Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • ask them when their gun was last calibrated. norm works afaik
    • Thank you for the summary you have given. I think you will need to commission a fully detailed point by point report which identifies the issues, the cause of the issues and then separately a quotation for resolving them. I think you need two quotations – comparative. Do you know the name of the person who owns TB plastering? Do you know their address? Do you know they have any assets? It sounds to me as if it's going to be quite an expensive job. On the basis of what you say, if you bring a legal action then you will have no difficulty getting a judgement in your favour the problem will be enforcing the judgement. What address do they use on their bill? You need to have a look at the land registry web check service for about three quid check to see who the owner of a particular property is. Of course you could simply wait until they decide to sue you and then bring a counterclaim but there is a big chance that they won't bother to sue and so it may be down to you to take your own action to undo the mess they have made. Come back here when you have found this out
    • Investors expect artificial intelligence to unleash a new wave of growth.View the full article
    • The first thing is to let the surgery know that you didn't enter your car registrtaion when you visited and ask them to confirm to Euro that you were a patient on that day and Euro should cancel. The quicker you do that before matters escalate, the more lkely that they will cancel. You could suggest that  they put up a sign reminding drivers to enter their vrm. thank you for posting the whole of the PCN which confirms that it does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 in two ways. [2][e] of S9 states (e)state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges; Your PCN does not. All it does is to ask the driver to pay which is not enough. In addition under [2][a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. Instead it gives the arrival and departure times of the car as it passes the ANPR cameras which is not the same. That means that you as keeper are not liable to pay the PCN only the driver is now liable. Courts do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person so proving who was driving will be difficult for Euro.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

IDRWW debts form Dubai now J&P chasing


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 366 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I was living in Dubai for 8 years lost my job didn't get paid by them etc.. so i had to leave as i couldn't find another job.

 

That was a year ago, since then i have received a couple of letters form IDR about my outstanding debts out there , 4 different banks totalling around 250 AED.

 

I've replied to them by email explaining that i am unemployed on universal credit, no assets at all etc. I didn't tell them i am just starting a small buisness online.

 

There reply was we will give you 30 days before they start with their collections.

 

Any advice from anybody please who knows about what they can do like CCJs or min payments. would it be best just to go bankrupt and tell them that.

 

Thanks very much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to the correct forum...please continue to post here to your thread.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Opps shame you responded..

They'll think they've found a mug to fleece now.

 

Get reading threads in this forum

You'll soon get the idea.......

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the main issue is them not having a correct and current UK address to prevent backdoor stuff like statutory demands and CCj's.

as everything will be sent to a wrong address and you'll know nowt about it all.

 

however they seem to be already writing to you so cant pull that stunt.

 

pers i'd block and bounce any emails/addresses they use ,

 

no betterway to answer all your questions than to read here on CAG ONLY.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so ill try and bounce back their emails when they come. I might just tell them to carry on with there collections as there isn't much they can get, then tell them i am going bankrupt so send me all the correct documents etc.. in English, who owns the debt and the balances so i can move forward.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no need to try. Just go to your email and block the sender. Dont tell them you're going bankrupt. Just dont communicate with them at all.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
59 minutes ago, ConcernedExpat09 said:

OK so it is acceptable to tick both boxes as Hornsey62 saying you can't tick both as then accepting Jurisdiction?

 

 

Hi well i am in the same situation as you i hope it goes well for you.. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

A quick up date, i am getting none stopped emails and letters every week threatening me with CCJs etc....  please reply within 7 days otherwise they will take action

Any advice please as its doing me head in. I feel like writing back to them and telling to f.. off 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's the idea of it

harassment to make you crumble to their fake threats that say will nothing...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Hi All 

 

i have been receiving letters etc from this J&P regarding an outstanding credit card debt  in Dubai

 

They have already sent me a PAP months / I've sent that back using your guide to send back. They have replied and finally sent all the info asked for. Apart from the T&Cs in English and Arabic

 

They have sent another letter today with 3 payment options without any interest added on. Reduced amounts. If don't try and settle it will go to collections.

 

Should i still take no notice of the letters and just wait to see if they send a CCJ letter or SD ? 

 

I've have no assets 

 

Thanks for an advice 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to IDRWW debts form Dubai now J&P chasing

J&P cant do anything

thats down to the original creditors.

 

so another one where the BANK are saying we've taken off our fake interest now, and want you to pay a small token amount £PCM?

 

instead of us guessing what you've received and you interpretation of the letters

why not scan all the letters up to one mass PDF

read upload

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...