Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I posted a couple of years ago about our debt situation and have been trying to pay off our debt as best we can. It is a possibility I maybe made redundant in a few months time, so I am trying to find out everything I can about what happens in today’s world when you can’t pay. I keep finding conflicting advice on various sites so I wanted to post this quote to get thoughts. It claims basically that the dca will likely get enforceable documents these days and therefore it’s likely you will have to pay dca at some point during the 6 year process.    on here I read a lot of comments assuming the exact opposite of this. A lot of the threads on here state the beginning of the process but I never see conclusive stuff about what happened from start to finish to get insight into whether debts post 2015 have been enforced etc. I hear a lot here not to pay dca companies but most my debts are post 2015 debts I am all up to date on our debts but if I lose my job it is likely I’ll end up where I tried to avoid in the first place. Which is destroying our files and dealing with DCA. I’ll post it below so you can see what I mean.   It is likely that any debts incurred after 2007 will end up with all the documentation being provided and being enforceable. Therefore you should use the time while awaiting responses going through your Income & Expenditure and considering any possiblity of making a full and final settlement. It can take a number of months to reach the stage of a hearing date and exchange of witness statements and normally you would be able to settle or come to an arrangement to pay before the court hearing, once documents have been provided, although this isn’t guaranteed.
    • depends who said sols state their client is. IDRWW vis~IDR(worldWide) are a debt collector regulated & registered in the UK & USA    they are not solicitors. they use various 'for hire' - here use our letterhead paper tiger solicitors. its just a case of who's stupid enough to join their folly. IDR law used to be their fav but they lost do much money, they broke ties after almost being struck off and now do Will/Probate disputes only. IDR Legal are their sols wing. moriarty law Judge and priestly Taheel - a foreign DCA that use absolutely any trick in the book to extort money even pretending to be any of the above inc being the bank themselves in phone calls.           
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/Mortimer claimform - old Capital One branded Luma Credit Card


roland60
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1574 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 11 months later...
  • Replies 115
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi there,

I recently received a letter from Mortimer Clarke Sols regarding Cabot Financial, stating the following:

 

"We note that we have not gained a response to our previous letter, copy enclosed. Our client set out it's position in the previous letter and it remains unchanged.

 

We have reviewed the matter and we have been instructed by our client to make an application to lift the stay and apply for summary judgment, if a settlement agreement cannot be reached within 14 days.

 

Our client remains willing to agree a repayment plan with you. If you wish to enter into settlement negations please complete and return the statement of means form attached, within 14 days, with your proposals."

 

They attached a letter dated 4th June 2018 which I have never seen or received before outlining that they have sent me the following docs:

 

1) Reconstituted agreement with current and historical t&cs

2) Statement of Account from the original creditor

3) Notice of Default

4) Statement of default

5) Notice of assignment

6) Statement of account from our client

 

I have never received these and they are not attached with this letter.

 

They further they go on to say in the June letter:

 

"It is not clear what your defence to this agreement is, we ask that you set out the precise legal basis of any defence within 14 days.

 

Alternatively, our client would like to settle matters with you without the need for further court proceedings. We therefore ask that you put forward repayment proposals to address to outstanding balance."

 

Any advice on this matter would be appreciated, thanks.

 

 

Roland

Link to post
Share on other sites

The claim is stayed

Until or unless you get an N244 id ignore them

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

we need the exhibits that are not just their template letters nor stuff we have seen before

 

so you've had notification from the court and the fleecers N244 too then to lift the stay..??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi DX

 

Yes we've had notification from the court with the N244 for the stay to be lifted and summary judgment to be granted pursuant to CPR Parts 24 and/or strike out of the defence under 3.4 on the grounds that:

1) Defendant has no prospect of defending the claim

2) There is no compelling reason why the case should be disposed of at trial

 

Should the defendant wish to rely on written evidence at the hearing , they should file such evidence with the court and serve a copy on the claimant not less than 7  days before the hearing pursuant to CPR Part 24.5(1). 

 

The hearing date: 4th Dec 2019.

 

They have sent too much paperwork to scan, if you could let me know which documents you would like from the list I will scan and attach accordingly, thanks.

 

1) Exhibit JK1 

- Original Agreement & T&Cs

- Default Agreement & Terms of your Credit Card Agreement  

- Important information about your credit card (Agreement & T&Cs)

- Original Account sold to Cabot letter - 18th April 2017

- Cabot letter they have the account - 18th April 2017

- Mortimer Clarke Sols letter to discuss debt - 11th Oct 2017 

- Cabot letter Statement of Account 7/4/2017 - 11/10/17 dated 11th Oct 2017

- My Defence 9th Feb 2018

- My CPR 31.14 Request - 2nd Feb 2018

- Letter from Mortimer for receipt of my CPR request  - 12th Feb 2018

- Letter from Mortimer for receipt of defence and response to some of the points in my defence, Assignment, POCs, Pre-action Protocol - 14th Feb 2018

- Letter from Mortimer - account on hold waiting for documents from their client and response to some of the points in my defence - 4th June 2018

- Letter from Mortimer that I haven't responded to their letter dated 3rd Jan 2019 and that they will be making an application to lift the stay -  No copy of this letter is attached - 4th April 2019

- Statements 

- Copy of the Default Notice  served 3/11/2015

- Statement of Default - 6/12/2015

 

Many thanks,

Roland 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

already answered that roland in my last post 

don't need two post to show you don't ever check first before posting unnecessary repeats for advice already given.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX

 

thanks for getting back to me, I think there’s been a bit of misunderstanding or confusion....

I didn’t mean to keep posting for advice, 

 

your last post #32 advised me to put up exhibits not seen before excluding template letters.... 

they sent all them documents in the exhibit mentioned in my post #33,

 

wasn’t too sure what was relevant for me to put up from that list of documents,

hence why I asked what you would like as there are too many pages,

didn’t want to put up unnecessary pages.

 

thanks,

Roland 

Link to post
Share on other sites

quite understand that.

 

but I cant see what is not clear by me saying.

we need the exhibits that are not just their template letters nor stuff we have seen before

 

the only misunderstanding or confusion.... is upon your part.

 

you have 7 days to get your WS completed and sent.

 

this is your 4th court claim

one would hope someone with that kind of experience would not be needing any help and might even have been helping others

not appearing to be a novice and asking silly basic unnecessary schoolboy questions as if its your 1st ever court claim experience

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a read of the following thread....similar application to lift the stay and request Summary Judgment.

 

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy

 

Thank you for the link, it was very helpful, appreciate it. 

 

I was actually made to feel quite 'stupid' and felt as if i was wasting the forums time on this thread after DX's comments in post #38.   

 

Please see attached the necessary documents, please do let me know if you require anything else, many thanks.

 

Files attached:

 - Default Notice 

 - statement of Default Notice

 - Reconstituted Agreement & T&Cs - 3 different sets

 

P.S - sorry about the quality of the T&Cs, the high quality files were too large and had to reduce them.

 

Thanks,

Roland

 

Exhibit JK1.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

in their WS they state its a recon, [pages 1-10] urm something smells here

for this to happen for an online 2012 signup.

 

pages 1+4+5 appear to be missing??

 

need to discover whats going on here 

so scan up the pages 1-10 as clear non blurred uploads

no good to us if we can see them

 

if you need to send them via the secure email then do so

and i'll do it.

but we need to see the text of all 10 pages very clearly to workout what they have done..

 

and just to check that they are statement from cap1 and not from any other source scan up one statement please.

 

its better you look stupid infront of us than lose another case infront of a judge. 

you only waste the forums time when you don't follow what has been already advised 

esp when it runs the clock closer to a deadline - its 3 weeks we've been waiting for these docs now

and what do we get..mostly blurred uploads we cant read...:lol:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:rockon:

will deal in morning

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

cant find the email with better scans of pages 1-10 

did you send it?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

got it 

for some reason this one was stopped by the online webmail portal as spam

the rest have always come thru no issue

 

working...

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry busy day

attached is a large file re clear agreement/ T&C's

 

is that obscured signature typed or your real sig?

Exhibit__Cabot_Vs_Roland.pdf

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

those docs could have come from anywhere their filing cabinet even here on CAG and all they have done is insert your name in two places.

there is no indication of how you signed up for this card in their WS

there is no time or date or IP addressed evidenced either.

 

that's why they are calling it a recon.

they need to provide proof of how and by what method you signed up for this credit.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx

 

Thanks for getting back regarding the 3 agreement and T&Cs.

 

Yes I did wonder why I had 3 sets of agreements and T&Cs....

 

Also their WS states in para 4 ...the defendant entered the agreement ON OR AROUND 5/11/2012 and then exhibit page 2 of the alleged Original Agreement has a date for 2/11/2012.....

. then a default agreement sheet page 4?,

and then 'terms of your capitalone credit agreement' with no date either...

too many grammar mistakes on pages 5 & 6 in the headings...

surely that can't be right....

 

I will start my WS now, if there is anything else that stands out please do let me know, i will post up the WS as soon as I have done a draft.

 

Another point i have noticed on Page 2 of the JK1 exhibit, the marketing box is 'unticked'.  

As a rule of thumb if i apply or do anything online i always tick the box for no junk mail!

This form is definitely fabricated by them and is not the original.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 

 

This is my draft WS, please do let me know of nay changes or additions required, thanks. 

 

IN THE County Court AT                                                                              CLAIM NO: 

 

 

BETWEEN:


CABOT FINANCIAL (UK) LIMITED

 

-and-



(DEFENDANT)
 

 

___________________________________________

WITNESS STATEMENT OF 

 

 

 

INTRODUCTION 

 

1. I, XXXX, the Defendant in this case, make this statement in support of my defence against the Claimant, Cabot Financial (UK) Limited.  The matters set out below are within my own knowledge, except where I indicate to the contrary. 

 

THE DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO THE CLAIMANT’S WITNESS STATEMENT 

 

2. The Claimant states in Paragraph 3, ‘….refer to various documents, true copiesof which are contained in the paginated bundle to this statement marked “JK”1’, but then states in para 4, ‘Acopy of the reconstituted agreementwith associated terms and conditions….pages 1-10’. There are 3 versions attached of the alleged Agreement and Terms & Conditions and according to para 4 they are not the original but ‘a reconstitutedversion’. They have attached 3 Agreements namely, ‘Original Agreement’, ‘Default Agreement’ and ‘Terms of your Capital One Credit Card Agreement’.  The Claimant has provided 3 sets of generic/reconstituted Agreement and Terms & conditions.  

 

3. The Claimant in Para 4 also states ‘On or around 5thNovember 2012 the Defendant entered into a Credit Card Agreement,’ but Page 2 of JK1 has a date inserted 2/11/2012.  It has my name, address and a date inserted in the form but no mention of how the agreement was made, online, post or telephone, and furthermore not mentioned in the Claimant’s Witness Statement.  

 

4. As a rule of thumb I always ensure that no 3rdparty is to contact me or to send me marketing information via telephone, post or electronically’, but Page 2 of JK1 has an unticked box, another indication that this is not an original agreement. 

 

5. Page 5 of JK1 has too many typo mistakes in the heading as follows: TERMSOF YOUR CAPITALONE CREDITCARD AGREEMENT, furthermore there are no ‘full stop’ punctuations at the end of each sentence, this surely cannot be a document sent out by Capital One.  

 

6. The Claimant states in Para 9 that my defence is a ‘templated defence’, requesting documents pursuant of CPR 31.14 and Section 78 of the Credit Card Act 1974, this is a defendant’s right for request of information but the Claimant has failed to provide the true original Credit Card Agreement and Terms & Conditions.

 

7. The Claimant states in Para 25 that, ‘the Claimant allowed the proceedings to be stayed in order to allow the parties to attempt settlement negotiations…..’ this is not correct as the Claim was stayed due to the Claimant not being able to provide the requested documents pursuant of my CPR 31.14 and Section 78 of the Credit Card Act 1974.

 

8. Para 30 and 31of the Witness Statement requests to restore the proceedings, to strike out the Defence, has requested for a Summary Judgement, together with costs to be assessed summarily by the court. I, the Defendant, strongly object to the Claimant’s Witness Statement requesting to lift the stay and enter Judgement. I believe therefore, that this should be denied and I respectfully ask for you to strike out the claim. My reasons for this have been outlined in points 1 to 7. 

 

9. By the reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief and invite the Court to strike out the claim.

 

I believe that the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true. 

 

Signed: 
Dated:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...