Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • unclebulgaria67
      Should we trust Sunak or the next PM to fix the Country's problems? (title revised 24/10/22)

      By unclebulgaria67 · Posted

      Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • tobyjugg2
      Should we trust Sunak or the next PM to fix the Country's problems? (title revised 24/10/22)

      By tobyjugg2 · Posted

      Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • dx100uk
      Judge & Priestly

      By dx100uk · Posted

      when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • Bhindi lover
      Judge & Priestly

      By Bhindi lover · Posted

      I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • dx100uk
      PRA Group - PAPLOC now Claimform - Halifax Loan £20k+

      By dx100uk · Posted

      Please fill this out   Dx Pl

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

court summons

ab1ab

By ab1ab
in DVLA

 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3202 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

ab1ab

ab1ab

Posted
Posted

I have a court summons "No ASN required" on the 28th August 2015 for the DVLA.

 

states in on the 25/02/2015 i was the registerd keeper of a insured vehicle. under section 22 of the road safety act.

A fixed penalty notice was sent and was not received by the specified date in notice.

 

no notification was received prior to the offence the vehicle had been disposed and to date no notification had been received the vehicle was insured on the date of offence.

 

I had an accident in my viehical october 2014 and my vehiclle was written offf i ha tax for a month.

 

received penalty notice in 22 Febraury 2015 thought the garage had sorted all this out as the vehicle was scrapped..

 

i sent all the details 25th Feb 2015 to dvla including slip explaining the car had been written off

and they sent a letter acknowledging their records had been updated

and i was no longer the owner of the vehicle.

i thought that was it...

 

now this court summons a few months later

 

 

can i get dval to overturn this decision...

 

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites
ab1ab

ab1ab

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hi

 

The DVLA stated

 

The records show i was was the registered keeper on 25/02/2015. The vehicle did not meet the the statutory insurance requirements contrary to section 22 of the Road Safety Act 2006.

On 25/02/2015 a Fixed penalty notice was sent to the defendant in accordance with section 144A and 144C of the road traffic act 1988. A valid payment was not received by the date specified in the Notice.

 

No notification was received prior to the date of offence that the vehicle had been disposed of or stolen and to date no notification has been received that the vehicle was insured on the date of offence.

 

well i did inform them when they wrote; to me and they changed ownership of vehicle and they sent letter back confirming this... why are they trying to pursue months afterwards..

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Raykay

Raykay

Posted
Posted

It depends when you notified the DVLA that you had disposed of the vehicle, if it was in October 2014, and you have their acknowledgement, then you would be not guilty.

If it was after that (when they first wrote to you?) you would still have been the registered keeper until then and the reason for the summons.

Link to post
Share on other sites
ab1ab

ab1ab

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I had notified them when they informed me in February they said it would be dealt with. Can i negotiate with dvla before it goes to court and pay less....

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites
CrappoMan

CrappoMan

Posted
Posted

Was the vehicle accident dealt with via your insurance company ?

 

If it was, do you have anything in writing from the insurance company stating the car was written off and disposed of ?

 

If it wasn't, do you have anything in writing from the garage that scrapped the vehicle ?

 

If you have neither, can you get it now ?

Link to post
Share on other sites
ab1ab

ab1ab

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hi

 

Yes it was delat with the insurance company...

 

No i don't have official writing that the car was writeen off or disposed of..... or that it was scrapped from the recovery garage....

 

The lack of comms from insurance comapny was not impressive to say the least....

 

Yes i propably could ask for it; if they do give does this alter my position in relaion to the offence in any way...

 

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Raykay

Raykay

Posted
Posted
Hi

Yes it was delat with the insurance company... if they do give does this alter my position in relaion to the offence in any way..

 

It may, but the DVLA case is that you were the registered keeper until you notified them of transfer of the vehicle, and the vehicle did not meet the insurance requirement when you were the registered keeper.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Raykay

Raykay

Posted
Posted
If the insurance company handled the disposal, should they have notified DVLA about the disposal on your behalf ?

 

Unfortunately not, it is the registered keeper's responsibility to notify the DVLA of the transfer, not the insurance company.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Raykay

Raykay

Posted
Posted
Also

If the insurers 'wrote off' the vehicle would they not have demanded the V5C (probably along with MOT) as part of their salvage?

 

They would, but it should have been treated as a 'Transfer to the trade' and the relevant parts of the yellow (V5C/3?) part of the V5C completed by the registered keeper and insurance company and sent to the DVLA by the registered keeper.

If the insurance company ask for the entire V5C, the registered keeper should notify the DVLA by letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites
ab1ab

ab1ab

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hi

 

Im pretty sure the car was insured until November need to check... so that leaves about 2.5 months without notification of insurance... I can see their trying to uphold the law to the nth degree... even though the vehicles was propably scrapped or are they upset i didn't pay a fine..:|

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...