Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PCN UKPCS - West Quay Retail Park, HULL **Dropped as GOGW by UKCPS**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3468 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

REF - West Quay Retail Park, HULL - UKCPS

 

Hello all,

Can anyone help with advice.

 

I parked in a fairly small car park which has 4 – 5 shopping units ( Staples etc ) dotted around one end.

 

 

The car park has a drive through entrance and exit.

 

 

It is fairly open to walk out onto the public footpath around the car park and shops.

 

I parked here to do a quick shop at a couple of the shops around the car park.

Parked up then walked to the public footpath at the entrance where I waited a couple of minutes for a friend

to drop off my medication which I had left in his car.

 

 

Then I walked across the car park to the first shop.

In all less than 10 min since I left my car.

Done my shopping and back to my car within 30 min.

 

 

Found a Charge notice on my car stating that ‘ Driver or passengers observed leaving the site’ £100 charge etc.

 

There is no charge to park here and some new notices around the car park stating in large letters stating

‘ Contractual Agreement ‘ 1 hr maximum stay.

 

 

Then in a lot smaller letters ‘ You must park in authorised bays’ also

‘Parking vehicle and leaving / walking off site will result in the issue of a Parking Charge Notice.’

 

I appealed stating that I parked my car,

walked to the footpath collected my medication for my critical medical condition from a friend,

walked to the shop did my shopping and left well within the 1 hr.

 

 

Also the signs are small lettering, some are high on lamp posts and none are near any of the pedestrian walk out areas.

 

 

I maintained that I stayed in the vicinity of the car park and only shopped at the store at the end of the car park then left.

 

Just received a letter saying my appeal has been rejected and if I want to make an second appeal this must be done within 7 days

with additional information.

 

 

You may also appeal through an independent appeals system,

 

 

details of which will be sent at the appropriate time.

 

This is a company that have just been newly brought onto this car park and have called it a Retail Park.

 

I have some questions to ask them,

- On the location they state it is a Retail Park. Which it is not. None of the 4 shops in this area quote a Retail Park.

The city council do not have it down as a Retail Park.

 

- What is there clarification of ‘ Leaving a site’.

- What are the boundaries of this so called site.

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated. If I have to I intend to take my chance in court.

Edited by old dog
added info
Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this West Quay Retail Park in Hull, and is the notice from UKCPS?

 

If so, you say you've already appealed and been rejected. Check your rejection letter to see if they've provided a POPLA code. It'll be a 10 digit code starting with 876. Check thoroughly because they may have hidden it somewhere in the small print or disguised it as a reference number.

 

Do this ASAP, as the codes have a time limit.

 

If there is no POPLA code there, you need to write back to them again and demand one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is West Quay Retail Park, Hull and UKCPS. But the retail parks name does not exist, checked with the council and the shops addresses. UKCPS are new on this area and called it a retail park.

 

I have attached an Ariel view of the car park and shops, with arrows to the shops entrance. To access the Computer Shop ( which is now vacant and for let) you have to leave the car park area through the large open canopy at Staples und up the public footpath. It is part of the same building as Staples.

 

I have also attached a close up of one of the new UKCPS signs. Not sure what they mean by 'site'. Also it does not say the car park is only for customers of theses shops.

 

I have checked and their last letter which rejected my appeal was headed ' Request For Further Information ' and had no POPLA code anywhere.

 

Hope this helps.

Thanks

Edited by old dog
added info
Link to post
Share on other sites

UKCPS Ltd joined the IPC on 18/11/2014.

 

 

Your NTD (windscreen ticket) was before this(?), so they should have given you a POPLA code with rejection of your appeal.

 

 

I advise one letter to UKCPS Ltd, stating that you require a valid code for the independent appeals service POPLA, where VCS vs Ibbotson will be used as why the charge must be cancelled.

 

 

or alternatively UKCPS Ltd could cancel the charge in writing forthwith.

 

 

 

 

This is the transcript that you would quote;

 

 

http://nebula.wsimg.com/e3da92cb966c72de63ec1f98605c2954?AccessKeyId=4CB8F2392A09CF228A46&disposition=0&alloworigin=1

 

 

pg 8.

Link to post
Share on other sites

UKCPS Ltd joined the IPC on 18/11/2014.

 

 

Your NTD (windscreen ticket) was before this(?), so they should have given you a POPLA code with rejection of your appeal.

 

 

I advise one letter to UKCPS Ltd, stating that you require a valid code for the independent appeals service POPLA, where VCS vs Ibbotson will be used as why the charge must be cancelled.

 

 

or alternatively UKCPS Ltd could cancel the charge in writing forthwith.

 

 

 

 

This is the transcript that you would quote;

 

 

http://nebula.wsimg.com/e3da92cb966c72de63ec1f98605c2954?AccessKeyId=4CB8F2392A09CF228A46&disposition=0&alloworigin=1

 

 

pg 8.

 

 

Pg 8 is useful to the OP, though the case is not binding on another court (as a county court case?) but should be persuasive......

 

I particularly enjoyed reading p13, lines 20-26, where the judge hints at a term in custody for contempt of court if they keep any cases (based on a false premise) active : "and I suggest you bring a toothbrush" !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I took your advice and sent UKCPS a letter on the 22nd November stating

that since they had rejected my appeal on 17th November then I require a valid code for the independent appeals service POPLA,

where VCS vs Ibbotson will be used as why the charge must be cancelled or alternatively

UKCPS Ltd could cancel the charge in writing forthwith.

 

Also asked for any photos / data they hold relating to me.

 

Not heard anything since.

 

 

Should I send a follow up letter or just wait.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Generally it is advised not to quote all your arguments in your initial appeal to the PPC.

That's why most people refer to it as a "soft appeal".

It's not hugely important though.

 

 

You don't really need to do anything at the moment.

 

 

They have 35 days from the date the appeal was sent in to respond with a POPLA code.

If they fail to do this in time then they are "timed out" from claiming the keeper of the vehicle is liable for the charge under the PoFA.

After that they can only pursue the driver.

 

 

However from looking at your earlier posts it seems you have likely already admitted being the driver in your first letter to them,

so we cannot rely on this.

 

 

By my reckoning they have another week to respond.

 

 

Failing to give access to POPLA when rejecting an appeal, despite being repeatedly asked to is a bit naughty.

 

If they haven't responded by next Monday, then you have to put them even further under the cosh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just received a letter today from UKCPS. Cancelled charge, yet another goodwill jesture.

Thank you for all the help and support from this site. Well done.

Donation on way

 

Well done!

 

We will be seeing a lot less gestures of goodwill now they are with the IPC...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...