Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Interesting. Thanks for that London.  That’s what I’m gathering.     iv no doubt they would send me fake documents but would they really dare present fake documents to a court of law?
    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Here Goes


owdoo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6226 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I does appear that we are all going to this stage now. I have filed my AQ and am now waiting for a court date. It really depends on what court date you get as to when you are likely to win but you will win. :D

Guide to claiming back your bank charges

 

Most of your questions can be answered by following this link.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

:Cry: Ok serious stuff now, got the pack through from the court and filled in the questionnaire along with another £100 in court fees!!!!! (Really need for this to work or I am going to be mega skint!)

 

Also got a from DG solicitors requesting the breakdown of charges of which I have also just sent!!

 

Does everyone get to this stage!?? I know I keep asking and sound impatient but any idea how long it takes from this point? Depending on if I win!!!!

 

if dg are asking for your breakdown, it's probably because you are going to get an offer soon. finger's crossed!

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i doubt it very very much. as i said in an earlier post, if dg are asking for your breakdown, it is more likely that they will offer very soon.

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok back again, letters sent over a week ago now one to courts with cheque enclosed and one with breakdown of charges to DS Solcitors both recorded delivery...... nothing back as yet is there a time limit on them replyling?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

OH DEAR LORD AM I THE ONLY ONE GETTING NOWHERE FAST!!!

I started this in November and I am still awaiting for information on my claim from the courts.

To elaborate.

I filed my claim through MCOL, then HSBC Filed a defence (Pretty usual) then I got a letter from the court asking me to fill in my allocation questionnaire and a letter from DG Solicitors asking me to send them a breakdown of charges!! Both of which I did, the day after (Begingin of March)

The letter stated that the defence had until 27th of March to complete their AQ, I ring the court at least twice a week and still they say they are awaiting it to be sent to the judge, but they have told me that no AQ has been sent by the defendant so the judge will either give them 5 days to submit one or throw it out, if it goes to court I will not get a date until AUGUST!!!!!!

I have never spoke to DG solicitors as I fear it may damage my case, or at least prompt them to send in the AQ Questionnaire which they may have forgotten to do?

Please help!! Has any one else had these problems?:x

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you have filed your AQ................ (multipage.gif1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page)

 

i wrote this thread specifically for those who had filed their aq's and wondered about what goes next - so.........post 1.

it's long due for you to write a big fat nudge letter to dg - the template is in that post - make it clear to dg that you have filed, they haven't, the courts know it, you are trying to get this resolved, they aren't, the courts would appreciate it if you could do........all of that in a polite but firm letter. with a copy of your breakdown.

and my newest advice is a nudge every 10 days until they offer.

there are maybe a few more nudging ideas on this post1 too,

New---after 28 Days - Maybe No Aq!!!!!!!

write one tonight and send it tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

OK so I got an offer from the solicitor’s wasn’t exactly what I was after but it is still a large amount they say they cannot refund the overdraft interest that I have put with my claim as this is interest paid on borrowing money?

Apparently my schedule has been checked and revealed some discrepancies, but they are still willing to offer me £1891.05 (Original claim is £2055.53)

Apparently this includes court costs and the like; it is getting really complicated now.

Shall I just accept or wait for the judge apparently they haven’t filed their AQ so he would give them 5 days to do so every time i ring he court they say they are behind with thing and it should arrive back from the judge soon who will give a court hearing or strike out their defense.

Was I right to claim the interest on my overdraft? Shall I Wait?

Don't know what to do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations on your offer!!!!!

Make sure it does include the court fees. As far as the interest, did you work it out on the advanced spreadsheet? You can only claim for the portion of interest that was related to the charges on the overdraft and not the whole ammount. As you say though, the offer is very close to your claim and I would do as you say and accept. Do you need an acceptance letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just fill it in and alter to suit yourself:)

 

Date

Dear Whoever

Ref: Your Offer of Settlement

 

Account: xxxxxxxx

Sort Code xx-xx-xx

Claim No: XXXXX in XXXX County Court

 

I acknowledge receipt of your letter date xx/xx/xx and your settlement offer of £XXX

 

I accept your offer as full and final settlement only for this claim of bank charges made on my account between xx/xx/xx and xx/xx/xx(dates of first and last charge)

 

I accept this offer without prejudice and I reserve the right to make any further claims should you apply future charges that may be considered unlawful under common law or in violation of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 or Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.

 

I will be willing to withdraw my claim upon receipt of unconditional full settlement of my claim.

 

I am also not prepared to agree to any confidentially clauses you try to impose, unless of course your client wishes to make an offer of due consideration in addition to the amount of £xxxxx, in order to be afforded this privilege by myself.

 

I trust that you will find this arrangement acceptable.

 

Yours Sincerely

Link to post
Share on other sites

do I enclose the signed part of the form with my acceptance letter?

Up to you but I would ignore their form and just send your letter

 

ALso do i need to put the bit in aboout not agreeing any confidetiality clause?
Again your choice
HAs anyone bee given more money this way?
Not that I know of, but then I wouldn't, would I?
Link to post
Share on other sites

me neither but i love the irony of putting 164.48!

 

i'd probably have advised you to take it - you are right - it does get complicated - and it's a good amount of money and you are done and dusted.

 

when you actually get the money into your hot little hands - let the court know that it has been settled - not until then.

 

CONGRATULATIONS - A DAMN GOOD WIN!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...