Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, firstly thank you for reading this. I know no one wants a long winded back story. So I’ll be breif. I entered a local store to buy some paint (which I did pay for) I am honestly not a bad person or a theif.   Didn’t have a basket or trolly as was on my lunch break. Whilst picking up the three tubs of paint placed some masking tape in my pocket (it was hanging out of so I had every intention to pay) just didn’t have a hand free. Paid for my goods (forgot about the £4.39 masking tape) I’ve got so much going on and im not well at all (like I say no one cares I get that) also have autism so wasn’t thinking particularly like others do maybe (who knows my minds going around and around) I left the store after paying, was pulled back in by security. Asked for the tape which I gave immediately  shook up. Gave them my ID and details. I was given some paper and told to expect a large fine in the post for their time and the tape and sent on my way. my questions are: I hardly ever go out without support so the ban I guess I can’t go there now for anything (their loss) - ok but is my photo going to be all over with my name? how much am I expecting in the post as a fine? I have sent them cash in the post recorded signed for delivery to arrive tomorrow (incident happened today) for my error. Their Address was on the bit of paper. i have read two posts on this page but they were from many many years ago so I hoped for updated advise please? 
    • V important you read lots of BMW threads too !  
    • So should I send them a new SAR and put my date of birth on it? Or do I need to send them some proof? Driving license? 
    • Thanks so much for your help!! I've emailed them, and when they reply saying they can't do it I'll reply and state my rights. I'm so glad I found this forum, and will read all of the posts I can find and help guides available for the future. Really can't thank you enough.
    • utter BS, doesn't matter you signed it. pers i'd be writing as per the other threads here rejecting the car as not as described under CRA etc and be done with it. as its a debit card you could also do a full chargeback within 120 days to your bank and simply dump the car back to BMW. 100's of like threads to read here. get your ducks inline. make sure you know what you are doing and off you go. dont take any BS from BMW, no matter what you sign it does NOT remove your consumer rights. p'haps it might be on the off chance you are a good manager , a quick phonecall tomorrow saying you dont want it because (no bla bla fitted) it might be resolved in 5 mins..i will guess to date you not tried
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can Claimant claim for Interest later if not claimed on claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2338 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have just received claim form for a CC debt of about £4,400 from 2009 and they have claimed interest for 6 months + upto the date of judgement, but no mention of going forward.

 

I don't mind paying them original amount in instalments

but I am worried that if I accept the claim as it is then they may ask the judge for 8% interest until the debt clears,

which may mean the payments I make will just pay off interest.

 

Someone has told me that if I defend the case by asking them to prove the debt then they are likely to concentrate on proving the debt and not ask for interest going forward. But if I accept debt at the first stage then they are most likely to ask the judge to add 8% interest. Is this correct assumption?

 

But I know that if I defend then I will be slapped about a £1,000 in further legal costs. What could be the best course of action in this case?

 

Is there an argument against paying interest of 8%, which I may be able to use?

 

I will be grateful for your comments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

totally wrong way to go about it ..

 

you've received a claimform

please complete this:

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-2016**

 

if the debt is from 2009 then its SB'd unless you've been paying someone recently

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You pay what the total claim states bottom right of the form...that already includes costs and 8% section 69 interest.

There is no further interest as the amount is less than 5K

 

If you do not defend the claim they will get a default judgment...you get a CCJ.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

throw the morality card of 'owing the debt'

out the window too..

 

if you did owe it think about this..

 

why did a multinational creditor sell the debt on to a debt buyer/DCA for

and not take you to court themselves IF you DID owe this supposed debt...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am grateful for your replies, and thank you Andyorch for answering the central question

- that if I accept the claim and pay them in installments then can the claimant get 8% interest for the period from judgement until it clears.

 

You said, they cannot claim statutory interest because the debt is less than 5K.

But I heard differently from the judge when I attended the hearing for another judgement over a year ago.

 

The judge seemed to suggest to claimant's lawyer who asked for interest for just 1 year in their claim,

"You have restricted yourself to 1 year's interest, but I generally would award 1% if asked for (until the debt clears)."

The debt in that cases was less than 5K.

 

This to me seems that if the claimant asks for interest going forward until defendant clears the debt, then it will be awarded.

I fear this as installments I can afford may only be used for paying 8% interest on that sum, and I will end up in a debt trap.

You said that they cannot claim interest if debt is less than 5K - is this in CPR?

If yes, then do you happen to know the section?

 

Yes,

I am owning up to this debt as I mentioned in my original post,

but I am just worried about 8% interest going forward, and was seeking some guidance on this.

 

There was some confusion, I think I should have made it clear that the debt start date was 2009, but default was 2015.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

why are you not defending the claim?

you've nothing to lose twill be the same outcome as if you cough up now.

just settle by a tomlin order

 

can you not fill that link in in post 2

then we'll know what we need too to properly advise

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am grateful for your replies, and thank you Andyorch for answering the central question

- that if I accept the claim and pay them in installments then can the claimant get 8% interest for the period from judgement until it clears.

 

Depends how their particulars are worded...normally its 8% section 69 interest up until judgment...not until it clears...otherwise you then enter into Post Judgment interest...which a separate claim would have to be raised.

 

You said, they cannot claim statutory interest because the debt is less than 5K. No I said they cant claim interest post Judgment......and only claims over 5K can attract post judgment interest and only if the agreement allows for it in their T&Cs

But I heard differently from the judge when I attended the hearing for another judgement over a year ago. He is wrong or you have misunderstood

 

The judge seemed to suggest to claimant's lawyer who asked for interest for just 1 year in their claim,

"You have restricted yourself to 1 year's interest, but I generally would award 1% if asked for (until the debt clears)."

The debt in that cases was less than 5K.

 

If it was an agreement pursuant to CCA974 then he was wrong...it is normal to claim 1 years section 69 interest on money claims

 

This to me seems that if the claimant asks for interest going forward until defendant clears the debt, then it will be awarded. No it wont ..once a claimant attains judgment thats the final figure you owe..... it cant keep changing...a judgment is a conclusion of the debt

 

I fear this as installments I can afford may only be used for paying 8% interest on that sum, and I will end up in a debt trap.

You said that they cannot claim interest if debt is less than 5K - is this in CPR? Post Judgment interest...they can claim section 69 interest (pre judgment interest)...normal for 1 year as already stated

 

Refer to section 35A of the Supreme Court Act 1981, and its county court equivalent, section 69 of theCounty Courts Act 1984.

 

If yes, then do you happen to know the section? See above

 

Yes,

I am owning up to this debt as I mentioned in my original post,

but I am just worried about 8% interest going forward, and was seeking some guidance on this.

 

There was some confusion, I think I should have made it clear that the debt start date was 2009, but default was 2015.

 

Thanks

 

I think your only confusion is Pre and Post Judgment interest...section 69 interest is up until judgment....Post Judgment is subject to the debt being over 5K and that the credit agreement in its T&Cs allows for it...which is very rare and I have yet to see an agreement that does.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...