Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Three / Lowell Portfolio


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2907 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone,

 

I've got a particularly horrible problem on my hands . . . well two of them, but let's start with this.

 

In July 2013 I left the UK to live in America.

However, during the move I neglected to settle an accuont with Three for a SIM used in a 3G iPad.

 

Sometime in the last few weeks, I checked my credit report and there is a default.

I should not be surprised, but I am upset about it, my UK credit was largely OK,

but now it's completely useless, which sort of traps me here in another country.

I can't rent or get a mortgage, or probably even get a phone.

 

Ok - I approached Three and asked nicely. I will pay £49.08 if you completely remove the default.

They refused.

 

I asked for the original credit agreement, default notice (which i never saw) and the deed of assignment as it ended up with Lowell Portfolio. They responded that a SIM is not governed by the consumer credit act.

 

This seems bleak - the default was added in 2014, I have a VISA until 2018. This is really not good!!!! at all.

 

I have requested the same information - credit agreement, default notice and deed of assignment as a SAR under the DPA.

I am still prepared to pay this money, as long as they remove the default

- a settled default is no better than an unsettled one, as I understand it.

 

My idea is this - I think for a default to be enforceable, I needed to have seen it? Which I did not.

 

There is one other piece of weirdness in all of this.

I use my Mum's address for all my correspondence,

however I totally forgot about this Three SIM, so I did not update my address.

 

 

However, when I spoke to Lowell Portfolio - they had my Mum's address

and lo and behold just last week whilst this all blew up

- my Mum received a letter from them!

 

- they claim to have contacted me, maybe they did - I don;t know I was in America.

Yet, my Mum is very fastidious at opening my mail and emailing me.

 

 

they had her address but did not send anything prior to the default?

How did they get her address?

And is this relevant to their claim that 'they tried'

 

Can anyone offer any advice, any suggestions - any argument, or mechanism I could attempt?

I'm not even looking to dodge this;

I made a mistake and should pay it.

But, I feel that a 6 year penalty on an otherwise clean credit report for such a small sum is just unfair.

 

I have made a SAR under the DPA - I'm hoping with this extra information something might arise in my favour?

but, i really don;t feel confident. Being trapped in another country - sure isn't as much fun as it sounds.

 

Really hoping someone has some advice, or an idea - or any suggestion that I could try! I have money available, and I have time; I just need to somehow get this default cleared.

 

Thanks a lot in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The default unfortunately sounds legit and will be very difficult to get removed. You moved abroad and didnt tell them so it naturally defaulted in your absence.

Unless you can prove that the default was incorrectly reported in some way other than an address issue then you are stuck with it for 6 years from the date of default.

If the defaulted amount had any charges included in it then that may be a possible avenue to pursue but will mean you potentially attending court in the uk.

They are correct in saying that a mobile contract/sim has no CCA agreement

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

why are you 'trapped' in another country?

it a civil debt

nothing to do with stopping you travelling at all

and not sure what other sites you are visiting?

but the three letter whip, re freemen of the land

wont help you at all.

 

 

there is no requirement for any letter to be sent anywhere

before a company defaults you

as for lowells

you really need to stay off the phone!

they are NOT BAILIFFS

and have

NO SUCH LEGAL POWERS.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trapped in the sense that with a default - getting a rental house is unlikely - credit checks. Getting a car loan - nope! Finding another job - not guaranteed. I wonder if I would even be able to get a mobile phone?

 

Maybe I was being overly dramatic - but, I don;t have a lot of options, with such a poor credit rating showing a default. I have heard that a settled default is not really any much better than a non-settled one?

 

Yeah - I phoned Lowell once, didn't like their attitude, won;t be calling back. But, you say there is no legal requirement to notify before applying a default?

 

I've heard/read that some people have been lucky getting default removed for small amounts by a gesture of good faith?

 

And lastly - let me ask this, if I may. Three could remove the default, right? I mean it is within their technical and legal power, they just choose not to?

 

Thanks for the response - only more 4 years to go . . . !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

As it appears that the default has been regd correctly you will struggle to get three to agree to its removal whether the small amount outstanding is paid or not, they are obliged to report a true reflection if how the account has been operated.

You are right in the sense that they can, at the touch of a few keyboard buttons remove it but getting them to agree to is a completely different matter.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stop ringing Lowell. They don't care about you and will say anything to get you to pay. As for one default that small, it's not that serious at all. Plenty of places will rent to you, let you finance a car and get a phone. You can even get credit cards.

 

Especially if the default was old

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...