Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Write to the IPC complaining that UKPC have not observed the requirements of PoFA . IPC  Waterside House, Macclesfield SK10 9NR Dear IPC, I am writing to complain about a serious breach of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 by UKPCM. I feel that as it is more a breach of the Act rather than not just  complying with your Code of Practice which is why I am bypassing your operator. Should you decide to insist that I first complain to your operator, I will instead pass over my complaint to the ICO and the DVLA . My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA. You will be aware that this is not the first time that UKPC have fallen foul of the DVLA and presumably yourselves. I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPC to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I would think that should be sufficient for the IPC to cancel your PCN though  you should await comments from the Site team before sending your complaint. Don't forget to include both PCNs.  
    • Hi DX, Sorry, fell asleep as I was up all night last night writing that statement. Yes, I attached the rest of the witness statement on post 50, bottom of webpage 2. That's the important part.  It looks like the lawyer who wrote Erudio's Witness statement does not work for them any more. So, I'll have another lawyer representing instead. Not sure if I can use Andy's hearsay argument verbally if that happens.... I did not put it in writing. Apart from not sending deferral forms, my main argument is that in 2014 Erudio fixed some arrears mistake that SLC made and then in 2018 they did the same mistake, sent me confusing letters. What is the legal defence when they send you confusing material?
    • Chinese firm MineOne Partners has been ordered to sell land it owns near a US nuclear missile site.View the full article
    • That isn’t actually what the Theft Act 1968 S1 actually says, BTW. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/section/1 (1)A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it;   The difference between what you’ve said and the Act? a) intent to permanently deprive rather than  just depriving (which is why the offence of “taking without consent” was brought in for motor vehicles, as otherwise "joyriders" could say "but I intended to give it back at the end") b) dishonesty : If I honestly believed A's pen belonged to B, and took it and gave it to B - B might be found guilty of theft but I shouldn't be. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Yeovil College claimform - unpaid Tuition Fees


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2840 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

We have just received a County Court Money Claims Form for a College Course that my wife withdrew from back in 2014 and I would like some advice if you can help?!

 

My wife enrolled in a course and at first it was going well but then problems started to happen such as the tutor regularly failing to turn up without warning, when she was there she was useless, coursework being lost or reviewed very late etc. This caused my wife so much stress as she was in a new job whilst also helping to look after our children. This was a very stressful situation and she left the course.

 

a few months later we received notice that we had to pay for the course and had a letter from a debt collection agency demanding full payment for the course. I then phoned the college and said that we were not willing to pay a penny for a course that was not provided. They asked me to provide a written complaint which we did.

 

In the email to the college (and copied to the debt collection agency) we detailed our complaints and asked them to investigate and to write off the fees or to inform us of their decision so that we could seek legal advice. We heard nothing back from them or the debt collection agency until now where we are facing a claims court hearing.

 

Unfortunately I think they may have us over a barrel as I don't think my wife fully followed the course withdrawal process. However, once I contacted them I was assured that if I put my complaints in a letter or email then they would investigate. Seeing as another year had passed before we got this claim form we believed that they had dropped the case. I now have to respond to this claim.

 

We would like to fully contest this claim as I don't think we should pay for a service or course that clearly wasn't being provided. I also do not think that they have investigated our complaint as we have had no response from them.

 

Any advice would be very welcome Thanks

Edited by honeybee13
Paras.
Link to post
Share on other sites

There are too many colleges nowadays that charge money for courses and do nothing about quality control and seem to think that because you are students, you have to accept whatever is dished up.

 

If you want to issue a challenge to this, then we will be pleased to help you.

 

Please post up the particulars of claim so we can see exactly what is being said. You should file an acknowledgement of the claim immediately which will give you extra time in which to defend.

 

What is the date of the claim and what is the return date?

 

Which college is this? Have you looked through the Internet to see if anybody else is complaining about similar things? You should try to look up not only the name of the college, but also the name of the tutor and see if there have been any complaints or criticisms directed at him/her.

 

You should now get your wife to write out a detailed statement – so far she is able to remember giving precisely the dates of the course, the dates of attendance, the name of any tutors and as many details as possible of the problems including times and dates whenever possible.

 

I have to say that it is a shame that she just dropped out without making an issue of it in writing at the time. I don't imagine that this is the way that you would deal with any other company with whom you had a contract – and I tend to find that students tend to treat their colleges and their courses in this way in exactly the same slack way that they themselves are treated by their colleges.

 

Although your wife hasn't followed the course withdrawal process, it doesn't mean that that is the end of the matter. I think that when it comes to the directions questionnaire, you can require the college to provide full details of the tutors absences and also the dates of any coursework and the marking dates et cetera. There should be records of this.

 

Does your wife know anybody else who was at the college at the same time and who had to endure the same poor standards?

 

You haven't told us what the value of the claim is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for your reply.

 

We have replied with an Acknowledgement of Service so do have extra time to defend.

 

The claim is for the 4,800 for the course,

625.80 interest plus 455.00 court fees

so a total of 5880.80.

 

VI believe there were other complaints and some other withdrawals from the course.

 

We responded to the College once we got a letter demanding full payment for the course.

 

I phoned the college and they said to put our complaint in writing which we did on 8th June 2015 detailing our complaint and asking them to investigate our complaint and for the fees to be waived.

 

We have had no response from them until this point where we have received the claim.

 

I even put in there that if they upheld the claim to let me know as I would then seek legal advice.

 

We have had no reply so can only assume no investigation took place or they did not agree with our complaint

but either way we didn't get a response.

 

We still have a copy of that email and will be submitting that as part of our defence.

I will also include your point about getting them to supply the tutors attendance and the marking criteria (thanks for that!!).

 

 

Surely we do have a case where they have failed to investigate our complaint and didn't even respond?

 

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the directions questionnaire that you mention? This was not part of the pack that was sent to us or is this something we fill out at a later date? When should I request the college to provide tutor absence records and marking criteria information should this be with our defence?

Link to post
Share on other sites

here is the e-mail that I sent to the college

 

 

- I have removed names and any other sensitive information but hopefully you can get the gist of our complaint.

 

 

I am writing in reference to my withdrawal from my HND Health and Social Care Course and the subsequent letters that I have received from you in regards to the fees apparently owed.

 

 

When I started this Course in 2014 I was led to believe that we would have tutor led lectures on a Tuesday and a Thursday which would aid our learning.

 

 

For a few weeks this started well and I was positive about the course that I had signed up for however, things then started to change.

 

The tutor xxxxxx and xxxxxxx (from the Learning Centre) then began to not turn up for lectures without warning which not only meant we were not getting the support that was promised but the majority of times we had turned up for no reason and had wasted a lot of my own personal time, money and effort.

 

 

xxxxxxx was then signed off on sick leave

 

 

until her replacement was in place I was left completely unsupported and without lecture support.

Even when the tutors that were supposed to be in on the Tuesday and Thursday lectures did bother to turn up,

the support we got was completely inadequate and when we handed work in it was on occasions handed back late

or in my case my work was lost completely and to my knowledge never recovered.

 

The inadequate support provided by xxxxxx and xxxxxxx and the poor handover to her replacement caused me huge amounts of stress at a time I was trying to complete my course to better myself whilst also holding down a full time job at Mencap looking after adults with learning disabilities and juggling childcare for my 2 children.

 

 

The stress that the inadequate support provided on this course was too much for me to continue and began to impact on my work and home life.

 

 

I know from other students that have also left the course and those still on it have also had similar cause for complaints and wish they had never started the course in the first place.

 

I am writing to let you know that the additional stress caused by my being chased for payment for a course where the tutor barely bothered to attend and when she did the support she provided was poor at best is unacceptable and that I am not willing to pay a single penny for a service that was promised and not delivered upon.

 

I hope that you investigate this case and can see that you as a University Centre failed to deliver a service on this course that you promised and will waive the fees that you are requesting with an apology for the stress caused both during my attendance at the lectures that I attended (with or without a tutor being there) and the follow on chasing for fees for a course that you did not adequately provide.

 

I look forward a quick and amicable solution to this issue before I am forced to seek legal consultation if this issue is not resolved. I also ask for you to place this account on hold until you resolve this issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The details of the claim are as follows:

 

 

The claimant's claim is for 4,800.00 due to the Claimant from the defendant in respect of tuition fees invoiced to the defendant. The claimant further claims interest at the rate of 8% per annum under section 69 of the County Court Act 1984 on the said sum of 625.80.

 

 

And the claimant further claims interest under the above act at the rate of 1.05 per day from 29/06/2016 until judgment or earlier payment.

 

 

They then include the invoice that was submitted to us for the original tuition fees of 4,800.00.

 

 

The college's claimant agent is ACT Credit Management Ltd based in Harrow - 7 St Johns Road, HA1 2EE.

 

 

Hope this helps?

 

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, but it would be very much more helpful if you could scan and put up the original particulars of claim as asked.

 

Also, which college is it? What was the course?

 

You say that there are other people who experience problems and that there were some withdrawals. Have you any idea as to who those people might be and where they are now?

 

Have you done anything about searching the Internet as asked.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Urm..this smells of a private college???

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no more info on the claim apart from the Claim Ref number and names of the defendant and claimant

- I typed all word for word.

 

The college is Yeovil College and the Course was HND Health and Social Care.

 

I will do some research on the internet later and ask the wife about any other people that withdrew or complained.

 

Here is the link to the colleges fees policy

: http://www.yeovil.ac.uk/Documents/Fee%20Policy%202015.pdf

 

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm very sorry, but I always err on the side of caution.

 

We prefer to have the original documents scanned up. Although you are getting the advice here for free, I think you have to pretend that you are paying the 2000 or £3000 that the advice is eventually worth and deal with us in the most efficient way. It is especially difficult when dealing on a forum so that we are asking questions and receiving answers at a distance and over time lag.

 

We are working for free and it makes it much easier for us if we can ask a number of questions and find that they are all answered at one go rather than having to chase for it in bits and pieces.

 

I'm sure that you are right that what you have typed is exactly the form, I'd like you to post the form please

Link to post
Share on other sites

thread title updated.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeovil.

 

Well there is quite a lot we can do here, I think if you will get back to us with the information we have asked for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...