Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Victorian Plumbing- gave refund after legal threat to sue them - ***resolved - refunded***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2168 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

It's me again! :)

 

Two months ago, we ordered a bath unit (the sink, cabinets and marble top) from Victorian Plumbing.

 

They delivered on time but one of the units was defective. After the silly song and dance with a customer service clown, they sent a replacement unit, at a great delay. We had to send our plumber home after paying him.

The replacement unit was also defective...

 

At this point, we are about a month without a bathroom. Lucky the old toilet dish is giving us some graceful end-of-life...

 

They now delivered another unit, which wasn't defective - but it's the wrong one!

All this time, we are wasting days with unnecessary CS emails...

 

They have finally pushed me over the edge. I've really tried to make amends with them. Even offered to receive a partial refund, which we even cut in half because we wanted to get it over with...

 

However, they very strongly insist on spinning us through CS and aggravating us with "we do apologise but you can go away

Sorry for any inconvenience"

 

Everything via email and I keep those.

 

I have finally decided to lean on on them and told them they must do right by us or we will sue them and claim for legal expenses, court fees, statutory interest, etc...

 

Question: regarding legal expenses,

can I hire my friend,

who is NOT a solicitor (he is an employee for a bank) to help me with that and then claim for the money I paid to him?

 

I could really use his help with handling this matter as I suffer from Autism and I sometimes go totally catatonic :(

A solicitor in my town is 250+VAT p/h and my friend would charge 200 net p/h

 

Also, as a bonus, we'll take comfort in knowing that the offending party didn't just spin us up for the whole process of suing them only to eventually pay us exactly what they owe us. Effectively meaning we are at a net loss because we got what we paid for, but after a significant delay and stress on us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to General Legal Issues Forum...please continue to post here to your thread.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid that you won't be able to claim anything for hiring a friend or even a solicitor to do this for you. It would be a small claim and the rules there are that win or lose, nobody gets their expenses paid other than the court fees.

 

However, from what you say it all seems very straightforward. Under the Consumer Rights Act you are entitled to reject the contract completely if there is a defect. Clearly supplying the incorrect or defective items is good enough for you to reject out of hand.

 

You should take control and simply write them a letter and send it to them saying that you are asserting your rights under the Consumer Rights Act and that you are rejecting the materials they have supplied and that they should arrange to collect them as soon as possible – in any event within seven days.

 

Additionally if you want you can bring a small claim to give you a certain amount of compensation for any losses you may have suffered. An example of this would be the money you had to pay the plumber but also any other expenses such as telephone calls et cetera.

 

From what you say they haven't completed the contract yet so the 30 day period doesn't even begin to run. Tell them to pick up everything and to give you your money back.

 

Put this in a letter as I have already said. Tell them that you want everything collected within seven days and tell them that after 14 days (seven days plus a further seven) if they haven't picked it up or if they haven't refunded you then you will sue them in the County Court without any further notice to them.

 

Only make this threat if you are prepared to carry it out. However it is very easy and we will support you all the way and help you draft claim which will be very simple.

 

Your claim will broadly be:

 

The claimant contracted with the defendant to supply bathroom equipment value £XXX on XXX date – reference number XXX.

The defendant supplied incorrect items and also defective items. The claimant has asserted their right to reject under the Consumer Rights Act but the defendant has refused to comply.

The claimant claims £XXX cost of materials, £XXX wasted expenses on plumber, phone calls, et cetera. Plus interest.

 

Sent the letter and at the same time registered with MoneyClaim online and start getting used to the website and drafting your claim. You can save it as you go along. There is no need to issue it immediately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, I didn't know I can't claim for legal costs, thanks!

It's a bit rubbish really. Right now, the system is tuned to make life easy for the vendors. They can mess up, put the consumer on stress for a few months and, just before the judge drops the hammer, turn all good, give the money back and walk out not a penny poorer.

While the consumer will have spent a lot of his (and YOURS!) time and probably all sorts of costs (tracked mail, driving to preliminary hearing, etc..) he won't be able to get back (or at least will probably not worth his time to get back).

 

Anyway, I will change my approach here according to your advise, thanks again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, I didn't know I can't claim for legal costs, thanks!

It's a bit rubbish really. Right now, the system is tuned to make life easy for the vendors. They can mess up, put the consumer on stress for a few months and, just before the judge drops the hammer, turn all good, give the money back and walk out not a penny poorer.

While the consumer will have spent a lot of his (and YOURS!) time and probably all sorts of costs (tracked mail, driving to preliminary hearing, etc..) he won't be able to get back (or at least will probably not worth his time to get back).

 

 

No. This is a complete misunderstanding. Of course it doesn't happen automatically but the law and the procedure is there to allow the consumer to recover their money on a failed contract and all of the associated expenses – but simply not the legal expenses of bringing the claim. On the other hand, the retailer is also unable to recover their costs of defending a claim.

 

The reason why retailers get away with so much is because by and large consumers either don't know their rights or (justifiably) they want a quiet life and so they often settle for second best simply in order to avoid trouble. However, if you are prepared to stick up for yourself then you can get justice and also give the retailer a slap and teach them a lesson which will be good for all consumers in the future.

 

I hope you will realise that so far you have allowed yourself to be led around by the nose. You haven't done yourself any favours – or the other consumers in the world and of course you have brought comfort to Victorian Plumbing. It's really about time you started taking control

 

If you take our advice, then keep us informed step-by-step and we will be with you all the way. That's another thing the retailer doesn't have. They don't have us on their side. You get your advice free – (you can make a donation if you want) but the retailer will have to pay for their advice. Furthermore, when they lose this case as they surely will, they will cause damage to their reputation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's just that everything we (our household) bought last two years was either defective or misrepresented in the advertisement. We have been very vigilant via PayPal and CC protection, where possible, and ALWAYS got our way with the vendors.

In cases where we have been cornered, CAG has helped (once with a broken down car and once with a laptop - thank you!) and I've made a humble contribution to support your good work!

 

But if I were a seller these days in the UK, I wouldn't mind selling any piece of rubbish. 10% of the consumers wouldn't even notice, 50% would notice but (justifiably) choose to live a quiet life, 20% don't know how to press me and the 20% that do know about the CRA: OK, they will send me letters, this will drag on for a few months, I will send an apprentice to push some papers to the judge and if the consumer hasn't agreed to a partial refund (which already leaves me at a profit), I will give them their money back, I'm not a penny poorer.

 

A slap? I wouldn't care, I make money from the above % distribution anyway and since we've settled before the hammer dropped, my abuse isn't even registered anywhere.

Citizens Advice / Trading Standards? They are normally giving the consumer even more trouble than I do. If we settled, they don't care about the case, if we didn't, they explicitly state that they can't claim anything on behalf of the customer and they won't do anything to shut my business down.

 

I am just ranting right now, feel free to ignore if you like to stick to constructive discussion :)

I will just finish with saying I've lived in many countries. Some of them "2'nd" or "3'rd world" and I've seen systems where the local equivalent of Trading Standards aggressively pursue bad vendors, issuing fines and shutting businesses down, putting a personal mark on the CEO against simply opening another cowboy shop under a different brand...

And legal expenses are claimable there.

 

I mean, what you are doing is great but you aren't a government-funded institute. There is no guarantee that you will exist and be able to help to everyone. Your existence is a miracle that makes shopping in the UK bearable. But the official system is such that a consumer can easily get lost in.

 

I will update here to remove this thread once we settle, which now seems far more likely than suing them. If we could put dent on their financials so we don't feel our modest resistance is not for nothing, cool. If it all boils down to months of arguing to get to the starting point, it's not worth it and it's not our fault but it's the system that doesn't care about vendors who like to "have a go" at the consumers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry to say but that is probably because you are so furious – justifiably so – and getting into rant-mode that you have allowed this to get out of control and that you are being mucked around.

 

We can help you get what you want but you need to treat it surgically.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How did you pay?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, they got the best of me. Apologies for any excessive bad vibes sent down here. I hope my loving appreciation of your work has not been made unclear!

 

We are in a bit of a pickle, because of now, having wasted all our contingency time provision, we had to install the unit.

 

Therefore, the discussion is now about replacing the defective unit and them taking back the 3 (2 defective, 1 wrong) units.

 

They have recently sent us something like this:

"we will send you a replacement and the guy will pick up the wrong unit.

You must re-package the wrong unit or he will not pick it up.

About the defective units, we will not pick them up, you need to deal with it"

 

At this point, I'd like to mention that I have a written request from them to take out the wrong unit out of packaging in order to send them a picture.

I also have a written request, which they acknowledged, that I implore them to inspect the package before sending to me.

 

If it was just repackaging the wrong unit, I'd do that. But take their rubbish out for them? Have they no dignity?

I mean, what if I don't have a car to transport the units and boxes to the kip?

What if I am elderly and I can't literally lug them around?

 

I've replied that I will NOT repackage their mistake for them (again, if it was just one thing and they were being reasonable about it, I would definitely help out).

And if they don't collect their stuff, I will pay a professional to discard of it and charge them.

 

Your thoughts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay it seems to me that you need to send a letter before claim and threatened to bring a legal action. Give them 14 days. Only do this if you are prepared to bring the legal action. Don't bluff.

 

Please can you list out here in bullet pointed form exactly what you're looking for – the outcome. Also what is the value of it all? I've rather lost track.

 

Although you can certainly sue them for a refund and compensation, you won't be able to sue them to replace the defective part. Frankly it seems to me that you will be best off cutting ties with them completely and buying what you want from some different seller.

 

That would make the business of bringing a legal action fairly simple. You will simply be asking for a complete refund for all the money you spent, refund of expenses of the wasted time for the plumber – and any other losses. If you have been without a bathroom for a couple months then I would certainly think about putting a figure down for that – although you need to be realistic.

 

On the basis of what you say, the chances of success are better than 95%. However I think you need to start taking control and act quickly – meaning send the letter of tomorrow. That gives a bit more information about the entire value of the problem. Have you identified an alternative seller?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, there aren't other vendors for what we need. It needs to cover a bad tiling work so it has to be this exact size.

Also, because we've wasted so much time dealing with them, we just couldn't wait more living in a shambles and decorators leaning on us, wanting to finish the project and get paid...

 

So what we are really looking for right now:

1. They will deliver a 3'rd unit (which I bet my life will be defective as well). We will choose the least bad one of all and touch it up.

2. We want them to pick up all the wrong and defective units

3. Without us wasting hours repackaging them

 

I reckon this might be a pretty humble expectation. I am not trying to get rich from this.

 

How can I be realistic about being without a bathroom? Sure, we had to play hopscotch around exposed floors, sit carefully on the detached toilet bowl... Nothing with an invoice...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid that the way that the claims system works is that it would be amazing if you have get an order forcing the defendant to do something. I think you should forget it. Civil claims simply deal with providing compensation for things that have gone wrong.

 

This means that you must absolutely find some other solution from some other supplier, cost it up, cost up the value of undoing the problems which have been caused by Victorian Plumbing and then make that the basis of your claim. It's frustrating – but there you are.

 

For instance you seem to be saying that they carried out some bad tiling. Why can't this be redone by somebody else?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, it covers some bad tiling, which was done before we even moved in :)

 

My idea is more like threaten them with what I hope is a very real possibility of: me hiring a garbage contractor and charging them for this cost I paid (likely suing them if they don't reimburse).

And then they might come to their senses and actually own up to some of the problems they've caused us

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, just in: for the fourth time that I've told them I am not going to repackage this, they say that if I don't repackage, their driver won't pick it up.

I really don't feel I should be repackaging this.

Especially since they have done absolutely nothing to come our way, why should I spend 2 hours breaking my back with a 40kg cabinet and who knows how much packaging material?

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case send them a letter before action and given 14 days. Tell them that in view of the fact that they are refusing to honour your rights under the Consumer Rights Act you have no choice but to give them a final 14 days to collect all the items and to provide you with a refund or else you will sue them in the County Court for the cost of the items plus additional losses and you won't give them any further notice.

 

Only do this if you're prepared to carry the threat out. It seems to me that you have no other choice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mentally: fully willing and not anxious at all (as I know I am in the right and I've already met a judge before about my defective laptop)

Skill-wise: I am happy to have learned from your advice on previous cases and I can sail through this solo.

 

Very shameful it had to resort to this, if they were a little more interested in my problem, they would have saved me AND them a lot of unnecessary nerves.

 

I will send the letter and let you know if any bumps arise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Yep, same day they got the mail: UPS guy rushed to us to pick up their rubbish and partial refund suggested by us sent via PayPal.

 

Funny that they remained utterly incompetent till the bitter end because they didn't warn us about the UPS guy - lucky my partner was there.

Also didn't inform us about the PayPal, so I was revving up to write them another bombshell - lucky I checked PayPal before that.

 

Amazing how stupid their customer care people are. Must have cost the company a 200-300 pounds in transport, damaged goods, man-hours...

Had they shown any sign of benevolence at the start, we both would have ended more or less in the green and happy.

 

Thanks for supporting us again. Happy to donate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this resolved now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great. Well done

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...