Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Regretfully it does. Have you actually seen any papers which show what you were charged with (rather than what you were convicted of)? It is unusual not to be “dual charged” but if you were not charged with both, you are where you are. If you had been charged with both offences and providing you were the driver at the time, you could, after performing your SD, have asked the prosecutor to drop the “Fail to Provide” (FtP) charges in exchange for a guilty plea to the speeding charges (you cannot be convicted of speeding unless you plead guilty as they have no evidence you were driving). You will have difficulty defending the FtP charges. In fact, it’s worse than that – you have no chance of successfully defending them at all because the reason you did not respond to the requests is because you did not receive them and that’s entirely your fault. No it’s not correct. Six months from 18/11/23 was 18/5/24 so, unless they were originally charged, the speeding offences are now “timed out.” There is one avenue left open to you. If you perform your SD you must serve it on the court which convicted you. You will then receive a date for a hearing to have the matters heard again. Your only chance of having the matters revert to speeding (and this is only providing you were the driver at the time of those offences) is to plead Not Guilty, attend court and ask the prosecutor (very nicely, explaining what a pillock you know you were for failing to update your  V5C) if (s)he is prepared to raise “out of time” speeding charges, to which you will offer to plead guilty if the FtP charges are dropped.   This is strictly speaking not lawful. Charges have to be raised within six months. Some prosecutors are willing to do it, others are not. But frankly it’s the only avenue open to you. There is a risk with this. I imagine you have been fined £660 (plus surcharge and costs) for each offence. The offence attracts a fine of 1.5 week’s net income and where the court has no information about the defendant’s means a default figure of £440pw is used.  If the prosecutor is not prepared to play ball you can revise your pleas to guilty. A sympathetic court should give you the full discount (one third) for your guilty pleas in these circumstances but they may reduce the discount somewhat. The prosecution may also ask for increased costs (£90 or thereabouts is the figure for a guilty plea). So it may cost you more if you have a decent income (I’ll let you do the sums). But MS90 is an endorsement code which gives insurers a fit of the vapours. One such endorsement will see your premiums double. Two of them will see many insurers refuse to quote you at all. So you really want to exhaust every possibility of avoiding them if you can. One warning: do not pay solicitors silly money to defend you. Making an SD before a solicitor should attract just a nominal sum (perhaps a tenner). That’s all you should pay for. You have no viable defence against the FtP charges and any solicitor suggesting you have is telling you porkies. The offer to do the deal is easily done by yourself and you can save the solicitor’s fees to put towards a few taxis and increased insurance premiums if you are unsuccessful. In the happy event you find out you were "dual charged", let me know and I'll tell you how to proceed. (Seems a bit odd hoping you were charged with four driving offences rather than two, but it's a funny old world!).    
    • Just the sort of people you despise eh Jugg  You would be much happier among your mates in that room with Rayner begging for votes 
    • I see the trial of the real criminal in the Biden Family has started rather than the sham political persecution of Trump    Biden will of course try to distance himself as far as possible to no avail  Even more votes for The Donald🤣    
    • Savings platform Raisin UK is offering a £50 bonus for new customers who sign up for an account.View the full article
    • With Farage back in the news, here's a reminder of his interview with Claire Byrne on Irish TV a few years ago.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bought car with gearbox problems - V12 Sports & Classics, Leicester repaired but still not fixed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2675 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Bought a Mazda 6 diesel estate , 61 plate from V12 Sports & Classics, Leicester.

 

 

The gear selection became 'notchy' within the 100 mile drive home.

within the next 100 miles it got worse and occasionally crunched into 2nd gear.

 

 

I contacted V12 and the car was returned to their 'preffered' garage and left for repair.

I contacted their garage after 1 week and was told the gearbox had been removed

and sent away to a specialist, they had reported that gears 1 to 4 needed replacing,

the garage were waiting for V12 to authorise repair or replacement.

 

 

A week later I was told the car was fixed,

I went and collected the car on a Saturday,

I was told a 2nd hand gearbox had been fitted.

 

 

It was immediately apparent when I drove the car that the problem was not fixed,

I pulled over and contacted V12 who repeatedly told me it had been fixed

and there was nothing wrong with it despite me being sat in it telling them it was not fixed.

 

 

It was decided that I should take it back to the garage.

a mechanic took it for a drive with me in the passenger seat,

he changed gear very carefully,

pausing in neutral, letting the rpm drop to tick over on the gear changes before selecting the next gear,

the box was still lumpy and he stated 'its not the smoothest of boxes'.

 

 

He suggested I try it for a week?

I took it back to V12 where there were no aftersales team available!

A salesman took the car for a test drive again, he never drove it over 1500rpm,

 

 

I pointed out that you do not drive cars this way,

the gear change was still notchy at 1500rpm,

however I suggested I drive the car.

 

 

At 2500-3000 rpm the gear change could be felt through the car.

The salesman acknowkledged the problem and said a member of the aftersales team would call me on Monday

I left V12 and travelled the 100 miles home.

 

 

I e-mailed a histopry of the problems to their customer services

and requested all correspondence be in writing or e-mail from this point on

as I felt I was being fobbed off.

 

 

I had no correspondence from them.

 

 

I sent a letter by e-mail and also recorded delivery formally rejecting the vehicle

and telling them they could collect it anytime,

I was no longer prepared to travel the 200 mile round trip.

 

 

received an e-mail back stating it had been passed to their legal team,

I have not heard anything since,

 

 

what do i do next?

Car was £6400,

i can get another replacement gearbox fitted for £1000 quoted by a local garage.

 

 

I have only done 1000 miles in the car and 400 of this was travelling too and from the sellers address.

 

Any advice would be appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

how did you pay for the car?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

aw shame I was hoping for finance

 

 

you complained within 14 days mind I'm sure you can cancel the whole thing?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, complained by e-mail within 14 days of purchase, and rejected the car 2 days after picking it up following the failed repair. I have heard nothing from them since other than they were passing it to their legal team. Can I have the vehicle repaired locally and regain the costs through the small claims court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes I believe you can.

 

 

the normal crew that advise on these things don't appear to be around the last few weeks.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's a VISA debit card then you can try Charge back---contact VISA for further advice. If you reject a car, you cannot use it after it's been rejected.

I always advise to buy anything of value on straight HP as the finance company are partly responsible and you have comeback. I did this with my last car even although I had funds to pay it outright.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The finance company are more than 'partly' responsible Scaniaman, they are 'wholly responsible. They are assumed to have bought the car even if they weren't present at the time and any faults are the finance companies. So any problems are between the finance company and the seller and not the customer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is nothing for the so called 'legal department' to look at Rich, this is a straight forward rejection, as you say, done by letter as the regulations require unless advised by the seller otherwise.

 

 

You should now write to them and request that the funds are transferred back to the debit card by the end of 7 working days or action to recover will be taken without further notice. Send that recorded.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is nothing for the so called 'legal department' to look at Rich, this is a straight forward rejection, as you say, done by letter as the regulations require unless advised by the seller otherwise.

 

 

You should now write to them and request that the funds are transferred back to the debit card by the end of 7 working days or action to recover will be taken without further notice. Send that recorded.

 

I already asked for the refund stating within 14 days when I wrote and rejected the car,

the only response was the 'legal team' response

- the e-mail received along with the one sent is pasted in below.

 

 

The letter I sent with the e-mail is pretty much a diary of the problems and correspondence, it also rejects the vehicle.

 

Hello Mr ........,

 

Thank-you for your e-mail.

 

I have forwarded it on to our legal team.

 

Regards,

 

Brian Coleman

 

Further to my e-mail of 21st February to which I have received no response;

 

I attach a letter formally rejecting the vehicle LR61 HFZ due to the fault reported to you shortly after purchase.

 

You have left me with no option but to reject the vehicle under Section 14 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979

which requires dealers to supply goods of satisfactory quality;

 

 

following your lack of response regarding your failed repair of the vehicle using second hand parts from a breakers yard.

 

 

I have allowed 11 days for a response from V12 but now need to move forward

as it is now over 7 weeks since I purchased the vehicle and 6 weeks since the fault was first reported.

 

I have been advised that you have three options under the sale of goods act,

1 - Full refund, 2 - Partial refund to have the vehicle repaired myself, 3 - You can arrange to have the vehicle repaired.

 

I complied with the requirements of your terms of sale and reported the problem to ACR and V12,

then returned the vehicle to your repairer ACR all at my own convenience and cost.

The problem had not been rectified - see history in attached letter.

 

The attached letter will be sent by post, recorded delivery, it details the history of the problems to date.

 

I would prefer all correspondence to be in written format either letter by post (recorded) or e-mail to maintain a clear history on this matter.

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very doubtful they have a legal one let alone a team, more like a bloke down the pub.

 

 

Get on to them, don't let them keep you waiting. Send by special next day delivery if necessary, but tell them they have xx days left from the 14 and further action will be taken without any further notice on expiration.

 

 

You can also add that you will be adding the statutory 8% interest from the date of rejection.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I am in a very similar situation and with the same company,

 

this company does seem to be have a very strange way of dealings

 

 

.it seems once they have sold you a vehicle and funds have exchanged, its simple as [removed]

 

I will be going down the section 75 route, if satisfactory outcome hasn't been achieved from my complain.

 

just did a search and it turns up there's quite a few upset consumer experience with this company..

Edited by dx100uk
behave
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Rich.H. have you had any success in getting the money back.? Same situation here and I would really appreciate your input. We're at the stage where the car is with ACR and v12 wants us to split costs. I'be rejected the car for a month now

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

And they will continue to ride roughshod over customers unless they start taking action. A month since rejection is a silly amount of time to let them get away with it. Write to them by recorded and give them a time, no more than 7 days from receipt, to refund telling them if the money is not in the bank by that time you will issue a court summons.

 

 

Of course if you are willing to just sit and see what happens, then don't bother making court threats.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replying. I've given them 14 days when I sent the rejection letter by recorded mail - may 16. They said they want to try fix it and we took the car to ÀCR more than a week now. They haven't approved all repairs and now they want me to cover half the cost. Just told them I'm not cover of anything and I want my money back as initially. Should I write them one more time or go straight to court?

 

Thanks again for replying as I'm not familiar with the process.

 

The car came with the discount of 200 pounds for clutch high, but it needs full clutch and flywheel replacement and ÀCR discovered the gear box is faulty also.

Link to post
Share on other sites

but make sure you do go thru with the threat

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replying. I've given them 14 days when I sent the rejection letter by recorded mail - may 16. They said they want to try fix it and we took the car to ÀCR more than a week now. They haven't approved all repairs and now they want me to cover half the cost. Just told them I'm not cover of anything and I want my money back as initially. Should I write them one more time or go straight to court?

 

Thanks again for replying as I'm not familiar with the process.

 

The car came with the discount of 200 pounds for clutch high, but it needs full clutch and flywheel replacement and ÀCR discovered the gear box is faulty also.

This company has some major issues with cars and their preferred garage ACR , I think is in with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
Hi, I bought a marcedes E300 hybrid (13) payed £18000 just now in July. Now I have gearbox problems "without changing gear consult workshop " V12 doesn't care

 

 

 

better to star a new thread

of your own please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

had issue with shock absorber in 2015 when i bought the car off them but had to accept partial cost as i didn't have the luxury of wasting time chasing it due to work. Stupidly enough got another car from them couple of months back, it's a lovely car no doubt and on a cheapest finance deal but i think there is an issue with clutch may be. The car jitters in first gear just about when you release the clutch full way up. Not sure if i should report this and would be covered in three months warranty service they provide or is just a minor issue and i should overlook it. What do you guys suggest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to start a new thread

of your OWN please

 

 

thread closed to stop newbies bumping a 3yrs old thread

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2675 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...