Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Any update here?  I ask as we have others now taking on CPM.
    • I am sorry about getting your status mixed up.  I have noticed one thing in your excellent WS. On their claim they are only pursuing you as the keeper-I think it is  in their Point C that  states along the lines of -the driver did not pay , so the keeper is liable. So on your No keeper Liability section  You may prefer  to alter 13 to    . It is trite Law that the driver and the keeper cannot be regarded  as the same person and the claimant has failed to offer any proof who was driving.  BY  only pursuing the keeper  when the PCN does not comply with PoFA must mean that their claim fails. See what the Site team thinks as it should  stop the Judge from looking at who was driving as your statement preempts them from even thinking about it.
    • What would suffice as proof? I just emailed them back my date of birth. Should I send a copy of driving licence? 
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Northampton   MCOL Northampton N1 ? Manual Claim CCMCC (Salford) ? New beta WWW.MONEYCLAIMS.SERVICE.GOV.UK ?   If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form.   This has been uploaded in my previous messages in the bundle of documents     Name of the Claimant ? Asset Link Capital (NO5) Limited   How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self   Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to./   14/02/2020   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total Not relevant as his claim was set aside, and has now been brought to the court again by the claimant       Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? Please see bundle of documents in previous thread   What is the total value of the claim? £10,734.1    Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred?  Yes - this is one of the grounds for getting it set aside   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? No Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ?  Apparently 2000   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? I do not recall entering into an agreement with Barclays   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?  It was, but it is not anymore   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned to Asset Link   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No - although they have provided a copy of the assignment notice in their bundle of docs for the hearing   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? I don't remember - but again a copy of a letter has been provided (see bundle on previous thread)   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  No    Why did you cease payments?  2015   What was the date of your last payment? December 2015   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?  I wrote to Barclaycard back in 2015 to ask them to send proof of the original agreement but they just sent me a reconstituted document which had no personal deals on relating to me   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? yes - step change took control and set up payments of £1 pm
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/Retsons claimform - old cap1 card 'debt'


trolley
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2913 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Start looking at defences in the success forum and start to prepare.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

If I submit a defence but the court decides I owe the money, can I then pay it or will a CCJ automatically be applied?

 

My head's in a pickle, I need to submit my defence by tomorrow but haven't a clue where to start :(

 

I requested a CCA and they haven't provided it, is that basically my defence?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Start looking at defences in the success forum and start to prepare.

 

I did advise to start preparing 5 days ago...leaving it a bit last min Trolley.

 

Yes if you pay the judgment by the date stated it will vamoose

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I can see from your viewing history today that you have looked at a plethora of discontinued claims...are none of them suitable /same/can be edited to suit your claim?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I'm honest I'm just confused by all that I've read and what fits. How is this?

 

1.the claimants claim is for the sum of 328.70 being monies due from the defendant to the claimant

under an agreement regulated by the consumer credit act 1974 between the defendant and Capital One under account reference xxxxxxx and assigned to the claimant on 28/09/2015, notice of which has been given to the defendant.

 

2.the defendant failed to maintain contractual repayment under the terms of the agreement

and a default notice has not been complied with.

 

and the claimant claims 328.70

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct Particulars of Claim

 

The claimant claims payment of the overdue balance from the Defendant(s) under a contract between the Defendant(s) and Capital One dated on or about May 26 2010 and assigned to the claimant on Sep 28 2015.

 

Particulars a/c no ******

 

Date 15/01/2016

Item Default Balance

Value 328.70

 

 

 

Defence now submitted

 

1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

2. The Defendant admits that a contractual relationship did once exist with Capital One, but does not recall the particular details of this agreement or any alleged balances.The Claimant/Solicitor has been unable to disclose any agreement or statements on which its claim relies upon. I am unaware of any legal assignment the claimant refers to within its particulars and deny any Notice was served pursuant to the Law of Property Act 1925.

 

3. Paragraph 2 is denied with regards to the Claimant serving a default notice in connection with the alleged contractual Agreement.

 

On receipt of this claim I requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CPR 31.14. I have received a letter acknowledging my request. To date I have yet to receive the documentation requested. This was posted on the 10.02.2016.

 

I also requested a copy of the agreement that this claim relies upon by way of a Section 78 request. I have not even received anything to acknowledge my request. To date they have failed to supply the documents and remain in default. This was posted on the 09.02.2016.

 

Therefore with the courts permission the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a)Show and disclose how the Defendant has entered into an agreement(s); and

(b) Show and disclose how the Claimant has reached the amount(s) claimed for;

© Show how the agreement was breached/ terminated to allow the claimant relief.

(d) Show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

4. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5, it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

5. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974.

 

6. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, looking back at mine it hasn't copied across properly.

 

Yours is ready for me to copy and paste into my defence?

 

If so then it's greatly appreciated, thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, as this time will I need to show evidence of my CCA request etc..

 

No...that comes later with your disclosure and witness statement.

 

Your particulars posted in post #30 are different to the upload of the claim form at the start of this thread ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh balls, I put the default amount and not the total amount. Is that what you mean?

 

No....you dont submit the particulars anyway ...thats just for reference...but in your post 26 above those particulars are not the same as the upload of your claim in post 2 ?

 

Your particulars....

 

The claimant claims payment of the overdue balance from the Defendant(s) under a contract between the Defendant(s) and Capital Oneicon dated on or about May 26 2010 and assigned to the claimant on Sep 28 2015.

 

Particulars a/c no ******

 

Date 15/01/2016

Item Default Balance

Value 328.70

 

Post 26 particulars......

 

1.the claimants claim is for the sum of 328.70 being monies due from the defendant to the claimant

under an agreement regulated by the consumer crediticon act 1974 between the defendant and Capital Oneicon under account reference xxxxxxx and assigned to the claimant on 28/09/2015, notice of which has been given to the defendant.

 

2.the defendant failed to maintain contractual repayment under the terms of the agreement

and a default notice has not been complied with.

 

and the claimant claims 328.70

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, you mean this bit?

 

 

2. The Defendant admits that a contractual relationship did once exist with Capital Onelink3.gif, but does not recall the particular details of this agreement or any alleged balances.The Claimant/Solicitor has been unable to disclose any agreement or statements on which its claim relies upon. I am unaware of any legal assignment the claimant refers to within its particulars and deny any Notice was served pursuant to the Law of Property Act 1925.

 

I copied and pasted this bit, reading back again this was in error.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No ...lets try for the third time...the particulars of claim you posted in post 26 are not yours?

 

Yours are in post 2 & 3 ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So why did you post them particulars in post #26?

 

They are what I have used to check the defence.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Afraid not...never copy another posters particulars of claim...let me just check it again to yours.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct Particulars of Claim

 

The claimant claims payment of the overdue balance from the Defendant(s) under a contract between the Defendant(s) and Capital Oneicon dated on or about May 26 2010 and assigned to the claimant on Sep 28 2015.

 

Particulars a/c no ******

 

Date 15/01/2016

Item Default Balance

Value 328.70

 

 

Defence now submitted

 

1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

2. The Defendant admits that a contractual relationship did once exist with Capital One, but does not recall the particular details of this agreement or any alleged balances.The Claimant/Solicitor has been unable to disclose any agreement or statements on which its claim relies upon. I am unaware of any legal assignment the claimant refers to within its particulars and deny any Notice was served pursuant to the Law of Property Act 1925.

 

3. Paragraph 2 is denied with regards to the Claimant serving a default notice in connection with the alleged contractual Agreement.

 

On receipt of this claim I requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CPR 31.14. I have received a lettericon acknowledging my request. To date I have yet to receive the documentation requested. This was posted on the 10.02.2016.

 

I also requested a copy of the agreement that this claim relies upon by way of a Section 78 request. I have not even received anything to acknowledge my request. To date they have failed to supply the documents and remain in default. This was posted on the 09.02.2016.

 

Therefore with the courts permission the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a)Show and disclose how the Defendant has entered into an agreement(s); and

(b) Show and disclose how the Claimant has reached the amount(s) claimed for;

© Show how the agreement was breached/ terminated to allow the claimant relief.

(d) Show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

4. As per Civil Procedureicon Rule 16.5, it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

5. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer crediticon Act 1974.

 

6. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to.

 

 

 

You may be lucky as it matches ...except they do not mention a default in their particulars.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not a major error...see what transpires.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, I have the money set aside just in case. If I end up having to pay then I will make a donation, If i don't then the donation will be much greater.

 

Thank you again for your help.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...