Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Odd one this, I recieved 2 notice's for the 18th and 19th April stating that I overstayed on Wigan Robin Retail Park. Permitted Minutes 180. They state I was there 355 minutes on the 18th and 388 minutes on the 19th. Both times I was there around 10 minutes getting my wife a brew from costa after dropping the kids off at school.  On both days I had passed through there a second time around 3pm, again to get a brew then left. Both notices have 2 images each, Entrance and exit.  This is the interesting bit. The Entrance images both timestamped actually clearly show I am exiting the retail park not entering it. And the exiting images they provided show me leaving the carpark after visiting a second time later in the day. In the attachments You'll see all 4 images show that I am exiting, none of them are of me entering. I understand most if not all that see this post won't know the area but if the look at the map link i gave you'll see the road I was on leading up to the main road. g24 ltd 1.pdfg24 ltd 1.pdf GoogleMap view of the road I am on in the entrance images I would have had dashcam footage but I since formatted the memory card. I tried recovery tools but I couldn't get the files back.  
    • An update: I just got another PCN. I get the feeling that someone in the residence is calling OPS, as it's dated for a few mins after I parked. I won't appeal of course. Interestingly, our cleaner was also parked but didn't get a PCN. I asked them why and apparently they're whitelisted. I did ask the MA if they could whitelist me and they said they couldn't. Clearly they decided not to tell the truth. Surely, this would resolve all of the issues entirely i.e. we'd keep non-residents from parking, whilst allowing for residents to park without issue? Also, could OPS now take me to court for both PCNs separately, or could it be one case?    
    • I was with sse broadband until Jun 2023 at which point without notifying me they passed me to origin broadband who I was unaware is my supplier now -  My broadband at home kept working and I was under the impression that sse are taking direct debit payments from my bank account and everything is fine because the Internet has continued to work.  To my horror I have just noticed that origin broadband has been sending me PDF bills for £39 a month and the email heading has been showing as just no reply so I thought it was junk and never bother to check it.  I have now noticed a bill every month and now I owe them some £350. I did instruct origin to supply me Internet and therfore don't feel responsible for this debt.  What are my rights and is it a legal debt considered I did not sign any agreements with them - their first contact with me tho was very clever back in July 2023 trying to lure me into an agreement however because I just saw that email now I'm not sure what to do because I owe them 400 pounds nearly supposedly at 39 per month.  Our agreement with sse was for 26 per month but they shut shop and passed us to origin without asking our consent.    The following is what origin email said back in July before they stated sending invoice every month for payment.    We hope you're enjoying your reliable phone and broadband with us. We're just letting you know your phone and broadband package will end on 30 Jun 2023. Thankfully, good things don't need to come to an end - read on to decide what you want to do next.   Below you'll find the details of your current package and some other great options to compare it to.   What can I do - shall I just pay the debt and cancel it and move elsewhere or is there any way I can fight this as they are more or less enforced upon us with out permission by sse who most Likly sold our accounts to them.    Any help greatly appreciated 
    • whyisthis - Oh bless ya, it's so easily done.  Not worth losing sleep over; listen to the guys here, they know their stuff.  They won't take you to court, they'd get laughed out of it x
    • Monk - you are an experienced and respected member of this forum. Surely you realise how vitally important it is to respect court deadlines. There was no lack of knowledge.  You knew the deadline date.  You calculated it yourself in post 5.  It was written on the claimform.  Defence deadlines are written on probably a thousand threads on the forum. Sorry, but if you're up for a legal fight you also have to be up for organising yourself properly. As for now - 1.  pay it within 30 days and the CCJ disappears, or 2.  don't pay, nothing "legal" will happen, but you'll have a CCJ for six years.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Old debts


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3106 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Have had a pile of old debts

, being very old and very cynical,

at pension age I made the çoncious decision to stop paying any and all of them.

 

I challenged every debter to take me to court, they didn't

, preferring to sell on debts to collectors

 

None of these took me to court,so here I am over six years later which should mean no more chasing from collectors,

 

however one chasing debt company has insisted I made a payment against one of the debts three years ago.

I challenged that knowing I had not.

 

They then advised that the payment had come from the debt owner.for repayment of charges or something and made to the debt collector intstead of to me??

 

How can this be taken as a payment from me??

 

Now I have another item which needs to be repaid

, but the debt owner wants to pay it against a debt which is past collectible date

. What is the legal position.

This is a business debt and debtor ,

 

I never tried for charges reclaiming and there were loads, because it was a business. Now they say it wasn't. Ten years later. Dahhhh.

 

Any helpful information on the situation regard to debt over six years and what the legal position of debt and debtor would be appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stature barred relates to actions by you e.g payment or acknowledgement of debt. So some internal payment between creditors does not stop the debt being statute barred and unenforceable.

 

Business debt also likely to be statute barred, but can you say exactly what it involves e. Rent, goods purchased.

 

As you know creditors and debt buyers can lie about matters claiming all sorts of legal positions which are false. So don't go making payments for these old debts. If they can take it to court, why have they not done so after all these years. They probably can't.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, you confirmed my thinking and I have disgarded the item concerned.

Second question I may not hàve made clear.

Have old bank debt, I always thought unclaimable because of limited status. This old debt won't go away, but now over the six years, again no payments from me, but now quite a sum of PPI has appeared and they want my permission to pay off this old account. It's over the 6 years. They are maintaining it was a partnership, I have a copy letter disproving this ,but imnot clear on what happens to an out of date debt, its not enforceable, but does it still exist??and how?? And when does it stop existing and become. Write off therefore no debt??

Would be glad of enlightenment thanks so

Link to post
Share on other sites

This, that's another fear to bed, but legally when if ever will the debt be written off or is the bánk going to keep it in its computer store forever and therefor always be àble to clàim payments meànt for me??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, you confirmed my thinking and I have disgarded the item concerned.

Second question I may not hàve made clear.

Have old bank debt, I always thought unclaimable because of limited status. This old debt won't go away, but now over the six years, again no payments from me, but now quite a sum of PPI has appeared and they want my permission to pay off this old account. It's over the 6 years. They are maintaining it was a partnership, I have a copy letter disproving this ,but imnot clear on what happens to an out of date debt, its not enforceable, but does it still exist??and how?? And when does it stop existing and become. Write off therefore no debt??

Would be glad of enlightenment thanks so

 

I think i would write back asking for the PPI refund as a cheque payment made out in your name and refuse permission for it being applied to the old account. The PPI refund is due to a miss sold insurance product and nothing to do with account as such.

 

In regard to the accounts which are in debt, these are statute barred so cannot be enforced in court. Not sure why they are raising issues about partnership. They had 6 years to enforce the debt and have not done so.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Partnership issues raised because I have argued for years that it was not a partnership but Ltd comp. Bank have always maintained it was a partnership. Im sick because if I had known they considered the accounts partnerships then I would have claimed the charges back on the accounts. The bánk charges were very very high. But that's another story.

Suffice to say I'll write to the bánk and refuse permission for anything due to me to be paid elsewhere. I'll see what they say.

But still no one says what happens to these old accounts. They are supposed to be taken off credit reference files, but what do the banks do,

I'm sure they get written off as a bad debt, but no one here seems to say so!

 

Thanks for help anyway

Link to post
Share on other sites

Partnership issues raised because I have argued for years that it was not a partnership but Ltd comp. Bank have always maintained it was a partnership. Im sick because if I had known they considered the accounts partnerships then I would have claimed the charges back on the accounts. The bánk charges were very very high. But that's another story.

Suffice to say I'll write to the bánk and refuse permission for anything due to me to be paid elsewhere. I'll see what they say.

But still no one says what happens to these old accounts. They are supposed to be taken off credit reference files, but what do the banks do,

I'm sure they get written off as a bad debt, but no one here seems to say so!

 

Thanks for help anyway��

Old unenforceable debts do get written off and they won't appear on credit records after 6 years. They are not recorded in any way as a black marker, as they are not allowed to do that beyond the limitations period.

 

But you can never rule out Banks sellng old debts to debt collection agencies, who may try to chase to see what luck they have.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No the other way around

 

If you know debts to be unenforceable or statue barred.......why

Enter into pointless letter tennis?????? Ignore them totally.....!!!

 

If anyone was stupid enough to file a claim

They'd lose hands down.

 

Just remember in e&w SB simply means any judgement would be time barred

They can ask for payment

You can ask them to go away

 

No letter tennis!!!!

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Bank agreed two quite large amounts of repayable PPI

 

sent me settlement letters and told me they were keeping it and transferring cash to their collection dept to go against these old debt,

 

That's a damn chocker, but even though statute. Barred they still maintain they hold an old debt and have a right to offset these sums.

 

Any thoughts on there that I may have a chance of getting something

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope

A statute barred debt in e&w still exists

Just simply removes judicial enforcement option

 

Unless they have sold the debt and thus their rights

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...