Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 2 foot of sea level rise   The Thwaites Glacier — dubbed the “Doomsday” glacier because of the grave impacts for global sea level rise if it melts — is breaking down “much faster” than expected, according to a peer-reviewed study published on Monday in the academic journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Using satellite imagery, scientists determined that widespread contact between the glacier and warm ocean water is speeding up the melting process. The climate crisis is interrupting natural processes across large parts of the continent, according to the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition. The glacier, roughly the size of the United Kingdom, could cause global sea levels to rise more than two feet if it melts completely, according to the study. “Thwaites is the most unstable place in the Antarctic and contains the equivalent of 60 centimeters of sea level rise,” study co-author Christine Dow said in a statement. “The worry is that we are underestimating the speed that the glacier is changing, which would be devastating for coastal communities around the world,” she continued. Read the full story here.       or here ... from the India civil service currents affairs exam Doomsday glacier Antarctica‘s Thwaites Glacier, roughly the size of Britain, is a fast-moving glacier in West Antarctica. Because of the risk it faces — and poses — Thwaites is often called the Doomsday Glacier. Because of its size (1.9 lakh square km), it contains enough water to raise the sea level by more than half a metre. Thwaites’s melting already contributes 4% to global sea level rise each year. Thwaites are important for Antarctica as it slows the ice behind it from freely flowing into the ocean. Credits: BBC Vigorous melting Salty and relatively warm ocean water is infiltrating beneath Thwaites Glacier, leading to significantly speedy melting. This process, termed as “vigorous melting“, is eroding its stability. However, its potential collapse could lead to a staggering 10-foot rise in sea levels, posing a dire threat to coastal communities worldwide. Previous studies discovered a deep connection to the east through which deep water flows from Pine Island Bay. That study also attributed the melting to the heat transport caused by channels bringing warm water towards the glacier from the north. With melting, glaciers become light and float off the land where they used to be situated. The resulting retreating grounding line exposes more of a glacier’s base to seawater, increasing the risk of melting. Since the late 1990s, the glacier has seen a 14km retreat of its “grounding line.” The grounding line is the point where the ice flowing off the land and along the seabed floats up to form a huge platform.   https://www.pmfias.com/current-affairs-for-upsc-civil-services-exam-may-28-2024/   or here Satellite data reveals Antarctica's Thwaites Glacier is melting faster than we thought | Space WWW.SPACE.COM Seawater rushing miles beneath the glacier makes the ice more vulnerable to melting.  
    • I have notified all parties and will start a new thread.
    • The messaging app's boss has taken to social media to deny Mr Musk's claim it "exports user data."View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lynsey V Capital One


lyns
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6109 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 146
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi LYNNS

 

Court N1 form has more room. I know it's a pain going to hand it in, but you need to get the POC right for contractual. You need to add the daily rate as well.

 

Ukaviator

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

lyns, POC is particulars of claim which sets out what you are claiming. The daily rate I think you are referring to is the daily rate of interest you can claim but if you are claiming CCI I was told it was not relevant but please check this out for yourself, am not bothering with daily rate myself. As for N1 form you can download or pop into the court and get one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You really need the N1 form to claim Contractual Interest as the POC for Mcol is too long. I amended one for my own use and left off the daily rate, as it was pence anyway. It's up to you i can PM it if you like.

 

Uk

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got a stalling letter from Mr Udy today saying he will get back to me in 4 weeks!!! In 5 days i will be sending the LBA regardless of this daft letter!

 

Hello,

Just got my daft letter today, I have been using a different websites advice since November. I am at final stage before court , can someone PLEASE work out compounded interest for my charges. I have £320 worth or late payments but I have asked for £77 at statutory rate all the way along, but when you said £56 for one charge Lynsey and Battleaxe, I could be missing out on a lot of interest.

(Charge 1) 27th Nov 2002

(Charge 2 3 4) 11th Feb 2003, 27th May 2003, 27th Oct 2003

(Charge 5 6 7 8 ) 27th March 2004, 27 Sept 2004, 27 Oct 2004, 27 Nov 2004

(Charge 9 10 11 12 13 14) 28th Feb & May 2005, 27th June, July, Sept,Dec 2005

(Charge 15 & 16) 27 March & April 2006.

Link to post
Share on other sites

klass, if you are going to claim compound interest at a contractual rate you have to state this from the beginning, ie prelim letter and enclose schedule of charges showing this. I suggest you do some reading - then go back a stage. There is plenty of help on here if you decide on that route just post up on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lyns

 

Did you use vamps spready number 2 as Battleaxe suggested in an earlier post on this thread?

 

The reason I ask is that I used that one too as I couldn't get number 16 to work. Now someone else (more adept at I am at getting these spreadies to work) has told me I ought to re-do it using 16 which contains more information ...

 

Cheers

 

P:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got another letter from Mr Udy today saying he is still sticking to his last offer as final settlement and telling me I should accept so not to waste the courts valuable time! Too late Mr Udy I have already commenced legal action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a standard response. . only at the court filing stage will they pay out. Not long now . .

 

Uk

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Battleaxe

Just checking, Vamps number 2 which is a google spreadsheet is simple and I am not too sure how much information is needed because this one has worked fine for me on all my claims.

 

Poor Mr Udy, not having a win with anyone. LOL

Link to post
Share on other sites

Capital One have aknowledged my claim on 23rd March and I sent the rejection letter today to Mr Udy telling him its too late i have already filed claim! Hopefully not long now:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...