Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • scott425
      Employment Tribunal

      By scott425 · Posted

      Thank you again Emmzzi for your insight. Not only did I do the work, but as a maths tutor delivering financial literacy workshops under the Govt Multiply project, the college were paid £400 for each student I recruited, which makes it an even bigger kick in the teeth! I spoke to Citizens Advice Bureau on Friday who advised me to go back to ACAS for advice and assistance, as ACAS are the experts in employment matters. They did also mention small claims court, as being more straightforward and less complex, but surely their solicitor would just contest this and I would lose the £80 court fee? If I did submit a claim through the small claims court, would I just leave the employment tribunal running until the outcome? The deadline for me to submit my schedule of loss is tomorrow, so I will submit today so that they cannot hold me in breach.
    • ProperDribbly
      Evri has probably lost a Parcel again.

      By ProperDribbly · Posted

      Ive just checked the tracking again and its actually out for delivery today! Anyway,  I refunded the buyer on Ebay off my own back on the 2nd of June they havent opened a case or anything like that so surely i cant take action against either the buyer or P2G/ Evri can i ? Id hope the buyer would see fit and pay but you know what people are like these days ... Once its delivered I'll send him a polite message asking for payment but i suspect there'll be no reply      
    • BankFodder
      Evri has probably lost a Parcel again.

      By BankFodder · Posted

      Thanks for this update. Let's not if you have any more difficulty – in particular if you have difficulty getting paid back from the purchaser. We can help you either against the parcel delivery courier or against the purchaser
    • tobyjugg2
      Should we trust Sunak or the next PM to fix the Country's problems? (title revised 24/10/22)

      By tobyjugg2 · Posted

      I'm still waiting for them to kick out sunak and bring Johnson truss and farage in late as it is - as an act of desperation. Tossuss and some others as well as those who were (alleged) brokering a farage ennoblement deal are promoting it aren't they?
    • unclebulgaria67
      Should we trust Sunak or the next PM to fix the Country's problems? (title revised 24/10/22)

      By unclebulgaria67 · Posted

      Tories realise that they are likely to be in opposition for 10 years or more. And for those who lose their seats, they will be looking for new employment.  Sunak is like an accountant, suddenly put into a leadership role, but without the intelligence required to think in a multi dimensional way. 

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

Restriction on Land Registry set to cause Repossession and Eviction

ninethlife

By ninethlife
in Home Repossessions

 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2873 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

ninethlife

ninethlife

Posted
Posted

I hope someone can help with a situation that has arisen out of the blue,

 

just a few weeks before completing the sale of my home after battling repossession and eviction for the past 7 years.

 

Despite no contribution to the mortgage, bills, expenses or child support,

my ex-husband has engaged a solicitor to apply for a Restriction on Land Registry.

 

The mortgage company have a possession order and have tried to evict my son and I twice this year.

 

The judge allowed us to pursue a normal sale both times.

 

My 3rd hearing is July 11th and now this final twist has occurred,

which could sabotage the sale and leave my son and I homeless.

 

Both the LR and mortage is in my name only.

 

Please reply urgently with any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites
AndyOrch

AndyOrch

Posted
Posted

" Both the LR and mortgage is in my name only."

 

Then he cant apply for a Restriction on Land Registry.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
dx100uk

dx100uk

Posted
Posted

a restriction does not stop a sale.

 

and in most cases if your sols is cute

a restriction can be ignored

 

what do you mean by your ex has put a restriction on

a restriction stopping the sale?

not my best subject sorry.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
ninethlife

ninethlife

Posted
  • Author
Posted
" Both the LR and mortgage is in my name only."

 

Then he cant apply for a Restriction on Land Registry.

 

Andy

 

His solicitor says they can put a Restriction without consent

and my solicitor says he doesn't have to justify or prove a claim for it to be accepted by Land Registry.

 

 

His solicitor says the sale can only complete with my ex's signature

and he will only sign after an agreement is made for him to receive 50%.

 

 

Any other thoughts Andy?

 

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites
dx100uk

dx100uk

Posted
Posted

this may help you.

.

Myth about charging orders

.

http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php?t=1839539&page=1

.

your solicitor may not know that a "restriction" is not a charging order and does not need to be "paid off" as a charging order would,

.

he only needs to advise the beneficiary (of the charging order/restriction) that a transfer is taking place and confirm to the land registry that he has done this.

.

The land registry should then proceed without further problems

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
dx100uk

dx100uk

Posted
Posted
His solicitor is threatening to put a Restriction without Consent on Land Registry in order that the sale completion would require my ex's signature and he would only sign for 50% of the proceeds.

 

 

how can he be entitled to anything?

has he even paid a dime on it?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
AndyOrch

AndyOrch

Posted
Posted

Yes a unilateral notice does not require the consent of the proprietor nor is the applicant obliged to provide evidence to satisfy the land registry that the claimed interest is valid. Once the notice is registered however, the proprietor will be informed and will have the opportunity to object. Upon receipt of an objection the beneficiary of the notice is obliged to provide evidence of the interest being claimed to the land registry.

 

If he is unable to provide evidence that the notice will be removed. The notice is entered using for UN1 and removed using UN4.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
AndyOrch

AndyOrch

Posted
Posted
Its mad really anyone could apply for a restriction on anybody's house of course then you would be committing fraud unless part 11 of UN1 is true.

 

Absolutely MB..or as in this case just trying to frighten the OP

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
AndyOrch

AndyOrch

Posted
Posted

RX1 form

 

If you dishonestly enter information or make a statement that you know is, or might be, untrue or misleading, and intend by doing so to make a gain for yourself or another person, or to cause loss or the risk of loss to another person, you may commit the offence of fraud under section 1 of the Fraud Act 2006, the maximum penalty for which is 10 years’ imprisonment or an unlimited fine, or both.

 

:spy:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
ninethlife

ninethlife

Posted
  • Author
Posted
how can he be entitled to anything?

has he even paid a dime on it?

 

 

dx

 

Apparently, he can claim that I agreed to give him half in a conversation he claims we had when we separated.

 

a restriction does not stop a sale.

 

and in most cases if your sols is cute

a restriction can be ignored

 

what do you mean by your ex has put a restriction on

a restriction stopping the sale?

not my best subject sorry.

 

dx

 

He hasn't put the Restriction yet but is aiming to do so. It may not stop the sale but it will stop access to the proceeds, which we need to use to obtain rental accommodation for my son and I.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Ganymede

Ganymede

Posted
Posted
I hope someone can help with a situation that has arisen out of the blue,

 

just a few weeks before completing the sale of my home after battling repossession and eviction for the past 7 years.

 

Despite no contribution to the mortgage, bills, expenses or child support,

my ex-husband has engaged a solicitor to apply for a Restriction on Land Registry.

 

The mortgage company have a possession order and have tried to evict my son and I twice this year.

 

The judge allowed us to pursue a normal sale both times.

 

My 3rd hearing is July 11th and now this final twist has occurred,

which could sabotage the sale and leave my son and I homeless.

 

Both the LR and mortage is in my name only

 

Please reply urgently with any advice.

 

Hi, a couple of questions please:

 

Are you divorced from your ex-husband yet?

 

Did you buy the house on your own before you got married?

 

Did he pay anything towards the bill or maintenance or did he do the DIY and upkeep etc himself?

 

Are you 100% sure it's a Restriction?

Link to post
Share on other sites
ninethlife

ninethlife

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Hi, a couple of questions please:

 

Are you divorced from your ex-husband yet?

 

Did you buy the house on your own before you got married?

 

Did he pay anything towards the bill or maintenance or did he do the DIY and upkeep etc himself?

 

Are you 100% sure it's a Restriction?

 

Only Decree Nisi

(He initiated divorce proceedings at the same time I faced repossession and eviction

and I didn't find out until years later that he'd never paid the fee for the Decree Absolute)

 

It was bought before we separated but we lost the sale on our existing home

so had to pay two mortgages for over a year, greatly diminishing the "deposit".

 

Nothing towards mortgage, bills, DIY, maintenance, child support.

 

The form his solicitor sent is an RX1 for a Restriction on Land Registry.

 

Thanks for your assistance.

Link to post
Share on other sites
ninethlife

ninethlife

Posted
  • Author
Posted
So was the house not dealt with in the divorce?

 

No, it was in negative equity and was about to be repossessed due to my unemployment.

 

 

By a twist of fate, I managed to find a job

the mortgage company didn't action the eviction warrant due to being taken over themselves

(due to the financial crash in 2008).

Because of that delay, I managed to negotiate an arrangement with them.

 

 

They tried to evict again a few months later, although I had fulfilled the arrangement,

but CAG helped me with advice and the judge suspended the possession order and cancelled the eviction.

 

 

I maintained the arrangement for 5 years, until I was made redundant.

After coming 2nd too many times in job interviews,

I decided I'd better sell but loads of DIY work needed completing before I could market the house

and some guardian angels came to my rescue.

 

 

Despite putting it on the market, the mtg co. tried to evict again in Jan and in May.

They have booked another eviction hearing for July, despite a sale being agreed in May.

(I became unemployed due to losing an 8 yr old business in the crash,

was made personally bankrupt and the OR claimed the house.

In 2011, the house was passed back to me by the OR as it was still in negative equity).

So that's why the house wasn't "dealt with".

 

 

Now, my ex is just blanking these details.

The label "it's complicated" applies here!

Link to post
Share on other sites
AndyOrch

AndyOrch

Posted
Posted

Previous threads for history...

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?303095-Eviction-imminent-please-help!-**SUSPENDED**

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?290423-Eviction-imminent-please-help!

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?324574-Charge-order-court-hearing-with-Official-Receiver-on-Friday-please-help!

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?424301-Redunancy-possession-order-mortgage-arrears/page2

 

Thread moved to the appropriate forum.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
ninethlife

ninethlife

Posted
  • Author
Posted

 

Wow, talk about the tragic story of my life! As you can see, CAG is a lifeline to vulnerable people. What does it mean "moved to the appropriate forum"?

Link to post
Share on other sites
AndyOrch

AndyOrch

Posted
Posted

Moved to Home Repossessions out of General legal Issues

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
BazzaS

BazzaS

Posted
Posted

If the divorce settlement isn't finalised, and you are still married, can't he make an application under the Family Law Act 1996 for a restriction (using form HR1).

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/applications-under-the-family-law-act-1996/practice-guide-20-applications-under-the-family-law-act-1996#application-for-notice

 

Sadly, if he did this : it isn't something you can appeal.

Get the divorce through before he tries this....

Link to post
Share on other sites
BazzaS

BazzaS

Posted
Posted

He can't do so (Family Law Act route) once the decree is made absolute, it only provides a route that can't be objected to while you are married .....

 

He could still try to put the UN1 based restriction on, but then you object to it .....

Link to post
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...