Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • for more information both driving offences were on the same day 18/11/23 so currently fall inside the 6 month mark for prosecution is that correct?
    • You're a wizard with Booking.com, Dave. I'll wait to see if you have any joy talking to your buddy and hope you have a good catch up. Thank you for doing this. I'm not sure the owner of this gite knows what she's doing so I'll certainly mention what you've just said about customer services. I'll wait for the result of your conversation first, though. HB
    • Yes, I noticed that.  Too much of a coincidence methinks!  The OP says they never received a LoC and then in the CPR answer the solicitors say they hold a copy of the LoC but don't include it. I think the best thing is not to request a copy but use this against them in your WS - you never received LoC and indeed in their answer to your CPR request (included an an exhibit in the WS) they included various documents but not the LoC.
    • Frustratingly I've got a voice WhatsApp message from my friend but he's misunderstood the situation and thinks it's you who wants to cancel.  Anyway, I've answered asking if I can call him and hopefully the two of us will be free at the same time today to actually speak on the phone. In the meantime I found this on a page I think meant for people/businesses who have listings on Booking.com How can I communicate with guests to inform them about unforeseen issues at my property and initiate a cancellation? If you’re experiencing unforeseen issues and can’t accommodate your guests, you must report this to our customer service. They will support you with the cancellation request and relocation of the guests, if applicable. https://partner.booking.com/en-gb/help/reservations/changes-cancellations/handling-cancellations-and-guests-cancellation-requests#question-153182 So that's what the host should be doing.  
    • Hi ALl,    Would appreciate some advice and support. I went to insure my car with my partner last night and they refused insurance. I checked my dvla license online and it stated I have been disqualified for 6 months. This is due to 2 driving offences that I failed to identify the driver. I moved house a year ago and completely forgot about changing the registered address. This went to court on 14th May 24 and was given a fine for both and 6 points each totalling 12 points and a 6 month ban. I have read a few things online and spoken to a couple of solicitors for a quick consultation and views and opinions are so varied. Some solicitors are charging extortionate money for something that I know takes 5 mins such as the statuary declaration.    I am going to complete a statutory declaration today and get a solicitor to sign and submit this. But is this just delaying the inevitable? what's the likely hood of being able to overturn this and just pleading guilty to the original 2 offences and take the 3 points for each and a fine with no ban? Any help would be much appreciated, I have been sent the papers by the courts today so have this to hand. Looks like I'm only being charged for the failure to identify and not that and the speeding offence if that makes any difference.    R
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Administrative penalty notice- how do they expect us to pay?


dragon29
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2548 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You were told the investigator would reccomend no further action, the decision maker decided differently.

 

 

Loads of people have no money and get sanctioned, they have to apply for hardship or borrow from people.

 

 

Count yourself lucky they are offering it instead of prosecution.

This is fraud we are talking about they don't take things lightly, especially as taxpayers these days believe everyone gets away with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Well I'm writing them a letter anyway as I feel that none of my mitigating circumstances were taken into account and I'm appalled to receive this after being so transparent at my IUC and being told no further action by the investigator minus the overpayment.

 

So please tell me

 

How are we meant to live and pay bills if they take our benefits off us for 4 weeks?

 

We have ZERO savings!

 

They have to be heartless after everything I told them.

 

I don't know how you are meant to live. I'm telling you the position from a practical point of view. Write a letter by all means and ask them to reconsider.

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like them to actually take my mitigating circumstances into consideration because they haven't.

 

 

You were told the investigator would reccomend no further action, the decision maker decided differently. Loads of people have no money and get sanctioned, they have to apply for hardship or borrow from people. Count yourself lucky they are offering it instead of prosecution. This is fraud we are talking about they don't take things lightly, especially as taxpayers these days believe everyone gets away with it.

 

It isn't fraud. I was neglectful at best. If you knew EVERYTHING I told the investigator you'd think it was heartless too.

So no I won't 'count myself lucky' because I didn't commit fraud. There was no intent to deceive at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They don't have to prove it was intentional unless they were going for dishonestly failing to notify. Sound's like yours is the lesser one which is failing to notify. Which they class as fraud regardless. I would say you are lucky as they have enough evidence to give you a criminal record. They may not suspend all of your benefits. Just ring them when you can or speak to cab.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did notify them.

 

Because of my mitigating circumstances which you can't judge because you don't know what they are I didn't CHASE IT UP!

 

I've ALWAYS sent payslips off. ALWAYS!!!

 

You are talking like I'm a criminal. Like I've killed several people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never judge even if i know all of the facts. I too have been overpaid because i didn't know that i had to declare occassional overtime but mine was £212 and they underpaid me over £1000. I was convinced i would get iuc and was thinking the worst and lost sleep over it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then you can understand why I'm worried they are going to leave us with no money then can't you?

 

Be careful before you start banding the term criminal or criminal record around.

 

I'm not a criminal. Never have been. Never will be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not saying you're a criminal i said they can give you a criminal record if they chose to prosecute. If you don't accept this do you want to risk going to court which costs even more money?

 

The thing I'm MOST worried about is having NO money for four weeks. We won't be able to pay bills or the overpayment.

 

They can give me a criminal record for being neglectful in chasing it up due to mental health and other things I won't go into? Well they are heartless then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be careful before you start banding the term criminal or criminal record around.

 

I'm not a criminal. Never have been. Never will be.

 

I don't think she did..

 

The recovery of the overpayment will happen either way. Have you appealed against it?

 

The ad pen is in respect of the alleged offence.

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think she did..

 

The recovery of the overpayment will happen either way. Have you appealed against it?

 

The ad pen is in respect of the alleged offence.

 

I've accepted that the overpayment will happen. It starts on the 16th June.

 

This is where you can apply for hardship and go to a food bank if you really need to. It makes sense to me that your sanction would offset the overpayment.

 

I don't understand. We are paying the overpayment at £44 a month from 16th June.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you get sanctioned, they technically recovered the money for that month.

 

I don't understand still. So we won't have all of the money taken off us?

 

Please can someone clear it up?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I mean when you recieve an x amount each month. When they sanction you, you wont recieve a penny of it therfore they got back x amount. Im not sure it it works like that but its stupid if it doesn't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now I'm reading that it's 14 weeks sanction for a first offence....

 

I'm so confused

 

There was no deceit in this at all

Only for organised and high value overpayments

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/loss-of-benefit-as-a-penalty-for-benefit-fraud/loss-of-benefit-as-a-penalty-for-benefit-fraud

 

 

 

See bottom of point one

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only for organised and high value overpayments

 

This wasn't organised at all. It was neglect at best. I would never knowingly deceive the DWP. Just my mental health deteriorated so I didn't chase up the payslips as I had bigger fish to fry.

I don't know if £1500 is a high value overpayment or not....

Link to post
Share on other sites

This wasn't organised at all. It was neglect at best. I would never knowingly deceive the DWP. Just my mental health deteriorated so I didn't chase up the payslips as I had bigger fish to fry.

I don't know if £1500 is a high value overpayment or not....

 

£1500 is not high value.... nor anything like. It's only 13 weeks in conviction

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I see... Well that's a relief. Thank you.

 

It says reduced also. Is there a chance it could be reduced not stopped for 4 weeks?

Link to post
Share on other sites

organised such as organised crime, you were part of a gang that did this on purpose and encourage others to do so and that is with a conviction. You will get 4 weeks at most.

 

I'm the least likely person to be in a gang ever. I've never even been in a court. Or a police station. Or anything like that. That way of life just isn't for me.

 

I want this over with.

 

£1500 is not high value.... nor anything like. It's only 13 weeks in conviction

 

Is this not a conviction?

 

I feel so sick that I'm not even sure

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's what it meant by organised.

 

ad pen isn't a conviction, a conviction is only when you have been prosecuted and plead guilty or been found guilty. if you accept ad pen, you will not be on police database, on court records. Only people who will know about it is DWP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...