Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • oh well i wonder what new fake documents they have made up then...for them to try this.... just to check nothing funky like Link have filed an n244 to lift the stay and strike out her defence....she hasnt moved since last court comms has she?   is this an n24? bit unusual for a 13mts stay to just be lifted... has she not received anything from link/kearns in the last fw weeks like a docs bundle? bit like this thread... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/466576-lc-assetlinkkearns-claim-form-2-mbna-cc/?do=findComment&comment=5256397  
    • if the agreement was taken out jan 23, then she has not reached the 1/3rd mark so the car has not become protected goods under the consumer credit act.  this puts her in a very very vulnerable position regarding ever keeping the car....whereby once they have issued a default notice they can legally send a guy with a flatbed (though they are NOT BAILIFFS and have ZERO legal powers) to collect the car.  if the car is kept on the public highway then they can simply take it away and she will legally owe the whole stated amount on the agreement AND lose the car. if it's on private property i'e like a driveway, ok they shouldn't take it without her agreeing, but if they do, it's not really on but its better than a court case and an inevitable loss with the granting a return of goods order. are these 'health reasons' likely to resolve themselves in the very short term (like a couple of months?) and can she immediately begin working again ? i'e has she got a job or would have to find one?  answer the above and we'll try and help. but she looks to be between rock and a hard place . whatever happens she will still have to pay the loan off...car or no car....unless you can appeal to the finance company's better nature using health reasons to back off for xxx months.
    • no need to use it. it doubles the size of the thread and makes it very diff to find replies on small screens too. just like @username it - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread already inc you ...gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.
    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

After a bit of Help for Family


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3599 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

my daughter is 28 and pregnant with first child

 

she works fulltime on minimum wage lives with partner who earns £19, 000

 

they live in a 3bed private rented house and

 

the rent is £550 per month.

 

When the baby comes along and she is off work she will get smp but,

 

will they be able to claim anything to help them until she can get back to work?

 

Would they be able to get housing benefit or anything?

 

They have both always worked and have no idea when it comes to claiming benefits so any help is appreciated. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try this link, it should tell you what entitlements she may be able to claim...http://www.turn2us.org.uk/benefits_search.aspx

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

She should claim for child benefit and child tax credits. Not sure about housing benefit tbh, her husbands wages seem to high. Try the link from bazooka boo above but it seems unlikely. And lapsed workaholic you forget to deduct income tax, national insurance and council tax :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did not forget to deduct anything. It’s not my place to conduct an audit or a means test. I have no idea what those people’s circumstances are apart from what has already been disclosed.

 

They mentioned ‘partner’ rather than ‘husband’. Could one deduce from this that they might be taxed separately? The expectant mothers’ salary was not mentioned at all. They mention ‘smp’. Could this be income of some sort? You mention child benefits, which I believe is still paid to the mothers of small children.

 

I’m almost certain that deduction of the stoppages you mention will not reduce them to giving up a bedroom and becoming reliant on food banks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies guys. I have told them about turn 2 us but does anyone know roughly how accurate it is?

 

It is accurate if the details entered are accurate, it's easy to miss things. I find entitledto useful and the benefits checker on the mse site.

 

Alternatively your daughter or her partner could call the relevant offices.

 

Child benefit is a set amount, £20.50 per week for the first child.

 

Tax credits can do a calculations over the phone, they'd need to have their 2013/14 income and expected 2014/15 income to hand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou I will pass that on they may find it easier on the phone if they struggle with the online forms. They had a quick run through on turn2us and if they have done things correctly which it looks like they have they will get a bit of help including some help with rent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did not forget to deduct anything. It’s not my place to conduct an audit or a means test. I have no idea what those people’s circumstances are apart from what has already been disclosed.

 

They mentioned ‘partner’ rather than ‘husband’. Could one deduce from this that they might be taxed separately? The expectant mothers’ salary was not mentioned at all. They mention ‘smp’. Could this be income of some sort? You mention child benefits, which I believe is still paid to the mothers of small children.

 

I’m almost certain that deduction of the stoppages you mention will not reduce them to giving up a bedroom and becoming reliant on food banks.

 

Means tested benefits are based on net income - your calculation used gross.

 

Partners are taxed separately, whether married or not. This isn't relevant, though, and I'm not sure why you think it is.

 

SMP = "Statutory Maternity Pay". It is counted as income when HB entitlement is worked out.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Antone, I did not conduct a means test, either calculated on gross or net. I said that I didn’t know what their circumstances were, that includes their tax arrangements. I was under the impression that a husband could claim a tax deduction for his wife in certain circumstances. I seem to remember there being different tax bands for single people and for couples.

I did think that housing benefit was conditional in some way on the number of people living in the house, the number of rooms and total household income from whatever quarter. I thought that because the form I filled in for HB asked questions on all those points.

Anyway I wish them all, including the new arrival when it arrives, the very best. When I responded to this thread earlier today I had just left off reading the heart-rending story of the widow who struggled to take care of her mentally ill son while he lived and is now desperate to know how to secure the means with which to bury him. Almost overwhelmed with a feeling of hopelessness and inadequacy and sadness at being unable to help in that case. If only she had as many options.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Antone, I did not conduct a means test, either calculated on gross or net. I said that I didn’t know what their circumstances were, that includes their tax arrangements. I was under the impression that a husband could claim a tax deduction for his wife in certain circumstances. I seem to remember there being different tax bands for single people and for couples.

I did think that housing benefit was conditional in some way on the number of people living in the house, the number of rooms and total household income from whatever quarter. I thought that because the form I filled in for HB asked questions on all those points.

Anyway I wish them all, including the new arrival when it arrives, the very best. When I responded to this thread earlier today I had just left off reading the heart-rending story of the widow who struggled to take care of her mentally ill son while he lived and is now desperate to know how to secure the means with which to bury him. Almost overwhelmed with a feeling of hopelessness and inadequacy and sadness at being unable to help in that case. If only she had as many options.

 

It sounds heartless sometimes, but if we are to offer advice, we need to be as dispassionate as possible. There's not a lot of point in telling a poster that there's someone who's worse off than they are: they already know that.

 

In terms of the factual matters - you are correct that HB is based on the number of people living in the house, kinda, sorta. Since it's a private let, the amount of HB payable will be based on the appropriate LHA rate for the OP's circumstances. A couple with one child will be entitled to HB that does not exceed the LHA rate for a flat or house with two bedrooms. The fact that they live in a three bedroom house does not disqualify them - all it means is that they can only be paid whatever is appropriate for a two bed place in their area. So, on balance, it seems likely that OP will not be entitled to HB but that depends very much on where she lives.

 

Tax wise, couples have been treated singly for some years now. But in any case, when means tested benefits are calculated, it is the net income of the household that is important, regardless of how they are taxed.

 

So I agree that Child Benefit and Child Tax Credits are the most likely sources of support here.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Means tested benefits are based on net income - your calculation used gross.

 

Partners are taxed separately, whether married or not. This isn't relevant, though, and I'm not sure why you think it is.

 

SMP = "Statutory Maternity Pay". It is counted as income when HB entitlement is worked out.

 

Just to clarify, tax credits is not based on net income. It is based on the taxable gross income.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...