Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "Dear HR, I refer to my correspondence of *date* in which I challenged xxx, copy attached. Clearly this was a grievance, and yet does not seem to have been heard under the grievance procedure. I am exceptionally dismayed that this 'review'. which never took place, seems to be being used as a criteria in redundancy selection proceedings. As this is time critical, please advise asap."            
    • Just to update, received a revised offer of £75 from P2G after they got my LOC last Friday. They stated that because it was not insured this would be their final offer. Looks like we are going to court.
    • and speaking of cover-ups .. from the environment agency with collusion/negligence  from the ICO   Environment Agency chief admits regulator buries freedom of information requests Speaking at the UK River Summit, Philip Duffy said officials do not want to reveal the true ‘embarrassing’ environmental picture ICO - waffle Environment Agency chief admits regulator buries freedom of information requests | Environment Agency | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Speaking at the UK River Summit, Philip Duffy said officials do not want to reveal the true ‘embarrassing’ environmental picture   Environment Agency ‘hiding’ report into Lancashire landfill making locals ill Exclusive The agency has refused to share details of how a landfill operator is breaching its permit because it could 'potentially cause unnecessary concern'    Environment Agency ‘hiding’ report into Lancashire landfill making locals ill INEWS.CO.UK The agency has refused to share details of how a landfill operator is breaching its permit because it could 'potentially cause unnecessary...  
    • As Dan Neidle pointed out on Twitter/X, pensioners used to have a higher personal allowance before they paid tax, but this government removed it a few years ago.
    • or this showing how rogue state the poops are making the UK https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/28/rwanda-uk-diplomat-interpol-target-regime-opponents and Sunaks pension plan 'benefit: Retirees relying on the full new state pension as their sole income could end up saving just £14.60 per year – or 28p a week – in tax payments by 2028 through the Conservative Party’s triple lock plus policy, according to calculations for i. Triple lock plus would only save many OAPs £14.60 a year by 2028, analysis shows INEWS.CO.UK Rishi Sunak outlined plans to increase the tax-free allowance for pensioners in line with the existing 'triple lock' to ensure it rises each year  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1875 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, I'm due to leave our property at the end of March after living there for 4 years.  For those four years we have had two cats (agreed with the landlord) living in the property.  Out of the blue the lettings agent have told us that we need to have the property fumigated.

I feel this is an unnecessary step as both our cats undergo regular check ups and are flea protected.

Can I please have some advice on whether this is normal, as different lettings agents seem to have different ideas of what is a requirement and what isn't.  They have stated that there is a provision in the DPS regulations as fleas can lay dormant.

This is the first I have heard of this expectation and there's no provision for any fumigation upon our exiting the property within the tenancy agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, theres nothing in the lease referring to fumigation. They make reference to us having been granted permission to have two cats at the property, but that's all the paragraph states.

I've looked on the DPS website and read the guidelines, and there doesn't appear to be anything in there about pets other than if there has been evidence they had caused any damage to the property, or had defiled the property.

There is a bit I'm there about cleaning, but all that means to me is that the onus is on us to leave the property as close to how it was when we moved in.  Taking into account the length of time we have been in the property.

I've said to them that having the property fumigated is unnecessary,  but they're still referring to the DPS guidelines.

 

Edited by Jase1982
Link to post
Share on other sites

What is normal after having pets in a property is to have the carpets professionally cleaned, and have the carpet cleaner use a flea treatment solution. this ensures that any eggs etc are neutralised, and has always historically been good enough for any end of tenancy... Just make sure that the cleaner marks it on the receipt that flea treatment has been included.

I am not a solicitor :!::!:

 

Most of my knowledge came from this site :-D:-D

 

If I have been helpful in any way at all .............. Please click my star..... :-(:-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

That sounds fair, although we have wood laminate flooring throughout most the house... the only part of the house where we have carpet is the stairs and landing.  All the furniture is ours too.

Neither cat are allowed anywhere near the upstairs either as we have a three year old.

I have settled on getting it professionally cleaned before we leave but surely fumigation is over the top?  Unless there are signs of a serious infestation.

Edited by Jase1982
Link to post
Share on other sites

are they asking you to arrange it or are they sating they are going to do it and charge you? There is a big difference so read your tenancy carefully and then you wont have to pay for something that isnt necessary or contractual. i agreee that spraying as part of a deep clean and getting that signed off is a smart move as it will save money and aggro

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are saying I need to either arrange for fumigation, or they will.  If they do it, it'll come out of the deposit.

The tenancy agreement has nothing in there that covers when we leave.

I don't mind the aggro.  At the end of the day we don't have very much money and this move is costing us an arm and a leg.  I just wanted to know if it was normal to request separate fumigation.  We could end up losing a third of our deposit if they want the place turned into a show room.

I don't think it's unreasonable to expect a certain standard after living there for four years, and I don't see why we should pay so that they can make even more profit.  If they want to clean it professionally they can.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask them to provide a source within DPS guidelines, where fumigation is required and an allowable Landlord deduction?

Also ask they outline where within your Tenancy Agreement that fumigation is required upon exit and at your cost?

Bottom line, if it's not in your agreement then they can go swivel. Chancers

Edited by Sparxeh
Link to post
Share on other sites

She's now trying to argue a weak legal point, in that we had no allowance in our contract for two cats so we have broken the agreement.  This is despite her admitting we already had an agreement (via the landlord's words) to have cats in the property, and a hard copy agreement (that I have), which they have conveniently misplaced.

 

Does renting have to be this hard?  If there was no agreement why have they let it pass after four yearly inspections.

 

She's gone off to speak with the DPS about their guidelines.  The same guidelines she was initially adamant provide for the allowance of fumigation upon leaving a property.  Honestly, they need to give lettings agents more training because they don't know what they're talking about, and you could drive a tank through their agreements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi,

 

Has anyone got any advice for what my next step might be with obtaining a return of my deposit?  I requested return via the DPS on the 28th March.  We physically left the property on the 30th, and the keys were handed back on the 1st of April, which is when the checkout inventory was carried out.

 

The agent came back and said they would need to review the checkout inventory first before making any deductions.  My worry is that the guy doing the inspecting said that he would do a final inspection and advise us of any issues that might cause us to lose any of the deposit (This inspection took place about a month before we moved out).  He only listed one thing we needed to address along with general advice about mowing the lawn and trimming the hedges.  When we received the checkout inventory it contained a lot more detail with at least ten things listed as the tenants responsibility.  Obviously I would imagine they would look to charge for these things as we are now not in a position to remedy them.

 

I've not heard anything from them since last Tuesday, and I know they have to return the deposit within ten days - Is there any advice on what my next step should be?  When would the ten days elapse?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you ask and if they dont respond you follow the procedure laid down in law.

That meand that you have to look up all about getting your deposit returned under the TDS and follow the protocols. It may be a court matter but better to try all other menas first so start off with a letter requesting payment forthwith.

Who is holding the deposit? a scheme or the LA under a trade association sign off?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, it's all sorted now.  They came back late yesterday and only claimed £156 for fumigation costs, which I raised another thread about.  I accepted the fumigation cost just to move on because there were other areas they could have easily shafted us over - We decorated for instance.  It did seem odd they fixated on the one issue that was inconsequential, and ignored other areas they had a clear right to deduct monies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...