Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all,        I really need to start my own thread on this Claim with Overdales/Lowell for a Cap One debt. but have already got to this stage .. My initial question for the moment - until replies come in - is that I figure my main stance is that a purchased debt cannot be claimed, debts can only be claimed by the original issuer of the debt .. but mediation is about coming to an agreement. So would I be acting in bad faith if I enter into mediation yet not seeking to come to a financial agreement? Also, I need to reject the scheduled time slot and ask for another as I'm not going to be free during those hours. The wording of the email gives the impression that I am given this one slot and if I reject it, then I am rejecting mediation - there is no mention of rescheduling, only of freeing up the slot for others .. although, I would have thought it would say so, if there were no possibility to reschedule.. Can I ask for another date without issue?   Anyway, if it's more helpful, I am happy to post up my defence and start a proper thread? I had a lot on at the time and had to do things right away due to the time limits, so didn't feel I had time to come here and go back and forth for info, so put my defence together from reading through relevant threads, late at night. CCA request appears to have been fulfilled (I'm still to check the accuracy of the documents). The other thing, asking solicitors about the particulars of the claim, hasn't .. although I forgot to ask for proof of postage and didn't send recorded post either (whereas the CCA I did), so not sure if I can pursue that easily ..?  
    • There is a plea guilty website...   Screenshot 2024-05-22 144200.pdf
    • Looking for a bit of assistance. I moved into a rented flat on 20th April 2024. I viewed it on the 14th April. Before I moved into the flat, the letting agency provided me with an offer sheet, in said offer sheet I made a number of requests and conditions related to me progressing with assuming the tenancy. These were: 1. A professional clean of the flat prior to move in date. 2. The hob, shower glass and bathroom cabinet be replaced prior to move in date. These were all planned actions by the landlord when I viewed it. I could see the boxes for the hob and other items in the flat. I prepared to move in on the 20th April but none of the work mentioned in the offer sheet had been completed. The standard of the clean was abysmal - mouldy food left in the fridge, nothing wiped down, bathroom mouldy etc. The hob, shower glass and bathroom cabinet were also not installed. I decided to not officially move into the flat as it was not in a condition as promised, my partner lives relatively close by so I lived with her initially. It was only on the 24th April that the hob, shower glass and bathroom cabinet were installed. The cleaners visited again 2 weeks after move in date (3rd April) and attempted another clean of the flat. Again, it was a poor job. I resorted to cleaning the flat myself. I have numerous pictures of the things I identified during my clean and have sent this all to the letting agency. Because of the issues faced, I asked the letting agency that the rent be reduced for the initial month. Exactly halved - to represent the 2 weeks that I was not living at the property. The landlord and letting agency have responded by saying that they will be willing to accept 1 weeks rent as a deduction but not 2. My question is, am I in a strong position to insist on the 2 weeks rent returned or have I been fortunate that they have even offered a weeks rent as a deduction? I would like to insist on the 2 weeks. I have paid the 2 weeks only as my rent collection date passed 2 days ago. Thank you for any assistance. Any further relevant details required let me know and I will provide.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/weightmans claimform - old Cap1 'debt'


mrben22
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3039 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Defence amended and checked.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks andy

 

 

mrben

 

 

you can copy and paste that directly from here into the mcol page

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy many thanks for your help . I have taken your amendments now , very much appreciated

 

Unfortunately Im in a right panic now as logged onto MCOL site to file defence , and when you get to the 3rd page where you input your defence an go to next , you get error message !! due to technical issues

 

Not sure if site is having problems , Ive tried it several times and will continue to this afternoon before 4pm , but the help desk number on the error page , rings then constantly get engaged tone !!

 

fingers crossed its just a blip with the site or I really am in trouble now !

Link to post
Share on other sites

quite usual

 

 

you can email the defence later so no panic

 

 

see what happens

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

MCOL is only one way of responding to a claim. If you are having problems logging in, or would prefer not to use MCOL, you can fax, email or post your response to the Court instead. If you send your response by e mail please send it to [email protected] and ensure you quote “Claim response” in the subject field. If you are fully admitting to the claim then the admission form should be sent to the claimant directly and not to the court.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

DX you may have saved the day for me ......YET AGAIN !

 

Im in a panic to get it sent over as Ive limited time today to be available to do so, hence why trying now having had the OK that defence is ready from yourself and Andy

 

When you say I can e mail it , do you happen to know the correct e mail address to sent it from or do I have to just send it to the e mail address listed on the error message

 

page on MCOL site of : [email protected] ??

 

Is there anything particular about what I need to include in the subject title or body of the email in terms of usual protocol when e mailing defence , as well the defence document itself i.e in a word document ??

 

sorry not wanting to waste more of your time on admin matters like this , just value your opinion & experience as seems you use to hearing of these MCOL error messages !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

post 30

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy / DX

 

thank you both very much , yet again for such timely response and assistance.

 

Would it be prudent to sent the defence as a PDF file as sending via e mail or a word doc will be OK ??

 

Sorry if im being overly worried now , will be able to leave you to assist others now , until I have any further update.

 

Hope you have a good Easter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi

 

So I have now had a response from Weightmans as somewhat expected advising that they do not accept my defence I submitted.(attached below )

Having been away for a while & had to sort by PC & technology problems out , I have now also received both :

 

- a letter and " proposed directions " form to complete from weightmans , basically suggesting the claim be stayed for 3 months to allow both parties oppoertunity to negotiate settlement.

 

- a Notice of Proposed Allocation To The Fast Track , and 6 page directions questionnaire to complete from the court.

 

Also both attached and I obviously need to respond to asap although I dont really understand what I should or should not be doing now ??

 

Only details I got back from Cabot in response to my request are a pile of statements summaries , a letter of statement of account , a badly copied photocopy of the original short application form and an up to date set of CC agreement T&C's (which are obviously not the original ones as they details £12 default fees as opposed to the £20 they were at the original time ! ) . This response bck from cabot was recieved on the 9th May 2015 although they dated them the 1st May 2015.

 

Hope someone can advise of my best required course of action now please and offer advise of completing details I need to get back ?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are now at Allocation stage ...this progresses the claim to track and outlines the directions of how the claim will proceed.Its very important that you complete the N181 and return it by the date stated.

 

It is important to note that within the claimants directions they have opted for SCT Small Claims Track......significant on a claim over 10K and may be perceived as a signal of weakness in its claim.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy

 

Thank you for your reply , I have now read through standard directions CPR 28 and Leaflet EX305 (as mentioned on the directions questionnaire from the court ) and tried to understand their contents as best I can.

 

In view of the fact that overall if need be , I think I would need to try and reach an agreed settlement on this claim and avoid any possibility of going to a court trial

Do I return the proposed directions to weightmans that they sent to me , agreeing to their suggested 3 months stayed period to try and negotiate a settlement ?? and if I do , Its presumably best just to print my written name on it rather than my actual signature on it ??

 

The proposed directions from weightmans suggest this 3 month period of claim to be stayed for negotiation , however the EX305 states that a judge will usually only allow to be stayed for 1 month , and if more time is required a judge will usually only give parties a further 1 month and no more ??

 

Weightmand proposed directions (point 5 ) a hearing for the claim would be a date in Jan / Feb 2016 . Presumably this does not have any bearing on the claim being potentially statue barred at this point , as the last payment I made on this was on the 3/1/2010 ??

 

If I am in agreement with these proposed directions from weightmans (as they seem a reasonable & realistic timescale , to attempt negotiation & reach settlement of the claim ) , then do I complete the the directions questionnare along these lines and do I need to send a copy to weightmans as well ?? or just return their proposed directions to them with my agreement.

 

Im at the point now where I believe I will have to try and reach a settlement with weightmans / cabot Financial , as they appear to be confident they have enough evidence to force the issue to trial and I really cannot afford to get a CCJ against me now having put all other debts & financial problems behind me over the last 5 and a half years !

My only case against them now seems to be that they have never been able to provide any true copy of a completed CCA agreement other than the original application form with my signature on (which may be adequate for their purposes to prove enforcement of the debt ? ) and they only ever provide a seperate copy of standard recent T&C's of the CCA rather than any original one or signed copy etc .

 

I aware I need to get details back to the court now asap and well within their deadline which I will ensue I do , just want to make sure that accepting that I need to agree to weightmans proposed directions & to try and negotiate is realistically by best chance to avoid getting a CCJ issued against me ?

 

sorry lots of questions I Know , Im just anxious to process this as I need too now and not take too much of your time keep coming back to you unnecessarily with lots of further questions.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

mediation etc..theres nowt to mediate over until they provide an enforceable agreement

stand your ground

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy

 

Thank you for your reply , I have now read through standard directions CPR 28 and Leaflet EX305 (as mentioned on the directions questionnaire from the court ) and tried to understand their contents as best I can.

 

In view of the fact that overall if need be , I think I would need to try and reach an agreed settlement on this claim and avoid any possibility of going to a court trial

Do I return the proposed directions to weightmans that they sent to me , agreeing to their suggested 3 months stayed period to try and negotiate a settlement ?? and if I do , Its presumably best just to print my written name on it rather than my actual signature on it ?? You complete your N180 and also agree to Small Claims Track and mediation...copy to the court signed copy to the claimant (unsigned) also attach a copy of the directions to both....I personally wouldn't agree 3 months ...say 2...this is only allowing them more time to try to retrieve said agreement...its not for mediation purposes.

 

The proposed directions from weightmans suggest this 3 month period of claim to be stayed for negotiation , however the EX305 states that a judge will usually only allow to be stayed for 1 month , and if more time is required a judge will usually only give parties a further 1 month and no more ?? See above

 

Weightmand proposed directions (point 5 ) a hearing for the claim would be a date in Jan / Feb 2016 . Presumably this does not have any bearing on the claim being potentially statue barred at this point , as the last payment I made on this was on the 3/1/2010 ?? Clock stopped anyway on issue of the claim

 

If I am in agreement with these proposed directions from weightmans (as they seem a reasonable & realistic timescale , to attempt negotiation & reach settlement of the claim ) , then do I complete the the directions questionnare along these lines and do I need to send a copy to weightmans as well ?? or just return their proposed directions to them with my agreement. See above

 

Im at the point now where I believe I will have to try and reach a settlement with weightmans / cabot Financial , as they appear to be confident they have enough evidence to force the issue to trial and I really cannot afford to get a CCJ against me now having put all other debts & financial problems behind me over the last 5 and a half years !

My only case against them now seems to be that they have never been able to provide any true copy of a completed CCA agreement other than the original application form with my signature on (which may be adequate for their purposes to prove enforcement of the debt ? ) and they only ever provide a separate copy of standard recent T&C's of the CCA rather than any original one or signed copy etc .And that is the crux of the claim...hence the 3 months stay...no valid agreement ...no enforcement

 

I aware I need to get details back to the court now asap and well within their deadline which I will ensue I do , just want to make sure that accepting that I need to agree to weightmans proposed directions & to try and negotiate is realistically by best chance to avoid getting a CCJ issued against me ? Possibly should you wish to agree settlement

 

sorry lots of questions I Know , Im just anxious to process this as I need too now and not take too much of your time keep coming back to you unnecessarily with lots of further questions.

Thanks

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

DX thanks for your reply

Your response has also been my attitude up until this point , however it would seem that weightmans / cabot appear to be confident that despite me requested a true copy of a CCA with all the true and original T&C's , that they just provide the copy of the original short application for with my signature on at the bottom !

 

Im starting to worry that this copy of the application form may actually constitute an adequate form of documentation to be able to prove enforceablility of the debt ?

 

I need to reply to weightsmans by the 9th at the latest , (so in post SD on Monday 8th ) in response and acceptance of their proposed direction , as I poposed up in post 35. Presumably if I do accept this , than at the very least its buying me some time to negotiate / clarify whats required from the claimant ??

 

As I mentioned because im not sure or confident whether they have adequate to enforce the debt , I really cant afford to have a CCJ registered against me at this point , having spent the last 5 and half years suffering the effects of all credit history being completely trashed and sorting out all other previous debts which are now settled.

Andy had previously suggested that their proposed small claims track perhaps suggests a weakness in their claim , is this because they cannot actually provide a signed CCA or does the application form constitute the same as this , as they appear to believe it does ?

 

I certainly dont want to accept this particularly in view of the fact that as of Jan 2016 I believe enough time would have past for it to be potentially statute barred , however not sure If this is the most realistic path I have to take to avoid a CCJ ?

 

Hence the number of questions I raised / asked in post 37 , if either yourself or Andy could offer anything further to help answer these and direction for me, id really appreciate your help , you have both been invaluable in all your help to this stage.

 

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

DX /Andy

 

Sorry just sent my last post (post 40 ) and then had seen that Andy had also just replied to my previous questions in his reply post 39

 

I will respond as Andy has suggested and copy in court & weightmans , just perhaps update the proposed stay to the 2 month period as Andy suggests ..

 

It would seem that no one can really be sure whether the Short application form which does have my signature on , does actually constitute adequate proof to enforce the debt or not ? as I cant ever actually remember ever signing anything other than this in terms of an actually CCA

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi ya

I see andy has answered

whilst you were posting.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so cabot have responded with a reply to your CCA request?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DX /Andy

 

Sorry just sent my last post (post 40 ) and then had seen that Andy had also just replied to my previous questions in his reply post 39

 

I will respond as Andy has suggested and copy in court & weightmans , just perhaps update the proposed stay to the 2 month period as Andy suggests ..

 

It would seem that no one can really be sure whether the Short application form which does have my signature on , does actually constitute adequate proof to enforce the debt or not ? as I cant ever actually remember ever signing anything other than this in terms of an actually CCA

Cabots reply does not comply with s78(1)

 

Read the app form refers to clause 23 overleaf nowhere to be seen

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Just a quick update

The only details i have had since I last posted are now attached and consist of

 

- a settlement offer sent from claimant (which I just ignored and frankly would advise that I had never recieved if need be )

 

- a notice of transfer of proceedings

 

- a standard order for stay for settlement with consent of all parties. (this details claim being stayed until 1st september 2015 )

 

- a copy of the claimants directions questionnaire that they submitted. ( I note in section C , THE PRE-ACTION PROTOCOLS , their comments about how they have NOT complied with the relevant pre-action protocol and not providing copy documentation ! ) so they have stated that they have not to date provided a vlalid copy of the CCA , other than the application form I posted previously )

 

my question is , In view of the fact that the stay period of the 1st sept is next week should I be sending or registering any further details , sent asap now & recorded before this date ?? The claimant has not sent any further details to me since their previous settlement offer on the 9th june which I viewed as just ridiculous and completely out of the question and so just ignored it completely !

 

I dont know what the next stage is to be & likely timescales ??

 

Any further advise or thoughts at this stage would be most appreciated as always

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you completed a directions questionnaire and returned it already? That's all that's required of you unless some sort of settlement has been reached and the claimant then notifies the court.

 

I note they have requested Small Claims Track. Are they trying to protect themselves against a big costs bill in the event they lose? It could be a fair indication of their confidence in this claim. On the other hand, it would also protect you against having to pay substantial costs should you go to trial and lose.

 

Just wait until you hear more from the court - probably a hearing date and directions. Soon after you should have a chance to get a better idea of how strong the claimant is positioned when you get their witness statement and any disclosure of documents/evidence. If there are weaknesses present you can then try to exploit them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On a £16 K claim ...no chance of SCT...its to protect themselves having to pay the hearing fee £545 in FT ....£170 In SCT.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

ih

 

since my last update the following are the documents and correspondence I have had from the court and the claimants solicitors.

 

- a standard order for further stay until the 8th feb 2016 (which the claimants presumably requested as I did not) , dated the 161015

 

- 2 further suggested settlement offers from weightmans . I did not respond to either as im not in a postion to consider offers of this sort of amounts. dated the 301015 and 231115.

 

- a copy of suggested Draft Directions from weightmans that they are proposing to submit asking for me to agree with or make suggested amendments.

 

so it would appear that the claimant are determined to take this to a court hearing if need be.

 

If I send the agreed Directions back confirming that I agree with these , do I then presumably await to hear from the court of a date as suggested some time in April / May for the hearing ? and can expect to get any related documents they intend to use no later than 14 days before this hearing ?

 

As stated previously the only CCA documentation they have ever provided is a copy of a short application form as I have uploaded before and the t&c's have always been copies of more up to date ones as they contain details of the £12 late fees etc rather than £20 fees that would have been in place at the time of this agreement in 2002. So Im still unsure as to exactly what makes them confidently believe they have an enforceable agreement ?

 

In the time between now and any date for a hearing in April / May , is it still acceptable to reach a settlement agreement , I cant possibly entertain the figures their offers have suggested but if it came to it am unsure as to whether I should attempt to reach some form of agreement to pay back in instalments . Its taken the last 5 years to try and get my financial history slightly back on track that and I really want to try and avoid it being completely trashed again for the next 5 or 6 years with a CCJ on there ! But Im not really at all confident in what they believe they have to make this an enforecable agreement .

 

As always any advise would be most appreciated , thank you

Weightmans Settlement Offer No.2_ 301015.pdf

Weightmans settlement offer No.3_ 231115.pdf

Order for FURTHER Stay for settlement 161015.pdf

Weightmans Draft Directions_Before Feb 8th_190116.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Directions seem standard and fine mrben so I would run with them...with regards to their offers they do not appear to be in that much of a hurry to get to trial.

 

"If I send the agreed Directions back confirming that I agree with these , do I then presumably await to hear from the court of a date as suggested some time in April / May for the hearing ? Yes I assume you have completed and submitted your DQ ? and can expect to get any related documents they intend to use no later than 14 days before this hearing ? Correct and you must also do your disclosure and witness statement by any preset date.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...