Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
    • Sleep apnoea: used to require the condition  to be “completely” controlled Sometime before June 2013 DVLA changed it to "adequately" controlled. I have to disagree with MitM regarding the effect of informing DVLA and S.88 A diagnosis of sleep apnoea doesn't mean a licence wont be granted, and, indeed, here it was. If the father sought medical advice (did he?) : this is precisely where S.88 applies https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64edcf3a13ae1500116e2f5d/inf1886-can-i-drive-while-my-application-is-with-dvla.pdf p.4 for “new medical condition” It is shakier ground if the opinion of a healthcare professional wasn’t sought. in that case it is on the driver to state they believed they met the medical standard to drive. However, the fact the licence was then later granted can be used to be persuasive that the driver’s belief they met the standard was correct. What was the other condition? And, just to confirm, at no point did DVLA say the licence was revoked / application refused? I’d be asking DVLA Drivers’ Medical Group why they believe S.88 doesn’t apply. S.88 only applies for the UK, incidentally. If your licence has expired and you meet the conditions for S.88 you can drive in the U.K., but not outside the U.K. 
    • So you think not pay until DN then pay something to the oc to delay selling to dcas?    then go from there? 
    • think about it, if you don't pay the full amount, what more can they do , default you  they've already registered a default notice by that point.  why have you got to await sale to a DCA.... for what?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Copart sold car with altered mileage


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2678 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

2 weeks ago bought car from Copart. Car was advertised as having 70K miles on clock, picture of odometer reading shown etc. After purchase VOSA database showed last years mileage reading as 132K miles.

Contacted Copart - usual bull** as we are not responsible, we deny anything, we dont check mileage etc. One of call centre staff actually informed that they had MOT on file and Copart DID see mileage discrepancy but chose not to advise buyers of this.

Any ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, welcome to CAG

 

Please help advisors by letting them know what you are looking for?

 

EG reject car, refund compensation etc etc

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have access to the advertisements?

 

ultimately if they advertised the mileage, whether they "check it or not" it is presumed accurate. Even worse if they have the paperwork that contradicts their own advertising.

The mileage is a "Trade description"

 

"A false trade description or a failure to comply with the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008, is a breach of the law and is treated as a criminal offense. "

 

Not only that but would also be a breach of the sales of goods act.

 

If it were me, I would write a formal letter of complaint rejecting the car on those two bases. Title it Letter Before Action. Send Recorded Delivery, keep a copy and proof of postage and receipt

 

State that if they do not take the car back and/or refund it then you will take further action resulting in a claim in the county court for the vehicle and court costs AND report them to trading standards.

 

The latter I would do anyway, forwarding proof of the advertising AND paperwork.

 

Feel free to use this thread to help get feedback on any letters before you send them.

 

We do have other members on CAG that are more upto speed with things involving Car Sales, so take on board their advice.

 

It does not matter what they say regarding checking the mileage. They advertised it as such AND had paperwork contradicting their advertisement.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for advice. The problem is that only one of the staff (and over the phone) mentioned that they had MOT, everyone else just keep quiet or says they didnt check anything, etc. and based on T&C's (that car should be checked by buyers before purchase) they refuse refunds or any kinds of compensations.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can say they refuse all refund and compensations all they like, they have to abide by the law.

 

Do you have a copy of the advertisement. If not, can you get a copy?

 

A General disclaimer can not be hidden behind. If they marketed it with mileage, they are responsible for checking it. The law presumes them "Experts"

 

Does any of the paperwork that came with the car, service history or mots have the true mileage on them that contradicts the current mileage?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately advert only shows odometer picture with 70K on it and there are no confirmation of mileage. Unfortunately mileage field shows as - unknown even do other cars they advertise have disclaimer in this field - mileage discrepancy, but not for car i purchased.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the picture might be enough, await more advice

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A dealer must take steps to verify the mileage of a car. He cannot say he doesn't know, he must tell you the steps taken to verify the mileage.

As you have found the mileage is different to when advertised, then so could the dealer so they cannot use the excuse that they checked but could not verify.

 

 

You 'must' report this to Trading Standards. Trading standards will not do anything on your behalf, but if they have other reports about the same dealer and about incorrect

mileage, they will investigate and if they find clocking is routine, they will prosecute. The sentence for clocking is invariably prison.

 

 

It would be a good idea to contact the previous owner and ask him what the mileage was when he sold it.

 

 

Was the car advertised as HPI checked or were you told that by the salesman ?

 

 

If either, then you should do an HPI check yourself and see what it comes back with. If the mileage is as you suspect, and you want a refund, then you must write, preferably using recorded delivery, and give the car details, the problem and say you reject the car for a full refund.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

And yes it was HPI clear etc (maybe some misleading as to the condition, but thats not my issue). And no, it was not sold as salvage since it didnt had any category or damage to it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you think the previous owner altered the mileage ?

 

You say it was HPI clear, who did the HPI check, the seller or you ?

What is the mileage shown on the MoT certificate ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you read their Terms of Service Winnie, it clearly states:

 

 

"YOU EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT YOU ARE NOT A CONSUMER OF OUR SERVICES, BUT A TRADE PURCHASER. AS SUCH YOU ACCEPT THAT IT IS FAIR AND REASONABLE IN ALL THE CIRCUMSTANCES FOR US TO EXCLUDE, RESTRICT OR LIMIT (AS THE CASE MAY BE) OUR OBLIGATIONS AND LIABILITY TO YOU IN RESPECT OF THE LOTS WE OFFER FOR SALE ON BEHALF OF SELLERS (WHO ON OCCASIONS MAY BE US)."

 

Buying as a trader makes a big difference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What difference does it make? Unfortunately I am not "legal savvy" person and thats why i am here. Previous owner had car for 2 years and last mileage record (August 2014) recorded as 132K miles.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are sold a car and the seller puts on 'Trade Sale' then he is attempting to take away your statutory rights.

 

 

If you are a trader you are not protected by consumer rights. If you declare yourself a trader but are a consumer, then the seller hasn't made an attempt to take away your statutory rights,

you did that by declaring yourself a trader.

 

 

But trader or not, you still have rights if you were deliberately misled into buying something because it was mis described.

 

 

You haven't said why you think it was the last owner who altered the mileage ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, Coparts Members pledge:

 

- at the time the vehicle was listed for sale, the vehicle's odometer reading was no less than the mileage recorded against the vehicle's registration number in the most recently available information from the DVLA and/or HPI.

 

If any of the above conditions are not met, Copart UK will refund the purchase price and all buyer's fees and applicable taxes, subject to the limitations and eligibility requirements listed in the Terms and Conditions of the Member Protection Pledge program.

 

And they still refused refund!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then send for an HPI report and check the V5 to see if the last owner added mileage when he sold it (optional).

 

 

That way you will have proof and can make a legitimate claim against them for a refund.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...