Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • HI DX Yes check it every month , after I reinstated the second DD I was checking every week. Also checked my bank statements and each payment has cleared. When responding to the court claim does it need to be in spefic terms ? Or laid out in a certain format? Or is it just a case of putting down in writing how I have expained it on CAG?
    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

council tax arrears now LO / housing benefit help please


stuggling
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3409 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

in July my housing benefit was stopped as i received child care element of tax credits, due to being a carer for my son.

 

The council said i was not entitled to this child care element and to pay my full rent,

 

 

i got my local MP involved and

 

 

he did a great job

 

 

just this week my housing benefit has been reinstated and payment made to landlord, but

 

 

i fell in arrears on council tax as i had to use the money i used to pay council tax to pay rent,

 

 

i explained this to the council and explained when the housing benefit was reinstated i would be able to catch up in my council tax.

 

They did not like this and are now taking me to court for full amount even though I'm only 2 months behind

(well now 1 month as i have paid the other and the oner will be paid before court date) but they dont care they said they still taking it court as no matter i should have not fell into arrears on it, I explained the situation and she said well you shouldn't have paid for childcare!

I'm outraged as it was essential for my son to be in there to maintain his routine ready to start school,

but she said that doesn't matter and that it still going to court and

 

 

now i owe an extra £49.50 for court fees and another £15 for the order!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No not till October 31st and I can't attend to defend as I'm away on holiday (booked by family last year as a Christmas present) they sent out a payment plan normally monthly payments but with the added costs

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, you have a date.

as has been seen in c'tax threads, there is not much opportunity to 'defend' even if attending. is just a 'rubberstamp' exercise.

 

maybe put in a formal complaint (higher up) to the council, get them to put things on hold/postpone the LO 'formality' whilst investigating.

 

get yr MP involved again

 

bump for further input.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pity you could not attend court and question the validity of "court costs" as has been happening elsewhere in the country recently. Have a look at the last few posts on this thread: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?413648-Reverend-Paul-Nicolson-has-local-authorities-really-worried-as-he-is-quot-willfully-refusing-quot-to-pay-his-council-tax-!!!/page11

 

Hopefully your MP can influence the council and get them to withdraw the LO application - If you can clear the arrears before the end of the month, one could speculate that issuing a summons is nothing more than a money making exercise on the part of the council.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know, it would mean leaving 3 days early, I'm fuming it already took me a battle with them for housing benefit.

 

I paid arrears today and will even have next months installment paid before court date, can I write to the court telling them the situation what was 121 PCM is now 176 PCM a huge increase! I've asked for a breakdown and the say it court cost and fees

Link to post
Share on other sites

.....question the validity of "court costs" as has been happening elsewhere in the country recently. Have a look at the last few posts on this thread: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?413648-Reverend-Paul-Nicolson-has-local-authorities-really-worried-as-he-is-quot-willfully-refusing-quot-to-pay-his-council-tax-!!!/page11

 

....

 

 

cheers, hadnt seen that.

there is also dudes thread where says #80 got costs off post hearing http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?423547-My-council-tax-summons../page4

Link to post
Share on other sites

had the visit and a letter was sent to council with regards to the bill, shocking today I had a call from council saying it was still going to court as i had been in arrears for 2 months so they have every right to demand the full years payment, as paying monthly is at there discretion. They said if i pay full amount by monday they wouldnt take to court, I told them no i can not afford to pay it, and that i had clear the arrears and was now a month in advance, but she still said nope.

 

I have contacted MP and told him, but he said they have had a few cases like this recently and unfortunately unable to pursue further, he said he will write to them again and ask for assistance. as it has been proven they owe me 2 months worth of housing benefit and council tax benefit amounting to £280, this was done with one of there advisors who told me this and wrote it down, but she said it would be up to a manager to get this sorted as it will be at there discretion to sort the back payment.

 

Ive decided to write a letter to the courts, stating that i have now clear the arrears and I'm now a month in advance and that i will be able to maintain the rest of the monthly payments, and i ve stated the reasons why i have missed the last 2 months and providing evidence

Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure what writing to the court as such wld do? if council lists it for LO then it seems is, unfortunately, just 'rubberstamped', costs issue aside. partic if you wont be there. see the c'tax threads.

have you made a formal complaint to the council as well as mp writing. that shld escalate it and get it ftao someone higher up than the 'clerk/advisor.'

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

well they got the liability order, and now I'm having to pay £176 a month not impressed as now it puts us in more finical hardship! they still haven't sorted the housing benefit out so even then we may be entitled to a reduction in council tax but nope they not interested.

 

Im waiting for a response from the formal complaint i put in

Link to post
Share on other sites

even the civil courts have 'recognised' that LO's at the mags are just a rubber stamp exercise.

the council has the power/authority to change things thereafter, so keep at it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i wanna cry over it! I'm going into the offices tomorrow over it all, turns out we should have a reduction of £65 of bill due to benefit, but they say that will only over court cost and fee! Ive asked for a tribunal over the housing and council tax benefits now, hopefully they will help

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you are appealing about HB decision, you need to do through the Council, who will review case to if they can to change decision to your favour.

If they cant, the Council will send your papers to HM Courts and Tribunals Service

 

There are different rules for Council Tax support, you first need to lodge a dispute with Council.

They have 2 months to respond to you.

Once you get the response, you then have 2 months to appeal directly to the Valuation Tribunal.

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

rubbish, sorry but they dont care. Im now going to a tribunal over it all just waiting for a date. Im gonna bring this up with them as i had to pay £176 this week alone to them for the ct and they wrote to me saying if i dont pay by the 7th of each month they will enforce the libablity order with out notice

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

good luck with the hearing stuggling. let thread know how you get on. post up for any help.

note that councils can amend LO's post.

could try get them to 'suspend' things subject to the investigation/tribunal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately the CT rules were written in a very very draconian one sided way, if the councils DON'T collect x amount they are fined heavily, so they are 'protecting their assets'.

 

I wonder what UKIPs policy on changing the CT rules will be,

 

a) Make them simpler - ie NO fining of councils and NO Liabilities to be issued in the current financial year. LOs only to be issued 3 months after the end of the Financial year....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just in case you don't read my post, I had my court costs cancelled twice! This last time was because despite telling them I could not pay the amount they requested, they insisted I did. However at no time over many emails, did anyone tell me I could have paid over 12 months instead of 10. If they had, there wouldn't have been a problem. The woman I spoke to cancelled it over the phone straightaway. If this is the case with you, they should be made to explain themselves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

hi just an update I've only just got the papers for the tribunal, over the housing benefit and council tax benefit, it turns out that I'm owed 416 by them for my landlord as they have been underpaying since june when the tax credits changed but they had not noticed, even though the papers say i told them and handed in documents showing this. they have told me that they have suspended the payments so i called and they said oh it was an error so sorry we will issue a payment to landlord on next payment date, I'm fuming as it put me in arrears with landlord by 3 months!

Link to post
Share on other sites

cheers for updating.

looking like then is their fault. a ground for them taking back the LO?

keep thread informed, and good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...