Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MBNA now Idem can't afford repayments want explicit consent re Data Protection


lorri-croft
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3309 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

I'm not sure if this is the correct place to post this...hope so.

 

I wonder if I share a story, if anyone can offer advice please.

 

9 years ago, due to illness and family tragedy, my husband got into financial difficulty.

Via the CCCS, token repayments to creditors were agreed an interest suspended.

Since then, payments have increased in line with affordability.

We have reapid a considerable amount, but still have a fair way to go.

 

I know some will say, 'why didn't you try to go the non-cca, unenforceable route'

but, all apart from one were helpful (I did get SD set aside re Arrow Global as they wouldn't play ball)

so did not want to pursue the fight with the others.

 

Fast forward to now and our circumstances have taken a turn for the worse and,

due to a reduction in income (husband self-employed and work slowed, loss of income due to ongoing health issues and hospital visits),

we can no longer afford the current repayment levels,

so we have written to the remaining creditors to explain the situation (and included an up-to-date I&E).

 

The one I would like to ask advice on is Idem.

ORIGINAL DEBT TO MBNA APPROX £7800

APPROX MBNA PAID £4400

APPROX PAID TO IDEM SO FAR £2000

 

Original Creditor MBNA agreed a repayment programme that, provided we kept to until they were repaid,

they would leave us alone (which they did).

 

 

We continued the payments, then in September 2012,

we were advised that they had sold the remaining debt to Idem Capital Securities Ltd,

but that the agreement would continue (which it did).

We began paying the same payments to Idem but, we cannot afford these now.

 

Idem has written (see letter C) saying that they need express consent to process the information in our letter and I&E,

either in writing or by a phone call. As we won't deal with any of this at the telephone, the signed confirmation is the only option.

 

DO WE HAVE TO SIGN AND RETURN THIS?

WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS IF WE DO?

WHAT IF WE DON'T?

 

What we don't want is for them to 'get heavy' with us, because we can't pay what we can't currently afford.

If the repayment programme with MBNA was in place and a default notice never issued as a result (don't have one in file anyway),

when the debt was sold to Idem, did that terminate the account and could Idem take us to Court if we can't agree on continued repayments?

 

Any suggestions on how to proceed?

 

Thanks

 

 

Sorry, forgot how to attach copy letter, it's been so long since I posted on here!!

 

Think this should work. Didn't-too small, sorry.

 

Hoping this works. Can someone let me know if you can see this copy ok. If not, I'll try the other suggested method.

 

Stigman, Thanks for the response.

Yes we do have our own house (with equity, I'm afraid). You said send a CCA request (to Idem I presume). Is that n preference to a SAR (to MBNA)?

 

Also, do you know anything about the request to sign the 'express consent' letter and whether we have to do this in order for them to look at our chnge of circumstances/I&E?

 

I've got all the MBNA statements so I can look at them with regard to charges and a possible reclaim. How far can I go back?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

First of all you pay what you can afford, if it is £1 per calender month then so be it.

 

Do you own your own house?

 

I know in the past you said you did not but because now your finances are at a stretch and every penny counts as well as your health send the CCA Request, Because these accounts were opened before 2007 then the originals must be produced along with certain other elements as well.

 

Only a Judge can request to see your I&E, but these do help in debt reduction letters to back up your financial status, however if you own your own property then the creditor may go for the easy route and try to get a charging order and then force a sell.

 

Go for the CCA request first.

 

Second, reclaim all charges and any PPI from the Original Creditors (regardless if the debt has been sold on).

Please reclaim these yourself for free, never use a reclaim Company, any questions on how to do this or if you get stuck along the way then please ask.

 

Stigman

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Send the CCA request to whoever is chasing you, enclose the £1 Postal Order - Template Letter is here... http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?387435-CCA-Request-Consumer-Credit-Act-1974-**Updated-January-2015**

 

You do not need to sign the "Express Consent" Letter, Idem are duty bound by Law to follow the Data Protection Act so why they are asking you to sign so they can process your information baffles me.

 

With the MBNA Statements, their is no time limit so go right back to the Account was opened, you can claim for all charges including letter & telephone, late penalty charges and PPI if applied.

 

Stigman

Edited by Stigman
changed a "to" to a "by"

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would not send the I&E yet, see what Idem come back with with the CCA request.

 

Stigman

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

send them a CCA request

£1PO leave it blank

don't sign anything

 

 

do that for all the debts thru CCCs.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...