Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • From their own terms and conditions on the website... https://www.carfinance247.co.uk/terms-and-conditions 6.1 CarFinance247 Limited offers a: 6.1.1  web chat service ("Web Chat"); and 6.1.2  SMS chat service ("SMS Chat"), which, provided your application for finance has been approved and you have created a MyCarFinance247 account in accordance with these Terms, enable you to chat either online or via text message (as applicable) to one of our customer service specialists, without having to make a phone call.
    • I've had a text and email from MCB: "Dear XXXXX Please contact us today. Your payment has not been brought up to date and we would like to discuss your account with you as a matter of urgency. Our telephone number is 02039236888"   " Early investigations confirm you are resident at the above address. Despite this, we have not managed to speak to you about your now, seriously overdue debt.   We are now instructing our external debt collectors to contact you directly in relation to your loan account. If you want to avoid this course of action, contact us today on 0203 923 6888"
    • What type of finance is it?   HP, PCP, Loan? They want her to ring so they can bully her into making payments she can't afford...unless she can record her calls then IMHO, I'd keep everything in writing. Is £400 SSP her only income? There's no chance they will justify taking half of that.   Lodge a formal complaint with them ASAP, exhaust it, and then you can escalate it sooner rather than later, ruddy sharks!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Charge on My House


quizzical
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2838 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have two or three charges on my home as a result of unsecured (credit card) debt from about 10 years ago.

 

These charges do not appear on my credit report as they are over 6 years old.

However, if I try to sell my home, can the creditors (who are all debt purchasing companies and who all bought the debtor account for pennies on the pound and then turned it into a secured charge through a CCJ) impose the charge and block the sale of the property unless I pay them the full sum of the old debt?

 

I'd really like to know where I stand on this

, as I have my mum's care home bills to pay as well as my own living expenses.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

charging orders?

see the charging orders sticky for eg

they prob wont block a sale, rather just try and get their payment upon sale, if applicable.

need to state what type of interest the charges relate to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I have two or three charges on my home as a result of unsecured (credit card) debt from about 10 years ago. These charges do not appear on my credit report as they are over 6 years old. However, if I try to sell my home, can the creditors (who are all debt purchasing companies and who all bought the debtor account for pennies on the pound and then turned it into a secured charge through a CCJ) impose the charge and block the sale of the property unless I pay them the full sum of the old debt?

 

I'd really like to know where I stand on this, as I have my mum's care home bills to pay as well as my own living expenses.

 

Thanks.

 

They may require an undertaking from your conveyancer that they will be paid from the proceeds of sale, as part of allowing the sale to proceed (the same way a mortgage company does for the outstanding mortgage settlement figure)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the house in joint names?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The house is not in joint names, just mine.

 

What I wanted to know was that, if my credit score is clear (which it is completely) because the debts are over 6 years old, how can these charges still be invoked upon sale of the house?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The house is not in joint names, just mine.

 

What I wanted to know was that, if my credit score is clear (which it is completely) because the debts are over 6 years old, how can these charges still be invoked upon sale of the house?

 

Yes. A charging order (if registered at the Land Registry) doesn't expire at 6 years, in the same way a CCJ* doesn't expire (even if no longer shown on a credit report).

 

* Yes, a CCJ would need the court's permission to enforce after 6 years, but it hasn't actually expired.

A charging order wouldn't need the court's permission to enforce after 6 years, unlike a CCJ.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So a charging order would legally allow a debt purchasing company

who bought a debt 10 years ago for 3p on the pound

to extort 33 times the cost of what they paid for the (originally unsecured) debt

from the sale of my home

which I have worked to pay the mortgage for 20 years?

 

Is that right?

Is that legal?

Is that ethical?

Is that honest?

 

This is not right.

 

I want to be able to buy the debt back for 50% of what the last debt purchasing company paid for it.

It think that's fair.

 

Otherwise I face a retirement of poverty and want.

 

Is there no legislation in place that will defeat this stupid calumny?

 

I thought we were a civilised country?

Clearly not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So a charging order would legally allow a debt purchasing company

who bought a debt 10 years ago for 3p on the pound

to extort 33 times the cost of what they paid for the (originally unsecured) debt

from the sale of my home

which I have worked to pay the mortgage for 20 years?

 

Is that right? no

Is that legal? sadly yes

Is that ethical? they don't care

Is that honest? they don't care

This is not right.

 

I want to be able to buy the debt back for 50% of what the last debt purchasing company paid for it.

It think that's fair. - wont ever happen

 

Otherwise I face a retirement of poverty and want.

 

Is there no legislation in place that will defeat this stupid calumny?

- well there was yes, why didn't you defend the CCJ?

 

I thought we were a civilised country?

Clearly not.

 

always been that way

 

that's why DCA's make and portfolios [the phishing lists]

change hands for so much money

 

but yes its all bogus in a way.

 

but sorry if you didn't defend the judgements

then its of your own doing????

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's why I used ???

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

but sorry if you didn't defend the judgements

then its of your own doing????

 

dx

 

as above IF you didn't defend

not assuming you didn't

 

thus you say you did..

 

sadly we see so many CCJ's / CO's are the result of not defending.

 

shame you didnt discover cag all those years ago

i'm sure we could have helped avoid the CCJ's/CO's

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, indeed it is a shame I had not discovered CAG and the other useful resources, some of which, of course, were not available then.

 

I defended it but could not afford a lawyer. I turned up at court and conducted my own defence, but the debt purchasing company had hired a barrister who was able to convince the judge (or, let's face it, a stipendiary magistrate) that I was wrong and the debt purchasing spiv was right.

 

This resulted in the injustice which persists to day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...