Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
    • New version after LFI's superb analysis of the contract. Sorry, but you need to redo the numbering of the paras and of the exhibits in the right order after all the damage I've caused! Defendant's WS - version 4.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Terrorised by Close Brothers Motor Finance - Repossession


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1780 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I purchased a used car from Motorpoint in around July 2016 which was financed through Close Brothers.

I was heavily pressurised to have a synthetic paint added to the agreement, which increased the monthly premium.

 

When I collected the car I was taken on a brief test drive before taking the car away and during test drive the car was pulling quite badly to the right.

I told the person who accompanied me for test drive from Motorpoint that it was pulling quite badly and he told me no, it wasn't and had already been check and there was nothing wrong with it. He was trying to deny and refuse fixing it. I then had to pick it up on a different day so they could fix the problem.

 

I have had no problems with the car since, except handprints of white synthetic paint on the black interior of car from where they applied the synthetic coat.

I did not notice those handprints / marks until later and felt unable to complain about it. 

The loan was over 60 months at around £260 per month.

I have struggled with finances for a while but always paid on time and have paid over £7000 in repayments.

 

I ran into financial & health problems towards end of last year and was late with a payment by I think only 2 days and Close Brothers sent a nasty aggressive debt collector to my home who absolutely terrified me, smashing on my front door, stalking around the property, looking in windows and flashing torch through windows, trying to open doors etc... Communication with them has completely broken down because of this.

 

I think that was Towerhall solutions and the debt has now been passed to Bluestone.

They offered to reduce the debt by a couple of thousand if I pay them immediately, but obviously I am in financial difficulties and no way of doing that. 

 

I am confused and now don't understand who owns the debt. 

I have been petrified of losing my car, which is a lifeline to me and I am in hardship, without any ability to buy another car.

 

I am trying to recover my health and prevent losing my home at the same time and struggle to sleep panicking that the car won't be there when I wake up.

I still have the car and wondered if anybody could tell me if I would be given any notice of a court hearing about this before they could take the car, or if I maybe have any claim against them.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The issues mentioned have nothing to do with the debt.

 

Yes if the car has unpaid finance registered against it,  then they can attempt to repossess. 

 

What does the last letter you received say exactly ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unclebulgaria - Thank you for your reply.

 

I expected it to be taken some time ago.... 

 

I have always paid my debts with diligence, but just really feel they have acted a bit unreasonably towards me and their actions have had a profound effect on my  health and caused me so much distress, which has had a bit of a domino effect and made it much more difficult for me to get back into a position to make payments. 

 

I could not live without a car so the constant worry of it being taken away is causing me extra stress... 

 

I think the most recent letter was from Bluestone asking for full payment, although will double check this and let you know if any different... 

 

Also really would like to avoid a CCJ and I find all of their correspondence distressing, but just confused and don't know what to do. Does that mean that Close Brothers no longer own the debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could be that Bluestone own the debt now.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

who do bluestone state is their client on their letters please?

 

no they cant take the car from private property without a court return of goods order as you've paid more than 1/3rd so it is deemed protected goods now.

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unclebulgaria - Thank you again for your reply - Any suggestions what I should do... If anything?

 

DX - It says their client is: Close Brothers Motor Finance - That's why I'm confused... So does the debt now definitely belong to Bluestone?

 

Thank you - That's reassuring about the having paid more than a 1/3rd - So does that mean I would receive a court papers and given a chance to defend before they could take?

 

... I have managed (albeit with great difficulty) to keep the car taxed, MOT'd & insured to date - Although, I switched insurers through a broker and ironically my current car insurance is with Close Brothers... I was late on a payment with that too and they immediately slapped a £30 late fee, which made it very difficult for me under my circumstances...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

penalty fees are unlawful.

reclaim them.

 

so very safe to ignore another powerless DCA = bluestone.

 

lets put it this way

 

IF anyone takes the car you could take them to court and get all your payments back and keep the car.

as long as you do not sign and agree to them doing it

as this is an hP agreement?

fully enshrined and protected within the consumer credit act are you.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had double checked my bank account before the car insurance premium was due and there was just enough to cover it, but online banking didn't show that my bank (Co-op) had charged me a late fee, meaning that my car insurance payment didn't clear and I didn't find out about the £30 fee charged by Close Bros until post arrived and received letter from them. 

 

I complained but it took me over an hour on the phone and a lot of distress.

They told me would cancel the insurance if I didn't pay, so paid their late fee a couple days later....

I had to go without any food that week.

 

They then, some weeks later, sent me a letter saying late fee paid had been credited to my car insurance account as gesture of goodwill, but that if I was late again I would not be refunded any late fees.

 

You've reassured me so much - Thank you!

 

Although if they took the car, I would have even more difficulty attending court than I do at the moment.

What will happen about my credit file if I just ignore this?...

I think I remember a default notice sent to me a while ago...

Does that mean that this will still affect my credit for 6 years if I do nothing? 

 

Please excuse my ignorance, but is HP the same thing as motor finance, or something different?... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hire Purchase look at your agreement.

 

co-op don't charge late fees?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I'm tired - Yes of course it's HP isn't it...

 

Co-op charges.... They've charge me many fees, although not sure if they're late fees, missed d.debit fees or what... I've banked with them for over 10 years too, so god knows what their various fees have added up to over the years... !  

 

I have loans with them too which are now in arrears and have had various problems with them too... With do a separate thread for that when I can put my mind to it... Not sure whether to include that with the Britannia mortgage thread or not, as they are same company aren't they

 

DX - What I meant was is hire purchase the same thing as motor finance?... My loan with Close Brothers was 60 months to be completely paid off, with no balloon payment at the end.... I had a vehicle finance agreement on a car when I was 17 which did have a large balloon payment at the end of loan term. Is the latter kind of agreement what is known as HP, or are both types of agreement still HP? Hope that makes sense?

 

The co-op charges I mentioned I think were for either going into an unauthorised overdraft, or for return of d.debits/standing orders without enough funds to clear... Not entirely sure to be honest but certainly hasn't helped when being in such financial hardship.

 

So with this type of situation with my car, if they went to court to get an order to repossess it, would I receive any actual court papers giving me a chance to attend / defend? Or would they just go and get a court order and then remove the car without notice?

 

 

Edited by Cadbury10
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Cadbury10 said:

DX - What I meant was is hire purchase the same thing as motor finance?... My loan with Close Brothers was 60 months to be completely paid off, with no balloon payment at the end.... I had a vehicle finance agreement on a car when I was 17 which did have a large balloon payment at the end of loan term. Is the latter kind of agreement what is known as HP, or are both types of agreement still HP? Hope that makes sense?

 

The co-op charges I mentioned I think were for either going into an unauthorised overdraft, or for return of d.debits/standing orders without enough funds to clear... Not entirely sure to be honest but certainly hasn't helped when being in such financial hardship.

 

So with this type of situation with my car, if they went to court to get an order to repossess it, would I receive any actual court papers giving me a chance to attend / defend? Or would they just go and get a court order and then remove the car without notice?

 

 

You would get papers from the court regarding application for return of goods.   You could defend if you can make payments going forward together with something to cover the arrears - if you can't make payments then the court would almost certainly award a return of goods order to the claimant.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi UncleBulgaria,

 

The most recent letter I received today is statement from Close Brothers... It details various random fee charges as well...

Edited by dx100uk
thread tidy session only
Link to post
Share on other sites

which are all unlawful.

and can be reclaimed.

 

just to be clear..

once 1/3rd has been paid they CANNOT just repo the car

else they void the agreement as I detailed earlier.

 

you'll soon know if they go for a ROG

not seen close brothers do that so TBH i'd put this problem on the back burner

least of your worries.

 

keep that roof over your cats heads is the very TOP financial priority.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

@Ell-enn - Thank you for your reply. Do you mean there would be no way of reclaiming payments made or keeping the car, as suggested by DX, until such time as they physically remove the car and I would then have to try to fight to get it back?... Would there be no option to file counterclaim? Or file a claim before they attempt to obtain ROG order? 

 

@dx100uk - Thank you for your reply... How do I go about reclaiming those fees/charges?

 

Thank you again for your reassurance that they cannot just remove the car without court order... That have relieved at least a little bit of stress.

 

It has been on the back burner as it were, as trying to prevent home repossession has been top priority, but this too, as if the car was removed, my horrendous existing problems would be escalated rapidly and my car really is a lifeline for me which I cannot live without either... 

 

I don't recall mentioning having cats on here before...It's almost like you're psychic! Hahaha..

 

Although I feel hugely reassured by what you have said, I still really don't want this hanging over my head and thinking of longer term problems with this, what options do I have? If any?

Link to post
Share on other sites

well 1st you'd need all the statements - sar time.

lets find out the extent of their charges if any

but it doesn't resolve nor remove you from needing to pay this as you should though.

 

but of course as I pointed too, and so has ell-enn, they can go for an ROG,

ok close brother are an unknown here on that we've not seen one

and their T&C's are very bad with regard their treatment of people that don't pay.

 

we've seen people get visits from powerless dca's and repo agents within 10day of a missed payment

but not heard of thing escalating to ROG...yet!!

 

but you must act

if not simply to tell them they'll one be getting £xxPCM for xx mts.

don't ignore the problem

communicate with them but NEVER over the phone

that goes for any debt!!

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...