many into vaccination.  I have noticed a subtle shift from vaccinations to being antibody +ve as the important figure in the media.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 462 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...