Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just a little something for consideration When a card is compromised, the replacements can be set up to automatically allow or manually re-add, old recurring transactions. The card issuer may ask you to confirm legitimate transactions which they would effectively 'migrate' to the new card Some do - some don't. Some staff on some cards seem to be entirely unaware/uncaring about this. Some card issuers expect you to sort it all out manually.   BUT if the leak is an ongoing lyca leakas it seems - as soon as you or your CC supplier give it to lyca/the leak source - compromised again     A note on security DONT use the same email or phone number for your banking as you do for sims etc. Although a bank eg santander leak would compromise this Infp seems to suggest that single/compromised multi factor authentication customers are priority targets, with more robustly secure cards being hit by 0.00 tests first Consider that the email address is one of the OTP recieving options AND one of the OTP security checks prior to sending the OTP - with the phone number being another So if they've got your card and email (same email for banking and end contact) - and you aren't forcing a phone OTP - you are compromised.  
    • Thanks for posting up the back of the NTK. The good news s that as it does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act, it means that you are not liable for the charge as the keeper as I explained in a previous post.  The PC fails for two reasons. The first is that it does not specify the period of parking. All it does is list the arrival and departure times of your car. Obviously that does not include the time taken to drive to the car parking space, manoeuvre the car into the space and later drive from the space to the exit. Nor does their times include things like getting kids disabled people out of and into the car as well as things like returning the trolley whilst still being parked. All of which can add a fair bit of time to the parking period which can then be subtracted from their ANPR times and makes your actual parking time a lot shorter than 118 minutes they seem to think it is. The second reason is that they failed to ask the keeper to pay Schedule 4 Section 9 [2][e]  (e)state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges You as keeper are now in the clear which is a good reason for you to contact Sainsbury  stating that you are being pursued as the keeper when you are not liable under the Act as well as the oher things I suggested in my previous post. If you don't get it cancelled with Sainsbury this could drag on for months with endless letters unlawfully pushing the price up to scare you into paying.  
    • Brilliant! That's great to hear and honestly pleased I'm wrong, my advice was out of concern. I checked some of your previous posts last night and you've been giving great advice to others at times. Bringing a claim can be serious (counter-claims etc) and it didn't appear you were knowledgeable based on posts so far. Far from an expert myself, just interested and will try to help. I'll sit on the sidelines, best of luck with the claim!
    • Thank you so much for the advice  I will try and up my savings to £500 for the next 6 months. Although I do still have an uphill battle, I feel more able to deal with it.  I hope my experience with the cifas marker helps someone else who finds themselves in that quite horrible situation. It is a huge weight off my shoulders getting it removed.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Moorcroft and old HSBC Business loan


kitchenboy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2823 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I was just wondering how best to deal with Moorcroft who have been hounding me.

 

I signed as guarantor for my HSBC Ltd Co. business loan when I started up in 2003/4.

 

 

Unfortunately due to a breakdown and ill health caused from stress etc the business had to close in 2007,

 

 

following that I did try to keep making what payments I could afford towards the loan (the outstanding balance is around 20k)

but haven't paid anything for about a year/year and a half,

however loan doesn't appear on my credit file.

 

Have been burying my head abit as going through a horrible divorce at the moment

and not quite able to deal with this as well,

have been ignoring all their threat o grams.

 

 

just need to hold them off for a bit until the divorce is finalised I kinda know where I stand financially.

 

 

To commit to a financial arrangement with them at the moment whilst everything is still in limbo is going to be hard,

and having been pretty much a stay at home Dad since the business closed,

I will have to rely on tax credits, CB and maintenance payments to provide stability for my kids

until I can get back onto my feet after the divorce is finalised.

 

Should I treat this loan as I would a personal one and send off a CCA request?

 

 

Or would it be worth just offering Moorcroft/HSBC what little I can afford to get them to go away?

 

 

As they are threatening me, that if they return the account to HSBC, then HSBC will start legal proceedings?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect HSBC are moorcrofts client?

 

 

if not who is please?

 

 

might not be as simple as a CCA or even necessary

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Hi, just an update as to this, HSBC finally responded to the CCA request a little while ago and have admitted to not being able to produce the credit agreement at this time, they also acknowledge that they wouldn't necessarily be able to seek recovery through the courts without it, however they did produce a copy of the guarantee I signed, and stated that it still acknowledges my liability for the debt.

 

So Moorcroft then passed this back to HSBC, then HSBC back to Moorcroft, now it's with Wescot. Wescot have also informed me they have done a check and established who I am and that I am living at the address they are sending their threat o grams to.

 

My divorce is still dragging through and becoming more acrimonious, until that is sorted out I am going to struggle with this, not to mention I may only end up being liable for half the debt as the business was set up as a family business whilst still married.

 

I am concerned that the personal guarantee can complicate things, so just wondering if best to set up token repayments? Perhaps when the divorce is finalised and with the house being potentially forced to be sold under a court order, there maybe some equity left to make a full and final offer, or would it be best to just fire off a letter to Wescot saying account in dispute?

 

At the moment token payments are what I can only realistically afford to pay, if that's in place would it not be more difficult for HSBC/Wescot to take it through the courts if and when they do produce the CCA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

NO CCA - NO PAY

 

 

as long as HSBC do not not sell the debt on

 

 

then totally ignore any stupid DCA

they have no powers whatsoever.

 

 

paying even a token payment, will ruin the SB clock.

 

 

until/unless a CCA appears. do nothing

pay nothing

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

why simply invite letter tennis

 

 

CCA request time now as outlined earlier

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1st Credit have responded saying that they are now aware of a dispute on the account.

 

 

A bit weird as no evidence on Royal Mail tracking systems to say recorded CCA request was received.

 

 

I never realised that under the Lending Code, HSBC should probably never have sold the debt in the first place if there were mental health concerns.

In fact they should have avoided passing it onto any DCA's at all.

 

I am wondering if I have a formal complaint against HSBC for selling this debt?

I suffered a major mental breakdown which contributed to the failure of the business and was under psychiatric care for over 2 years,

I was deemed unfit to work and as such had an income replacement insurance policy with HSBC to cover my living costs etc which was claimed against.

 

 

I am guessing they should have been aware of my history of mental illness, even though this happened some years ago?

Link to post
Share on other sites

correct

irresponsible lending?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

As it has been many months since I last posted on this thread

I just wanted to write a quick update and to ask some opinions as to how to move forward.

 

HSBC sold this old debt to 1st Credit who have been chasing me

, after a few back and forth letters along with requests for a copy of my original loan agreement,

 

1st Credit have written to say that " due to the age of the account, the original creditor has informed them they don't hold copies of the facility letters, or any other correspondence between the parties prior to the execution of the Guarantee".

 

in spite of this,

what could possibly be assumed to be a letter before action has arrived

, even though it doesn't expressly say that,

they have given 21 days for me to get back to them with an offer of repayment.

 

As I have been away and only recently opened the letter

, the due date to make an offer falls next week.

 

Even though they have admitted that they can't get the credit agreement

, this is still an unregulated loan secured by way of a personal guarantee and they can prove the amount owed by way of the statements.

 

I was wondering if now is the time perhaps for a full and final offer, as I am pretty sure they are not going to go away.

 

The balance they are claiming is just over £20k.

 

I look forward to hearing your thoughts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No agreement no payment

 

Off and bugger 1st crapit

 

Ignore them

Unless/until they issue a claimforn

Which they can't without a signed agreement

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...