Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Negotiating debt payback MMF & old Sunny PDL


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3225 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a couple of relatively small debts, and I'm trying to get them to accept a full and final settlement figure.

 

I read that the best tactic is to offer a much lower amount, say 80%, and most will come back with 40%-50%.

 

One company has replied (Motormile Finance). The debt is for £462.74. I offered £200 to close the account and this is their reply...

 

Debt balance: £462

Debt: Sunny Payday Loans - Debt assigned to Motormile Finance UK Ltd.

 

Further to your recent communication, I would like to offer you the following information.

 

Motormile Finance UK Ltd recognises your willingness to satisfy your liability to us by offering a payment of £200.00 to close your account, unfortunately your offer does not meet our criteria. However we are in a position to accept a settlement figure of £370.00 to close your account.

 

If you wish to take advantage of the settlement offer, please can you forward me the below details in order to process the payment:

 

- Debit Credit Card Number

- Expiry Date

- Security Code

- Name as appears on Card

 

If you are unable to settle your account, we are willing to accept a repayment plan.

Please reply direct to myself via email, I will be your account manager.

 

 

This equates to a 20% reduction. Should I press for more? What is the best way to do this?

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers I'd never pay MMF anything

 

I hope you've sent CCA requests FIRST to everyone.

 

paying the debt will not improve you credit rating either.

nor remove any defaults

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

moved to the MMF forum

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, Thank for the information.

 

No I haven't requested a CCA. Is it too late to do this now?

 

I was loosely basing my 'plan of attack' around this post

thread 20758 (I cant post links)

 

As both debts are around £400, I'm in a position to pay both off immediately. So I was hoping to get some debt reduction, then just pay both in the next few days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

tell us the history please

 

and what is the other debt please

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

both are payday loans. The first MMF/Sunny isn't on my Noddle credit report, but the second is.

Both are pretty much the same as far as dates/debt.

 

LENDER BALANCE UPDATED STATUS

Payday Express £543 20/09/2014 Default

 

Account type Advance Against Income

Account number ****

Account start date 18/03/2013

Opening balance £ 428

Repayment frequency Monthly

Date of default 17/08/2013

Default balance £ 428

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you the full statements for both?

 

if penalty charges have been added

you can reclaim those

 

have they both been sold on?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The first debt I mentioned (Sunny/MMF) has been sold on. Sunny to MMF. All I have is a letter from MMF. I assume they have added penalty charges, but I don't know how much. (this debt isn't on credit report).

 

The second I only know about because it's on my credit file. I haven't been contacted about this, although I possibly received a letter last year to tell me I have defaulted on the repayment. The credit report has Payday Express as the lender, so I assume this hasn't been sold on yet.

Edited by puma85
Link to post
Share on other sites

id be getting the statements

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, this is interesting. I was just taking a look through my junk mail and came across this from Sunny (who the original loan was with). This was sent about 5 weeks ago.

MMF are requesting £462.74 for this debt.

 

 

sunny.png

Edited by puma85
Link to post
Share on other sites

that's nothing just a NOSIN[a] email.

 

if you owe it

pay them directly.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you received Notice of assignment?

 

if the debts have been sold

it will show the buyer against the CRa file debt not the OC.

 

if they've been sold

 

invariably that means something is wrong somewhere

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I'm slightly confused now. I'll try to condense the above ^

 

I took the debt out with Sunny at the beginning of the year. Missed a couple of payment's and it defaulted.

 

The only communication I've had is;

1. 17/9/2014 Sunny sent me the email above (which went into junk mail) requesting a total of £267

2. letter from MMF (who say they are representing Sunny) requesting £462.74

 

None of this is on a credit check. I've signed up to Noddle, Equifax (free 30 days), and Experian (free 30 days).

 

What is my best course of action?

Should I negotiate with MMF or contact sunny directly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

MMF are representing sunny

 

deal with the grinder NOT some powerless dca.

 

you will ALWAYS get a notice of assignment if a debt is sold.

 

in the true spirit of everything cag

that we've learned about MMF..NEVER EVER PAY THEM A PENNY

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks again!

 

I will contact Sunny and propose to settle the debt for £200.

I'm hoping if I get this closed pretty quick it wont appear on my credit report (as it hasn't yet).

 

just logged into my sunny account and have found this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

deal with sunny or get all the statements

 

something smells here

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good advice by DX all the way through...

 

if paying the original creditor , always do it by standing order...

Dont give them your card details as they will clear out your bank account

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a long running email line with a lad called Darren ? at MMF

who I can only think doesn't know how to tie his shoelaces and wears a baseball cap with "killer" on the front,

as some of his replies have been beyond laughable.

 

They wanted £1300 in refinance fees for example which Darren seems to think are totally lawful !!.

 

Problem is they are "arm bending" us all into paying excessive fees using the default markers on credit files.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not blackmailing at all. the default will be added on my the OC. NOT MMF. MMF must also update the record as a true reflection of the status of the account.

 

They cannot add on charges or ANYTHING unless your original contract says they can ( which 99.9% of the time it doesnt. Even if they are allowed, they can only add on small amounts, not thousands.

 

Thats why we say to laugh at their purile attempts at getting money and start getting the paperwork needed to sort it out. MMF will do court, but ONLY if they are convinced of a default judgement or that the person they are harassing and threatening will pay up without question.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It becomes a form of "arm bending" when the debt they are trying to recoup contains unlawful and excessive charges, for a £250 loan they will insist on enforcing the original debtors figure which can run into thousands.

 

Problem is when a good honest offer is made to repay the original loan then they try and do deals to get as much as possible even when they would have paid peanuts for the debt.

 

I doubt very much if any judge would agree with their claims but along with refusing to amend the default entries they put us in a situation whereby we have to pay the charges or be stuck with bigger problems.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be very careful when using that word. You need to get the paperwork in order to be sure what you are accusing them of.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure what you mean buddy,

but if they really wanted to help us clear our debts properly then serves no-ones purpose if they insist on trying to claim back fees and charges which are now being finally recognised as wrong.

 

Holding out and just letting people who are already in trouble get further in the brown stuff are not the actions of a caring sharing outfit they claim to be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...