Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My autistic son brought a van from a private seller. ( there was 5 other cars on his drive and another van, plus loads of machanic tools in his hallway,  so he probably is a unofficial dealer).  He gave the van a once over, he checked for any warning lights that might be on, there was none. He checked underneath for any rust etc, it all looked fine. The body was rough, but you'd expect that for the age of the van.  He got his brothers machanic to give it a pre mot check, as the van was old so he expected it to have a few problems. The van is a deathtrap, the seller had blacked out all the warning lights that were on the dash,  and I mean all.  He had also painted some kind of black stuff on the underside, to hide all the damage there.   My son drove it for over 2 hours to get it home. The machanic said he's surprised my son is still alive, and an untrained eye would not of seen what the seller had done.  Iv asked the seller for a refund and for him to have the van back, but he is refusing. Is there anything we can do.   
    • The economy grew by 0.6% in the first three months of the year, ending a shallow recession.View the full article
    • First of all it sounds as if your retailer is very decent and very responsible. This itself is unusual in these kinds of circumstances and I think we need to bear this in mind. The guarantee is not particularly relevant and in fact the dealer had a statutory duty to exercise a certain responsibility for your computer – probably for several years as their obligation under the consumer rights act. The dealer may not have known this and it simply acting out of a sense of moral responsibility and that is even more noteworthy. You've already suggested earlier that you didn't really want to cause problems for your retailer. I think that you will need the help of your retailer as well in order to get information and evidence. I suggest that you proceed against DPD – but before you do that – I suggest that you have a discussion with the retailer. Tell them that this is what you are going to be doing and you would like to have a copy of anything they have which relates to the special instructions which apparently your dealer has already informed you about in relation to where item should be left. Secondly, maybe you should tell your dealer about this site and also about this thread. I can imagine like many dealers who are frequently sending items by means of couriers, they have had things go missing. Tell them that we will be very happy to help them recover money for lost or damaged or stolen items – and that is regardless of whether or not they have purchased insurance. Apart from being very pleased to help your dealer recover items which have been lost by irresponsible parcel delivery companies, I think we need to encourage the complicity between you and them so they will be pleased to support you in your claim against DPD. It will be helpful if you can get a copy of the instructions that you have referred to above, and also if you can get some written evidence of your own instruction that your laptop should be left in a safe place. Have you done the reading on this sub- forum? You will need to do lots of reading of many of the similar stories on this sub- forum. They won't necessarily be against DPD but the principles will broadly be the same. Also read the pinned topics at the top of the sub- forum in order to understand many of the principles involved. Getting your money back but be quick – but your chances of success are better than 90% that you can bank on it taking anything up to a year. Have you got anything in writing from DPD either refusing you or telling you that they won't discuss with you?  
    • Thank you for telling us the text of the letter you had from the police. As we don't seem to have come across this before, it would be really useful for us to see the original please. HB
    • Pasco has recalled 104,000 packs of sliced bread after rat remains were found in at least two packs.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HSBC Going to Court to obtain my data!??


craigten
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1630 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

God you’re good!!!!!

 

No I haven’t involved them and I’m angry at myself for this.

Please can I ask what I need to do now - is it FOS questionnaire? And what to do with HSBC? Do I wait for the FOS to get back to me, please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although I still badly want the help on the above question, I feel it might be of interest to this thread and anyone reading it of the latest communications with HSBC that I have had regarding them not supplying all my data, which is in contradiction to their privacy policy (details of that below) 

 

I have been in email contact with someone from HSBC who has been dealing with my compliant.

She emailed me on Monday saying that their letter to me on 26th June was their final response on the matter.

 

My reply to her was this:

Sarah, you mention the letter that was sent on 26th June. In it, it states 

'HSBC has comprehensive Records Management and Information Security policies which ensure records are identified and securely retained for the appropriate period of time, and destroyed / deleted in a controlled manner on expiry of the retention period. If you held any accounts with HSBC plc which are now closed, we may no longer hold any information about these accounts'.

 

However, HSBC's own privacy policy,here, states:

How long we’ll keep your information

 

We keep information in line with our data retention policy.

For example, if you’re a customer, we’ll normally keep core banking data for seven years from the end of our relationship. 

 

I am still a customer of HSBC so still am in a 'relationship' with you.

Therefore, my question is, bearing in mind your own privacy policy, please can you explain why so much of my data is missing, with no record of deletion?

In effect, I put it to you / HSBC, that you have no clue where it is or who has it.

 

Her reply to this specific question was:

I appreciate you are still a customer with HSBC and feel you've been given conflicting information regarding our Privacy Notice.

I can't comment any further regarding our Privacy Notice, as I don't have the specialist knowledge.

 

I understand your frustration with this, but a final response has been sent out to you from the team who specialise in that area and deal with complaints daily about those sort of issues.

 

I am unable to go into that any further nor can I add any information regarding the DSAR.

All information we are required to send to you has been sent to you, including all calls held.

 

If you remain unhappy with the response given previously, you would need to escalate it to The Financial Ombudsman, as that was the banks final response regarding the matter.

 

For me, this is tantamount to them putting their hands over their ears and shouting "la la la la la" and ignoring what I am saying about the contradiction.

 

What do you guys think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

very useful...

 

time to involve the FOS upon this.

 

but I suggest this is an informal phone call in the 1st instance.

 

let me resit this later.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the simple questions already outlined above.

but you need to be cute and not waffle or worry about or relate everything to date else they might run a mile.

 

stick to the simple facts [giving away a wee bit of history only]

 

in 2010 you made a PPI complaint to HSBC regarding if PPI existed on numerous very old loans with them [insert date range]

HSBC replied that there was no PPI on any loan.

 

in 2019 with the impending deadline approaching you revisited the issue as you were sure you did have ppi.

sar's were sent, with little new information initially forthcoming, until you started to question their blanket statement of any data outside of 6yrs has been destroyed.

 

following the involvement of the ICO some historic data from HSBC did appear [if this part of the story is wrong way around switch it out to be correct]

 

that data shows that I did have xx number of PPI policies but that HSBC could not match any of those to my historic loans , so ultimately refused my claims again and have issued a final response.

 

would this be something you would be interested in investigating upon my behalf as it appear I have proof of PPI being levied under several policy numbers but because HSBC have no data to link them to my loans i'm being fobbed off.

 

as simple as that

invite them to take it on.

see what they say.

 

RECORD THE CALL

the smallest of comments that you forget could be the key to success.

but don't expect this to be quick!!

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi there,

 

Sorry for the long delay, far too much going on in other areas.

 

Okay, I rang the FOS and recorded the call: 

I advised them that in 2012 I made a request to HSBC for them to look for PPI on my loans and that they replied to say that there were no PPI on any of my loans.

 

I then explained how earlier this year I made a DSAR and the results appeared to show PPI on all of the loans but didn't show the amounts of the loans.

 

I explained how I emailed them to ask about where the data is regarding said loans and how they initially quoted the old six year line but when I queried their privacy policy that states 'if you’re a customer, we’ll normally keep core banking data for seven years from the end of our relationship.' and how they then said they don't have the data but also do not have any record of deleting the data or on what date it was deleted.

 

The FOS asked how many loans there were, I said there were five and asked if this was something that they could look in to?

They said "We can have a check" and look at the evidence and would want to see mine as this would help. They said I would need to email them to start.

 

I will be doing this in the next 48 hours.

However, I'm guessing I need to get my PPI claim with these buggers (HSBC) quickly before the deadline. 

 

Is there anything else I can do, please?

 

Thank you ALL for the great help you've given me and everyone so far!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

fill out an FOS CQ

send that to HSBC

 

copy that with ALL your data to the FOS.

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick one - I’m taking a whole day this weekend to get this done.

 

Incidentally, I read this today on the Martin Lewis site;

While putting in an actual complaint is best, you could still beat the deadline by enquiring if you ever had PPI by 11.59pm on Thursday 29 August. Every big bank or card firm we spoke to told us this'll work. What's more, now most automatically turn the check into a complaint later, but not all will.

 

Link here;

https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/reclaim/ppi-loan-insurance/

 

Did we all know this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

obviously else we wouldn't have told you to do so elsewhere.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning folks,

I've got part of the day to myself to get this done, once and for all.

I need to double check:

 

1. Simply a FOC CQ to HSBC for each of my loans is all that is needed to send HSBC

(they don't need to see any evidence that I have?)

 

2. Re the complaint to the FOS: I am claiming five things?

 

A) that the attached PDF ('Proof of PPI maybe') proves that I had PPI with each of the loans and that I am disputing that they were explained to me?

 

B) That HSBC claiming that they don't have any data longer than 6 years ago is plain wrong as they included bits in my DSAR as far back as 2004 (PDF '2010 Claim but 6 year...' is but one example of this)

 

C) That their repeated claim of the '6 year rule' in many of their emails / instant chats/ letters to me directly contradicts their own privacy policy that states 'if you’re a customer, we’ll normally keep core banking data for seven years from the end of our relationship', and that HSBC are deliberately not sending me the data they do have for fear of it proving I did have PPI on my loans?

 

D) That following my DSAR, they sent me some phone recordings but haven't sent me phone call recordings from 2013-14 where the customer service operator told me exactly how much the loans were for (which would be useful to me)

 

E) Provide emails from HSBC where they acknowledge my point of the contradiction between their '6 year' claim and their privacy policy but go on to 'refuse to discuss it any further', further substantiating my claim that they are holding back data from me

 

3. Complain to the ICO about the repeated failings of HSBC to provide me with data further than 6 years previously and provide them with the proof of contradiction and, thus, infringing GDPR and my rights?

 

Please let me know if I'm missing something, I sure would appreciate it (as I always do!)

Thank you,

C

2010 6 YEAR CLAIM BUT STILL SENT 2004 LOAN, YOU CAN TAKE THIS..02062019.jpg

PROOF OF PPI MAYBE.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to the appropriate forum...please continue to post here to your thread.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, craigten said:

 Morning folks,

I've got part of the day to myself to get this done, once and for all.

I need to double check:

 

1. Simply a FOC CQ to HSBC for each of my loans is all that is needed to send HSBC

(they don't need to see any evidence that I have?) - no send one fos cq mentioning ALL mis-selling all the loans.

 

2. Re the complaint to the FOS: I am claiming five things? no you send them a copy of the same HSBC FOS CQ. inclosing ALL your evidence

 

A) that the attached PDF ('Proof of PPI maybe') proves that I had PPI with each of the loans and that I am disputing that they were explained to me?

 

B) That HSBC claiming that they don't have any data longer than 6 years ago is plain wrong as they included bits in my DSAR as far back as 2004 ( PDF '2010 Claim but 6 year...' is but one example of this)

 

C) That their repeated claim of the '6 year rule' in many of their emails / instant chats/ letters to me directly contradicts their own privacy policy that states 'if you’re a customer, we’ll normally keep core banking data for seven years from the end of our relationship', and that HSBC are deliberately not sending me the data they do have for fear of it proving I did have PPI on my loans?

 

D) That following my DSAR, they sent me some phone recordings but haven't sent me phone call recordings from 2013-14 where the customer service operator told me exactly how much the loans were for (which would be useful to me)

 

E) Provide emails from HSBC where they acknowledge my point of the contradiction between their '6 year' claim and their privacy policy but go on to 'refuse to discuss it any further', further substantiating my claim that they are holding back data from me

 

3. Complain to the ICO about the repeated failings of HSBC to provide me with data further than 6 years previously and provide them with the proof of contradiction and, thus, infringing GDPR and my rights? - no need

 

Please let me know if I'm missing something, I sure would appreciate it (as I always do!)

Thank you,

C

2010 6 YEAR CLAIM BUT STILL SENT 2004 LOAN, YOU CAN TAKE THIS..02062019.jpg

PROOF OF PPI MAYBE.pdf 408.34 kB · 1 download

 

let them work it all out,

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for that!

Okay, I'm using this FOS CQ: https://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/files/2619/PPI-consumer-questionnaire.pdf

 

Here is what I have added to the appropriate blank space in the form. Please could you take a minute to have a quick look over it to see that I have laid it out appropriately?

 

finally, tell us why you are now unhappy with the insurance

Because since that time, I have found out that agreeing to the insurance would not have helped my application, contrary to what I was told when I applied for the loan. Also, I realise due to the recent publicity surrounding PPI that I should have had the details explained to me clearly.

Additionally, I did previously ask HSBC whether I had PPI on my loan and they replied to say that they were ‘unable to provide’ me with the data I required because they ‘do not hold any information prior to 6 years due to The Data Protection Act’. (you will see repeated use of this claim on attachments D1, D2 and D3)

However, since then, I contacted the Information Commissioner’s Office regarding this statement and they confirmed that there was no such provision in the Data Protection Act. Further to this, I recently found that HSBC’s own Privacy Policy (attachment ‘Y1’) stated the following:

How long we’ll keep your information

We keep information in line with our data retention policy. For example, if you’re a customer, we’ll normally keep core banking data for seven years from the end of our relationship.

It states ‘seven years from the end of our relationship’ but I am still a customer of theirs, therefore, according to their own privacy policy, they should still have all my data stored. The fact that they do not, or claim they do not, directly contradicts their own privacy policy.

I reject their position that they do not have the data and I believe that they are withholding the data from me because they feel that it would be disadvantageous to them to provide it to me.

Because I did not believe HSBC’s claim of not having any of my data from beyond six years, I issued them with a  Data Subject Access Request earlier this year, the results of which showed irrefutable evidence that they do in fact have masses of my data from at least as far back as 2005. I have attached PDF scans of these statements, memos, etc as evidence of this.

 

You will see from the email correspondence from a Sarah Berry from HSBC sent on 9th July 2019 (attachment ‘X1’) that when I question the contradiction between their privacy policy by asking ‘Sarah, I am still a customer of HSBC so still am in a 'relationship' with you. Therefore, my question is, bearing in mind your own privacy policy, please can you explain why so much of my data is missing, with no record of deletion?’, she replied with ‘I appreciate you are still a customer with HSBC and feel you've been given conflicting information regarding our Privacy Notice. I can't comment any further regarding our Privacy Notice’. They are simply refusing to explain why they will not send the data.

I also ask Sarah Berry ‘You state that you had to check 'with our Legal Team about what information we can disclose to customers', please can I ask what you mean by this?’, and her response was ‘When we are looking to disclose any information of a sensitive nature, we are required to check with our Legal Team to ensure this information can be provided externally. This is a bank policy and I cannot comment any further about this’. I believe this, as well as the evidence that I have attached showing they do have records from as far back as 2005, is further evidence that HSBC are selective in what they release to their customers in response to requests for their data / records.

 

Most importantly, you will see from HSBC’s letters to me, ‘G1’, they claim that, even though they cannot locate the data I need, they state ‘I confirm that none of these loan accounts had Loan Protection Insurance’, this is a contradiction because how can they confirm this if they do not have the data? However, you will see from attachment ‘A’, that the internal memo not only shows that there was PPI on all of my loans, but they even provide the ‘Personal Loan Protection’ policy numbers!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If you need more space, please use the spare page at the end of this questionnaire.

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers i'd simply use a few bullet points.

the meat can be gathered from them reading the correspondence

 

go get a cheap penstick attach that to the form.

put EVERYTHING on it.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great! I will be sending this on Saturday via 'signed for' postage.

 

One question I would love to know the answer to, though, is if the FOS do agree with me that HSBC are withholding my info, what can they do about it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

they have some powers to force them too but I would suggest they'd probably rule that they must refund you and suggest what that should be rather than going down a disclosure route.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no, all PPI providers have std refund calculations for lending they use for refunds when limited data is available but accept PPI existed or are told to refund.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just getting my stuff together to send. A question - I have various statements from them, following my DSAR, from as far back as 2005. This is part of my evidence that HSBC do have records going back much further than their claimed six years. However, I must have over a 150 pages of sporadic statements that show this, would you advise I scan / copy them all?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Already answered post 108

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies.

One of my main points to the FOS is that they state in many documents that they have no records that show I had PPI on my loans (they state the loan account numbers and sort codes), but then state  

'Please note that you can take this letter as confirmation that you have not had Payment Protection Insurance for any of your loans'.

I will be very interested to see what the FOS says about this!!

 

One more stupid question

- If I send the same FOC CQ to HSBC which contains all my bullet points of evidence,

does this not give HSBC the 'heads up' regarding how to combat / argue the points I've made?

And I send HSBC ALL the evidence too?

 

Also, I have just found details of a personal loan repayment on one of their statements they sent from 2005.

Can this be used by the FOS to work out anything?

 

Should I only include my big explanation of things in a covering letter to the FOS with the CQ?

I'm concerned that my breakdown of how they lied to me will give HSBC the chance to compile their argument?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hsbc don't need their own data back.

but yes send them a copy of the FOS CQ.

 

you are quite entitled to send the FOS a covering letter.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...