Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi folks, The keeper received correspondence today from DCBL.  The keeper has received previous correspondence from (Possibly) Parking Eye and Debt Recovery Plus, all of which has been ignored with zero contact with either company. The keeper has moved house twice since the original PCN but has kept DVLA informed of every move and V5 updated accordingly. The driver recalls entering the car park but didn't see any signs indicating payment required. The drivers friend happened to be in the same car park a few days after original PCN was received. Friend is a truck driver and said there is a sign but at truck windscreen height. Driver was in a small vehicle and, due to being careful as to where they were driving, did not see the sign. Original paperwork has been lost while moving but keeper still has scans of paperwork from Debt Recovery Plus. Driver was on site for approximately one hour after a long drive and was resting. After having read previous cases on here, is it still safe to ignore? 1 Date of the infringement 15th September 2020   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] Unsure    3 Date received A/A 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] A/A 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Driver recalls there was a screenshot of the reg plate, but it wasn’t a very good one.  6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No.   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up A/A  7 Who is the parking company? Parking Eye?   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] MFG ESSO Cobham Gravesend  DCBL 30:04:24 Redacted.pdf
    • Hi all, hope you can help. I've received a £4k repair estimate from the main dealer after my 2016 F30 330e developed the dreaded drivetrain error. The qoute is for a replacement cell module and associated labour and various bits and bobs to get it done. I initially had them investigate the issue when it first popped up a year ago. They replaced the auxillary battery which 'fixed' the issue for a few months before returning. Last Novemner the issue escalated to 'Battery not charging' which would clear after powering off the car , and disappear. Took it into the dealer and they diagnoised a faulty high voltage battery under the boot but could not do any work as they needed to schedule more cars for this 'specialist high voltage work'. So they said I could continue to drive the car until they got in touch when the car could be booked in for repairs. Roll on to April, the issue became severe (battery not charging error not going away, car in limp mode one morning) and car completly died at a traffic light same day (dashboard flashing all over the place), couldnt engage in 'Drive' and had to be recovered by AA to the dealer. Turns out car was now only running on the 12v battery in the boot and that had run flat as the hybrid function had stopped working altogether. My question is whether this is a reasonable estimate. Could this be done cheaper elsewhere? The dealer has servived this car from new hence took it them in the hope they'd not point fingers at any other party. Should I be paying for this at all since I raised the issue with them before it escalted and resulted in a now expensive fault? I also suspect the KLE may have gone too based on other posts, but the dealer hasnt qouted for that yet. I worry they'll' 'discover' that after I've already shelled out for a new cell module and end up lumbered with another bill to replace the KLE. Feels like I know about what they need to do than they do. The Service Advisor has been completely useless. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
    • The Petrol Station is Shell Garage Wickham (Hampshire ) Another person obviously had the same issue as they had called the garage previously-
    • Thanks Dave, that all sounds clear to me. In terms of avoiding PCNs, I'm not sure if I can. I need to be able to park in that spot, especially as I've got kids to lug forth and back for the school run. Likewise it's not always possible to use the MA's permit system either, as I've not always got them to hand. So, if I'm actively avoiding PCNs, then it could mean I've given in to their idiotic rules. But, I do get what you're saying, as I imagine the risks go up if they claim there are multiple PCNs to be paid at court. Not sure what to do with this one.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HSBC Default


rosierose
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6251 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Got this today...

 

Dear Rosie

 

I can now confirm the (Rosie's) branch have completed their search but unfortunately have been unable to locate the original signed agreements.

 

However we have aexceptionally agreed to delete the default entry registration with the Credit Reference Agencies and my colleagues in Debt Recovery Services Mangement Centre are currently arranging this.

 

I trust this meets with your approval.

 

Your Sincerely

 

Which is, I hope, of use to all of us with defaults registered against us but no agreement to back it up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi rosierosie,

 

Well done getting the default removed, it probably helped that it was so old and they couldn't find the agreement. I'm in the same boat with HFC, they have a defaulted registered on settled account but can't provide agreement to say it ever exisited!

 

Cheers,

Lee

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done Rosie!!!

 

Good luck on the next one

Allyxia

KEEP FIGHTING FOR YOUR MONEY - EVEN WHEN IT GETS TOUGH

The Banks are somewhere which lends you an umberella when it is sunny, and takes it away when it rains

 

HSBC £1200 - Settled in Full

Cap 1 2 X £100 - Settled in Full

Nationwide £1641 - Settled in Full inc Default and CCJ Removed by Court Order

NatWest £2215.60- Settled in Full and Removed Default Natice

Woolwich £3690 - Settled in Full

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lee. Indeed it did. They really have no business processing data without a contract. This really leaves them in a double bind as they are required to process data in some respects, but without a contract they must cease

 

and Thanks Allyxia :) I hope your efforts will be coming to fruition soon

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh yes hun forgot to tell you 3 defaults all gone and one CCJ gone!

 

Which leave one.....

 

Just blooing Open Uni £204 which turned five years old today guys 1...2...3... Happy birthday.......

 

So after reading your thread i realised i have never had a copy of the original default notice only the credit agreement......

 

Anyway i have sent them a letter giving 14 days notice tick tock tick tock

Allyxia

KEEP FIGHTING FOR YOUR MONEY - EVEN WHEN IT GETS TOUGH

The Banks are somewhere which lends you an umberella when it is sunny, and takes it away when it rains

 

HSBC £1200 - Settled in Full

Cap 1 2 X £100 - Settled in Full

Nationwide £1641 - Settled in Full inc Default and CCJ Removed by Court Order

NatWest £2215.60- Settled in Full and Removed Default Natice

Woolwich £3690 - Settled in Full

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Clint - I think they may have untill Wednesday. If you leave a couple of days for delivery and then 5 working days plus another couple for their reply to be delivered, then you end up with the 31st.

 

Not that they tend to adhere to the code too rigourously anyway :rolleyes:

 

Cheers

Rosie

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Rosie, fristly well done on getting your default with HSBC removed.

 

I am in the same boat as you, yesterday I received the exact same response from HSBC after sending SB's letter. I am now going to send a similar letter to the one you wrote, but was wondering how long should I give them to reply? Is there anything else I should attach to the letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Tangliss. I was fairly pleased myself. :D

 

In theory, they are required by the Banking Code to acknoweldge your letter in no more than 5 working days. They did take a good while to respond when looking for the agreement. But, in fairness, HSBC were fairly efficient in comparisson to some I've been dealing with lately. Not mentioning any names... Oh well... HBOS.

 

Good luck with it. Post your response when you get it.

 

Rosie :)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Rosie, with your permission could i posibly post my response from HSBC in here for you to look at? And ill post my response im writing now as they have come back with a letter with no substance to it at all, and i feel im banging my head against a brick wall and i would love to shift to the route you have taken (asked for the T&C you signed up to)

 

Without your permission i wont post as i have no intention to hi-jck

 

Many thanks

Clint

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice down that way!

 

I could do with a break!

 

Basically i recieved a 'sod off' letter, to the tune of:

 

Dear

 

Thank you for your letter dated 17th January 2007, regarding your account. I am sorry that you are unhappy with our previous response.

 

The facility in question was an overdraft. Unlike loans the process of demanding repayment of an overdraft does not require a notice of default and our records show that a letter demanding repayment of the overdraft was sent to you on the 7th january 2005.

 

You have made formal request under section 10 of the data protection act 1998 (DPA9cool.gif that HSBC ceases and/or does not begin to process personal data that is likely to cause damage or distress. I regret that having sought guidance from its legal advisers, HSBC is unable to comply with your request and is satisfied tht the processing of personal data by HSBC and the credit reference agencies complies fully with the requirements of the DPA98. The reasons are set out below:

 

The fact that HSBC along with all otherd leading lenders shares customer data with credit reference agencies is clearly stated in application forms and terms and conditions. A copy of the current terms and conditions and a more detailed explanation of the use made within the financial services industry of credit reference agency data entitled "Credit Scoring what is it?" is enclosed. Similar terms would have applied at the time you held your account with HSBC and acceptance of these terms would have been a pre-condition for opening your account.

 

The sharing of information about customer defaults between lenders via credit reference agencies is a legitimate process subject to strict rules which ensure compliance with the DPA98 and other legal and regulatory requirements. The sharing of such data to ensure that excessive credit is not made available to those already in financil difficulties and/or have previously demonstrated their inability to manage credit is both commercially prudent for lenders and actively encouraged by the government which is keen to avoid consumer over indebtness. Personal credit histories will be held by the credit reference agencies for up to 6 years in the case of defaults which enables lenders to obtain a long term view of prospective borrowers records.

 

Any application to a bank or other lender for credit is likely to be subject to a credit reference agency search and the potential lender will expect to see your full credit history which will include any defaults in the last 6 years. By your own admission, your management of your HSBC account was naive and unacceptable and led to HSBC making demand for repayment which you did not satisfy within the 28 days required. This forms part of your credit history and is something that other potential lenders may wish to take into consideration when decideding whether and on what terms to lend to you. The fact that you subsequently repaid the debt is reflected on the credit reference agency records and is likely to reduce the negative impact of the default.

 

As indicated previously HSBC, his (yes it says his) precluded by both the rules governing the sharing of data via credit reference agencies )And the DPA98 itself) from seeking to amend the record of your default to create an innaccurate credit history which would mislead other potential lenders.

 

I am advised that the sharing of data between HSBC and other lenders via the CRA's and the relevant retention periods comply fully with Principles 3, 4 and 5 of the DPA98. Your other comments regarding the DPA98 are noted however, i am informed they are not relevant to this issue. (NOTE - Regards to automated processing i think)

 

Thank you once again for taking the time to bring your concerns to the banks attention, i trust that this matter can now be considered concluded. If how ever you are still not satisfied the next step is outlined in our complaints leaflet given to you previously with our letter dated 15th January.

 

Yours Sincerly

(Signed letter from same person as before)

 

 

 

So i replied with this on monday:

 

Dear Mr HSBC Rep,

Thank you for your letter dated 2ndth February 2007,

I am saddened and disappointed that the reply received from you states that you will not comply with my statutory request.

I must wonder, how ever, if my letter has been read properly and fully, as many of my points raised were ignored and not responded to.

The bulk of your reply consists of informing me of how credit scoring works, and an explanation that when applying for credit, a credit check will take place. I am fully aware of the procedures of credit checking and the involvement of credit reference agencies (CRA’s) in the processing of lending decisions.

You also inform me that HSBC shares account information with the CRA’s in accordance to the terms and conditions of the account I held with you until 2003.

I am fully aware that, during the time my account was open with yourselves, you would have informed the CRA’s about my account performance, however I must re-iterate that since the account closure and the contractual relationship ending, I have withdrawn my permission for you to process in relation too and communicate my data with the CRA’s.

I am also aware that there is no statute, or legalobligation that gives HSBC the permission & right to retain and process my details in tandem with the CRA’s after the contractual relationship has ended, unless there is a term specified in the terms & conditions I signed up too.

If you aware of any such legal obligation, you will refer me to the exact statute that gives you the right to communicate my data to the CRA’s after the contract has ended.

The only legal right HSBC has to process & communicate my details to the CRA’s is that of a contractual agreement between HSBC and myself; to which I am requesting that you provide me with a signed copy of any contract that might give HSBC the right to process & communicate my data other than during its currency.

To illustrate this point, a letter released on the 6th September 2006 from the consumer compliance executive of Experian contained:

As far as we are aware there is no specific piece of legislation that gives us the right to retain your information for 6 years from the date the account is settled”

And:

This information would only be retained with your consent as per the terms and conditions of the particular account you held”

As of my Statutory Request pursuant to S.10 of the DPA98, I continue to contest that the processing of my data is unwarranted, and until I am in receipt of the signed contractual agreement that gives HSBC indefinite permission to process & communicate my data to the CRA’s after the contract has ended, then I must still insist on the following, on the grounds that the notice is not un-justified.

I require that (a) you cease to disclose any data to third parties not explicitly referred to under current statute, specifically including but not limited to, Equifax plc, Experian Ltd and Callcredit plc; and (b) instruct Equifax plc, Experian Ltd and Callcredit plc to remove all data pertaining to your records on me, to the extent that no data entry in relation to HSBC Bank plc will exist on my credit files.

 

 

I trust this will clarify my intent. Please understand I am attempting to resolve this situation amicably, without recourse to litigation, but should you insist upon your current course I will have no option but to issue proceedings.

I look forward to your reply and the documents requested.

 

Yours Faithfully,

Mr Clinton Mccutcheon

 

 

(hope you dont mind i used some bits from your letter)

 

So i now await a response from them regarding that letter.

 

Of interest to me was the bit stating 'as it was an overdraft default, we dont have to serve you a default notice'

 

seemed weird to me, i didnt think that was true.

 

Thanks for letting me post,

Clint

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not quite sure as to whether they must serve a default notice for an overdraft as a small agreement under the CCA - I will have a check. But, as you say, they still need your permission to process your data in the form of a signed agreement. Out of interest, how old was the agreement?

 

Rosie :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I opened the student bank account in 2002 (maybe 2003... no mustve been 2002) when i started my HND.

 

So its about 4-5 years old (i know they tend to delete stuff after 6 years).

 

Even if they provide the agreement, there wont be a clause which allows them to process my data after the contract has ended im sure, but i will await their response!

 

Many thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

HSBC letter recieved this morning, ignoring my request for my account opening documents (and ignoring everything else...) with the following:

 

Dear Me

 

I have today recieved your letter dated 19th february. I am sorry that you once gain have had to contact us regarding this matter.

 

It is clear from your correspondance that you remain dissatisfied with the banks response. I am there for arranging for the banks final response to be issued to you from customer services department, which will enable you to refer your complaint to the ombudsman should you wish to do so.

 

I am sorry it has not been possible to resolve this matter to your satisfaction and thank you for your patience.

 

Mr HSBC Rep

 

 

 

 

Why do they keep ignoring my letters issues? Am i seriously to belive that i have exhausted their complaints department by sending 2 letters?

 

My last letter was addressed to the cutomer relation mnager as well...

 

They seem so insistent on dodging my points it makes me wonder what it is their trying to hide...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Clint

 

It seems as if our friends at HSBC have had a slight turn around in policy regarding agreements and permission to process data. They have ignored your explicit request for a copy of the document that might give them permission to process your data. Although not strictly speaking liable to provide the copy, as they would be under the CCA, it can only be seen as a reasonable request in order to avoid litigation.

 

Perhaps a LBA might be in order. I'm not quite sure whather anyone here has succesfully sued on this exact matter so far. You could be a first! :) The other option would be the ICO, but they move so slowly... I'm still waiting for anything other than an automated response 3 months after reporting MBNA.

 

BTW, have you been writing to the Group Data Protection Office? If not I would start talking to them rather than customer services (who are a right bolshi lot!). However, if they are writing a final response then it may be too late to start that now.

 

Before issuing proceedings I would have a thorough read of the DPA, the Enterprise Act 2002 and have a look at whatever you might be able to find relating to small agreements in the CCA and later SI's.

 

Please feel free to post any findings for discussion.

 

Cheers

 

Rosie

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...