Jump to content


MET/DCB(L) windscreen PCN PAPLOC Now Claimform - electric bay abuse - ASDA Arla Old Dairy South Ruislip


Recommended Posts

On Monday I posed snotty letter to DCBL and MET and also sent email to ASDA CEO with attachment of receipts and bank transactions.  Unfortunately I got below response from ASDA.

Thank you for contacting Mr Issa, my name is Anjan, as part of the Executive Relations Team at Asda, I will be responding to you directly.

I am sorry to learn that you received a Parking Charge Notification (PCN) in 2019, all of our stores have clear signs informing our customers of the conditions of the car park, failure to adhere to the conditions may result in a PCN.

As the PCN is now 4 years old and the car park is monitored by an external company, MET Parking Services, Asda do not have any control over issuing or cancelling the PCN in question.

I would advise you to contact the issuer, MET Parking Services who would be best suited to support you further.

Apologies that I could not help further.

Kind Regards
Anjan
Executive Relations Team

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's disappointing.  It's the first time we've seen Asda not be cooperative.  No doubt down to the four-year delay in contacting them.

Hopefully the snotty letter will see MET off anyway.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

yours is not the next move.

it's a bit like mother +child , disabled, one legged dog owners-  bays. they MUST have a sign AT THE BAY and not rely upon general T&C's on signs around the whole site to even be half considered poss a chance to issue a speculative invoice.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi.

Could you also let us have the answers to the questions in the forum sticky please?

HB

 

Have you signed up to MCOL? HB

 

I've hidden your post with the claim pdf. Please edit it and repost, you've left yourname on it twice and the claim number several times. Best to keep this anonymous.

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dx100uk will be on shortly with details of how to defend.  You have plenty of time to do so.

MET are issuing claim forms like confetti at the moment.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to MET windscreen PCN PAPLOC Now Claimform - electric bay abuse - ASDA Arla Old Dairy South Ruislip

sticky first please

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @honeybee13 and @dx100uk ,  Thanks and please see below answers.  Please let me know if anything missing.

Which Court have you received the claim from ?  Yes  (civil national business centre - the county court)

Name of the Claimant :    MET Parking Services LTD

Claimants Solicitors: Ellen O'Donnell

Date of issue –    08  DEC 2023

Date for AOS -   26 DEC 2023

Date to submit Defence - 09 JAN 2024

What is the claim for  

1. The Defendant (D) is indebted to the Claimant (C) for a Parking Charge(s) Issued to vehicle xxxxxxxx at (840) Ara Old Dairy, South Ruislip, HA4 OFY.

2. The PCN(S) were issued on 05/12/2019

3. The defendant ls pursued as the driver of the vehicle for breach of the terms on the signs (the contract). Reason:Electric Bay Abuse

4. In the alternative the defendant is pursued as the keeper pursuant to POFA 2012, Schedule 4. AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS

1.£170 being the total of the PCN(s) and damages.

2. Interest at a rate of 8% per annum pursuant to s.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 from the date hereof at a daily rate of £01 until judgment or sooner payment.

3.Costs and court fees

What is the value of the claim?

Amount Claimed - 227.36

court fees - 35.00

legal rep fees - 50.00

Total Amount - 312.36

Have you moved since the issuance of the PCN? (y/N - if Y state Date too) No

Did you receive a letter of Claim With A reply Pack wanting I&E etc about 1mth before the claimform? Y/N + date and did you reply?  No I think I got I&E together with claim form

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform

.

register as an individual on the Gov't Gateway Site
Go to HMRC's login page.


Click the GREEN sign in button.
Click “Create sign in details”
Enter your email address where asked.
You will now be emailed a confirmation code. ...


You will now be issued with a User ID for your government gateway account.
 note down your details inc the long gateway number given, you might need it later.
 

then log in to the MCOL Website

.

select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim


type your name ONLY


no need to sign anything

.

you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.

you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.

………….
 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get AOS and CPR done as dx says.

Nearer the time of the defence filing please come back on here.  We have a standard defence but it needs to be tweaked to include that is is unreasonable for MET to delay litigation for four years so that they can claim a huge amount of interest.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for your guidance

I have prepared a letter as below to solicitor

can you please review and suggest any correction or modifications if you think please? 

also is my name need to be same as in passport or is it ok to use usual short name that I use for myself? 

I already have government gateway id I suppose I can use that as that is needed for the reason of income & tax purpose? 

Many Thanks

 

To DCB LEGAL LTD

[Your address]

DCB LEGAL LTD - 0330 1744 172

DIRECT HOUSE,

GREENWOOD DRIVE

RUNCORN

WA7 1UG

 

(template removed - dx)

Link to post
Share on other sites

read what the template says in red at the top...

you use the name on the claimform.

your existing gateway is ok to use.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

for the third point about disclosure and production of document where I need to mention solicitors do I mention just DCBLegal or also CST Law? please see below.

3. Copies of the notice to driver, notice to keeper and any other correspondence from [insert Claimant Name] & DCBLegal  & CST Law to the defendant that they intend to rely upon in court.

If I have used my short name in past communication with those solicitors and MET will that matter? or will I have to mention that in the 3rd point?  those communication did include relevant PCN Number.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CST Law just sent threatening letters, you can ignore their existence in your CPR request.

The point of the request is to embarrass DCBL and MET who won't have bothered to obtain the required legal documentation.

As dx says, use the name they have sued you under.

 

Edited by FTMDave
Irrelavent part ommitted

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

yesterday I did AOS and today sent CPR request to solicitor,  in CPR there is below paragraph does that mean there will be some cost that I will have to pay for?

In accordance with CPR 31.15© I undertake to be responsible for your reasonable copying costs incurred in complying with this CPR 31.14 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

just send it as is.

no one ever gets hit,

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to work out when your defence is due and start working on that. Please tell us what the deadline date is. From memory, that information is in the sticky thread questionnaire you filled in about the claimform.

Don't wait for a response to anything that could take you over that deadline.

You really need to start reading other threads now, to understand the court process. Try looking at cases that have already been to court and won in our Successes form. Start with the newest ones.

HB

 

  • Like 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In particular if you read this short thread it takes you all the way through the court process, you will be able to see what happens at every stage  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/406892-highview-parking-anpr-pcn-claimform-urban-exchange-manchester-claim-dismissed/#comments

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 14/12/2023 at 15:40, rocky_sharma said:

Date to submit Defence - 09 JAN 2024

 

and is already in the court sticky you filled out further down in that post.

but you must get reading up

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have prepared defence as below can you please review and amend as you think?  I am not at all close to this and tried to adapt the defence to refer directly to the points in the PPC's Particulars of Claim but not sure at all if I have done that correctly and definitely need your help for that and please also can you advice on point 2 and 4?

few additional points I want to highlight not sure if it matters:

  • the car park is not just for ASDA as there are other shops including Cineworld, The Gym etc.. but car park is right at the ground floor under ASDA.
  • In my case I received NTK on time.
  • Does it matter if my car insurance only has my name?

====================================================================

Defence Statement:

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4.  The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

1.     Paragraph 1 is denied.  It’s denied that defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land.

2.    Paragraph 2 and 4 denied.  As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance.  The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner.  Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract.

3.     It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. The claimant is not in a position to state if Defendant was the driver at the time.

4.     In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant.

5.     Paragraph 4.1 is denied.  The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 

6.     Paragraph 4.2 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.

7.     Paragraph 4.3 is denied.  Notwithstanding the above on 19/12/2023, the Defendant made a request pursuant to CPR 31.14 for the Claimant to disclose the necessary evidence in support of their claim. To this date the claimant has failed to respond to said request.

Therefore, the claimant is put to strict proof to evidence its cause of action and contractual costs and what loss it has suffered. 

The Claimant is further put to strict proof that it has sufficient proprietary interest in the land, or that it has the necessary authorisation from the landowner to issue parking charge notices, and to pursue payment by means of litigation.

The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the recovery or any recovery at all.

====================================================================

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...