Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wow thats incredible. Thank you so much
    • If the purchaser denies having received it then sue P2G. If you simply don't hear anything more from the purchaser then you have the purchaser's name and address – and frankly for £48 I would go ahead and sue. As long as you have good proof of delivery then your chances of success are probably better than 95% and frankly the purchaser would probably put their hands up as they would effectively be being sued for the civil equivalent of theft. I wouldn't let it go if I were you. It would be a good exercise for you and gives you confidence the next time something comes up which is may be much more valuable
    • Thank you again Emmzzi for your insight. Not only did I do the work, but as a maths tutor delivering financial literacy workshops under the Govt Multiply project, the college were paid £400 for each student I recruited, which makes it an even bigger kick in the teeth! I spoke to Citizens Advice Bureau on Friday who advised me to go back to ACAS for advice and assistance, as ACAS are the experts in employment matters. They did also mention small claims court, as being more straightforward and less complex, but surely their solicitor would just contest this and I would lose the £80 court fee? If I did submit a claim through the small claims court, would I just leave the employment tribunal running until the outcome? The deadline for me to submit my schedule of loss is tomorrow, so I will submit today so that they cannot hold me in breach.
    • Ive just checked the tracking again and its actually out for delivery today! Anyway,  I refunded the buyer on Ebay off my own back on the 2nd of June they havent opened a case or anything like that so surely i cant take action against either the buyer or P2G/ Evri can i ? Id hope the buyer would see fit and pay but you know what people are like these days ... Once its delivered I'll send him a polite message asking for payment but i suspect there'll be no reply      
    • Thanks for this update. Let's not if you have any more difficulty – in particular if you have difficulty getting paid back from the purchaser. We can help you either against the parcel delivery courier or against the purchaser
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA Question - Help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3665 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was awarded ESA originally in February 2012. This was not income related. When it finished, I was told I would go straight onto income related ESA. Which I did, then after about 2 weeks they said I didn't qualify as I was living with a partner. This isn't true, but I had lived with him until about 4 months previously. I sent them proof of the fact that he was now back at his previous address. I explained that he was indeed caring for me as I have been suicidal and have joint problems, panic attacks etc. They then said that they couldn't reinstate ESA, as he works 25 hours per week. They totally ignored my initial letter and when I rang, they said I should write again to remind them of the situation - but admitted they had received the letter!

All this despite the fact that he isn't living with me and works 23 hours per week! I then sent them proof from his employer that he works 23 hours. After phone calls, they agreed to do a Mandatory Reconsideration. It was now March.

They then sent me a letter asking about my income. I have been honest all along that I get 2 small pensions from my late husband. Again, I sent them proof that I only receive about £140.00 per month, that is all. Over 2 months later I have heard nothing. I rang and they said there is a backlog!

I have completed 2 forms for help with my mortgage which they keep 'losing'! To top it all they have just sent me an Income Tax form stating that they have paid me about £3100.00 this financial year which isn't true!

Good people out there - can anyone please help me? Where do I go from here?

I have always worked for over 32 years and never claimed anything before. My life fell apart when my husband died and this situation has left me desperate.

Thank you in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't help from the ESA side but I might be able to help with the tax side.

 

When you say you have received an income tax form - what form are you referring to? And what's is wrong with the figure? Is it too high or too low?

Link to post
Share on other sites

my guess would be P45 or P46 baring in mind new tax year stated a month ago

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again

This tax form is a statement of what benefits I have supposedly received this tax year, the figure is far too high, given that I have received nothing for over 6 months. Like many on here, I am getting desperate. Have had to beg and borrow to survive.

Someone told me I could claim JSA whilst waiting for their decision on my ESA.

 

Thanks again and still hoping someone can advise me. I was thinking of writing to give them 1 more chance, then making a complaint. They seem to ignore everything, whether by post or phone. Never been in this position before. I am struggling so much.

 

Best wishes:-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again

This tax form is a statement of what benefits I have supposedly received this tax year, the figure is far too high, given that I have received nothing for over 6 months. Like many on here, I am getting desperate. Have had to beg and borrow to survive.

Someone told me I could claim JSA whilst waiting for their decision on my ESA.

 

Thanks again and still hoping someone can advise me. I was thinking of writing to give them 1 more chance, then making a complaint. They seem to ignore everything, whether by post or phone. Never been in this position before. I am struggling so much.

 

Best wishes:-(

 

It will be for the previous tax year which ended April 14, unlikely to be for this tax year. So how much did you receive? Either way won't make much difference if you didn't have any other taxable income as the amount is below the tax threshold.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got about £100 per month when on non income related ESA. Then was told I would get about £60 per week IR ESA. I had one payment and than got a letter saying that they couldnt pay me as my 'partner' was working 25 hours or more per week. He was no longer my boyfriend, not living with me and only works 23 hours per week. They have had proof of all this, Their last letter in March, asked me for proof of my late husbands pensions, which I sent straight away - only £140 per month. The letter said when I had sent this they would decide how much to pay me. That was over 2 months ago. They are now saying there is a backlog!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I second the suggestion to contact your MP. I mean, benefit offices are busy and do have backlogs, but this is ridiculous.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got about £100 per month when on non income related ESA.)nths ago. They are now saying there is a backlog!

 

Contributory Esa Rate is normally £101 and only a pension income of £100 or over would decrease that

cant understand the £100 a month figure ?

 

as for signing on J S A You can only do that if your fit for work in which case you wouldnt be able to claim ESA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not 100% on contribution based but I would start with checking your mortgage company hasnt recieevd payments from DWP, DWP are a bit random with these i find and it might explain the sum. If no and you can prove no or little income then write to them asking to explain themselves, why they are breaking the law refusing to pay your esa award leaving you destitute with next to none or very little income because the law states they have to pay you enough to live on. As soon as you mention legality they perk up i find as they know your not going to take any ****e.

 

I dont think there is a massive backlog its just they aim to frustrate in the hope you will give up. And even if there is a backlog it isnt your problem, IDS should hire more staff or stop sacking the ones he's got because his actions are causing distress to the vulnerable as we know and its also illegal to unduly with hold these personal allowances cos its the amount the law says you need to live on, if the law didnt say it they would not pay it full stop.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...