Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • when mediation call they will ask the same 3 questions that are in their email you had to accept it going forward. simply state 'i do not have enough information from the claimant to make an informed decision upon mediation so i refuse. end of problem.  
    • Food prices, including a $40 chicken, has stoked fury and calls for big foreign supermarket chains to come to Canada.View the full article
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Civil National Business CEntre Name of the Claimant ? Lowell Portfolio i Ltd How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self   Date of issue –  15 Feb 2024 Particulars of Claim What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?  The claim is for the sum of £922 due by the Defendant under and agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a Capital One account with an account reference of [number with 16 digits] The Defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a Default Notice was served under s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit ACt 1974 which has not been complied with. The debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 16-06-23, notice of which has been given to the defendant. The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of the issue of these proceedings in the sum of £49.15 The Claimant claims the sum of £972 What is the total value of the claim? £1112 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? I dont know the details of the PAPDC to know if it was pursuant to paragraph 3, but I did receive a Letter of Claim with a questionaire/form to fill. Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? no Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned/purchaser Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? I was aware, I'm not certain I received a 'Notice of Assignment' from Capital One but may have been informed the account had been sold without such a title on the letter? Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Yes Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Not since the debt purchase, and not from Capital One. Why did you cease payments? I can't remember - it was the tail end of the pandemic and I may not have had enough income to keep up payments - I am self-employed and work in the event industry - at that time. I also had a bank account that didn't allow direct debits and may have just forgotten payments and became annoyed at fines for late payments. What was the date of your last payment? Appears to be 20/4/2022 Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No Here is my Defence: Defence - 1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have in the past had an agreement with Capital One but do not recognise this specific account number or recollect any outstanding debt and have therefore requested clarification by way of a CPR 31.14 and section 78 request.. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. I am unaware of having been served with a Default Notice pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment pursuant to the Law and Property Act 1925 Section 136(1) 5. The Defendant has sent a request by way of a section 78 pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974, for a copy of the agreement, the Claimant has yet to comply and remains in default of said request. 6. A further request has been made via CPR 31.14 to the Claimants solicitor, requesting disclosure of documents on which the Claimant is basing their claim. The Claimant has not complied and to date nothing has been received. 7. It is therefore not accepted with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof to: a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement and; b) show how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed for and; c) show the nature of the breach and evidence by way of a Default Notice pursuant to sec 88 CCA1974 d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim 8. As per Civil Procedure 16.5 it is expected that the claimants prove the allegation that the money is owed 9. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of section 136 of the Law of Property Act and section 82A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 10. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief. .................. Please note that I had to write a defence quite quickly as I hit the deadline. At the time of writing the defence, I hadn't been able to find correspondence from Capital One, but had since found default letter etc. I submitted CCA request and CPR 31.14. However, I didn't get any proof of postage or use registered post for the CPR (an oversight) but did with the CCA request. I received a pack which included a letter from Overdales, going over the defence I'd filed, as well as letters of Lowells and reprints of letters from Capital One. But I have no idea if this pack is in response to the CCA request or the CPR ! I would have expected two separate responses ... although I do know they are both the same company. Looking over the pack today, and looking through old emails .. I find some discrepancies in the Capital One default letters (notice of default and Claim of default). They are both dated *before* an email I have stating that a default can be avoided. The one single page of agreement sent (so not the full agreement) has a 16 digit number at the top in small print, next to 'Capital One' which corresponds to a number called 'PURN' printed at the top of each of the 10 pages of ins and outs of the account (they're not official statements, but a list of monthly goings) yet no mention anywhere on either of the account number. I cant really scan them at the moment - I can later tomorrow, but that will be after the mediation call I'm sure. I guess I may be on my own for this mediation ... I am not certain the CCA request has been satisfied .. or if the CPR has been . And then I appear to have evidence that the Default notices provided are fabricated ? Yet, I do have (elsewhere ... not at home) Default letters from Capital One I can check ..
    • Atsushi Katsuki tells the BBC the firm sees the sober generation as both a risk and an opportunity.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Settlement offer - how to accept so that it is binding


mikehunt69
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2688 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I instituted a legal claim for £14k, plus court fee (~£1k), plus interest (~£7k) (Litigant in person) (Total claim is thus almost £22k)

 

The claim was almost statute barred when filed, and if filed today would be statute barred.

 

The claim is currently subject to a 1 month stay until February and the defendant has written to me offering to settle for £16k. I am inclined to accept.

 

They have sent me a letter (via email) which reads

 

"Without prejudice except as to costs

 

...

Without any admission of liability or wrongdoing we confirm that we would be prepared to offer you the sum of £16,000 in full and final settlement of all claims which you have or may have against us in relation to the Claim.

 

Please confirm your agreement to the terms of this settlement by:

 

1. signing a copy of this letter and returning it to us at the postal address above

 

2. writing to County Court Business Centre (“CCBC”) to inform them that you want to discontinue the Claim.

 

Once we have received a signed copy of this letter from you and we obtain confirmation from CCBC that the Claim has been dropped, we shall arrange for the payment set out above to be made into your bank account (details of which you will need to provide to us).

"

 

And then at the bottom there is a space for me to sign. (And none for them)

 

So very simple.

 

I just wonder if this is valid and binding on them, or do I need to turn it into a Part 36 Offer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you think £22k might not be possible?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you think £22k might not be possible?

 

Do you mean as a settlement now? Or in court later?

 

I don't know what normal practice is by defendants in settling cases.

 

 

The defendant from what I can see, does not want to go court.

 

 

But I don't know if it is heard of for a defendant to accept a claimant's offer when the offer is for 100% for the claim value including interest.

(Certainly I have in the past settled a claim for a higher % of the value; the distinguishing feature of this claim is six years worth of interest at 8%, which is quite a chunk of change in this era of zero base rates)

 

With respect to Part 36,

I don't really have any costs apart from the filing fee,

but I don't know if I make the Part 36 offer and they accept it, whether it complicates things

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should I perhaps send them a copy of form N242A, making a Part 36 Claimant's Offer for £17k or £18k (so a little more)?

 

Their offer does not mention Part 36, nor does it specify a time limit.

 

So, it doesn't fulfil the requirements to be a Part 36 offer, (if it doesn't meet every requirement, it can't be) but can still be a valid Part 44 ('Calderbank') offer.

 

The way it can be made to be binding is by a Consent Order ('Tomlin Order'), where the agreement is lodged with the court.

Usually these don't discontinue the claim but do 'stay' it indefinitely unless the order is breached. The Tomlin order also creates a new contract.

 

If the order is breached, the side suffering loss can either

A) ask for the stay to be lifted on the original case, or

B) commence new proceedings for breach of the contract created by the consent order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make it as a Part 36 offer as once it's accepted the claim is automatically stayed.

 

You also have the advantage that if they don't pay the accepted Part 36 offer is essentially a judgment that you can enforce.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, it doesn't fulfil the requirements to be a Part 36 offer, (if it doesn't meet every requirement, it can't be) but can still be a valid Part 44 ('Calderbank') offer.

 

The way it can be made to be binding is by a Consent Order ('Tomlin Order'), where the agreement is lodged with the court.

Usually these don't discontinue the claim but do 'stay' it indefinitely unless the order is breached. The Tomlin order also creates a new contract.

 

If the order is breached, the side suffering loss can either

A) ask for the stay to be lifted on the original case, or

B) commence new proceedings for breach of the contract created by the consent order.

 

That will cost another £100 upfront though, whereas Part 36 is free!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That will cost another £100 upfront though, whereas Part 36 is free!

 

Absolutely, though (GM will be aware of these, but the OP needs to bear in mind):

A) the other side may not accept the OP's part 36 offer, and

B) the OP will need to ensure their part 36 offer meets EVERY technical requirement contained within part 36, or it will become a Calderbank offer,not a part 36 offer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am confused about the Part 36 offer.

 

Claim is:

 

£14k + £1k court fee + £7k statutory interest = £22k

 

Their offer is I guess a Calderbank offer for £16,000 in full and final settlement.

 

If I send them N242A Part 36 offer, what do I say?

This:

"The claimant is willing to accept £18,500 in full and final settlement of the case."

?

 

I read here:

 

http://www.pumpcourtchambers.com/sites/default/files/DataLaw.Part36Notes.2012.pdf

 

22. Where a Part 36 offer is accepted within the relevant period, the following costs

consequences will flow (please see the scenarios below).

(a) Offer by a claimant which is accepted by the defendant within 21 days and

where the offer has been made preLaction and no proceedings have been

issued:

(i) The defendant will pay the amount offered within 14 days; and

(ii) The defendant will pay the claimant’s costs on a standard basis

(to be assessed if not agreed).

(b) Offer by a claimant which is accepted by the defendant within 21 days and

where the offer is accepted after proceedings have been issued:

(i) The defendant will pay the amount offered within 14 days;

(ii) The proceedings will come to an end; and

(iii) The defendant will pay the claimant’s costs on a standard basis (to

be assessed if not agreed).

© Offer by a defendant which the claimant accepts within 21 days of the

offer by filing written acceptance at court and serving a copy on the

defendant’s solicitors:

(i) Proceedings are stayed;

(ii) The defendant will pay the amount to the claimant within 14 days;

(iii) The defendant will pay the claimant’s costs up until acceptance on

a standard basis (to be assessed if not agreed).

 

 

So we are in case (b) or ©.

 

But I don't want to imply I have any costs?

 

Would this be valid as a Part 36 Offer?

 

"The claimant is willing to accept £18,500 in full and final settlement of the case.

 

If this offer is accepted within 21 days, claimant's costs will be paid in full by claimant"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your £1000 Court fee is a disbursement, not damages, so technically you have incurred some costs.

 

You need to check the requirements for a Part 36 offer. You should find loads of information on Google.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see

 

"If a party makes an offer to settle inclusive of costs, such offer will

not be in accordance with Part 36, and it will be in the court’s

discretion (not pursuant to Part 36) as to whether any costs or

other advantages will be given to the party making the offer if the

offer is unreasonably rejected. "

 

So I make an offer for £18,000 on form N242A, and accompany it with an email saying "To date claimant's costs are limited the £1000 court fee. The claimant will not incur any further costs during the period of stay" would that be ok?

 

Hence they pay me £18,000 + my £1000 court fee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not pressing but something to consider whilst you're waiting for the Pt 36 offer to expire - have a read of Civil Procedure Rule 46.5 regarding the costs that litigants in person may be awarded... As stated above the Court Fee is just a disbursement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I sent an offer for '£18,000 plus costs', plus a covering email saying

 

"I attach a claimant’s offer made pursuant to Part 36.

 

With regards to an agreement as to costs, I will accept £1000 in settlement of claimant’s costs to date if the Part 36 offer is accepted within the next 21 days. This costs figure is provided in the interests of swift resolution of the case and should not be regarded as a statement of costs to date, nor of final costs in the event of trial, which will undoubtedly be considerably higher.

"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep just email the Court.

 

As for receiving payment remember Part 36.14(6)(a):

 

(6) Unless the parties agree otherwise in writing, where a Part 36 offer that is or includes an offer to pay or accept a single sum of money is accepted, that sum must be paid to the claimant within 14 days of the date of—

(a) acceptance;

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...