Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • thread title updated. so a sold debt. who are the solicitors? TM legal? why didn't ovo do this themselves as they do but chose to sell the debt on for 10p=£1? funny debt you state you reived a letter of claim, why did you not reply too it.? also is there is no indication of the date this bill comes from on the claimform? how do you know its from 2022? what other previous paperwork have you received? please scan page 1 of the claimform and bothsides of ALL previous letters upto one mass pdf read upload carefully. .................. pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/466952-lowelloverdales-claimform-old-cap1-debt/?do=findComment&comment=5260464 .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
    • Thank you again. I'm hoping it will come out in the wash and will endeavour to check my online account. I'm a bit unsettled by not hearing from Booking.com but the host is sounding helpful at the moment. HB
    • I've just remembered that a friend of mine had bookings cancelled on Booking.com about a month ago - and the good news is that all worked out in the wash. I'm at work now but will scribble properly in a couple of hours with the full tale.
    • Thank you Dave. I've had nothing from Booking.com, just a message via the site from the host. I know I need to check my bank account, just trying to resolve some technical issues. HB  
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Civil National Business Centre Name of the Claimant ? JC INTERNATIONAL AQUISITION How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self Date of issue – 22 May 2024  Particulars of Claim What is the claim for – 1. The def owes the claimant £300 in respect of gas and electricity charges supplied by OVO. 2. Debt was assigned to the claimant with notice given to the def. 3. Despite formal demand the def has failed to pay the debt and the claimant claims £300 and further claims interest pursuant to s69 of the CCA 1984. What is the total value of the claim? £385 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Energy debt When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Moved home and they were the current energy supplier  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax/Etc...) ? No Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt assigned to JC International Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not sure probably  Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Again can't remember but probably  Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? No Why did you cease payments? Changed supplier What was the date of your last payment? Never  Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MKdp llp claimform - old barclaycard 'debt'


tofam
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3222 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I received a claim form from MKDP LLP dated 10.12.14.

 

 

I have responded online intending to contest the claim.

 

 

Just to give a little background of the debt as far as I recollect.

I was having a temporary financial problem around 2010 and missed a payment or two.

I later called barclays to make some payment.

They asked if they should set up a direct debit on the account I paid for and I said no.

I told them I will always make a telephone payment until my situation changes.

 

A month later, I wanted to use the card and was told the little money I believe was in the account was gone.

I found out that a company by the name Mercers had taken money off my account.

I investigated this and found out that it was a company that assist Barclaycard to collect their debt.

 

 

I called barclaycard and told them that my right has been violated as my account details

should not have been passed to a third party which went ahead to take money out of my account without my permission.

I sought compensation but they refused.

I told them I would not make further payment until the issue is resolved.

 

There were a couple of back and forth telephone conversations and I stopped hearing from them until I got this claim form from MKD LLP.

 

I am at the moment a full time masters student at the university and have no income at the moment.

 

 

I called MKDP LLP and offered to pay £1000 as a final settlement.

 

 

I told them I intend to get the money the only credit card I have which has a limit of just over £1000.

They refused and demanded a settlement of £1600 instead.

I told them that apart from the fact that barclaycard violated my right,

I do not believe I was owing that much.

 

I have not made a formal defence and don't know how to go about it.

The whole issue is overwhelming as I have exams coming up at the end of the month

with loads of assignments before then.

 

Any advice will help

Edited by citizenB
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi, I have moved your thread to the correct forum - you need do nothing, it is purely an administrative move.

 

Could you please have a read of the link below and post the answers to the questions asked, in this thread.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-December-2014**

 

As soon as you have done this, we can start to help you.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

My goodness, you've left this a bit late, haven't you? Assignments or not, you better get your skates on. Fortunately, a simple holding defence may save your skin, once we've seen your answers to the link Citizen has provided.

 

In the meantime do not make or take any calls whatsoever to / from M K.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Defence due today by 4.00pm

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? MKDP LLP

Date of issue – 10/12/2014

What is the claim for

 

Particulars of claim are as follows:

 

The claimant claims the sum of £17xx.xx

being monies due from the defendant to the claimant

under a regulated agreement originally between the Defendant and Barclaycard.

The Defendant's account number was xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and

was assigned to the claimant on 18/10/2011,

notice of this has been provided to the Defendant.

The Defendant has failed to make payments in accordance with the terms of the agreement and

a default notice has been served pursuant to the Consumer Act 1974.

The Claimant claims the sum of £1768.14 and costs.

The Claimant has complied , as far as is necessary,

with the pre-action conduct practice direction.

 

What is the value of the claim? £1768.14 and costs.

 

Is the claim for a current or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? A credit card

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? I'm not sure but perhaps I can get a disclosure on that -[edit by DX] July 2002

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. The debt purchaser (MKDP LLP)

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? I was not

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not to my knowledge

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? I have not

Why did you cease payments? Account details was sent to third party company who illegally took money from my account.

What was the date of your last payment? First quarter of 2011

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Yes, as mentioned above and in the first thread

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementicon plan?

 

 

I called MKDP LLP to agree a reduced settlement figure considering the violation of my right by Barclaycard (original creditor).

This attempt was made after receiving the claim form

Link to post
Share on other sites

Type out particulars of claim pls as requested above.

 

Call Barclays. See if they will tell you account opening date and date default notice issued. This is important.

 

Both above actions required *immediately*.

 

Forget about Mercers at this stage. Your CCA authorised Barclays to employ 3rd party to act on their behalf. However, the fact that they were involved means that Mercers will almost certainly have issued a default notice.

 

After you have posted back keep checking here from time to time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where can I find the CPR31.14 template. I van drop it off today at MKDPP LLP office as their head office is close to where I live

 

I called Barclays after I got the claim form requesting for this information

and a statement of how they arrived at the amount owed but

 

they said any information has to be routed through MKDP LLP as they have sold the debt.

 

I will call them again and let you know how I get on.

 

I am 100% certain Mercers never issued any default notice but we can leave them out for now as you suggested.

Link to post
Share on other sites

cpr

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?387484-LEGAL-CPR-31.14-Request-Request-for-information-when-a-Claim-has-been-issued.

 

 

CCA request

 

 

just to be clear here

mercers ARE BARCLAYCARD

they did not sell the debt

so theres nothing illegal or unlawful that has gone on at all anywhere

as for the offset of the card payment from your current account

that's lawful too under their T&C's.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Mercers, although a separate company, are owned by Barclays but it will make no difference to the action we propose. It will be a holding defence - putting the Opposition to strict proof of their claim.

 

It is a shame you didn't mention that you're able to get to M K in person today : we might have organised things slightly differently.

 

Third time. Pls type up the POC as it dictates elements of the defence.

 

I have to disappear now but others can help you. If the claim has not reached mcol by 4 p.m. it can still be accepted *unless M K have already acted*. I would doubt that, but your visit may have triggered "special measures". Just hope you only dropped your request letters off, not had a cosy chat over tea and an iced bun with Lucy Brown or others.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just been off the phone with Barclays and got some information.

 

 

The account was opened in July 2002 and

the amount actually spent was £1502 but the amount sold to MKDP LLP was £1768.14 plus an additional £105 court fee.

 

I now have more information on the Mercers issue.

 

 

It was the method of deduction that I contested.

I had called Barclays to make a one off payment and given my 16 digit card details along with expiry date and 3 cvc.

It was these details that Mercers used in getting money off my account in another month.

In other words my card was charged.

 

 

I told barclays I never gave permission for those details to be stored and clearly asked them not to use this details again

when their rep asked if they could.

 

 

They knew this was unlawful as they later refunded the money and offered a compensation of £50 against my demand of £600 which I believe was just.

This was the stalemate we were on when the account was sold.

 

 

Some of these information I retrieved during today's call as I was beginning to forget some details

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am mystified as to how Mercers [part of Barclays] could not have your Barclay card details anyway. Besides they have right of set off if you're in arrears. Maybe I've missed something.

 

However, it's a matter between you and Barclays, not you and MK.

 

You have not typed out the particulars of claim, needed for defence due in by 4 p.m.

 

As agreement was 2002 the Opposition would have been required to produce a copy of the original to enforce their claim.

 

Did you take them your CCA / CPR 31.14 requests?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have prepared the CPR31.14 but yet to hand it over as I realised I need a £1 postal order and the post office have closed.

 

 

I will get the postal order tomorrow and take it to the.

 

Thanks for your prompt responses.

 

Just wondering why MKDPP LLP did not accept a settlement offer of £1000 when they stand to get nothing if they go to court as I have no income.

 

 

All they will achieve is getting a CCJ against me which will not materialise into money

Link to post
Share on other sites

no need for £1 with CPR

only the CCA request.

 

so barring your dispute, and that is p'haps a CPA issue which is outside of this claim.

 

have you filed the holding defence/nopaperwork defence yet?

 

if not you need to find it

post it up

 

and get it checked and do so

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you made them an offer of money, now they can smell it.

 

CPR does not require the postal order.

 

A CCA however does

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please how do I go about submitting this request and where can I find the form or template. Online? Thanks

 

it is not a template

it needs to follow their PoC

 

it is in many threads here

 

and in

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?190-DCA-Legal-Successes

 

have a look

give it a go

and we'll help later

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry doesn't read right?

 

 

cpr 31:14 goes to the sols free

in the green library tab top left - legal section

 

 

 

CCA request goes to the CLAIMANT £1 blank PO

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Dx.

 

Please who are the sols in my case to send the cpr 31.14

and Still cant find the thread with the holding/nopaperwork defence.

 

I however found this on the net:

 

Defence

1.The claimants particulars of claim are vague and fail to disclose any cause of action,

they appear to be an abuse of the process in that they fail to deal with the basic rules of pleading in accordance with the CPR.

 

2.Even making allowance for the Northampton Bulk Regime the claim fails to disclose sufficient information as required by the CPR, there is no reference to any account number, no date of alleged agreement, no date of alleged default or details of any default notice served in accordance with s87 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974, the claim is missing vital information.

 

3. Without admission that any cause of action is shown by the Claimant it is denied that the Claimant has a claim whether as pleaded or at all.

 

4. No documents supporting the claims in the particulars have been offered which the defendant needs to establish what agreement it is that this action is based upon

 

5. Without clarification of the claimants claim, the defendant is extremely disadvantaged and the claimant’s claim appears without merit

 

6.Further to above the defendant is unable to plead effectively or at all. The defendant is embarrassed.

 

It this ok to use.

 

no that's not come from a recent cag thread

load of twaddle

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?429565-MKDP-Barclaycard-claim-form

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Claimant and solicitor are same, so both requests go to M K.

 

Postal order is not a legal requirement just a precaution [unnecessary in my personal opinion] to prevent other side lifting your signature from a cheque to fabricate [eg] a CCA. As you said you could go to M K yesterday, I don't understand how post offices would have been closed. That aside, you could easily have enclosed a £1 coin go the envelope.

 

Choose a more recent defence from the Legal Successes link, such as what d x suggested above. Ensure any references within it still make sense in the context of your case, especially wrt the POC. In particular you better not stipulate what date your CCA, CPR were submitted. Just state that you delivered them in person and are awaiting a reply to both.

 

If M K have already contacted the court, absent your having defended, then I'm afraid you'll have to brace yourself for the inevitable. Check the claim status on mcol before wasting precious time visiting M K.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you get time, also send the defence online via mcol so that it is received today.

 

 

That way you not only gain an extra day to prevent M K applying for judgment,

you also get immediate confirmation of receipt by the court.

 

When you are free,

you should post up your defence,

so we know what we are working around.

 

 

We usually ask that this be done in advance, so that we can check and , if necessary, tweak.

 

 

However, I appreciate that you have been under considerable hassle with this matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hello,

Just to give an update on the issue.

 

 

About 2 weeks ago I received a mail as attached from MKDP.

 

 

On the 30th I received a similar (sake for the date) mail dated 26/01/15 from them

and don't understand why they are resending same mail 2 weeks apart.

 

 

Over the weekend I received a mail from the court proposing to allocate the claim to a Small Claims Track

with an option to have it settle by mediation.

 

 

They have given me until 16th of February to respond or will set a date for hearing.

 

 

Not sure what my response should be.

 

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...