Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Informing DWP of changes - when?


Nystagmite
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3179 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Nystagmite:

 

:rant:Sheer ignorance of some general practioners about DWATO, specially blue ones as mine is, beggars belief! None of which helps you.

 

Sorry, but if your doctor won't support your claim with a Med 3, it's find a different practice or back to jobseekers. Waste of time completing the ESA50. Not meaning to sound harsh but that's the reality unless anyone's got any better ideas.

 

Think Jobcentre have to pay you jobseekers, assuming you keep the agreement, if your doctor, or Atos, say fit for work. Praps Antone or Flumps will know for sure.

 

Sincerely, Margaret. :hug:

 

I think if he fills in the ESA50 the WCA will still go ahead, but his payments will stop in the mean time when his current cert runs out.

 

I assume then if he passes the WCA for now his GP situation wont affect the benefit. Of course its possible a processing of the ESA50 and medical could take many weeks which wouldnt be practical without sick notes.

 

I also suggest to change GP, assuming you know yourself that you not well enough to work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 233
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks. He knows I'm ill and it's extremely unlikely I'm going to find a job which fits my requirements.

 

There is no way I can take part in the work programme and he knows there's no alternative - I have to take part. I can't.

 

He claims it's because he doesn't want me to spending my life on benefits. Where have I ever said that's going to happen? I just need a few months off to sort myself out.

 

That GP does not even make sense as surely you would go onto JSA or ESA and both are benefits? and there is nothing to stop you looking for work whilst on ESA just without the added stressors of the Work Programme (at least whilst you are on assessment anyway). And how can an ESA50 apply if you have to go back on to JSA because you have no access to sick notes....?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My thoughts exactly, Slatted. The GP's stance just doesn't make sense to me. But then I am a simple person! So the GP acknowledges his/her patient is unfit for work but won't provide the necessary written confirmation. Doesn't the GP know that a) that is not his/her patients best interest and b) even in the Support group of ESA you are quite entitled to look for work that you feel able to do.

I'm so sorry you're having such problems Nystagmite ...:grouphug:

Link to post
Share on other sites

ESA is for anybody sick for over 2 weeks as anything over 2 weeks means you are intelligible for JSA. There is no maximum nor is there a minimum term. ESA claim will have to be withdrawn and a claim for JSA made.

 

So.....

 

I'd explain all this to the RNIB, Council and whoever else you can think of to get a lot of pressure applied to the work program provider.

 

You know my musings on this already.

 

Did your GP not even put extra conditions/adaptations for a return on your fit note?

 

If not I would maybe suggest getting the practice manager involved and explain the situation and how without the adaptations you will suffer and deteriorate. Remember if/when you go back to work you will need exactly the same adaptations that also apply now to the Work Program.

 

As for GPs it's like banging your head against a brick wall at the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But, well, if a GP signs a Med 3 as "may be fit subject to the following adjustments" the ESA department will accept that as a med cert stating the claimant is unfit for work. This is on the basis that technically you don't need to be completely incapable of working to claim ESA, you just need to have LCW - Limited Capability for Work.

 

I restate: if a GP issues you a Med 3, this is fine for ESA purposes as long as it states your incapacity, gives an end date (unless you have already been on ESA for six months, which I know Nystagmite has not) and is signed and stamped.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. The fit note states my disabilities, adjustments needed to be made and the date as ongoing. I have been informed by an Audiologist that my hearing may return to normal; but he doesn't know when or if this will happen. (whereas everything else won't)

 

On the first note note, the date was July 2nd and I was signed off for a month. The second note is dated 25/7. Is that a problem?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. The fit note states my disabilities, adjustments needed to be made and the date as ongoing. I have been informed by an Audiologist that my hearing may return to normal; but he doesn't know when or if this will happen. (whereas everything else won't)

 

On the first note note, the date was July 2nd and I was signed off for a month. The second note is dated 25/7. Is that a problem?

 

The only concern I have here is that a cert marked as "UFN" (Until Further Notice, or ongoing) may not be accepted at this stage of your claim. The rules used to be that UFN certs could not be accepted until a claimant had provided six months worth of dated certs. This could have changed, though, as it was a guidance/procedural thing and not actually stated in the legislation.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nystagmite:

 

An extra thought;

 

Seem to remember you're in a support group. Is there a leader/organiser who could advocate your case for adjustments should you find yourself back on jobseekers for any reason?

 

Sincerely, Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nystagmite:

 

:oops: Completely missed the bit about reasonable adjustments. Sorry. Glad I suggested others may know more about it.

 

Assuming tomorrow goes alright, good luck with the ESA50.

 

Sincerely, Margaret.

 

Ah, these things happen. You are correct when you state that a failure of the WCA has to be accepted as prima facie evidence of capability for work for JSA purposes. The problems tend to arise because many people kicked off ESA aren't able to agree to the Jobseekers Agreements they are required to sign when claiming JSA because of their health condition. This is a systemic failure, of course, but one that needs to be considered.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

On the first note note, the date was July 2nd and I was signed off for a month. The second note is dated 25/7. Is that a problem?

 

Meant to note, although it's not directly relevant to your case, that overlapping certs are not a problem. A cert signed 02/07/2012 for one calendar month will be accepted as valid until 01/08/2012. If you subsequently present a cert signed 25/07/2012 then all that happens is that the end date of the new cert will take precedence.

 

On the other hand, a gap in certs can cause problems. This is one of those areas where I could elaborate, but won't unless someone really wants me to as it could be tedious.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nystagmite:

 

An extra thought;

 

Seem to remember you're in a support group. Is there a leader/organiser who could advocate your case for adjustments should you find yourself back on jobseekers for any reason?

 

Sincerely, Margaret.

 

Thanks. This has been brought up. I've not heard from the branch manager yet as to whether she did contact my adviser. Thanks for the reminder.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope it works out ok for you Nystagmite that is good news your cert will be valid and just date been the issue.

 

Indeed. And thanks for the clarification, antone, it was quite interesting ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nysty as we discussed in another thread you are going to have to put your GP to one side and start putting your own support services in place. Make this your one and only goal in life as it will make things far less stressful.

 

The G in GP stands for general. So for specialist tailored support you can't really expect them to know what is available. All you can do is find it yourself and if you need a GPs help in a referral to it, convince them. Helping yourself in this way should also tell them that this problem is that serious for you and your health that they have to help.

 

I have engaged my own welfare rights service, charities and am now paying for my own counseling as my GP is absolutely hopeless. I have also found out there are a lot more things he can and should have done for me. I am just preparing to leave for a new practice as this one since it reorganised in 2010 has consistently failed me.

 

Your GP does not sound too bad. I just think when they are out of their depth you have to educate them to get the best out of them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. If it makes any difference, this particular GP is a trainee.

 

Spoke to someone at the job centre this morning who wasn't sure, neither was the person she spoke to. Phoned ESA and they said that my fit note is acceptable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it makes any difference, this particular GP is a trainee.

 

I wonder? Talk to people, then if you have to, get your practice manager involved. Trust me demonstrating your needs backed up by evidence from other people and organisations can bring a pretty big change in how you are treated. It also has a bonus effect in your own understanding so you can play with things that might help.

 

It has taken me a bit of effort to get what I have in place and I am currently having to train my new counselor. She thought I was joking when I said I would like to learn how to do a handstand today. I even offered to buy her an ice cream too! Freud would have seriously investigated it and everybody knows he would never turn down a free ice cream.

 

All the stuff I have got in place will not fix me! It does allow me a bit of space from benefits, housing and my brain issues. Once you have the basics in place you can then go looking for more specialist support. It exists and the people handling your basics are the folks who will have a good idea of what is available beyond them. It also gives me the confidence to make big decisions and fight for the support/treatment I currently really need to have.

 

I know more about my issues and what treatment I need than my GP. It is not hard tbf. He has been an absolute disaster for me since my excellent nice lady doctor left. As soon as I figure out how it may effect my current referral I'm binning him as I think I've found somebody in a better position to help me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I received my DLA award last week. It mentioned something about communication (I said on DLA & ESA forms I have trouble) and something about needing help in unfamiliar places. Can I use my DLA award as evidence for ESA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received my DLA award last week. It mentioned something about communication (I said on DLA & ESA forms I have trouble) and something about needing help in unfamiliar places. Can I use my DLA award as evidence for ESA?

 

Highly unlikely that they will be interested in what the DLA report said. However, should you fail the ESA assessment, the DWP will and do use the ESA report to review your DLA entitlement

 

Simply put, no you can't use evidence for one benefit with another, but the DWP can if it means a possibility of being able to reduce the amount they pay you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The simple answer, to my mind, is yes. Of course. It is evidence of your disability or illnesses. I certainly intend to include details of my DLA award in the bumpf of evidence I'll be submitting to the DWP for ESA. It is true that the criteria of the benefits are different but all evidence that supports or highlights your illness and disability in any way helps form an overall picture for the DWP Decision Maker.

Any other evidence you can think of also has some merit. I have copies of a letter written by a consultant at Charing Cross Hospital. What I was seeing him for has absolutely nothing to do with my illness or ESA. However, he did note and comment on my physical state when writing to my GP. These side comments help to support my assertation of physical debilitation so it goes in the mix!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...