Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3270 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 130
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm a bit perplexed as to what is being asked for here.

 

N244 for Set Aside is not an option as now been too long.

N244 for a Stay of Execution is a possibility depending on the grounds being claimed on.

N245 for a Variation Order is also possible to try and get an affordable instalment & is probably better than an arrangement made "privately"

 

The discussion about the rights & wrongs of the Tenancy and Deposit Scheme should be taken to the Residential & Commercial Letings Forum for further help & advice.

 

It doesn't matter the length of time from the original CCJ to now to commence enforcement as it is within any time frame. If you do not have themeans to pay the blood may not be removed from the proverbial stone & if you have insufficient goods or they are of no value then the Writ should be returned Nulla Bona.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a bit perplexed as to what is being asked for here.

 

N244 for Set Aside is not an option as now been too long. - I was never going to set aside, I went to court and accept the judges ruling

 

N244 for a Stay of Execution is a possibility depending on the grounds being claimed on.

N245 for a Variation Order is also possible to try and get an affordable instalment & is probably better than an arrangement made "privately"

 

The discussion about the rights & wrongs of the Tenancy and Deposit Scheme should be taken to the Residential & Commercial Letings Forum for further help & advice.

 

It doesn't matter the length of time from the original CCJ to now to commence enforcement as it is within any time frame. If you do not have themeans to pay the blood may not be removed from the proverbial stone & if you have insufficient goods or they are of no value then the Writ should be returned Nulla Bona.

 

I understand all what you have said, and I have read all that, my question is if they attend my property (I will not be letting them in) in order for them to take control of ANYTHING do I have to sign something? Or can they take control without me signing anything?

 

I will take to them through a window, and happily provide the papers to prove I have no means to pay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they can take control of nothing then they may not agree to a payment plan. They only want this so if at some stage in the future you default on payment they can return, remove the goods & sell them. You must remember that if someone attends & cannot gain entry or take control of anything outside (usually a car), then he is powerless. Also don't forget that if you agreeto make payments through the HCEO they will be split with the Claimant so that for every £1 you give only 60p may get handed on, the HCEO retaining the other for his fees/costs. This will nearly double the length of time it takes you to pay.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they can take control of nothing then they may not agree to a payment plan. They only want this so if at some stage in the future you default on payment they can return, remove the goods & sell them. You must remember that if someone attends & cannot gain entry or take control of anything outside (usually a car), then he is powerless. Also don't forget that if you agreeto make payments through the HCEO they will be split with the Claimant so that for every £1 you give only 60p may get handed on, the HCEO retaining the other for his fees/costs. This will nearly double the length of time it takes you to pay.

 

That's fantastic advice, thank you so much. I don't have much to offer, £20 per month, and I can't see them excepting that, and it would take many years to pay off.

 

Would you be able to confirm if I gave this right please. Say HCEO arrives, I say my payment offer is £20 per month, I gather at that point he will contact claimant, if claimant accepts, is it only at this point that I sign anything and let him take control of my watch for intance (bearing in mind I will not be letting him in and there will be no car on the drive)

 

Thank you Plodderton you have been a great help too

Link to post
Share on other sites

What will happen when HCEO realises that everything I've told them is true, that I have no assets or means to pay, what will normally happen in regards to this, will they keep returning (I don't think my nerves could handle jumping at every knock at the door) surely if they keep returning it's piintiess and costing them more money knowing I don't have anything to pay them with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Final easy option ,,, do nothing dont talk to them or let them in.. debt cant be collected its returned to the creditor. They have to pay for each enforcement

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Final easy option ,,, do nothing dont talk to them or let them in.. debt cant be collected its returned to the creditor. They have to pay for each enforcement

 

 

Thank you Mikeymack2002 - would they have to notify me if its been returned to creditor

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its down to each HCEO if they do sorry

 

 

Don't forget to keep doors locked as they can just walk in that way the have gained peaceful entry which allows them back in if you have a car keep it away from your property too

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok great. If I opened the door (not knowing it was them) and they asked to come in and I said no, could they force their way in (by putting foot in the door or hand in so I couldn't close door) is that classed as peaceful entry just because I opened the door?

 

You can't access back door as its on the back of my house enclosed within garden fence, garage is also enclosed within fences too, there would only be the side gate (which is locked) or front door

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mode of entry

57. Enforcement agents should not seek to gain peaceable entry to premises under false pretences; for example asking to use the toilet, or to use the telephone. They should be clear as to why they are seeking entry to the premises.

58. Enforcement agents should only enter premises as part of the enforcement process.

59. Enforcement agents must only use a door or usual means of entry to enter premises.

60. A power to enter premises by force exists for the execution of High Court and County Court debts at business premises or at any premises where an enforcement agent is enforcing criminal penalties. This power should only be used to the extent that it is reasonably required and only after the debtor has been warned that the power exists and the consequences of a wilful refusal to co-operate.

61. A power to re-enter premises by force applies to both residential and business premises where a controlled goods agreement is in place and the goods remain on the premises but the debtor has failed to comply with the repayment terms of the controlled goods agreement. This power should only be used to the extent that it is reasonably required and only after the debtor has been given notice of the enforcement agent’s intention to re-enter.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brilliant, understand all that.

 

In regards to the writ, I've just found out that it's for my previous address! Yet the letter I received Thursday from the HCEO was to my current address. I gather they can't enforce this now?

 

I've also been reading about a "notice to produce and notice to leave" can I do that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brilliant, understand all that.

 

In regards to the writ, I've just found out that it's for my previous address! Yet the letter I received Thursday from the HCEO was to my current address. I gather they can't enforce this now?

 

You would be seen to be very wise to stay away from the site you have been reading, it has just cost a hapless debtor in excess of 3K in costs alone.

 

However to answer your question...................

"I've also been reading about a "notice to produce and notice to leave" can I do that"

 

Yes you can do it but it will get you nowhere, the attending Agent may be someone other than the Authorised HCEO as he is allowed to delegate to someone else to enforce for him. The attending Agent must also hold a Bailiff Certificate.

 

I have not had time to go over the thread advice today but, if you have a gargage or outbuildings that are detached from your dwelling he is also allowed to break entry to those and take control of any goods within.

Edited by ploddertom
,
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you wonky donkey,

 

Doesn't need to be certified? So can just be a random self employed bully boy?

 

So if he scales my fences (even though there are dog signs up) and he gets attacked by my dog, I can't be held accountable can I? (I have an English bull terrier)

 

Yes they are detached, but none of my contents are in there, plus they are all tools of trade.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now to the Writ........a writ lasts for 12 months. thereafter the creditor can for a small charge, seek to renew it as many times as they feel it neccessary. The writ is obtained by way of the County Court Judgment and is made to the address on that Judgment, with that being the last known address of the debtor, as long as you are named correctly eg Mary Mary it will be valid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that, thank you. We are into the 5th year if the original judgement, it's taken him this long to actually decide to ge a writ. So it makes no difference that the address is incorrect?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you wonky donkey,

 

Doesn't need to be certified? So can just be a random self employed bully boy?

 

The HCEO is appointed by the Lord Chancellor to execute writs allocated to him /her, he in turn is allowed to appoint an agent to act on his behalf in the execution of the writ, however he does so in full knowlege to the fact if things go wrong during the enforcement process...it is his/her head on block.

 

Most acting HCEO's are highly trained, some are freelance and others employed by the company to which the HCEO is attached

 

So if he scales my fences (even though there are dog signs up) and he gets attacked by my dog, I can't be held accountable can I? (I have an English bull terrier) You could be accused of having a dangerous dog!!

 

Yes they are detached, but none of my contents are in there, plus they are all tools of trade.

They could take tools of the trade and seek you make a claim to them.!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for clearing that up, much appreciated.

 

Even though they aren't mine? - surely that would be clear that these sort of tools wouldn't belong to me.

 

Does this sort of thing happen a lot, or would it not be worth their time, knowing I'm on benefits and won't have anything of worth and even tools (that's aren't mine) wouldn't be of that amount of value

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that, thank you. We are into the 5th year if the original judgement, it's taken him this long to actually decide to ge a writ. So it makes no difference that the address is incorrect?

 

If you have been traced to your current address and are the debtor named on the writ it will not invalidate things.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...