Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
    • They are absolute chuckleheads. You paid but because you entered a different car park site also belonging to them they are pursuing you despite them knowing what you had done. It would be very obvious to everyone, including Alliance that your car could not have been in two places at the same time. Thank you for posting the PCN so quickly making it a pity that you appealed since there are so many things wrong with it that you as keeper are not liable to pay the charge. They rarely accept appeals since that would mean they lose money but they have virtually no chance of beating you in Court. Very unlikely that they will take you to Court given the circumstances. Just in case you didn't out yourself as the driver could you please post up your appeal.
    • Jasowter I hope that common sense prevails with Iceland and the whole matter can be successfully ended. I would perhaps not have used a spell checker just to prove the dyslexia 🙂 though it may have made it more difficult to read. I noticed that you haven't uploaded the original PCN .Might not be necessary if the nes from Iceland is good. Otherwise perhaps you could get your son to do it by following the upload instructions so that we can appeal again with the extra ammunition provided by the PCN. Most of them rarely manage to get the wording right which means that you as the keeper are not liable to pay the charge-only the driver is and they do not know the name and address of the driver. So that would put you both in the clear if the PCN is non compliant.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PRAC / BW PAPLOC now Claimform - old Paydayuk PDL


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1510 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Today, we have had a letter from the court ( Claim form Northampton County Court

Particulars of Claim 

 

The claimants claim is for the sum of £349.77 being monies due from the defendant to the claimant under a loan agreement regulated by the consumer  credit act 1974 between the defendant and Instant Cash Loans Ltd T/A Payday UK under account reference xxxxxxxxx and assigned to the claimant on 09/12/2018, notice of which has been given to the defendant. 

The defendant failed to maintain the contractual payment under the terms of the agreement and s default notice has been served and not complied with.

 

The claimant also includes statutory interest pursuant to section 69 of the Country  Courts act 1984 at a rate of 8% pa from the date of the assignment of the agreement to 29/11/2019 being an amount of £86.88 

 

Total amount they are now claiming is £521.50

 

How can we deal with this claim against my wife as the loan was taken out in 2013 and no payments were paid to Payday UK not to BW Legal when they stated to send emails and letters. I under we have set time frames to reply to the court letter and need to sort out ASAP

 

Sorry yes it was a payday loan taken out on 13/10/2013 

 

I can confirm the loan was taken out on 1/10/2013 and payable in full on 31/10/2013 this never happened.

Had few emails during 2014 then nothing until 2017 that`s when BW Legal started emailing and few letters.

 

 

Defence - Simple Statue Barred based on loan taken out on 1/10/2013 never repaid nor acknowledged, also they state date of 09/12/2016 never had anything ?  


 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 98
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thread moved to Financial Legal Issues Forum...please complete the following link by reading and copying the Q,s and your responses back here for further advice.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/357877-you-have-received-a-claim-issued-in-england-wales-what-you-need-to-do-updated-jan-2019/

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to PRAC / BW PAPLOC now Claimform - old Paydayuk PDL

name of claimant - PRAC  

 

date of claimform -  2nd December 2019

 

What is the claim for – 

 

Particulars of Claim

 

1.The claimants claim is for the sum of £349.77 being monies due from the defendant to the claimant under a loan agreement regulated by the consumer credit act 1974 between the defendant and Instant Cash Loans Ltd T/A Payday UK under account reference xxxxxxxxx and assigned to the claimant on 09/12/2018, notice of which has been given to the defendant. 

 

2.The defendant failed to maintain the contractual payment under the terms of the agreement and s default notice has been served and not complied with.

 

3.The claimant also includes statutory interest pursuant to section 69 of the Country  Courts act 1984 at a rate of 8% pa from the date of the assignment of the agreement to 29/11/2019 being an amount of £86.88 

 

Total amount they are now claiming is £521.65

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC ( Pre Action Protocol) ? - yes

 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No 

 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? - No as never moved address


Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? -  Payday Loan

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? - 1st October 2013

 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? - On line

 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/ Equifax /Etc...) ? - No

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. -Prac

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? - 

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? - No 

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? - No 

 

Why did you cease payments? - Unemployment 

 

What was the date of your last payment? - Never repaid after taking out the loan payment due for repayment on 31/10/2013 payment not made to claimant

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? - No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? - No 

 

Now we have submitted the AOS and the date of the court claim form is 2nd December 2019

i have 33 days to submit the defence details,

also sending request to the lender & BW legal as well,

they won`t reply but will request.

 

Anything else we can do at this stage

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Payday UK Repayment plan

can I just confirm both yourself and your wife had loans from paydayuk?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Based on the fact the loan was taken out 1/10/2013 and not repaid on the date 31/10/2013,  will it fall under as Statue Barred.

 

i submitted the AOS ticking All will be defended on 04/12/2019

 

i will be sending SAR & CCA to the lender and Lovells is this correct as they won`t reply 

 

Also when do we submit the defence and what to write are there any templates

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was enquiring because I found an earlier thread going back before the date you indicate this loan started with payments made.

 

so just to be clear,

you had a loan from Paydayuk before this one currently under litigation taken out by your wife?

you don't sar 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok well scroll back to post 1 here and read a past thread ive merged in here.

 

It appears to me you must have had an earlier loan in your name?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok but im just checking

as I know how scatty you can be and end up get things mixed up throughout your threads here

 

if you are sure its no been paid

then:

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.
[if mcol is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time]
.
 register as an individual
 note the long gateway number given
 then log in
.
 select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.
.
 then using the details required from the claimform
.
 defend all
 leave jurisdiction unticked
 you DO NOT file a defence at this time
 click thru to the end
 confirm and exit MCOL.
.
.
 get a CCA Request running to the claimant
https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/
 leave the £1PO blank and uncrossed
.
.
 get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant]
.
.

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/
.
.
type your name ONLY

no need to sign anything
.
you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.
you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]
…………..

 

there is also nothing to stop you filing our SB defence today either

 

he following defence is all you need if it is SB

 1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date).

 2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980. 
.
If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant.
.
 3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £[insert figure from their POC]  or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.
..
..ends..

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have sent CCA request today by recorded delivery to the claimant and CPR 31:14 to the solicitor / company BW Legal as well.  i  will be filing defence based on SB barred soon or do we wait to see if they reply. 

 

Based on submitting the AOS on 4/12/2019 via MCOL last night we have 33 day or sooner

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the debt is SB'd then there is no need to wait

whatever paperwork they hold is immaterial if you are 1000% sure its SB'd.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got home to letter from BW Legal 

 

States we must reply to them now as they have sent court papers and if we don`t agree by 28th December a repayment plan the court will confirm the CCJ adding more cost and charges. And the CCJ will ruin my wifes credit. etc etc 

 

I will submit defence based on statue barred over the weekend, 

 

Loan processed 1/10/2013 - I have email confirmation

Loan deferral 26/10/2013 -  I have email confirmation

Loan payment failed 31/10/2013 - I have email confirmation

Email from claimant Jan 2014 - Confirming no payment

 

Next B W Legal 2017 email reminders 17/05/2017 & 19/06/2019

 

I have been reading letter as kept everything, had letter from PRAC on 13/02/2017 saying they have purchased the debt from Payday UK. They sent annual statement saying the original agreement date 9/12/2016 wrong date as the loan was date 1/10/2013.

 

Had email from Payday UK on 1/12/2014 saying we can pay via paypoint same account number as court papers, so confirms PRAC have enter the wrong date on the paperwork.

 

Just need to put into a defence case

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You either file sb as written or drop the whole sb defence

you cannot mix sb with anything else

its absolute

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your correct, will be filing defence based on statue barred, just need to see how to word the SB defence.

 

Once i have file the defence how long is it before we hear from the court, do we have to attend the court ? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sb defence is already my post 36

you cant mix it with anything!! use the exact defence wording/format I listed there only simply copy and paste to mcol website

your defence filing by date is also clearly outlined

 

if or if not you have to attend your LOCAL county court [which you specify in the N180 the court sends] 

is solely down to if the claimant if they want to risk pushing the case that far.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just what to ensure i submit correctly 

 

 

1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date). Question is this the date the loan was taken out 

 

2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980. 

If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant.
.
 3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £521.50 or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

eh? simple enough question...

 

The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date).

what date was the claim issued on

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The date on the court paper is 2nd December 2019, this is the information i will file / submit 

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim vague and are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below 

 

1 The Claimant's claim was issued on 2nd December 2019.

2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980. 

If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant.
.
 3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £521.50 or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.

 

Question - Will we need to confirm date when the loan was first taken out or is it up to the claimant to prove that information.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure why you added the blue line I've highlighted?

that's not in the we gave you.

 

as for your question...

PRAC's roboclaim computer knows when the account was taken out, after all it raised the claim and checked everything carefully first before issuing the request via northants bulk courts equally inept roboclaim computer... 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should have change text to same colour, my defence is listed below 

 

Defence

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim vague and are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below 

 

1 The Claimant's claim was issued on 2nd December 2019.

2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980. 

If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant.
.
 3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £521.50 or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.

 

 

Stranger if they know the loan was taken out on 1/10/2013 the should know it`s now SB, i have already sent CCA and CPR 31:14, filing in the defence on Sunday night

 

Fingers crossed but think they will still keep pushing for payment, think its a matter of filing and waiting

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

why have you added in the blue bit...????

 

it is not part of CAG's SB defence that was given to you......:frusty::crazy:

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think just getting confused about the whole filing and what to actual write ( Sorry) 

 

Think listed below is ok file plain and simple

 

Defence

 

 1 The Claimant's claim was issued on 2/12/2019.

 2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980. 

 

If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant

.

 3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £521.50 or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:cheer2:

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...