Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Having some issues with Utility Warehouse


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3203 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, this is my first post and i need as much help as i can.

 

I have been with Utility Warehouse since i moved in which was in November 2011 and

 

i thought i was getting a good deal as i was paying £68 a month for both gas and electric

but it was only till August 2013 when i found out that i was under paying.

 

I then chose to pay for what i was using and pay the excess (£330) off in one go and

was told that i would be charged for what i used.

 

I was not told that i needed to supply them with a meter reading every month

and with the meters being read by an external company and then me giving them a reading every so often.

 

In July, i got a bill of £2200 for unpaid gas units in the post which i have been trying to dispute

and decided that i wasn't getting any where and wanted to pay the bill off in small chunks.

I have just got a new job and have been trying to get on my feet and

 

i have spoken to them earlier in the month and an advisor said that i need to make a payment by the 10th but i didnt get paid till today.

I was going to call tomorrow morning and sort it out but

 

i have come home from a long day to find that my friend who is lodging with me allowed some so-called 'bailiffs'

in on monday and they have changed the gas and electric meters.

 

These new meters dont have the old meter readings or any writing on them what so ever,

there was no paper work and no notice of entry from the court.

 

I have been left no top up cards and the gas has been cut off!!

I am extremely upset as there is no paper work and no nothing.

 

Any advice would help as i need to sort this issue out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what bills did you receive during the whole of this period

 

 

if they did NOT send you bills detailing your [obvious] under payment REGULARLY

 

 

under the attached back billing rules

they are on VERY dodgy ground.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Sorry - please correct me if I am wrong - have just joined. I have an issue with Utility Warehouse as below:

I changed to Utility Warehouse ("UW") some years ago for my mum. The payments were made monthly and there were no apparent problems. However, when she went into a care home and her property was empty the problems started. They wanted a reading every month, but I live 100 miles away. They were not helpful and kept sending estimated bills and then charging late payment fees etc. Every time I thought I had got 'up to date' with payments - having given them a reading - I would receive another bill. Nothing made sense. I have now, finally, moved to another company (should have done it ages ago). I explained that the property is empty and up for sale but the bills are still quite high. The new energy company sent out an inspector and there was a slight leak. I had asked UW on several occasions about this but they never suggested an inspection. I gave the new company readings to start at end of June but have just received an estimated bill from UW. I asked for a final bill as the new company will be billing me from beginning of July but UW say they will send another bill in August and I am to settle then? Am I missing something. I have written again asking for a final bill based on the final readings given to the new company ... what more can I do. I have never dealt with such an outfit in my life.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry - please correct me if I am wrong - have just joined. I have an issue with Utility Warehouse as below:

I changed to Utility Warehouse ("UW") some years ago for my mum. The payments were made monthly and there were no apparent problems. However, when she went into a care home and her property was empty the problems started. They wanted a reading every month, but I live 100 miles away. They were not helpful and kept sending estimated bills and then charging late payment fees etc. Every time I thought I had got 'up to date' with payments - having given them a reading - I would receive another bill. Nothing made sense. I have now, finally, moved to another company (should have done it ages ago). I explained that the property is empty and up for sale but the bills are still quite high. The new energy company sent out an inspector and there was a slight leak. I had asked UW on several occasions about this but they never suggested an inspection. I gave the new company readings to start at end of June but have just received an estimated bill from UW. I asked for a final bill as the new company will be billing me from beginning of July but UW say they will send another bill in August and I am to settle then? Am I missing something. I have written again asking for a final bill based on the final readings given to the new company ... what more can I do. I have never dealt with such an outfit in my life.

 

 

best you start a new thread

 

 

of your own

you'll not get see here

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...