Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though.     A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees.   https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme
    • China green-lights mass production of autonomous flying taxis — with commercial flights set for 2025 | Live Science WWW.LIVESCIENCE.COM The EHang EH216-S autonomous flying taxi is the first eVTOL ready for mass production and could lead the way for flying cars around...  
    • Lolerz - I don't understand you.  Rebuked you?   No. I simply replied to your orange comments with legal facts as I know them.  I've already worked through the s42 and s146 issues - over the last 3-4y - and these issues are (mostly) resolved legally.  In terms of posting evidence.  Sure I can post some.  But my most recent questions have been a) how can I enforce a sale before trial?  And b) how can I make a complaint and/or a claim v receiver? (E.g. to which body do I complain?).  At the mo I'm asking for some helpful pointers on those specific questions??  I'm not asking for help with how to prove or present evidence. Fwiw - all evidence for trial has been disclosed (although additions are poss). The lender sent me like 10,000 emails and docs.  There's also 000s of emails, docs, photos, videos, recordings and texts that relate to freeholders/ me.   I read, filed and categorised everything for ease of future reference.  Witness statements and evidence were prepared for trial in the 42 and 146 matters. (now joined with current claim to save duplication).  I've lived the process before.  My current statement and linked evidence has taken like 6 months to draft/ write - to ensure I can succinctly prove my defence and counterclaim points.   Whether I can convince a judge at trial w/o lawyer / barrister is debatable 🙄   But I've prepared.  And continue to try better prepare - which is why I visit this site (and clinics).  This is NOT my business or expertise at all.  I'm just trying.  Not that anyone should ever have to justify why they need help if they ask politely! 
    • Thanks for the other info will also take a look at that.
    • It doesn't use the word reconstructed in the cover letter.  Although, I have just noticed on the cover letter they have asked me to complete a financial statement and offer a repayment within the next 10 days, or they will continue to follow court directions.  They sent a separate letter on the same day advising me they will be continuing with their claim ?  They have done the same for both claims.  Is it worth just doing that - doing the financial breakdown and offering a x amount.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Need advice about rent and deposit as a lodger, no contract.


Guest Alison82
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3510 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest Alison82

Hi everyone. i'd be so grateful if someone can help me work out my legal rights in this flatshare situation.

 

The room I moved into was in a shared flat. Advert stated no minimum or maximum term, did not mention deposit.

 

On moving, I transferred £1100 to him through online banking using reference rent and deposit. There was no contract, no receipt, no inventory and no notification of rent deposit scheme.

 

On day 1, i found that he smokes heavily indoors even though there is a balcony. The communal areas were also extremely dirty on closer inspection. There was no lock on my bedroom door or bathroom door and he refused to put them on.

 

We agreed prior, that I would be replacing the poor quality/broken supplied chest of drawers and mattress with my own.

 

Communal areas were unusable due to the offensive cigarette smoke, which came into my room. I knew i could not remain living there.

 

Day 4: I told Trevor that I was uncomfortable there and the smoking indoors bothered me a lot and I did not realise he smoked inside as the balcony is just off the living room.

 

Day of the move: I moved my things out then brought back a replacement mattress and drawers, both in better condition than original.

 

Problem:

 

Now he is saying the items are not the same. That i have made a chip in ,the wall. He is witholding my remaining rent. Says he needs 28 days to return my deposit. And wants compensation for the chip and furniture.

 

I think I will need to file a Letter before action for rent and deposit. I have text messages, advert, witnesses and bank transfer. Can i get my money back?

 

Please help!

 

Thank you in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the thread title you suggest you are a lodger so is flatmate (Trevor) the owner of the property or renting from a superior LL?

Lodgers have few legal rights and deposit does not require protection. How much of £1100 was deposit and how much was rent?

Due weekly or monthly?

How long did you stay before you moved out?

All you can do is issue LBA, then apply to SCC for what you think you are owed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Alison82

Hi Trevor is the LL, I paid £550 rent for the month although no contract/licence to say its weekky or monthly and £550 deposit, I stayed for 5 days =£90.42

Link to post
Share on other sites

A verbal Agreement is sufficient.

I assume £550 pcm is more realistic rent than £550 /wk, payable in advance, as per your calc.

You voluntarily moved out after 5 days, normally the Lodger notice period is one rental period, so Trevor is entitled to keep unused £550.

Your claim would be for return of £550 deposit only IMO

If you want to rent rooms by the day (or hr) use an apropriate hotel.

Rental accom should be for min of 6 months.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Alison82

Lol, he gave me the impression (actually he plainly told me) that he kept his home clean and tidy; if he had been honest and told me he smokes inside not on the balcony, and the fact that it is mot so clean, and there are no lockes then I would have never moved in.

 

As stated the advert said no minimum term and no maximum term.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone. i'd be so grateful if someone can help me work out my legal rights in this flatshare situation.

 

The room I moved into was in a shared flat. Advert stated no minimum or maximum term, did not mention deposit.

 

On moving, I transferred £1100 to him through online banking using reference rent and deposit. There was no contract, no receipt, no inventory and no notification of rent deposit scheme.

 

On day 1, i found that he smokes heavily indoors even though there is a balcony. The communal areas were also extremely dirty on closer inspection. There was no lock on my bedroom door or bathroom door and he refused to put them on.

 

We agreed prior, that I would be replacing the poor quality/broken supplied chest of drawers and mattress with my own.

 

Communal areas were unusable due to the offensive cigarette smoke, which came into my room. I knew i could not remain living there.

 

Day 4: I told Trevor that I was uncomfortable there and the smoking indoors bothered me a lot and I did not realise he smoked inside as the balcony is just off the living room.

 

Day of the move: I moved my things out then brought back a replacement mattress and drawers, both in better condition than original.

 

Problem:

 

Now he is saying the items are not the same. That i have made a chip in ,the wall. He is witholding my remaining rent. Says he needs 28 days to return my deposit. And wants compensation for the chip and furniture.

 

I think I will need to file a Letter before action for rent and deposit. I have text messages, advert, witnesses and bank transfer. Can i get my money back?

 

Please help!

 

Thank you in advance.[/quote

 

 

 

 

GOOD MORNING ALISON]

 

 

when you first viewed the property did you not realise this trevor was not a suitable person to share with.

before paying monies without a contract.

I realise renting a room does not afford you the same protection as renting a self contained flat but you should still expect a contract, the landlord can purchase a pre printed legally accepted contract from a well known high street newsagents for under £10. for all types of lets furnished/unfurnished

 

 

PS

are we allowed to mention first names ( trevor )

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Alison82

Hi Shirley. Dont worry Trevor is not his real name.

 

I did have a viewing but looking back on it it seemed quite staged, he had set his bath so I couldn't really look in the bathroom to notice the cobwebs, no lock and hole were a lock should be (so anyone could look in and see you on the loo)

 

The windows were all open that day so the smoke had aired out, but when I moved in it was a colder day so everything was closed and thats when I noticed. With regards to the kitchen and hallway I did not see the how dirty it was until I was using the facilities, when I went to put something in the oven I saw how dirty it was plus all the hairs!! (I do understand that ovens get build up time to time but you wouldn't expect to find hairs in there).

 

Sorry if there are typos I'm typing this on my phone

Edited by Alison82
quote
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Alison82

 

If you are considering sending a Letter Before Action you need to be prepared to follow it through to court if the LL fails to respond.

 

You also need to consider what mariner51 has said in post#4

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does "Trevor" own the flat or is he a tenant of the owner? If the latter does he have a right to rent out a room (i have yet to see a tenancy agreement that gives this right but many exist that allow flatshares if the new occupants go on the tenancy or make the head tenant entirely liable for everything).

I would suspect that Trevor doesnt have anything that allows him to rent out a room or enter into a flat share agreement and this gives you considerable leverage in terms of demanding your money back but also makes it likely that he cant afford to live there on his own so may not have the money to return to you. this makes it a gamble in deciding whether to sue him for the money.

As for the furniture, who owns it?

It all sounds like Trev is on a sticky wicket and making you pay for any preceived bill that may accrue in the future that he is responsible for.

As for a contract, if you have been mislead significantly there is a thing called repudiation of contract and that would entitle you to leave as you have without penalty or the necessity to pay for the month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...