Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just a little something for consideration When a card is compromised, the replacements can be set up to automatically allow or manually re-add, old recurring transactions. The card issuer may ask you to confirm legitimate transactions which they would effectively 'migrate' to the new card Some do - some don't. Some staff on some cards seem to be entirely unaware/uncaring about this. Some card issuers expect you to sort it all out manually.   BUT if the leak is an ongoing lyca leakas it seems - as soon as you or your CC supplier give it to lyca/the leak source - compromised again     A note on security DONT use the same email or phone number for your banking as you do for sims etc. Although a bank eg santander leak would compromise this Infp seems to suggest that single/compromised multi factor authentication customers are priority targets, with more robustly secure cards being hit by 0.00 tests first Consider that the email address is one of the OTP recieving options AND one of the OTP security checks prior to sending the OTP - with the phone number being another So if they've got your card and email (same email for banking and end contact) - and you aren't forcing a phone OTP - you are compromised.  
    • Thanks for posting up the back of the NTK. The good news s that as it does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act, it means that you are not liable for the charge as the keeper as I explained in a previous post.  The PC fails for two reasons. The first is that it does not specify the period of parking. All it does is list the arrival and departure times of your car. Obviously that does not include the time taken to drive to the car parking space, manoeuvre the car into the space and later drive from the space to the exit. Nor does their times include things like getting kids disabled people out of and into the car as well as things like returning the trolley whilst still being parked. All of which can add a fair bit of time to the parking period which can then be subtracted from their ANPR times and makes your actual parking time a lot shorter than 118 minutes they seem to think it is. The second reason is that they failed to ask the keeper to pay Schedule 4 Section 9 [2][e]  (e)state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges You as keeper are now in the clear which is a good reason for you to contact Sainsbury  stating that you are being pursued as the keeper when you are not liable under the Act as well as the oher things I suggested in my previous post. If you don't get it cancelled with Sainsbury this could drag on for months with endless letters unlawfully pushing the price up to scare you into paying.  
    • Brilliant! That's great to hear and honestly pleased I'm wrong, my advice was out of concern. I checked some of your previous posts last night and you've been giving great advice to others at times. Bringing a claim can be serious (counter-claims etc) and it didn't appear you were knowledgeable based on posts so far. Far from an expert myself, just interested and will try to help. I'll sit on the sidelines, best of luck with the claim!
    • Thank you so much for the advice  I will try and up my savings to £500 for the next 6 months. Although I do still have an uphill battle, I feel more able to deal with it.  I hope my experience with the cifas marker helps someone else who finds themselves in that quite horrible situation. It is a huge weight off my shoulders getting it removed.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Jobseekers Agreement and MPPI - don't want JSA!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3613 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

my good lady wife is to be made redundant at the end of the month.

 

We have MPPI and the only condition of claiming is that she has to have an active jobseekers agreement.

 

My cousin has just started claiming JSA, and they're already sending her on a 5 day 9-5 training course.

 

The wife is paranoid that they are going to send her on these courses to teach her how to do joined up writing, send emails or whatever, but if she doesn't claim JSA will she still be sent on them? We'd be happy to just have the MPPI coming in as it's the equivalent of what she's be earning so we're no worse off.

 

Secondly, she currently works part-time due to childcare commitments - will they be ok with her only looking for part-time jobs that match her current hours within reason?

 

Thirdly, if she does eventually have to go on one of these courses, how does it work around childcare requirement? Our 5 year old won't be able to make his own way home from school!

 

Obviously I work full time so I'm out of the equation.

 

Apologies if I've missed anything obvious - and if this has been asked before just point me in the right direction. I've searched the forum till I'm blue in the face I cant see this has been asked before.

 

Cheers all

 

BL

Well 6 years on and most of the defaults have disappeared, thank you CAG for a

ll your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure what MPPI is

 

Mortgage Payment Protection Insurance.

 

bradfordlad: As your wife has care responsibilities for your children, she can limit the hours she is available for work - If any of them are under the age of five, a different set of rules kick in (others should be able to advise on this). The child care responsibilities would have to be taken in to account if the JCP were to send her on any of these (pointless) "courses". If they try, challenge it on the grounds that it is inappropriate for her needs.

 

Depending on your level of income, she might not be entitled to JSA. Call the claims line over the next couple of days - This gives them time to process the claim and come to a decision even although she isn't officially unemployed yet.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank Mr P, very helpful post!

 

Youngest has just turned 5, but even so we're about to hit the school holidays so right now she's hoping she can get through the school hols just signing on every couple of weeks.

 

Just asked her for more specific dates, and she expects to be formally informed on 1th July, but they have to give her 3 weeks notice so she'll be "out of work" from 8th August.

 

When school starts in September, we'll have the 5 year to be dropped off at 8.45 and picked up from school at 3.15, and the eldest will be starting year 7 at high school so will need dropping at about 8.30 and collecting at around 4pm. In effect, this rules out afternoons.

 

Interesting point about the course being potentially "inappropriate for her needs" - I've seen people here saying they've got a degree in IT but have had to go on courses telling them how to send an email etc!! I know a lot of people say they find it insulting or whatever, and I'm sure the courses are helpful for some people, but her career is in a very specific industry (facilities management) and she's worked at the highest level so that type of thing would be pointless.

 

On my main question, is it possible to get her form stamped for the mortgage insurance by the JCP, but not have to justify her every movement, if she says she doesn't want to claim JSA?

 

The irony is she is on the shortlist (2 people) for a job that starts in early September, which will fit the hours etc, so all this may be unecessary - best to be prepared though.

 

I'm self employed Mr P, so my income will be irrelevant (quite literally!!)

 

Thanks for the tip about calling early - I presumed she'd have to wait until she was actually unemployed.

 

Cheers

 

BL

Well 6 years on and most of the defaults have disappeared, thank you CAG for a

ll your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

The last time I was made redundant, I filed a claim with the JCP while I was working my final week of notice - It is not an unusual situation, so unless things have changed of late, the JCP/DWP should still be able to accept a claim. It is also possible to file a claim on line: https://www.dwpe-services.direct.gov.uk/portal/page/portal/jsaol/lp

 

Admittedly, the only time I came across these (pointless) courses was through a W2W provider - After suggesting that some of the staff should do the basic maths and english courses, the subject was never raised again :madgrin:. Or it might have been the fact I would sit at their desk, red pen in hand, correcting the spelling & punctuation mistakes in "adviser" reports or informing them of the poor grammar.

 

The best of luck for your wife. Hope she gets the new job and avoids having to suffer the current JCP regime.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not possible to have the JCP stamp an MPPI claim form without claiming a benefit - JSA in your wife's case. If she needs a Jobseekers Agreement in place then she will need to make a full claim to JSA and jump through whatever hoops are presented to her, noting, of course, Mr P's point about anything she's asked to do being "reasonable in her circumstances". For the first few months of a claim, things tend not to be so difficult. The daft demands are reserved for those who claim for longer periods.

 

If she's worked full time for most or all of the tax years 2011/12 and 2012/13 then she may be entitled to up to 26 weeks of contribution based JSA regardless of your income or any savings you may have. But I stress again: there is no way to get JCP to stamp this form without her making a full claim to JSA.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Antone, a very concise answer!

 

I guess the next question is going to be "what's reasonable?" - the plans we'd made for the school holidays were as follows (she only works/worked 3 days a week):

3 weeks holiday allowance taken for the first 3 weeks of school hols, then childcare in place for 3 days a week to cover when she returned to work.

From September,the kids were to go back to 3 days breakfast & afterschool clubs. Obviously thats likely to be a luxury we can't afford now, so she'll have to be responsible for 5 days a week of dropping off & collecting after school which only leaves her "available" from 9am - 3pm (not allowing for travelling time).

 

Thanks again all :-)

 

PS - another thought just occured. Her employer is prepared to reduce her notice period to 3 weeks instead of 4. For various reasons this would help us out, BUT.... it would mean her redundancy takes effect half way through our camping trip to Cornwall. Is the fact that she wouldn't be able to visit the JCP for a week going to cause her problems when she gets there? Presumably, it just means she isn't eligible to claim JSA until she officially is available for work - ie when we get home?

Cheers

Edited by bradfordlad
answere my own question!

Well 6 years on and most of the defaults have disappeared, thank you CAG for a

ll your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Antone, a very concise answer!

 

I guess the next question is going to be "what's reasonable?" - the plans we'd made for the school holidays were as follows (she only works/worked 3 days a week):

3 weeks holiday allowance taken for the first 3 weeks of school hols, then childcare in place for 3 days a week to cover when she returned to work.

From September,the kids were to go back to 3 days breakfast & afterschool clubs. Obviously thats likely to be a luxury we can't afford now, so she'll have to be responsible for 5 days a week of dropping off & collecting after school which only leaves her "available" from 9am - 3pm (not allowing for travelling time).

 

Thanks again all :-)

 

PS - another thought just occured. Her employer is prepared to reduce her notice period to 3 weeks instead of 4. For various reasons this would help us out, BUT.... it would mean her redundancy takes effect half way through our camping trip to Cornwall. Is the fact that she wouldn't be able to visit the JCP for a week going to cause her problems when she gets there? Presumably, it just means she isn't eligible to claim JSA until she officially is available for work - ie when we get home?

Cheers

 

Well, childcare responsibilities should always be taken into account when a Jobseeker's Agreement (JSAg) is drawn up. If your wife and the adviser can't agree on what's reasonable, it would be passed to a Decision Maker adjudicate.

 

There shouldn't be a problem if she has to wait a week or so after redundancy to claim. Since she'll be on holiday, she isn't really "available for and actively seeking" work during that time anyway.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice Antone - useful again!

 

We've received the claim form from the mppi and as suspected it states that the claim will begin when your notice period ends or you register with DWP whichever is later.

 

We tried to register the claim with JCP online as suggested by Mr.P above, but it said that by completing the details, we were registering the claim and she had to be ready & available to go in to see the adviser possibly even the same day! Obviously as she's still at work we knocked it on the head straight away, but.....is this correct? I thought you could register in advance?

 

So - plan of action is to register online the day we get back from holiday, which is day 1 of unemployment and it will be day 1 for the insurance claim too.

 

NOW - another question if I may.....

 

The Mrs has/had a decent job, she was on £16k a year for 20hrs a week. Obviously this is the level of income our household runs on, so this is the sort of salary she need from a new job. In other people's experience, is there likely to come a time when JCP say she needs to lower her salary expectations and take ANY job and if so, how long is it likely to be before the start to put pressure on her to do so?

 

Thanks in advance (again!)

 

How long before same wage hours inst inportant

Well 6 years on and most of the defaults have disappeared, thank you CAG for a

ll your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

The rule used to be that you could restrict your jobsearch to your "normal" occupation for 13 weeks. After that you would be expected to seek and accept anything that would fit in with your agreed hours/distance from home requirements as set out in the JSAg, provided it was more than 16 hours per week and paid at least NMW.

 

I think that is still the case, but others with more recent experience may correct me.

 

As to claiming in advance, again, that used to be possible but maybe not online. A call to the new claim line wouldn't hurt - she can always refuse to give personal information and pose the question as a "general enquiry" if she prefers.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...