Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • more detest the insurrectional ex variety dx
    • Laura, I was surprised that the Director said that you hadn't appealed twice. I thought that the letter you posted on 24th June was the second appeal and that was to the IAS. And they did say that there was no further appeal possible. Could you please explain how many times you appealed. I am going to read your WS now. PS  Yes I meant to say that the keeper did not have a licence therefore it was wrong of them to assume he was the driver and the keeper. Thanks for picking that up.
    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council Tax - Attachment of Earnings


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3710 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I wonder if anyone can give me some advice please?

 

 

I have spent the last 5 years fighting eviction for mortgage arrears. My lender, sub-prime, got in just in time before the legislation changed demanding more consultation before applying for a possession order, and have been pushing ever since.

 

 

I was never more than 5 months in arrears but I have defended - I have lost count, but I think, 6 eviction notices. During that period they have raised their rate 3 times. I am now down to slightly less than 2 months arrears and they seem to be prepared to back off.

 

 

During this whole period I have amounts of unpaid Council Tax because every Penny went to keep my house - I did not prioritise other debts over the CT and I have 3CCJs to prove it!

 

 

Out of nowhere the council have now sent my employer 2 x attachment of earnings for CT years 2009 and 10 which combined will cost me over £400 per month since I just fall in the 17% of earnings level of net pay.

 

 

I earn just under £1500 net, the mortgage is now £800 (£750+£50 arrears) which is less than they want but I think will be okay. The £400 will take that to £1200, leaving me £300 for everything else.

 

 

Do I have any right of appeal? I notice that the Eviction Notices were always copied to the council, presumably for rehoming in a hostel or something, although I understand single people get no help at all. So they had proof of what is happening.

 

 

My employer could sack me for this because of the nature of my job, and if they send further attachments for overdue sums in subsequent years I think he will, which benefits no-one.

 

 

I am paying an interest rate on my mortgage of 7.75% which is in loan shark territory but obviously there has been no chance of re-mortgaging to a fairer rate with the arrears.

 

 

Any thoughts please? I thought I was out of the woods and had emailed to explain to the council that I would be in a position to catch up now, an email they seem to have ignored, but with the outstanding amounts which include bailiff and court charges I fear that I will lose my house.

 

 

My lender will not be sympathetic if I starve, will the council? I have not wasted money I have no car, never go out, and have not been on holiday for 20 years.

 

 

Thanks for any input.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have not paid or made an arrangement with the Council then they have done nothing wrong I am afraid and yes there is every chance that when one is paid off they will do the same with others. Do you know how many Liability orders the Council have?

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I don't Plodd. I confess I have had my head in the sand as I have literally been fighting off repossession for 5 years.

 

 

I paid when I could but that was not all the time I'm afraid.

 

 

I will write and ask them that question. My main concern is losing my job altogether over this which means I lose the house and there are no earnings to attach to. I would far rather they take a charge over the house, and that I pay them without the charging orders - are they likely to agree to that?

 

 

I could understand if they had written to me and said you have to pay one way or another - with that sort of threat I would have done what they said even if it meant going without food, etc.

 

 

Do you have any idea how flexible they are?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do I have any right of appeal?

You can request the council withdraw one or both of the orders but it's their prerogative only.

 

 

I could understand if they had written to me and said you have to pay one way or another

Once a liability order has been granted the council need to give you no further notice prior to them issuing an attachment order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks SS00. If they would withdraw one of the orders I might be able to survive. It will still be £255 but the £404 they want is going to cripple me. I have put in an immediate plea for this to happen but will follow up tomorrow with a breakdown of my outgoings. That said I don't suppose they will care that I am locked into such a high mortgage interest rate - what is that to them??

 

 

I confess I had no idea that the liability order, rubber stamped by a magistrate, gives them such power without further reference to the CT payer. That is certainly a lesson learned.

 

 

What I think may have happened is that this has been triggered by the recent merger of my council with another, and them jointly outsourcing this to a third council. All my letters etc., will have been lost and the computer has taken over. Hopefully there is still a human in there somewhere that I can talk to!

 

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should write to your council explaining that your job could be at risk if the AOE goes ahead, and ask if you can make an arrangement to pay - include a budget sheet with your letter to show them what you can afford. I have done this for a couple of people at my work and the council allowed them to pay either via direct debit or bank transfer, or at the council offices.

 

Link to budget sheet -

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=31141&d=1320168516

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ell-enn. Thanks.

 

 

It was you that helped me save my house! 6+ eviction notices over the last 5 years, but mercifully now at a point where I can 'get away with' £800 per month compared to the hundreds of extra Pounds a month I was paying to keep them at bay.

 

 

I could maybe afford one attachment - which would come out at £255 - just! - but two at £404 will send me back into mortgage arrears and I think I will have run out of sympathetic judges on that.

 

 

I will appeal as you suggest. Should I offer them a charge over the house instead?

 

 

Thanks again for all your help in the past and ongoing. I have neglected the CT and I do want to pay it back, but when an eviction notice comes through your door every time you are £1 short on the mortgage plus arrears (plus the mortgage company put their rates up three times during that period) it is hard to give them what you haven't got!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, how much is the normal monthly mortgage payment ?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was £756 but it has suddenly gone down to £743 - the first time it has gone down in over 5 years. The actual arrears are down to below £1,000 now but because I pay a bit late they go up to about £1,500 until I pay for the last month. I would love to 'catch up' but that is impossible.

 

 

The other issue is that while I am hoping to get a better paid job, that will never happen with an attachment order on my earnings in my industry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What industry are you in ? A future employer wouldn't know, I know some jobs need various clearance, I for example work in IT and I have sc level clearance but the majority of it jobs don't require it, is there a similar jobs you could apply for that won't need checks ?, how about contract jobs ? I've been doing short term roles since 2013 and the pay has been quite good.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless you told a new employer they would never know about the attachments unless the council sent them a copy of the order to take an attachment from your wages - there's no public record of the attachment (even a liability order application is held only by the court and the council).

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is SS that until I have paid it all off the attachment would follow me. My employer has to tell the council if I leave so they would know where I had gone.

 

 

If have never told them where I work - they got the info from the Inland Revenue. Apparently they have powers to do that. In fact it seems local councils have the power to do just about anything!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go Self-employed/contract. :) I owed some council tax and informed the council that they should accept my offer to pay, as attachemnts wouldnt apply to me, unfortunatley that only really leaves the bailiff option..or jail.

 

And yes, they do have the power to do almost anything, sidestepping the usual civil debt rules, its all goes back to the poll tax.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually could go self employed Andy so not a bad idea!

 

 

As for going to prison - I would be glad of the rest! If they sent me to prison for three months instead of collecting the money I could have my first proper holiday in 20 years, catch up with some reading, and chill out! :)

 

 

Quite apart from anything, why the hell do they have the right to be told by the Revenue where you work??? They have never asked me, just gone behind my back. A bailiff did come round some time ago. I told him, quite honestly, that if I had anything I could sell to catch up with the payments I would have done so! I don't have a car, and nothing in the house is worth anything on the second hand market - my PC belongs to my employer. He was quite nice about it!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...