Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sunak tried to stop the public seeing this report. Rishi Sunak ordered to publish secret analysis showing Universal Credit cut impact - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK As Chancellor, Rishi Sunak ignored pleas from campaigners including footballer Marcus Rashford by scrapping the £20-per-week Universal Credit...  
    • A full-scale strike at the firm could have an impact on the global supply chains of electronics.View the full article
    • He was one of four former top executives from Sam Bankman-Fried's firms to plead guilty to charges.View the full article
    • The private submersible industry was shaken after the implosion of the OceanGate Titan sub last year.View the full article
    • further polished WS using above suggestions and also included couple of more modifications highlighted in orange are those ok to include?   Background   1.1  The Defendant received the Parking Charge Notice (PCN) on the 06th of January 2020 following the vehicle being parked at Arla Old Dairy, South Ruislip on the 05th of December 2019.   Unfair PCN   2.1  On 19th December 2023 the Defendant sent the Claimant's solicitors a CPR request.  As shown in Exhibit 1 (pages 7-13) sent by the solicitors the signage displayed in their evidence clearly shows a £60.00 parking charge notice (which will be reduced to £30 if paid within 14 days of issue).  2.2  Yet the PCN sent by the Claimant is for a £100.00 parking charge notice (reduced to £60 if paid within 30 days of issue).   2.3        The Claimant relies on signage to create a contract.  It is unlawful for the Claimant to write that the charge is £60 on their signs and then send demands for £100.    2.4        The unlawful £100 charge is also the basis for the Claimant's Particulars of Claim.  No Locus Standi  3.1  I do not believe a contract with the landowner, that is provided following the defendant’s CPR request, gives MET Parking Services a right to bring claims in their own name. Definition of “Relevant contract” from the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, Schedule 4,  2 [1] means a contract Including a contract arising only when the vehicle was parked on the relevant land between the driver and a person who is-   (a) the owner or occupier of the land; or   (b) Authorised, under or by virtue of arrangements made by the owner or occupier of the land, to enter into a contract with the driver requiring the payment of parking charges in respect of the parking of the vehicle on the land. According to https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/section/44   For a contract to be valid, it requires a director from each company to sign and then two independent witnesses must confirm those signatures.   3.2  The Defendant requested to see such a contract in the CPR request.  The fact that no contract has been produced with the witness signatures present means the contract has not been validly executed. Therefore, there can be no contract established between MET Parking Services and the motorist. Even if “Parking in Electric Bay” could form a contract (which it cannot), it is immaterial. There is no valid contract.  Illegal Conduct – No Contract Formed   4.1 At the time of writing, the Claimant has failed to provide the following, in response to the CPR request from myself.   4.2        The legal contract between the Claimant and the landowner (which in this case is Standard Life Investments UK) to provide evidence that there is an agreement in place with landowner with the necessary authority to issue parking charge notices and to pursue payment by means of litigation.   4.3 Proof of planning permission granted for signage etc under the Town and country Planning Act 1990. Lack of planning permission is a criminal offence under this Act and no contract can be formed where criminality is involved.   4.4        I also do not believe the claimant possesses these documents.   No Keeper Liability   5.1        The defendant was not the driver at the time and date mentioned in the PCN and the claimant has not established keeper liability under schedule 4 of the PoFA 2012. In this matter, the defendant puts it to the claimant to produce strict proof as to who was driving at the time.   5.2 The claimant in their Notice To Keeper also failed to comply with PoFA 2012 Schedule 4 section 9[2][f] while mentioning “the right to recover from the keeper so much of that parking charge as remains unpaid” where they did not include statement “(if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met)”.     5.3         The claimant did not mention parking period, times on the photographs are separate from the PCN and in any case are that arrival and departure times not the parking period since their times include driving to and from the parking space as a minimum and can include extra time to allow pedestrians and other vehicles to pass in front.    Protection of Freedoms Act 2012   The notice must -   (a) specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates;  22. In the persuasive judgement K4GF167G - Premier Park Ltd v Mr Mathur - Horsham County Court – 5 January 2024 it was on this very point that the judge dismissed this claim.  5.4  A the PCN does not comply with the Act the Defendant as keeper is not liable.  No Breach of Contract   6.1       No breach of contract occurred because the PCN and contract provided as part of the defendant’s CPR request shows different post code, PCN shows HA4 0EY while contract shows HA4 0FY. According to PCN defendant parked on HA4 0EY which does not appear to be subject to the postcode covered by the contract.  6.2         The entrance sign does not mention anything about there being other terms inside the car park so does not offer a contract which makes it only an offer to treat,  Interest  7.1  It is unreasonable for the Claimant to delay litigation for  Double Recovery   7.2  The claim is littered with made-up charges.  7.3  As noted above, the Claimant's signs state a £60 charge yet their PCN is for £100.  7.4  As well as the £100 parking charge, the Claimant seeks recovery of an additional £70.  This is simply a poor attempt to circumvent the legal costs cap at small claims.  7.5 Since 2019, many County Courts have considered claims in excess of £100 to be an abuse of process leading to them being struck out ab initio. An example, in the Caernarfon Court in VCS v Davies, case No. FTQZ4W28 on 4th September 2019, District Judge Jones-Evans stated “Upon it being recorded that District Judge Jones- Evans has over a very significant period of time warned advocates (...) in many cases of this nature before this court that their claim for £60 is unenforceable in law and is an abuse of process and is nothing more than a poor attempt to go behind the decision of the Supreme Court v Beavis which inter alia decided that a figure of £160 as a global sum claimed in this case would be a penalty and not a genuine pre-estimate of loss and therefore unenforceable in law and if the practice continued, he would treat all cases as a claim for £160 and therefore a penalty and unenforceable in law it is hereby declared (…) the claim is struck out and declared to be wholly without merit and an abuse of process.”  7.6 In Claim Nos. F0DP806M and F0DP201T, District Judge Taylor echoed earlier General Judgment or Orders of District Judge Grand, stating ''It is ordered that the claim is struck out as an abuse of process. The claim contains a substantial charge additional to the parking charge which it is alleged the Defendant contracted to pay. This additional charge is not recoverabl15e under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, Schedule 4 nor with reference to the judgment in Parking Eye v Beavis. It is an abuse of process from the Claimant to issue a knowingly inflated claim for an additional sum which it is not entitled to recover. This order has been made by the court of its own initiative without a hearing pursuant to CPR Rule 3.3(4)) of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998...''  7.7 In the persuasive case of G4QZ465V - Excel Parking Services Ltd v Wilkinson – Bradford County Court -2 July 2020 (Exhibit 4) the judge had decided that Excel had won. However, due to Excel adding on the £60 the Judge dismissed the case.  7.8        The addition of costs not previously specified on signage are also in breach of the Consumer Rights Act 2015, Schedule 2, specifically paras 6, 10 and 14.   7.9        It is the Defendant’s position that the Claimant in this case has knowingly submitted inflated costs and thus the entire claim should be similarly struck out in accordance with Civil Procedure Rule 3.3(4).   In Conclusion   8.1        I invite the court to dismiss the claim.  Statement of Truth  I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Live abroad. MBNA contacting parents UK home for payment


billybob12
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2500 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The facts are as follows:

 

1) I owe MBNA some £10k that has not been paid since November 2016 (so recent) and I imagine is about to default.

Its a combination of balance transfers from cards that were used to fund my foreign studies.

 

2) Until now my parents have been transferring money to my bank account which I then forward to them as minimum payment.

This is not sustainable for any of us and I am just barely paying the 28% interest.

 

3) I have lived abroad for a long time, but kept my UK accounts as they were useful but the situation has become critical.

I did not inform any institution that I was abroad, and in any case, students are a special category in terms of continuing NHS care when studying abroad. I am currently in Eastern Europe but about to move to Hong Kong for work.

 

4) I have no assets of any kind, not even a TV in my parents bedroom, some old toys, about it.

 

5) I don't intend to return to the UK for a long time but I may live in the EU with my Italian girlfriend.

 

I want to know what steps MBNA will take to recover this debt.

The most important for me is that my parents are not harassed for my own decisions because I do not live at home or in the UK.

 

I intend to deregister myself from the electoral roll/council tax list,

I just have not had a chance to do so

but I'll head home before departing to HK to take care of such procedural matters.

I would be happy to close any other accounts and in any case they are not in use and will not be in use.

 

I intend to inform them of my HK forwarding address,

I believe that would be my legal obligation in any case,

I presume this might also limit the visits that could potentially disturb my parents.

 

Regardless of the moral implications of giving up on paying this debt and starting a new life,

I am only interested in the legal ones,

and especially to mitigate any stress that my parents could be subject to in terms of home visits from a bailiff if/were a CCJ issued.

I am not even sure if they can get one and how it could be enforced in another country.

 

 

According to my research, it would be statute barred from the last payment or the date of a CCJ.

During those six (or more) years I want to ensure my parents are not subject to home visits, phone calls etc.

 

 

Presently they are being called twice a day, but they won't speak to my parents, asking for me.

To be clear, I won't be hiding in the backroom, or down the road or in another UK town.

 

What steps should I take to ringfence any potential earnings in HK?

There is a PhD on the cards which would probably take place in Italy,

and again the question would be the feasibility of pursuing this debt etc (ignoring the post-Brexit scenario).

Link to post
Share on other sites

you simply inform them you are moving to HK.

 

as for visits CCJ's Debt collectors

bailiffs etc etc.

 

that's should all stop or never happen once the creditor knows you no longer reside in the UK.

 

bailiffs even IF MBNA [ and they WONT] get a CCJ would only ever be court bailiffs

they are the good guys and are not commission based, so are not the remote bit interested in racking up fees and theres no forced entry either.

they [MBNA] will most probably sell the debt to a no powers DCA.

 

you don't need to ring fence anything either.

 

although its not what we preach [debt avoidance]

the bottom line is there is very very little they can ACTUALLY do to you abroad...

esp in HK!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you seem to be pretty much on top of the issues.

 

You need to disassociate yourself with any UK address including your parents and advise any UK creditors of your Hong Kong address.

 

Because HK is now part of China,

UK creditors have zero chance of any debt enforcement there and will give up.

 

I suspect that MBNA will not do anything apart from noting the default on your UK credit file and in a few years sell your debt onto UK debt buyers.

 

UK debt buyers may or may not be given your HK address and if not try to trace you.

 

Without any live UK records, they will draw a blank.

If your parents receive any letters, they should just forward to you in HK and you write giving your HK address.

 

If you come back to the UK to live within 6 years you stand chance of UK enforcement through the courts.

The whole point of advising creditors you are in HK is that this should avoid UK court actions.

If you move to Italy and there is still EU cross border debt enforcement,

it would be technically possible for an Italian court to become involved, but very unlikely.

 

You will be surprised that many credit card companies such as MBNA don't issue court claims and instead choose to sell debts on to debt buyers/collectors.

 

It can be years before the new debt owners look to take action and you must ensure your HK address is known to them.

If necessary you can add notes to your UK credit file that you live in HK by contacting Experian.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your replies. It is very much appreciated.

 

Something that is on my mind is the issue of bankruptcy.

I admit, I have no idea how this works but it would have huge consequences if they can get a CCJ and then issue this against me, because it would have global ramifications and bars me from future work in the UK in many fields.

Can someone explain this and how it could be forced upon me?

 

I've read on the other forum about legal issues pertaining to debt enforcement.

I am wondering why dx100uk you think MBNA would not seek a CCJ because from my research it seems there is an excellent chance it would be successful, even on a HK residency because it would be a win by default as clearly I wouldn’t turn up or return the forms.

 

Does the court procedure rules allow them l for them to use a “last known” address to serve such documents even though they are fully aware I do not live there?

 

A legally minded friend told me I should just say nothing so its clear I have “gone away” and remove myself from the electoral roll/council tax list because it doesn’t matter where I am, the debt is unenforceable and they would search irregardless in the UK in case I come back during the 6 years.

I think that would have some further ramifications that I would like to avoid.

 

Do I actually have any legal obligations to tell them beyond that I have left the UK, to keep it up to date when I move home over the next 6 years, what kind of timescale?

 

Would this lead to bankruptcy?

And by ceasing to use all my accounts, and removing myself from the ER it is clear I am not at my parents home, I presume also its very easy for them to indicate they are a third party and it is unenforceable on their home and all correspondence must desist.

 

If I failed to provide a forwarding address, would they use that of a third party (my parents) where I am no longer resident and not registered at that address.

 

Surely a foreign address cannot be entered as such, because I understood UK credit files require a UK residency?

So it will not say Billy Bob, Hong Kong if/when I came back to the UK?

 

One unrelated matter is I have a phone contract in my name.

This has another 8 months left to run.

My parents offer to pay this but that would keep my file alive.

 

Surely under this system of “freedom to contract" in E&W, the carrier would be happy to transfer it to my mothers name for the remaining months on a new credit agreement keeping the term the same?

This way, my credit file would be inactive and at £30 a month, it seems little to default over.

 

I have a card issued in my name on my mothers credit card account for emergencies (an additional card).

Do I need to give this up?

It would be useful to have.

I can’t see how the data sharing could even be legal and there's surely no way the Court nor a bank could slap my debt on her card one day, and as I understand, there is no credit file or reference attached to this.

 

I'm only in my early 20s so who knows what the future holds.

It terms of statute barring, if I wish to obtain credit or open a bank account after this time has passed how is this viewed?

 

I read it like someone who has no credit history at all, so if you like, “score” 0.

I know that a CCJ would be entered into the Register of Judgments, Orders and Fines how long would it stay there and would this restrict me from future employment after the 6 years?

 

Who knows if I would like to work in public service down the line, even as a Special Constable.

Perhaps I would be barred from ever working in the financial sector.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Due to recent FCA rule changes for a consumer credit debt, they would need a CCJ to be unpaid first, before they could go for bankruptcy. Given the cost of bankruptcy to creditors which i believe is about £3,000, i think this is a very unlikely option. MBNA are likely to sell your debt on for a fraction of its value and it just would not make sense to incur fees on bankruptcy. They would most likely then be in a loss making position.

 

Technically yes creditors can issue court claims to your last known UK address, but this when they don't know of any different address for service. If you advise them you live in HK, then they would have to serve the court claim on you in HK. But given that they could not enforce any CCJ in HK, what would be the point. They would lose money.

 

Your phone contract if on your UK credit record should be finished to stop a continuing record in the UK. It cannot be transferred to anyone else, as far as i know. Speak to the contract provider.

 

The second card on your mothers credit card account, presumably means you have an association on your credit record, which might mean your mother receives debt letters in your name to her address. Check your credit record to see whether you are associated to your mother due to this card.

 

After 6 years of no payment, no acknowledgement and no CCJ, then the debt will no longer be enforceable. Therefore if you return to the UK after 6 years, the debt should not cause you any harm.

 

It is your choice. If you are really worried about it, then see if you can settle the debt, by making a reduced full and final settlement offer. If accepted, you can then live anywhere in peace without having any wories about this debt.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you again.

 

Just to clarify one point you made:

 

After 6 years of no payment, no acknowledgement and no CCJ, then the debt will no longer be enforceable.

 

If there was a CCJ issued would that still be 6 years from that date? Technically could it be almost 12 years? Say 5 years 6 months no payment, get CCJ and then another 6 from there? Its probably unheard of and perhaps then bankrupt me another 12 months then 5 years leading to a further 6 in total on the credit file. Can only the original creditor obtain the CCJ or can a DCA also get one?

 

I presume if multiple amounts were owed to various lenders it would be more worthwhile to pursue bankruptcy because they could join the petition. I have no idea how common this is, whether say MBNA join forced with say Virgin.

Link to post
Share on other sites

billybob slow down...

 

i'm not sure what site you at reading but most of what you are worrying about is mostly totally wrong

or you are not understanding it.

 

your main 'worry' seems to be BK

 

they cant do that.

once you advise your creditor you're moving or HAVE to HK

 

they cant do anything to you.

 

mbna do not take people to court.

 

mbna will sell it on and it WILL have your HK address attached to it.

 

no dca will touch it with a barge pole

 

one other thing

 

you eluded to thinking a CCJ is made against a residence its NOT

its against a person

cant hurt anyone at the address its was wrongly attained at.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes either original creditor or a debt buyer could obtain CCJ and could apply for your bankruptcy. They could get a CCJ after say 5 years by sending a court claim to your last known UK address and then have 6 years to gain enforcement of the CCJ. So you could return to the UK in 11 years and have a creditor contact you looking for payment of the CCJ.

 

BUT if you advise creditors you are living in Hong Kong this is very very unlikely. As a double safety measure, you could subscribe to say Experian and log on to your UK credit record from abroad. Check with Experian whether you could access your record from abroad with log on. You can then add notes to your credit file that you live in Hong Kong. Creditors will look at your credit record and see the note, so no excuse in sending court claims to a UK address and gaining a sneeky default CCJ.

 

Given how costly it is for creditors to for bankruptcy and that you don't own any assets, this is very very unlikely, as they are likely to lose money.

 

As you are coming across as a person who is going to be living in nervous fear of this debt from thousands of miles away, i would suggest you talk to your parents about it. Perhaps in the interests of your health, you should seek to settle the debts by negotiation.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

an update after all this time, it finally defaulted.

 

I am just unsure whether I have an obligation to inform them of my new address or informing them that I am no longer resident is enough because it is obviously important to get those gone-away notices so my parents are not pursued and they try to use a backdoor to obtain a CCJ or head down the bankruptcy line.

 

I can imagine that many people will say they are not-resident anymore.

 

is it a matter of fact that if I inform a CRA and DCA that I am "gone away" that they have an obligation to accept it and at the very least put this on my credit files and for the DCA accept that notice was given at the time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if MBNA have defaulted it

i'd suggest they are about to sell it on.

so they have your HK address and have been legally informed of it

so no DCA can do anything with it.

they are aware you reside in HK

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

an update after all this time, it finally defaulted.

 

I am just unsure whether I have an obligation to inform them of my new address or informing them that I am no longer resident is enough because it is obviously important to get those gone-away notices so my parents are not pursued and they try to use a backdoor to obtain a CCJ or head down the bankruptcy line.

 

I can imagine that many people will say they are not-resident anymore.

 

is it a matter of fact that if I inform a CRA and DCA that I am "gone away" that they have an obligation to accept it and at the very least put this on my credit files and for the DCA accept that notice was given at the time.

 

What happens in reality is that Banks might say that they cannot send statements or letters abroad and must have a UK contact address. They do this for the simple reason that someone with UK financial records should have a UK address for all communications to make it easier for the Bank. The advice is that If you are going to live abroad and are likely to be in debt, that you do not provide another UK address, as that will cause you problems. You must confirm your foreign address.

 

If you want Banks and any current owners of your debts to believe you live abroad, then you can send them a copy of anything official stating your foreign address. Most people will have something showing their foreign address, as they have to register themselves with local authorities. You will have something showing your residency in Hong Kong.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...