Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Do not under any circumstances plead guilty until we know what we are dealing with. It's a sure way to 9 points. The tried and tested way to handle this is to plead not guilty to both charges and offer to plead guilty to speeding provided the "Fail to give information" charge is dropped. But I am concerned about this "ticket refused" sticker. I've never heard of this before. A "ticket" is not a term used in connection with speeding offences. There seems a distinct possibility that your response was received by the police but one thing worries me: I've never heard of a sticker being placed on a response and it being returned "Return to Sender". t's just not what ticket offices do. If you could post a picture of this document and the sticker it might help.  If you can show the response was received you may have a defence to the "Fail to Provide" charge (provided you completed your response properly). If the police are saying you did not respond they cannot succeed with a speeding charge (as they have no evidence you were driving). But if you did not respond, who put the sticker on the document and sent it back yo you?
    • lolerz, many thanks for your reply and correcting my big mistake, oh dear start again. They sent the section 48 along with the Form NO 6A, it was sitting on top of the paperwork, sorry about that. SO they have sent me a Form No 6A and i have received the court paperwork with the claim form and defence paperwork.    
    • Hamster Bedding. Ignore.
    • Hi, below is a draft of the letter Address: Hugo Martin Director of Legal and Company Secretary EVRi Parcelnet Ltd trading as Evri CAPITOL HOUSE, 1, CAPITOL CLOSE LEEDS LS27 0WH REQUEST OF CONTRACTS      Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing in regards to the ongoing small claims case ____. In your Defendant’s response you make reference to a pre-existing commercial agreement between yourselves and Packlink (2.7). In that, you claim to have a clause removing customers third party rights under the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. I would like to request a copy of this contract and confirmation of the date on which the exclusion of third party rights term was included in it. If you refuse to provide this then I will be henceforth referring to that refusal in the claim, including to the Judge. I also notice that you have destroyed tracking information due to "lapse of time" in line with your data protection policy (2.12). Can you share where this data protection policy is disclosed to customers? I also ask you to forward you a copy of that data protectiono policy, and again if you refuse to provide this then I will be henceforth referring to that refusal in the claim, including to the Judge. Kind regards,
    • Firstly, thank you for filling in the sticky so quickly - we wish everyone who comes here would do that! You're in the clear.  MET don't know who the driver was.  They can use Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 to transfer liability to the keeper if their bilge arrives within 14 days - they didn't send it out till 102 days after!!! So sit on your hands.  MET will come out with threat after threat but ultimately will do nothing. Have a read of other threads for this car park - we are having a tsunami of cases at the moment. Be sure to come back here though if they ever send you a Letter of Claim.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

heath lambert aviod like the plague ,WORRY IF YOU AVE A POLICY WITH THESES


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3659 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

been with these guys 10+ years

 

never made a claim in all those years,

 

burst pipe in bathroom

 

flooded bathroom and kitchen ceiling damage

 

called over a week ago took over 50 minutes to get though at cost of45.00 phone bill,

 

so compliant number 1 cost of ringing

 

heath lambert was sending a renovation team out wednesday ?

 

nobody arrived had no acknowledgement of claim either

 

recalled friday there so

 

called compliants line asked for chairmans office details

was told dont have a chairman?

 

passed around again 4 different people who said if you want to complain go to fos ??

 

eventually a acting team manager took the call again

 

went though what happened

 

what they was suppose to be doing ,

 

her response i will go over to the manager dealing with asap , and guess what ?

 

stillnothing .

 

so im left with hole in kitchen ceiling while these clowns get there act together

ki

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would appear that the OP has been a customer of Heath Lambert for in excess of 10 years during which time no claim has been made.

 

A burst pipe in the bathroom flooded the bathroom and damaged the kitchen ceiling.

 

I believe the OP called to report it and was on hold and incurred a £45 telephone bill. This represents the first complaint.

 

It would appear that Heath Lambert were to send operatives out on a Wednesday (OP did not state which Wednesday)

 

It looks like nobody called and Heath Lambert had no record of claim when OP telephoned again on Friday.

 

OP telephoned and asked to make a complaint and to speak to the chairman. OP was puzzled speaking to the chairman was not an option.

 

The OP claims to have been passed around 4 people without resolving the issue.

 

OP claims to have been advised to contact Financial Ombudsman to make complaint.

 

OP appears to have finally spoken to acting team manager to whom the complaint was repeated.

 

Despite this the OP is still waiting for a response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly you must stop doing things on the phone. Do everything in writing - by email if possible. If you do use the phone then you should record the calls.

 

Make a detailed note of everything that has happened so far and send it to the insurer as part of a complaint.

Tell them that you want it sorted out but that your letter is a formal complaint and that if they don't respond in a satisfactory way, that you will then go to the insurance ombudsman.

 

Remember that you won't get anywhere if you don't have paper evidence of everything that happens.

 

Take photos of all damage and get two competitive quotes for repairs.

 

Let us know what happens in the next few days

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heath Lambert are a long establised brokers, but it appears that they have been subject to change in recent years and are part of Arthur J Gallagher group, who are a big US company based in Illinois.

 

Mike Constanti appears to be the UK claims director at their London office. According to their site, they centralised their claims in London a few years back.

 

Head Office

 

The Walbrook Building

25 Walbrook

London

EC4N 8AW

 

 

 

 

Tel: +44 (0)20 7204 6000

 

 

 

It is not very good that they are not offering you a claims service and I think I would phone their head office to see if I get through to executive complaints. They can't tell you to complain to the FOS in the way that they did. They are supposed to acknowledge the claim and try to resolve it.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi thanks for the above information letter drafted already but regarding the claim finally got a letter acknowledging my claim sent thursday 8th may ? as postage mark stating claim was made

02/05?? when actually i did original claim monday 28/04?? 02/05 date was second call to heath lambert. i have had to get someone one it to repair the damage as heath lambert have failed to act correctly and couldnt leave my bathroom with expanding laminate any longer or the kitchen with a 4foot hole where the plaster board and dropped down from the ceiling

Link to post
Share on other sites

letters gone to heath lambert shoudl have got yesterday also response from fos acknowledging by claim and that could take upto 6 weeks so wait see if any response from heath lmabert pictures of damge taken and all letters copied as suggested earlier

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...