Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sending you a big hug. I’m sorry your going through this. The letters they send sound aweful, and the waiting game for them to stop. But these guys seem so knowledgable and these letters should stop. Hang in there, and keep in touch. Don’t feel alone 
    • In my time I've never seen a payout/commission from a PPC to a landlord/MA. Normally the installation of all the cameras/payment of warden patrols etc is free but PPCs keep 100% of the ticket revenue. Not saying it doesn't happen mind. I've done some more digging on this: Remember, what your lease doesn't say is just as important as what it does say. If your lease doesn't mention a parking scheme/employment of a PPC/Paying PCNs etc you're under no legal obligation to play along to the PPC's or the MA's "Terms and conditions". I highly doubt your lease had a variation in place to bring in this permit system. Your lease will likely have a "quiet enjoyment" clause for your demised space and the common areas and having to fight a PPC/MA just to park would breach that. Your lease has supremacy of contract, but I do agree it's worth keeping cool and not parking there (and hence getting PCNs) for a couple months just so that the PPC doesn't get blinded by greed and go nuclear on you if you have 4 or 5 PCNs outstanding. At your next AGM, bring it up that the parking controls need to be removed and mention the legal reasons why. One reason is that under S37(5b) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987,  more than 75% of leaseholders and/or the landlord would have needed to agree, and less than 10% opposed, for the variation to take place. I highly doubt a ballot even happened before the PPC was bought in so OPS even being there is unlawful, breaching the terms of your lease. In this legal sense,  the communal vote of the "directors" of the freehold company would have counted for ONE vote of however many flats there are (leases/tenants) + 1 (landlord). It's going to be interesting to see where this goes.  
    • @Whyisitthisthank you very much for asking. I am still feeling anxious, especially when someone rings the doorbell, or when I receive a letter I feel a it paranoid. I stopped going to the shops unless I really have to. I shop online now. When I see security I feel paralised. 
    • My expectation was their WS would include the best paperwork, like at least true copies of originals, but these just look wrong somehow, perhaps the font and size of font... Not sending me the DN in CCA request but producing it for evidence I would argue could be a tactic used by them... - Page 11 with ticks - there is no reference to IP addresses - Home addresses are correct for dates in documents   Just looking up example Defendant WS's while awaiting your thoughts on this
    • Hello lovely, just posting to check in to see how you are feeling now? Hopefully your feeling better? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Carter/Lowell/ - Claimform Orange mobile 'debt'


Remy3
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3362 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, I hope that I am on the right forum/ thread.

 

I have received a CCJ claim form for an old mobile phone that was with Orange. It is from Bryan Carter solicitors on behalf of Lowell Portfolio.

 

I have responded at MCOL tonight stating the intention to defend and asked for additional time. The claim was issued on the 21st Jan.

 

We constantly had issues with the signal of the phone and called numerous times over the three months

before we stopped paying the contract and took another contract out with another company who provided us with a vastly improved signal.

 

On the times that we called they agreed that there was issues with the local mast being out of order

and they admitted that there was a problem.

However we have no evidence of these conversations,

although I would hope they are on a call log somewhere.

 

There is no information at all about this account with the claim form,

No dates of original contract etc.

We estimate that we had the contract about 3-4 years ago, possibly longer.

 

The amount is for less than £200.

 

Your advice and help would be greatly appreciated.Many thanks

I may not be money rich, but I'm rich in other ways! I like to 'pay it forward'. One good turn triggers another!

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ideally you should not be asking for an extension

 

 

serves you no purpose to give THEM more time

to find paperwork they should already have before issuing a speculative claim hoping for a default uncontested judgement.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant Lowell Portfolio I Ltd, Ellington House

 

Date of issue 21st Jan 2015

Date of issue 21st + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) 9th Feb + 14 days to submit defence = 4pm Friday 20th Feb

What is the claim for – The claim is for £164.95,

the amount due under an agreement between the original creditor

and the defendant to provide finance and / or services and / or goods.

 

This debt was assigned to/purchased by Lowell Portfolio l Ltd on 29/08/14 and

notice served pursuant to the law of the property act 1925.

 

Particulars Re orangelink3.gif A/C **********

 

and the claimant claims £164.95

 

The claimant also claims statutory interestlink3.gif pursuant to s.69 of the country act 1984

at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of the assignment of the agreement to date

but limited to a maximum of one year and a maximum of 1000 amounting to 5.21

 

What is the value of the claim? £245.16

 

Is the claim for a current account (overdrafticon) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? Mobile phone account

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? ? Unsure of the start date,

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. By Lowell the debt purchaser?

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Can't remember

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Again, sorry can't recall?

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? Again, No recollection

Why did you cease payments? Lack of signal after 3 months of complaints

What was the date of your last payment? Sorry, can not remember, it was over 2-3 years ago

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? I suppose the lack of signal.

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementicon plan? No just complaints about lack of signal.

I may not be money rich, but I'm rich in other ways! I like to 'pay it forward'. One good turn triggers another!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks you for the advice on additional time. I just thought it was to give me more time.

I may not be money rich, but I'm rich in other ways! I like to 'pay it forward'. One good turn triggers another!

Link to post
Share on other sites

is that ALL of the PoC? what is the claim for bit?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

correction to your dates ...submit defence by = 4pm Friday 20th Feb

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The claim is for £164.95, the amount due under an agreement between the original creditor and the defendant to provide finance and / or services and / or goods.

This debt was assigned to/purchased by Lowell Portfolio l Ltd on 29/08/14 and notice served pursuant to the law of the property act 1925.

Particulars Re Orange A/C **********

 

and the claimant claims £164.95

 

The claimant also claims statutory interest pursuant to s.69 of the country act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of the assignment of the agreement to date but limited to a maximum of one year and a maximum of 1000 amounting to 5.21

 

 

Thanks

I may not be money rich, but I'm rich in other ways! I like to 'pay it forward'. One good turn triggers another!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok see if you can find out information from your credit files

noddle is free see below.

 

 

you need to send LOWELLS a CPR 31:14 from the legal section of the top green library tab.

 

 

have you moved since the contact

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I will check my file and send the form off to Lowells.

 

No we have not moved since. Thanks

I may not be money rich, but I'm rich in other ways! I like to 'pay it forward'. One good turn triggers another!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please also send Orange an SAR. Maybe this will reveal the call records you are referring to and also some useful screen notes - but don't hold your breath.

 

If you had bad service which they did not fix then you have a wining argument. However it will come down to whether you have the evidence - and if you lose it will be because you did not take the basic customer services precautions when dealing with them. You have been here since 2011.

 

Get the SAR off now, read our customer services guide and also try to put together a detailed chronological account of the problems you had and the steps you took to have them sorted out before you gave up.

 

Let's see the chronology here

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, I have sent off the SAR to Orange and registered with Noddle.

 

Noddle shows the account began on 17/01/2009 and defaulted on 26/11/2012

 

I am just starting the LOWELLS CPR 31:14

 

Many thanks

I may not be money rich, but I'm rich in other ways! I like to 'pay it forward'. One good turn triggers another!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Good Evening, I have received a response from Bryan Carter,

 

It say's

 

We write further to your letter of (Date) requesting disclosure under Part 31 of the civil procedure rules.

 

We confirm this matter will most properly be allocated to the small claims track as this is a simple contractual matter and Part 31 of the civil procedure rules will therefore not apply. . In any event the Notices of Default and Assignment left the control of the Claimant when they were dispatched to you.

 

It is the original creditors policy to issue at the start of the contract and statements throughout the duration of the agreement and , in this regard, we ask you to refer to your own records.

 

We confirm our client is not agreeable to an extension for filling the defence. (Spelling is theirs)

 

As you will be aware a claim was issued in this matter on 21st January 2015 and we are in receipt of your acknowledgement of service. Please respond to the claim using the response pack provided by the court. You should comply with the deadlines outlined by the court in order to avoid a default judgment being entered against you.

 

We recommend that you seek independent legal advice.

 

Yours sincerely BC

I may not be money rich, but I'm rich in other ways! I like to 'pay it forward'. One good turn triggers another!

Link to post
Share on other sites

std reply remy

 

 

go read a few carter threads

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...