Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I had some contact with this company earlier in my working life but I'm afraid there's not a lot I can suggest that you haven't already done. During your grandfather's time  British Celanese was a subsidiary of Courtaulds. Courtaulds was subsequently (after your grandfather had stopped working there) acquired by Alzo Nobel. They in turn closed down the Spondon site and sold it. I have no idea what the number is that you are trying to call. It's a Derby (Spondon) area code but the number appears not to be allocated. From my slim knowledge of the history of the company I would have expected your grandfather's pension to be in the Alzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme.  But Willis Tower Watson are the Pension Scheme Administrator of that scheme and would be the people who should know if your grandfather had contributed. Is your grandfather certain he contributed? Joining pension schemes wasn't compulsory in those days. Or might he have got his contributions returned when he left them? That happened sometimes back then. Sorry not to be of more help.      
    • I am sorry I am not aware of this report from IAS assessors? The Court will consider my application at a online hearing in June. The Court instructed me to send Bank copies of my sons condition proving he could not have been the driver I have heard nothing further. My son is not aware of any proceedings I have not involved him to avoid causing him distress, he has been sectioned a fair few times and I need to avoid this happening.
    • I am very pleased that the Court has taken the decision to allow you to  represent your son and hope that he is happy enough with that to relieve the stress he will also be feeling. I do agree that Bank parking are so insensitive, greedy, horrible etc etc to continue proceedings considering  in what it is a very minor case of a wrong number plate . Even their  own  IAS Assessors, who are normally hopelessly biased in favour of their members, went out on a limb and said  " The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." That is damning evidence and you must take that report with you as well as including that in your Witness Statement which we will help you with. I would expect that Bank would discontinue the case at that point.  But I am sorry to say  that you should not count on it.  
    • Evening all,   I have deliberated over this offer for two weeks and I have decided to take their offer. I do understand that some may prefer us to go to court and receive a judgement but with our personal circumstances and my current military commitment that could become an issue. I am so grateful for all the help and support you have all offered me over the last few months. I will continue to monitor this site and push all those that are being wrong to get in touch.   Thank you! what you all do is truly amazing!
    • When I first responded to the PAPLOC, and received that 29 page junk back it was accompanied with a letter saying that they had already responded to my request back on Feb 18th 2023,(I never received it). I was just clearing out some paperwork today and found a letter from Lowell, dated Feb 17th 2023, explaining that they were still waiting for the documents from PayPal, and my account was on hold  until further notice.  Does this mean they were lying and can it be used against them if this goes any further? I have now filed my defence, and have had an acknowledgement from Overdales and the court. A little threatening from Overdales , explaining that part of my defence was invalid because they have now complied with the CCA, and they were still waiting for the Default notice from PayPal.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Working notice period - employer delaying pay of week in lieu and holiday pay


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3573 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi folks, not been on in a while.

 

Got a question essentially about when final sums and accrued holiday pay are payable on/after leaving an employer.

 

To give some details.

 

My employer cuts off the last working week of the month so they can use an external payroll company to calculate pay, leading in effect to a week lying on - so that the last week of a month falls into the following months pay period.

 

I started mid march, and gave notice on 17/07/14 (last day of work 25/07/14) with the July payroll cut off being 18/07/14 and payable on 27/07/14.

 

I am owed 4.8 days holiday which has been rounded up to 5 days, this will be paid to me also.

 

My employer claims that due to the cut-off for payroll, they cannot/will not pay me my final weeks pay for the lie week and the sum owed for holiday pay until the next payroll period at the end of August. Ive tried disagreeing with this but they're not moving on the matter. :mad2:

 

I also don't like the idea of having to wait at least a month for a P45 when I start with a new employer on 26/07/14.

 

I know the rules state that pay owed and accrued holidays owed are payable upon leaving, but can they get away with delaying as described or are they just mucking me about to save having to pay their payroll provider to make out of schedule corrections?

 

I tried contacting the CAB about this but the advisor wasn't able to answer definitively and the number they referred to me for 15m free employment law advice thus far goes to answer and despite leaving a message no return contact yet.

 

Id like to go back at them asap if they're wrong as I have 3 days left until leaving so any clarification would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Next pay cycle date would be entirely normal.

 

You can also use a P46, not 45, with new job, which you fill in yourself.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replying.

 

I understand it might be normal but is it right, in the sense of when Im entitled to receive?

 

Got a tough month financially changing jobs and no real funds in hand to buffer things, was unemployed for a while before starting current job and Im still coping with arrears on bills etc. If I am entitled to the money upon leaving that is when I really need it.

 

Changing work as the current job is beyond a joke physically and tasks wise and vastly different from what was described upon hiring.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What does your employment contract actually say? If there is an absolute entitlement to the pay by a certain date then you can inform them that the late payment will cause you a loss by way of bank charges etc and you can recover those costs directly caused by their breach of contract and expect them to pay them.

They may well agree to this or raise a cheque to pay you on time. If they dont you can sue them for your costs incurred by their actions. They wont want to go to court for a fiver (plus significant costs for them) so may well offer something as recompense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No contract, one was promised but was never forthcoming.

 

I raised the issue recently and was given an apology they "forgot" to issue one, many other employees have never seen theirs or received pay revue dates etc.

 

It seems after further talking to CAB that they can indeed delay like this as its a normal pay cycle and they arent actually witholding or refusing technically, certainly Ive been advised theres nothing written specifically about exact time periods, only monies are due upon leaving but nothings covered on exact timing.

 

Stuff them, Ive been offered an earlier start date of Fri instead of Sat by new employer, and for a better first site/job, seeing as Ive never seen a contract working short notice and then cutting that short gives me no pause for remorse, as of today and tomorrow Im "ill" which will see out my notice. Itss half true, Ive been suffering symptoms of repetetive muscle strain in both forearms since doing this work.

 

I certainly need the rest cant go from a heavy late shift to a new job early shift next day Ill look and perform terrible so day off today!

 

I have an exemplary record with this employer, Ive gone way over and above what is required so the utter lack of goodwill leaves me with no reservations about terminating like this.

 

If they then cause me problems end of August theyre for it as they will then be in breach.

 

Ill just have to wait and see, as its technically money now or money later at this point and a financial gain at the end of next month will be useful instead.

 

Thanks for the advice.

Edited by mindriot
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...