Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
    • Thanks DX,   I wasn't aware we could do that for that length of time. I'll ask my wife to check with the bank this week
    • Yeah That's correct. We left rent payment coming out of his bank account from January 2023 - August 2023 until we could find somewhere to sort out his belongings which was fine. I tried to give notice a few times from August 2023 asking for advice from Sanctuary housing how we went about this explaining his condition and that he was in a Nursing home from December 2022. I explained we don't have any legal powers to his account like POT but were in the process of going for Deputyship and that I was the named person to act on his behalf to speak with Santuary housing. I said we could provide details of his condition and proof he was now in a nursing home with date he moved in. This went ignored despite repeated attempts to contact them until a housing manager contacted us end of February 2024 and notice was finally accepted with his tenancy coming to an end March 22 2024. Although they have continued to take rental payments for the flat despite someone else living in it from the 1st April. I wasn't aware payments were still being taken till I checked his May banks statements. I had asked them to back date rental payments to August 2023 when I gave notice rather than just giving notice in March 2024 but they've ignored that bit. I don't see why they shouldn't give it back they've taken money they shouldn't have.
    • go do a Direct Debit Guarantee Clawback to your bank if you've now got control of his bank account finny.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Claim form Cabot- old cat 'debt'***Claim Discontinued***


OldDebt_Weary
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3336 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I meant in terms of the value they are claiming for.

 

There are many examples on here of Claimants discontinuing their claims after they've paid the fees.

 

It's up to you but as there are no adverse costs risks in a small claim really I wouldn't be so quick to admit liability and cave in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 119
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks Ganymede, given the age of the debts, and the fact that they have been re-assigned several times already, I guess the odds are in my favour that they won't have the necessary documentation to be able to prove their case.

 

 

Oh what the heck, yes you're right, it IS worth contesting. I will do the letters as you have suggested.

Link to post
Share on other sites

there are very few cat debts that cabot get agreements for

 

defend all, watch them discontinue

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

May of been prudent to have posted your proposed defences here first for checking OldDebt.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

May of been prudent to have posted your proposed defences here first for checking OldDebt.

 

Andy

 

 

I haven't entered the actual defences yet, just given them notice that I intend to defend the claims. I will put the defences here first before I enter them on MCOL

Link to post
Share on other sites

well done!!

 

can we check that you have sent off 2 CCA requests and 2 CPR 31:14's to now?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well done!!

 

can we check that you have sent off 2 CCA requests and 2 CPR 31:14's to now?

 

dx

 

 

I will let you know when these are done, using the templates you pointed me to. Do you want to see the actual letters first?

 

 

Now I think about it, I'm not entirely sure what to actually write for the defence in both cases. Is there a template for that I might use?

 

 

Sorry for all the questions, I have never contested such a claim before.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to get these done TODAY

 

you are already WELL INTO you 33 days and time is running out.

 

2 CCA request to CABOT

2 X BLANK £1 PO's

do not sign the letters

 

cpr 31:14 from thelegal section of the library tab top left

to the sols sign the letter

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX, I have the £1 postal orders but finding money for CCA requests is impossible right now - I just do not have it.

 

 

Can you clarify - which letters do I NOT sign? Also, where might I find an example of what to write for my defence?

Link to post
Share on other sites

forget the defence for now

 

all you need is 2 £1Po's

 

print out this CCA request

 

twice

one for each account number

 

DO NOT sign the letters

 

put each in its own envelope with ONE of the BLANK £1PO's

 

sent hem to cabot

 

that's all the cost you have

 

you can then peint out the CPR 31:14 [the correct one!!]

from the legal section of the library tab top left

 

sign that one

put it in an env

 

post it to the sOlicitors [no fee needed]

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry DX, getting myself confused! I get it now. The only problem I have is that my b**** printer has decided that now would be a good time for its cartridge to run out! I should be able to replace in a couple of days but I shall get the stuff ready to send anyway.

 

 

Thanks for all your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you not as friend neighbour relation to go use their printer

or a library?

 

thing is

you've the w/end coming with no postout

so in effect you lose at least 2 days or the time line to file

as that's cal days [33 days]

 

just musing

 

as the CCa requests are 14 WORKING days to reply. .

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DX, I should have the printer cartridges in the morning.

 

 

So you are suggesting that Cabot will drag their heels over providing the CCA, which seems entirely possible. If I do not get a reply within the 33 days, what would happen?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no what I am saying is

they have 14 working days to supply it

 

you ideally need those to have expired by the time you have to file your defence

on cal day 33 from the date on the claimform.

 

EITHERWAY you DO NOT MISS filing 'a' defence

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks I understand.

 

if it comes to day 33 and I have had no reply to the CCA letters,

then I would have to word the defence differently if the 14 days haven't expired by that time,

that is, the defence would not be as strong if the expiration had not occurred?

Whereas, if the expiration HAD occurred I could state that within the defence, adding weight to it.

 

However, as I do not recall ever signing any credit agreement in either case, then they will hopefully admit they don't have it and withdraw.

 

Excuse my ignorance over this whole process. This is invaluable information you are providing me with and I greatly appreciate it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DX, I should have the printer cartridges in the morning.

 

 

So you are suggesting that Cabot will drag their heels over providing the CCA, which seems entirely possible. If I do not get a reply within the 33 days, what would happen?

 

 

CCA request is 12 + 2 working days end of:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

you must file by midnight sat 6th sept.

 

if you have posted the CCA's by yesterday you are ok

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

 

I have today received 2 identical letters from Cabot. This is what they say:

 

 

"Thank you for your request for information under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. Cabot Financial currently does not have this information on file. Hoever, we have requested the original information under Section 77 and/or 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 from the original lender.

 

 

"What happens next.

 

 

We anticipate that we will be able to provide this information within 40 days. In the event we are unlikely to obtain the information within those time limits, we will write to you again.

 

 

"Contacting Cabot

 

 

If you have any queries about your account please call etc. etc"

 

 

So what do I need to do about these letters? Are they merely continuing this bluff or do they really mean business here? Is this something I have to add to my defence? They claim they have 40 days in which to allegedly find the information, how does this affect the court hearing?

 

 

Any help here would be much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

 

I have today received 2 identical letters from Cabot. This is what they say:

 

 

"Thank you for your request for information under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. Cabot Financial currently does not have this information on file. Hoever, we have requested the original information under Section 77 and/or 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 from the original lender.

 

 

"What happens next.

 

 

We anticipate that we will be able to provide this information within 40 days. In the event we are unlikely to obtain the information within those time limits, we will write to you again.

 

 

"Contacting Cabot

 

 

If you have any queries about your account please call etc. etc"

 

 

So what do I need to do about these letters? Are they merely continuing this bluff or do they really mean business here? Is this something I have to add to my defence? They claim they have 40 days in which to allegedly find the information, how does this affect the court hearing?

 

 

Any help here would be much appreciated.

 

 

Inform Crabot immediately that they have 12 + 2 Working days and no more to comply.

 

 

The absence of the CCA renders the alleged debt unenforceable until it is provided.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...