Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Know it has already been answered, but? Does not explain why JCI has registered a different default date when they get the information from the original creditor, Virgin
    • Since you were stopped at the time there is no requirement for the police give you anything there and then or to send you anything before they have decided how to deal with the offence.  They have three choices: Offer you a course Offer you a fixed penalty (£100 and three points) Prosecute you in court  The only option that has a formal time limit is (3). They must begin court proceedings within six months of the date of the alleged offence. Options (1) and (2) have no time limit but since the only alternative the police have if you decline those offers is (3) they will not usually offer a course beyond three months from the date of the offence and will not usually offer a fixed penalty beyond four months from that date. This is so as to allow time for the driver to accept and comply with their offer and to give them the time to go to option (3) if he declines or ignores it.  Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, the action they take will usually be in accordance with the National Police Chiefs' Council's guidance on speeding enforcement. In a 40mph limit this is as follows Up to 45mph - no action. Between 46mph and 53mph - offer a course Between 54mph and 65mph - offer a fixed penalty Over 65mph - prosecution in court So you can see that 54mph should see you offered a fixed penalty. Three weeks is not overly long for a fixed penalty offer to arrive. As well as that, there has been Easter in that period which will have slowed things down a bit. However, I would suggest that if it gets to about two months from the offence date and you have still heard nohing, I would contact the ticket office for the area where you were stopped to see if anything has been sent to you. Of course this raises the danger that you might be "stirring the hornets' nest". But in all honesty, if the police have decided to take no action, you jogging their memory should not really influence them. The bigger danger, IMHO, is that your fixed penalty offer may have been sent but lost and if you do not respond it will lapse. This will see the police revert to option (3) above. Whilst there is a mechanism in these circumstances  to persuade the court to sentence you at the fixed penalty level (rather than in accordance with the normal guidelines which will see a harsher penalty), it relies on them believing you when you say you did not received an offer. In any case it is aggravation you could well do without so for the sake of a phone call, I'd enquire if it was me.  I think I've answered all your questions but if I can help further just let me know. Just a tip - if you are offered a fixed penalty be sure to submit your driving licence details as instructed. I've seen lots of instances where a driver has not done this. There will be no reminder and no second chance; your £100 will be refunded and the police will prosecute you through the courts.
    • Looks similar to you original email to their Complaints team. I dont rate copypasta for a CEO complaint. Rewrite it with emotion involved as to how badly this is affecting you and make them feel embarrassed for their actions... 
    • Well, not quite the trouncing they deserve, and Andy Street suffering - despite distancing himself from the poops and being a good mayor (and despite the rather ridiculous muslim voter labour boycott across regions - did they really want the tories to stay in power?) - But not bad at all The Reformatory goons managed two council seats didn't it - out of over 300 they tried for ..     
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Electric Shockers


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6352 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi people, i own a business and i am always a logger heads with the electric company due to the fact that their promises of saving me money are shallow if not non existant. But my problem is they have gave the the Human rights letter with a date they want to apply for a warrent to disconnect, not a problem. Now the amount they say I owe is being disputed by me and i want this to go to Fast Track, can this be done???

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you want this "to go fast-track"?

 

Can you explain more about the issues?

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The issue are they use the Disconnection warrents much to their advantage, by using this this method they by-pass all other matters pertaining to the debts. Now the debt is two charges for bailiff calls costing a staggering £500, no bailiff has ever called to my business! its all been done via letters so why should i pay this. I have always paid the bills but i refuse to pay this fee. My contract ran out with them in March 2006 but this debt is blocking all attempts to change suppliers. Fast Track to me is the best place to go with disputes over money matters or is it not.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well certainly challenge the fees for bailiffs as these seem to be extortionate but, presuming that this would end up in court, seeking to obtain a fast-track case would put you at risk of costs should you lose whereas small claims track would not.

 

The advantage of fast-track is that the other party would be required to provide items under Standard Disclosure, but I don't think this is a must here since you are only seeking to persuade a Judge - on the balance of probability - that £500+ for 2 letters is an unreasonable amount. I wouldn't have thought you would have much trouble doing so....

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Johni2bad, how do i go about getting it to small claims, the application for the warrant is 12th December 2006. Its not the first time i have been to court with this company, and the judicial system at this level favours the defendent. Should I turn up and explain or write to the courts? Now every time i have turned up at these hearings the guy applying for the warrent gets really moody with me telling me I have no rights to be here, and has tried to stop me from going into court. I know its my rights to turn up and defend against any warrants they try to get, so far none have been issued. Either im lucky or just tenacious .....may be both

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be perfectly honest Kevin, I have no experience of these events.

 

If you have a court date for this then I would certainly attend and fight them all the way, especially since the matter of debt seems to be "other costs" rather than the use of electricity.

 

If you have received any notification from the court relating to supplying documents in any form of defence, then perhaps a letter for the District Judge would suffice, explaining the position as you see it.

  • Haha 1

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Went to court today and they did NOT issue a warrant for disconnection, because of the dispute but gave me to the 8th January to pay for the electric used. They are unable to refer to small claims as the sitting was to decide a yes or no to warrant issues, but its a moral win for the little guy again!!!!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all check your meter serial number and make sure that they are billing you on that meter serial number. It is on the actual metering on your premises. Secondly check your original contract to make sure that they charged you at those prcies. If there were any increases you should have been notified in writing. If they have not notified you, the original prcies stand. If they are preventing you changing to another supplier, they cannot increase their prices in the meantime. This would be illegally as basically it amounts to a penalty. The last bit is very important and may help reduce any charges incurred. Before bailiffs disconnect they need to show that you received at least three warning letters including a final demand befroe disconnection. Actually they do not disconnect but rather de-energise by removing the fuse. Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Surfer01,

 

Good Info there, will look into this further.

My contract ran out in march 06, there is an amount still to pay but as there is a debt i cant change suppliers because they keep blocking the move is there a way around this

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good work so far - keep at 'em!

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this fee is for Bailliff's charges, (is this in respect of a Court Order?) then you should refer the Bailliffs (who are probably not Bailliffs but Debt Collectors) to their client; I don't believe that you are under any contractural or other obligation to pay their fees whatever.

 

As to the bloke trying to intimidate you at the court building itself, it beggars belief!! You are absolutely entitled to defend against a warrant application against you... what kind of justice system would it be if you weren't?! If the bloke tries this again about anything, make sure you explain his actions to the Judge - I'm pretty sure his eyes will bug out of his head on hearing that!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...