Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Russia’s economy has been cut off from the global financial system - but it is still growing. Why?View the full article
    • Well done. Are you able to tell us more about how it went on the day please? HB
    • when mediation call they will ask the same 3 questions that are in their email you had to accept it going forward. simply state 'i do not have enough information from the claimant to make an informed decision upon mediation so i refuse. end of problem.  
    • Food prices, including a $40 chicken, has stoked fury and calls for big foreign supermarket chains to come to Canada.View the full article
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Civil National Business CEntre Name of the Claimant ? Lowell Portfolio i Ltd How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self   Date of issue –  15 Feb 2024 Particulars of Claim What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?  The claim is for the sum of £922 due by the Defendant under and agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a Capital One account with an account reference of [number with 16 digits] The Defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a Default Notice was served under s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit ACt 1974 which has not been complied with. The debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 16-06-23, notice of which has been given to the defendant. The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of the issue of these proceedings in the sum of £49.15 The Claimant claims the sum of £972 What is the total value of the claim? £1112 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? I dont know the details of the PAPDC to know if it was pursuant to paragraph 3, but I did receive a Letter of Claim with a questionaire/form to fill. Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? no Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned/purchaser Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? I was aware, I'm not certain I received a 'Notice of Assignment' from Capital One but may have been informed the account had been sold without such a title on the letter? Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Yes Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Not since the debt purchase, and not from Capital One. Why did you cease payments? I can't remember - it was the tail end of the pandemic and I may not have had enough income to keep up payments - I am self-employed and work in the event industry - at that time. I also had a bank account that didn't allow direct debits and may have just forgotten payments and became annoyed at fines for late payments. What was the date of your last payment? Appears to be 20/4/2022 Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No Here is my Defence: Defence - 1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have in the past had an agreement with Capital One but do not recognise this specific account number or recollect any outstanding debt and have therefore requested clarification by way of a CPR 31.14 and section 78 request.. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. I am unaware of having been served with a Default Notice pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment pursuant to the Law and Property Act 1925 Section 136(1) 5. The Defendant has sent a request by way of a section 78 pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974, for a copy of the agreement, the Claimant has yet to comply and remains in default of said request. 6. A further request has been made via CPR 31.14 to the Claimants solicitor, requesting disclosure of documents on which the Claimant is basing their claim. The Claimant has not complied and to date nothing has been received. 7. It is therefore not accepted with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof to: a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement and; b) show how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed for and; c) show the nature of the breach and evidence by way of a Default Notice pursuant to sec 88 CCA1974 d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim 8. As per Civil Procedure 16.5 it is expected that the claimants prove the allegation that the money is owed 9. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of section 136 of the Law of Property Act and section 82A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 10. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief. .................. Please note that I had to write a defence quite quickly as I hit the deadline. At the time of writing the defence, I hadn't been able to find correspondence from Capital One, but had since found default letter etc. I submitted CCA request and CPR 31.14. However, I didn't get any proof of postage or use registered post for the CPR (an oversight) but did with the CCA request. I received a pack which included a letter from Overdales, going over the defence I'd filed, as well as letters of Lowells and reprints of letters from Capital One. But I have no idea if this pack is in response to the CCA request or the CPR ! I would have expected two separate responses ... although I do know they are both the same company. Looking over the pack today, and looking through old emails .. I find some discrepancies in the Capital One default letters (notice of default and Claim of default). They are both dated *before* an email I have stating that a default can be avoided. The one single page of agreement sent (so not the full agreement) has a 16 digit number at the top in small print, next to 'Capital One' which corresponds to a number called 'PURN' printed at the top of each of the 10 pages of ins and outs of the account (they're not official statements, but a list of monthly goings) yet no mention anywhere on either of the account number. I cant really scan them at the moment - I can later tomorrow, but that will be after the mediation call I'm sure. I guess I may be on my own for this mediation ... I am not certain the CCA request has been satisfied .. or if the CPR has been . And then I appear to have evidence that the Default notices provided are fabricated ? Yet, I do have (elsewhere ... not at home) Default letters from Capital One I can check ..
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

The European Union.....In or Out?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2899 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If independent economists start to issue warnings, we would be mad to ignore.

 

As long as they were informed warnings, Now that would be notable. Still waiting.

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

and German figures released report that only 8% of migrants that have been there a year are in employment (most with state controlled/infuenced industries)

 

Source France24 news.

 

 

On another related note, proposals being presented which will 'allow shengen open borders to be reintroduced by the end of the year'

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

To reinforce what we already know that freedom of speech no longer exists,

 

BCC boss suspended over EU referendum comments

 

John Longworth told the business group's annual conference on Thursday that the UK's long-term prospects could be "brighter" outside the EU.

 

He later said he thought Britain would be "better off" after leaving.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To reinforce what we already know that freedom of speech no longer exists,

 

BCC boss suspended over EU referendum comments

 

John Longworth told the business group's annual conference on Thursday that the UK's long-term prospects could be "brighter" outside the EU.

 

He later said he thought Britain would be "better off" after leaving.

 

ooops - misread again

 

Must get my observation back in gear.

 

"In his speech, Mr Longworth had described the referendum as a choice between the "devil and the deep blue sea". One option was staying in an "essentially unreformed EU", with the other being the uncertainty of leaving, he told the conference."

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

and the Tory infighting brings out some figures,

Rather than the 250,000 or even 330,000 net immigrants claimed,

 

The number of new national insurance numbers issued to immigrants (to allow them to work and gain benefits) last year was actually well over 600,000.

 

and that 600,000 new NI numbers is a real figure, not some fuddled statistics.

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

and the Tory infighting brings out some figures,

Rather than the 250,000 or even 330,000 net immigrants claimed,

 

The number of new national insurance numbers issued to immigrants (to allow them to work and gain benefits) last year was actually well over 600,000.

 

and that 600,000 new NI numbers is a real figure, not some fuddled statistics.

You are not comparing like with like. Net migration is exactly that: ins - outs

Also we do not know who these migrant figures include.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are not comparing like with like. Net migration is exactly that: ins - outs

Also we do not know who these migrant figures include.

 

You are correct, but what is included as migration in and out is open to interpretation (and are reported as estimates).

New NI numbers is the actual number of new migrant slots in the employment.benefits system. I cant yet find any figures for NI numbers removed.

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

....when the scaremongerers start spouting the risks of leaving, I tend to sway towards the out campaign. ..

it was interesting that after the PM's meet with the French, they (the french) then quickly mentioned the issue of migrants at calais being allowed to britain shld we leave....

am i being too cynical, or was that quite calculated given the sensitive migrant issue? :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

it was interesting that after the PM's meet with the French, they then quickly mentioned the issue of migrants at calais being allowed to britain shld we leave....

am i being cynical, or was that quite calculated given the sensitive migrant issue? :)

 

Politicians politicking

 

Some expansion on the NI stats which is clearer than most:

http://blogs.ft.com/ftdata/2016/03/02/immigration-statistics-whats-behind-the-numbers-row/

 

 

"Jonathan Portes, principal research fellow at the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, filed a freedom of information request last year in a bid to extract Whitehall figures on how many NI numbers issued to EU migrants are “active” – showing recent tax or benefits payments. This data could potentially prove that far more NI numbers are being issued than actually used, which would confirm that eurosceptics’ fears about the scale of EU migration are overblown.

 

The government does hold this data, but Mr Portes’ request for it to be published was refused by HMRC late last year on the grounds that it would be “unhelpful” to Mr Cameron’s renegotiation."

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Politicians politicking

 

"

indeed. but may backfire; as silverfox says, such political 'threats' may sway more to the out

Link to post
Share on other sites

France has said if the UK decides to leave the EU it may close down border controls in Calais and Dunkirk,

so that the economic migrants would come straight to the UK, and we would have to sort them out.

 

These are the same people who the stay campaign call our friends, this sounds like blackmail to me, why

would I want friends like that?

 

I think the French like having these people in these ports, as they can use them as bargaining tools.

 

If they really wanted to get rid of them they could get them out of the country within days, just put them

on trains and send them to Germany, they seem to want them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

France has said if the UK decides to leave the EU it may close down border controls in Calais and Dunkirk,

so that the economic migrants would come straight to the UK, and we would have to sort them out.

 

I have a slightly different perspective.

France has let these illegal migrants in - they are Frances problem.

If we let them in, they become our problem.

 

Calais shuts down and they let them come to the UK immigration - we simply ship them straight back just like Canadians, Australians and Americans do to undesirables and those without the correct documents.

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Calais shuts down and they let them come to the UK immigration - we simply ship them straight back just like Canadians, Australians and Americans do to undesirables and those without the correct documents.

thats what i refer to. france (no doubt prompted by Cam) has come out with that 'threat' trying to win the in vote. yet it is empty if as you say we can just send them back. they were trying to 'play' on the migrant issue. but it hasnt worked.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with you tj, but if France just shipped them out/put them on trains,

which they could do within days we would not have a problem at these ports in the first place..

 

Its got to happen - ship them back to refugee camps on the borders of their own countries and address the issues at source. Few will stay in the camps anyway as they aren't genuine refugees.

 

While they think they wont be shipped back, and the EU and UK are easy targets, they will keep coming,

and everything else aside - GENUINE refugees will lose out because of it, and the source issues will continue as there wont be enough political will and pressure to address them - well until its too late.

 

If the EU wants shengen to survive, it needs to properly police its outside borders.

Whats happening now is nothing to what will happen with climate change migration over the coming decades.

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

All these scaremongers, are interested in is looking after

themselves and sod the rest of us.

[i]Who wants us to stay in:- those who have something to gain

from our membership as they have been Commissioners in the

EU, and will get big pensions which they will lose if we leave.

[/i]

Mandelson a £34,000 annual pension.

Ashton, if she had been employed by a business she would have been sacked, as she was rubbish.

Kinnock, well what can I say about him not much!!!

Patten, WHO!

Lord Hill, just been appointed by Cameron.

And then you have Blair, he wanted to be EU president, do you think that that is what Cameron wants to be???

Link to post
Share on other sites

hate rhetoric deleted

 

What a horrendous post.

The migrants may be illegal and a problem, and France and Germany may well have the infrastructure to move millions via rail or road,

but the sort of hate rhetoric you post there has no place in a modern society or reasoned debate.

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

The truth hurts, would you trust the French?

 

Yes, far more than most - including most of Camerons senior Tories

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

no wonder we have got problems.

 

Yes, Cameron and his Tories are a real problem.

Sadly labour under Corbyn wouldn't be any better - just in different ways.

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a horrendous post.

The migrants may be illegal and a problem, and France and Germany may well have the infrastructure to move millions via rail or road,

but the sort of hate rhetoric you post there has no place in a modern society or reasoned debate.

 

History goes down the pan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

History goes down the pan.

 

That happened long ago, it needs no further abuse from you.

 

 

and those who think Britain will join our buddy the USA are also completely unaware of true history.

 

America is not our ally except when we work in their interests

America is not our friend

 

America demanded high cost at the start of world war 2

 

America betrayed Churchill at the end of world war 2 in the assault on Berlin which defined the layout of Europe for decades

 

America betrayed Britain, France and Israel in the Suez crisis

 

They betray and use us to this day throughout the world

 

So those who think leaving the EU so we can make our way with the US are sadly mistaken.

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it possible to have a fair debate given most newpapers appear to be anti the EU ?

 

Yes people don't believe everything they read and it does not mean they will vote the way newspapers tell them. But quite often the newspapers have a huge influence on the political debate. Broadcast media do cover news stories covered in print media and it then becomes a talking point.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2899 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...