Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks, that's clear Andy! Just to check - what does hearsay mean? Is it that a layer is representing Eruidio instead of them being there themselves?
    • Your points are fine but as I am late to this topic I am not aware of the finer details. Sums in Arrears Notices must be provided if the claimant wishes to enforce an agreement and claim any interest. The relevant section of the CCA1974 is sec 86B  https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/39/part/VI/crossheading/sums-in-arrears-and-default-sums (2)The creditor or owner— (a)shall, within the period of 14 days beginning with the day on which the conditions mentioned in subsection (1) are satisfied, give the debtor or hirer a notice under this section; and (b)after the giving of that notice, shall give him further notices under this section at intervals of not more than six months. Regards Andy     .  
    • Hi All, PRA Group are chasing an old Barclaycard unpaid from 4 years ago. They are threatening court action - CCJ unless I respond before last Saturday. Which I did not. I'm unsure but reckon the Barclaycard was applied for about 30 years ago. What's the best next step approach ? Best, P.       
    • Can you please also have a look at points 20-27? The sent me a remediation pack with not only statements but sums of arrears they haven't sent for 2 years, so I didn't know I was in arrears. Then they defaulted me after they apologised for their cca breach. I truly didn't understand what that pack was about. I thought it was some kind of a mistake they will make right later as SLC used to do this. Genuinely I thought that but I don't know if that's an OK defence?  
    • Thank you for posting the full sar.  So they definitely did place the PCN on your vehicle only to remove it 10 minutes later apparently because of a possible problem with the driver which seems highly unlikely [the reason for the PCN removal ]. Did the driver even see the warden at all while they were photographing the car . They did take several pictures spread over 12 minutes or so using a flash so the driver would have seen the car being photographed had they been there.   Very strange. You said that you had an onboard camera -are you able to go back and see what happened? Was the warden wearing UKPC clothing? In any event that PCN has not complied with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  That should be a Notice to Driver and the follow up PCN should not be sent until 28 days AFTER the day the first PCN  was given were it a postal PCN. Instead the knuckleheads have issued the follow up PCN on the 28th day of their dodgy first PCN and so totally blowing all their machinations to get over the fact that  the windscreen ticket wasn't a windscreen ticket. In neither case, even if they had been sent properly, they were non compliant. neither of them showed the period of parking which is specified in the Act. Both just show a time of issue at 20.02 but no end period. Their  "mistake" in not giving 29 days  before issuing their keeper Liability notice, makes the PCN more than just non compliant. It means that the PCN was unlawful and probably deliberate as had UKPC waited until the correct time to send that Notice, it would have delayed it until the Monday. And as they probably knew that had not received the original windscreen PCN perhaps they thought it better to rewrite the Law. Part of that is conjecture but the basic fact is correct-the Notice was unlawful. And for that there should be repercussions. My first thought was the ICO but  as it isn't really a breach of data protection it goes higher than that. Perhaps the Site Team would know. I did look at the Legal Ombudsman but they are for complaints against lawyers.  I cannot imagine a decent lawyer even countenancing such a thing though were are dealing with third rate ones when involved with some parking companies.   For reference PoFA Schedule 4 S8 and S9 [2][f] f)warn the keeper that if, at the end of the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to keeper is given— Their PCN dated 12/04/24 states "as 28 days have now elapsed since the Notice to Keeper was given, Parking Control management [UK] Ltd. [the creditor] are now able ...........to recover the unpaid parking charge from......... the registered keeper. The original PCN was marked by them as being deemed delivered 15/03/2024 so 28 days +1 =13/04/24. Their letter was sent one day early which means they altered or ignored the law . I have never seen that "error" on any other Notice from any of the parking companies. As the Member did not receive the original PCN which was originally a Windscreen ticket but they then changed it to a postal one for some fanciful reason the whole scenario reeks of skullduggery. I am going to ask again from Hamz why their warden might have felt scared about a confrontation with the driver but even if there was a chance the PCN was placed on the windscreen and not removed for around a minute but pictures had already been taken so why remove it? And then why produce a brand new keeper Liability Notice the like of which I have not seen before.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3499 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello I am new here, and trying to work out how to go about rebuilding a garden wall that was blown down last winter.

 

Finally managed to get a straight answer from my local city council about what plans they need, but a design and access statement? Who from? I have read the guidelines but they seem rather excessive as they refer to developments and changes to buildings which this is not.

 

 

Yes, we live in a conservation area, the house is listed, but the wall is not. So we do not need listed building planning for it, or so we are told by the city council, having been previously told that we do!!

 

We started this rigamarole months ago, when, having got a builder in to give us an estimate, we realised that we would have to build the wall slightly differently because it has a tree with a TPO in our garden, next to the wall, so the wall will have to make room for it. We had an arboriculturalists report done on the tree, which gave precise descriptions of what would be needed for the tree and the wall. At this point the owner of the house next door (it is let to someone else, she does not live there) then decided to go for permission to cut the tree down. After a frustrating and wasted three months, the tree still stands.

 

So...tearing our hair out, we are now facing a lot more cost - we think, if we do have to go the route of a design and access statement. We cannot get any sense out of the City council planning people, they just refer us to the guidelines on line, which tell us little that is helpful about who does these statements, and if it is really necessary anyway for a replacement garden wall!!!

 

We put in a claim to have the wall rebuilt, back at the beginning of the year, and got some of the money from the insurers, but had to stop the process because of all the fuss about the tree, and now we are not sure if we can go ahead, or if it will cost us even more.

 

Please...anyone? Any help very gratefully accepted.

 

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the tree on your property? If it has a TPO then the most you will get is to crown lift or trim some branches IMO.

how is the neighbour involved? is it a party wall in the garden?

If you do not need planning? then I do not see how they can ask for design and access statement? as it usually goes with a planning application.

You need to go and see the Planning dept and have a pre-application assessment; they will tell you what you need to do. ( take photos of wall and tree ).

So if you do need planning as you are altering the wall ( does it front on roadway? )you will need to submit plans of the proposed wall, height, details of construction and materials to be used etc.

If you were rebuilding like for like then no planning would be required.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the full response. Yes the tree is on our property, and we know it has a tpo, that is why we got the arboriculturalists report on it. Legally bound.

 

Our closest neighbour and we share a driveway which leads onto a road. To be clear, we live on the corner of two roads. Our house used to have an orchard which stretched away behind the house. The previous owner sold it to a developer and we have a small garden and a shared drive onto the road to our right.

 

To our left our wall stretches along from the end of our garage to the beginning of the wall beside our closest neighbour who shares our drive. The tree is on our side of the wall, about 1\4 of the way along. I cannot post a link to explain this as a picture as I haven't posted here enough yet.

 

So, unless we are willing to rebuild the wall without changes, which we cannot do, other than by leaving a gap where the tree is, we have to have a D & A statement? Even that is an alteration.

 

We have already had a long telephone consultation months ago, when the young lady (who has now left!) guided us through the forms to complete, which we did, on her instructions. May be we missed out on the D & A by mistake.

 

Frankly we are very unimpressed with the City Council, they are known to be very difficult to deal with. The TP Officer never bothered to come to look at the tree when the application was put in to fell it, by our neighbour. We waited three months for a response from him, when we wrote to ask about the tree and the wall, way back at the beginning of the year, and the conservation officer turned up without making an appointment and was pretty uncompromising.

 

So my original question remains - how do we get a D & A statement done? Who does it? Neither my husband nor I have the time, energy or ability to complete what is required, and frankly the stress of the last six months is beginning to tell on my blood pressure and his ill-health (he has copd).

 

In hope and with thanks for the help so far.

Edited by stephn-s
Link to post
Share on other sites

as said. the DAS will be pretty basic, but if you feel you cannot do it yourself, you can employ a Planning Consultant, or a local Architect to do it for you.

What did the conservation officer actually say? and did he confirm anything in writing.

Have you made a Planning Application yet? and got a number and any response? you can get approval subject to conditions.

If not then again suggest you go for a pre-app consultation. ( minimal cost ) but you do get good advice, but they do caveat that with they are not bound by the advice when you actually make the App.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as said. the DAS will be pretty basic, but if you feel you cannot do it yourself, you can employ a Planning Consultant, or a local Architect to do it for you.

What did the conservation officer actually say? and did he confirm anything in writing.


Have you made a Planning Application yet? and got a number and any response? you can get approval subject to conditions.


If not then again suggest you go for a pre-app consultation. ( minimal cost ) but you do get good advice, but they do caveat that with they are not bound by the advice when you actually make the App.


 




Yes, we have made two applications, one listed building consent and one ordinary planning. We received an email telling us that we don't need listed building consent, as the wall was not listed. This is confusing because when the conservation officer visited (at the request of the neighbour during the tree fiasco) she said that we must rebuild the wall using bricks and mortar identical to the original. This will escalate the cost. Now we dont need listed building consent, so are we free to do as we wish? we have had no email from the conservation officer at all, during this recent saga. Is there a time limit on any of this? Are we under pressure to get it done or can we relax and take the whole thing slowly? Thanks for your continuing help much appreciated in this crazy world of planning.

Steph
Link to post
Share on other sites

It may not be listed, but as in a Conservation Area, any change will require Planning Approval.

What you need to do is as the Conservation Officer has told you, and this would have been attached to any conditions on any approval you may get.

They are very strict!

Is the wall covered by any insurance ( has it collapsed or just become unstable ?) Is it significantly high? retaining any soil/earth? you may need structural advice!

Has you Planning Application been acknowledged and have a reference number?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It may not be listed, but as in a Conservation Area, any change will require Planning Approval.

What you need to do is as the Conservation Officer has told you, and this would have been attached to any conditions on any approval you may get.


They are very strict!


Is the wall covered by any insurance ( has it collapsed or just become unstable ?) Is it significantly high? retaining any soil/earth? you may need structural advice!


Has you Planning Application been acknowledged and have a reference number?


 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The wall collapsed towards the neighbours side in the strong winds last year. The soil level on our side is higher around the tree than on the neighbours side, they did put in a path a while ago, which lowered the soil level on their side at the part next to the tree. It was quite high, but now we have to make space for the tree roots, that will have to change it. Yes we do have a planning ref no. Thanks for the continuing advice, it helps to see more clearly.

 

Steph

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe photos would help? Without knowledge of the height, and thickness/construction of the wall, it will be difficult to be comment accurately.

If it is a high wall, and not too thick then the wind would be a consideration if in an exposed location.

 

 

How much did they lower it on their side? and what is the difference in levels? If they lowered to near the foundation level that would a reason for the collapse.

It could be that in lowering the level on their side, this de-stabilised the wall, and their actions caused the collapse. so you may have a claim against them?

 

 

Is it a party wall? are you sure you own it and are responsible for it.

Is it covered by any insurance? the insurance co. may well inspect and appoint an engineer or surveyor to deal with it.

 

 

I think it would be wise to consult a structural engineer before embarking the rebuild, the adjacent tree and existing roots and future growth would have to be taken into account and they could also deal with the planning issues.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...