Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Drydens Fairfax chasing possible old debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2474 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

 

new here and after some advice on a rather messy situation if possible.....

 

Around 2011/2012, i was discharged from an IVA id been paying into as i lost my job at the time,

was out of work for a lengthy period, and had no way of covering the amounts set.

 

The IVA company handling my account told me the creditors would "probably" start contacting me again in pursuit of the monies outstanding.

Some did, some didn't.

 

After a period of around 6 months, i was offered settlement on a couple of these, which I accepted.

As i wasn't being pursued by the others, i assumed the matters were closed. Naively.

 

Roll on to 2 weeks ago when I received a letter from Drydens, this was a phishing letter as they wanted to know if i lived at my new address, of which ive been at 8 months. No mention of debt, just an "is this you" letter. i ignored it.

 

Today ive received another letter from them, addressed to me and detailing the debt of approx £1200 to a company I've never heard of.

I believe this company to be a Luxembourg company that buys debts.

But to me, it could be anyone, and none of the original creditors I owed.

 

After 5.5 years, to be honest, I have no idea who i paid off, who's was left chasing, and who gave up.

This amount is on my credit file, but again, i have no recollection of the company Drysdens are claiming i owe this money to.

 

Also, it looks like this debt will become SB'd in December of this year, Dec 2017.

There are 3 entries, of which this is one, on my CF that are "closed", whatever that means.

 

where do i go from here?

Do i just ignore Drydens,

do i ask who this is they claim i owe money to?

Do i try and ride it out to SB'd?

 

Any advice appreciated.

S

Link to post
Share on other sites

its not a good idea to move and not infor the creditors listed on your credit file

you leave yourself wide open to backdoor CCJ served to your old addresses.

 

 

whos drydens client.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dx, hi

 

I get what you're saying, but to be honest, after 4 odd years of not hearing from anyone, no statement of accounts, no chasing letters, it just didn't seem an issue anymore.

 

As i said, possibly naively, Id assumed the remaining ones had "given up" chasing the amounts.

checking my credit file when i moved wasn't even on my radar.

 

Until today, i haven't checked my CF since around 2012.

And i would have assumed, if someone was going down the CCJ route,

it would have been served by now and on my CF?

Of which there isnt any...

 

Are you saying i should inform the remaining ones of my new address,

when I haven't heard anything from them in over 5+ years whilst at that previous address?

 

The client Drysden are representing are PCO Holdco SARL.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PCO Holdco SARL are a bunch of low life fleecers

 

debt buyer will hold off issuing claimforms until just before the 6yrs mark

that way they can charge 6yrs of stat 8% interest

 

inform your creditors asap

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again DX,

 

Ok, they are fleecers, but Im still not aware of who they are or what debt, if any was sold onto them, and from whom.

How do i clarify this, and determine if its enforceable by them or Drydens?

 

And reading your reply, it insinuates that these companies "deliberately" hold off until near SB'd in order to then apply interest on the last 6 years, is that correct?

 

Is that even allowed without some prior communication? I'm no expert, but a quick google shows that this legislation (1998 i believe) applies only to commercial defaults and not applicable to Consumer Credit issues?

 

Getting away from my original post.

How do i deal with Drydens letters now?

As I'm not aware of who SARL are and cant recall the amount requested and to whom, if any, this was originally owed too.

 

Do i ignore until if/when they start threats, or approach them to determine who SARL is and prove this is my debt?

If it is legitimate, do you think they'd offer reduced settlement, or would just go straight for the CCJ with charges anyway?

 

As i said previously, they are 3 creditors left on my file with outstanding money, that NONE have communicated with me in over 5 years.

Again, possibly naively, I thought these may have been "written off" as I've not heard anything.

 

But, by what you are saying, you think they are all going to proceed with CCJ claims now at this point, 6 months from SB'd, in order to charge the extra interest?

 

To be honest, if that's the case, informing the other two is the least of my worries, as Ill have to declare my self bankrupt, as I'm in no position to pay anything towards these at the moment..being self employed and currently looking for further work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to get reading up here

 

there must be some indication on the letter

why not scan it up here click upload pdf please.

 

your credit file should tell you the type of debt each is and the owners now.

 

they can hold off and ofcourse all comms have gone to old addresses.

you've a phishing letter.

you need to respond to it and to all the others that you've never written too with a change of address.

 

but we need to know debt types first

not every type of debt is covered by a CCa request.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 files on My CF in addition to this one;

 

santander Overdraft / unsecured loan (cant remember)

Store Card

Credit Card

 

Not had any comms from any of the above since the IVA.

 

Worth noting, the IVA discharged in 2012.

 

I remained at the same address for another 4 years.

 

In that time I received no correspondence regarding any of these debts that remained.

 

Also attached the images of the 2 letters.

 

Thanks again.

dryden letters for PCO Holdco SARL.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you moved since you took your debts out...

 

those are phishing letters

 

you could send the prove it letter if you wanted too.

just so they have your correct address

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX,

 

Yep, as i said previously. The original IVA ended in 2012. I remained at that same address for another 4 years with NO contact from anyone, and recently moved 8 months ago to my new address. This letter turned up 2 weeks ago.

 

I think Ill wait on the next one and send the prove it letter as you suggest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm flabergasted, no surprised, no...............giggling, yes that's what I am, I'm giggling at their use of those hilarious phishing letters, they are Sooooooo 80's!

 

I didn't even believe they still used those playground missives, ''please tell us where our client maybe''? Are they seriously still that stoopid??

 

Worthy of a complaint to the FCA, if this is their ''World leading trace system'' then we're going backwards...

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...