Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shocking costs created by Tory led Government in 2012. Taxpayers brace for £100bn money-printing bill – as George Osborne says it’s ‘not my responsibility’ MSN WWW.MSN.COM  
    • Sorry, I may have forgot to get back on this. Please monitor for a reply tomorrow
    • Yes, now its just about getting the WS / Court bundle finalised to send to the court / Evri. I've attached the most recent version of the WS / Court bundle to save having to scroll back up to the previous post (#204) where it was also shared. If you, @BankFodder or anyone else has any feedback on this, i'd be grateful for your thoughts. In my previous post #204, i'd also attached an invoice from Packlink which shows that I was charged by Packlink for these services: "drop-off at Her mes - Next day delivery" and "Proof of Delivery". It also has the payer's address and there are "Origin" and "Destination" fields which have the postcode of the sender [origin] and the recipient [destination] - I have redacted personal details in the attached invoice.  I am already including this in my evidence bundle (without the redaction) but wanted to share this redacted version so that other people can consider this as example in their bundle of Packlink and Evri's contract being instigated by the sender of the parcel who has paid for the service, and further shows that there is information in the invoice to identify that a third party beneficiary (the sender / recipient) is involved in this transaction. I have also attached this redacted invoice in this post to save having to scroll back up. Happy to get any thoughts and if this invoice is no good, then please let me know.   Draft - Witness Statement and Court Bundle redacted.pdf Packlink invoice - REDACTED.pdf
    • Does anyone know if I would be allowed to record conversations with health professionals for my own use on my phone without them knowing. I know that we are allowed to record phone calls. I do record some of my phone calls for my own use due to my disability and if anything is said then I am covered. I would only record audio in private area's of myself and the professional dealing with me. I know I could not get and other persons audio in it and I don't intend to. my only other option is to buy a body cam but I am not sure the rules regarding this.I never thought i would have to but things are getting worse Thanks for any guidance 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help I have been caught shoplifting at Primark


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2626 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, I did something bad today and Im very sorry and freaked out about it.

 

I shoplifted from Primark for 24 pounds. They caught me and I filled a paper with name address NIN and job. They said I need to pay a fee or something and I will get a letter. I asked if I am in big trouble like I will get kicked out of uni (i dont want them to find out) or fired from my job because some dude has access to this kind of data and has all mcdonalds (where I work) and when he sees my name he will fire me.

 

The police was not involved but im still afraid because they said that If the police ask them for a list of shoplifters they will give it to them and well i will be in trouble. It was my first attempt and I SWEAR i will never ever try to do something like this again. Can I get out of it without anyone important like my uni or guys at work to find out? I will pay the fee no problem but I just want to dig this incident and get over it so i can be happy again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG.

As you have now posted in the open, I won't respond to your private message but keep all responses here.

 

As no police were involved, your uni place is fine. Maccy D's won't find out either because of the Data Protection Act. Primark nor RLP can divulge this information without your express permission. As for the police asking for a lit of shoplifters. That is something I have never heard of before. I suspect it was a ploy to scare you into paying this so called 'fee'

 

As no police were involved at the time, it is very unlikely that they will get involved in the future. Of more concern is the reasons why you did it. I am not a doctor and I don't know you personally but I have seen a few cases here where depression was a motivating aspect to the crime. Can you identify whether this may be true or not.

 

Do you live at home or in student digs? Are you over 18?

 

Now, this 'fee' you will be sent from RLP (Retail Loss Prevention) is nothing of the sort. It is an invoice which you can decide not to pay. we can explain more on that if we need to.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your fast reply. I rent a house with 2 friends. And yes I am over 18 (20). I can say that now is the best time of my life, and happiest because i recenly quit smoking drinking and weed. I got all my life together I started to work, to sleep and learn graphic design. I am extremely good right now. Yes, I was depressed, I had a weird period before I decided to change a month ago. I dont know if that is the reason, but i wouldnt be so stressed if I was depressed because when im depressed I really dont care what happens to me. But now, when I finally realised and changed my life, I am being stupid and **** up everything by trying something like that...and about RLP, if I just ignore every single warning they send me, everything will be fine?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So long as RLP write to the address of the shared house then you should be fine.

 

Once you start getting the letters (should be within a couple of weeks) they will state things that are at best, fictitious. Primarni :-) wash their hands of you as soon as you have left the store and let RLP do the chasing. RLP will threaten court action but they cannot do so. Only the retailer can begin action-except they don't. They can't be bothered.

 

Once RLP have given up, they will pass this on to their pet debt collector of the day; they can do even less!. Eventually, they give up but it does take some time. So long as you treat the letters with disdain and not believe all the crap they spout, you will be OK.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

RLP rely on fear and intimidation, there is no legal ground for the sums of money they are demanding, Myself or Silver Fox could write and demand as much as RLP, and the demand would be just as invalid. Move on ignore them and don't do it again. They would probably bill someone who couldn't produce a receipt straight away when challenged as checkout hadn't disabled a security tag.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Primark dont have a list of shoplifters so you wont be on it and it wont get handed over to the police. I'm glad that the experience has scared you into seeing sense and now you should consider this the opportunity to focus on what is impoertant for your future. As said, you will probably get begging letters from RLP but they have no place in the legal system and you can ignore them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys thank you so much for the replies. It was a real help for me. Yesterday I couldt think straight and made up so many possible scenarios of how my life is ****ed up because of this, I overreacted Im sure. I feel much more better now and I learned an amazing lesson. I will not touch anything that is not mine ever again and I'll tell all my friends to learn from my stupid mistake. Thank you again for your support and I wish you all the best!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is what we are here for. We try not to judge you but to offer support and to raise awareness of how wrong the civil recovery process is.

 

This might seem a little pedantic to you but I don't like the word 'mistake' I prefer to use the word 'choice'. We all have choices in life. Some good, some poor. Mistakes imply (to me) that it was accidental.

Not criticising you of course.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

mistake as in mistake or error in judgement. Still reflects choice or decision making.

The word accident is no longer used by the police when dealing with road traffic collisions as ultimately the overwhelmimg causes of RTC's are human error and taking away the comfort blanket of the word accident will eventually make peopel aware that very few such collisions are true accidents

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I agree, it really was a poor choice. I knew what I was doing and I should've stoped. I do regret now, and I will not do it again because I feel very bad about that. I will keep you updated with my situation, when the letter comes and all that. Maybe others will find themselves in the same situation as me and I want to help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Having responded to a PM, I feel this should be placed here:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?356933-Oxford-Retail-Loss-Prevention-A-Retailer-**-reveiwed-September-2015-**&p=3898857&viewfull=1#post3898857

 

Since this case (apart from one already set for court) no other cases have been taken by any other retailer.

 

Also, I made a post to explain what they mean with their claims.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?448994-RLP-FAQ-s.-What-do-they-mean-Reviewed-September-2015&p=4762870&viewfull=1#post4762870

 

I will try and find the full judgement that is stored on my PC.

 

I see RLP have updated their website. Looks professional. Means nothing of course.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a copy of the full judgement.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

RLP have updated their site but the pay up pages are the same.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...