Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. ( Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM   1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack  Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached   2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00.  The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month.   3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement,   Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us.   Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement   9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate   4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:-   a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement number 756050. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     Thw total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by Firrst class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges ]= 5.  A the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or  alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage.   Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs.   Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024   What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

esa support group payment and group income protection


moving on
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3473 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:moving on:

 

Now we know for certain that you're off sick, rather than retired from your job on health grounds, thanx to :estellyn: for her help. :-) It's the argument I'd use as well, cos treating health insurance as pension should only apply to ex employees.

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/decision-makers-guide-vols-8-and-9-employment-and-support-allowance-staff-guide

(Chapter 44, section 44700)

 

And the legislation;

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2008/794/regulation/72/made

 

Well that's the theory, but I think it very unlikely that you'll successfully argue your cause over the phone. Experience tells me that every call will be a repeat performance of starting from scratch with the issue and erroneous explanations of why you're not entitled to employment n support without deductions. Also, Jobcentreplus are unlikely to accept anything you say about the insurance payments, without written proof from your employer or the insurance company.

 

So please, pretty please, try to stay off the phone. :pray2:

 

Written argument with references to the guidance/legislation.

Not relevant to this argument, but enclose confirmation of the insurance so Jobcentreplus can check.

And ask Jobcentreplus to explain why you're not entitled to employment n support without deductions for income.

 

I've never been involved in this particular debate, but among my self help group we've used the strategy to overturn several incorrect deductions for pension income. If you've problems with wording a letter or physically writing it, you may be able to get help from, for example, a hospital social worker, a support group for your condition, or (if you're a member) a trade union.

 

Best wishes, Margaret. :panda:

 

 

(If your insurance income is high enough for you to pay national insurance and tax, you're unlikely to qualify for short term help.)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to you all for the advice and help,would it be best to write in first instance to ask for confirmation of what part of regulations or legislation they are using and then try to gather all the information that I can to try and overturn their decision.

 

Or should I phone,ask for local office to return call and then,keeping conversation brief and to the point,request reason,ask for written confirmation and also if possible, an email address for correspondance.

 

Then if need be approach employer and ask could they (or I) contact insurance company to confirm the official name of policy,and what affect,if any,it would have on an ongoing ESA contributions based support group payment of over thirteen months duration.

 

After all ESA is deducted automatically from payment by insurance company for first twelve months so therefore insurance company must assume you are able to be in receipt of both ?.

 

Recall some mention last Thursday that they were looking into investigation further,not she though as I had a lot going on at time of call,so have not given up hope yet.

 

I am in a union-UNITE-so hopefully if this all becomes too much,and needs challenging, I will be assisted with my appeal.

 

Will keep you all posted of any updates,

Again,thanks for all your help,

 

Moving on.

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Margaret said, you need to write, requesting a mandatory reconsideration of their decision, arguing that the payments are in fact sickness pay.

 

 

And yes, the payments take into account ESA, because you are able to have sickness pay and ESA once your SSP has ended. I assume that your employer completed an SSP1 form, which you provided to the DWP?

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks estellyn,

 

An SSP1 was completed and sent to me by wages,albeit two weeks late,I then completed my part and asked wages what do with form.Answer was,submit to DWP to claim benefit for ESA,as ESA amount was to be deducted from monthly group income protection payment for one year.

 

Claimed ESA via phone,when asked about "received or waiting to receive any income from pension, permanent health insurance, or compensation payment?" my answer was No,as the only paperwork I had referred to payment as Group Income Protection Scheme.

 

Received Tax claim for ESA money last year.

 

February this year received form to fill out from ESA enquiring about "my part time or voulantery work" part 16 asked "Is your employer paying you any sick pay or maternity pay,as well as SSP,instead of SSP,or when an employee cannot get SSP?

 

To this I answered No.

 

I then added a note in reference to answer, No,stating,my payment each month is off my employer, my employer receives it from a policy they have and it is passed onto me as a continuation of my salary.All forms I have in relation to the policy have been titled Group Income Protection.I have no details of the policy".

 

I submitted a number of recent pay slips and also the address of the wages department, and a letter sent to me by the insurance company requesting a medical report.The letter was titled "Group Income Protection Scheme".

 

After giving them all this information they appear to be discounting it and putting ESA claim under whatever title they feel like, just to decline benefit payment.

 

With all this in mind,would it be wise to base appeal on the grounds that payment is sick pay,or carry on with the only paper proof that I have,which is,payment is from a policy that my employer has,it is passed onto me as a continuation of my salary,it is titled Group Income Protection, I am still employed by the company,I am off work on long term sick and I am still in receipt of sick notes,and have been for the whole time I have been claiming ESA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The paper evidence you have and the argument that it is sick pay is one in the same. Your employer takes out insurance so that they are able to pay sick pay to their employees. The payments take into account that ESA is payable at the same time. Whoever is making the decision on the claim evidently doesn't understand the type of scheme and needs it explaining as 'sick pay'. How your employer can afford to pay you extended sick pay is not really anything to do with you, you don't pay for the scheme, it is not your insurance and should not be treated as such.

 

 

It really needs to be sent for a mandatory reconsideration to a more experienced decision maker, who will hopefully have more understanding and come to the correct decision.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again for your replies.

 

Update: e-mailed employer on Friday,employer contacted insurance broker who in turn called me back.I explained my situation to him and he seemed quite certain that there had been a mistake,misinterpretation, on the part of the DWP/Jobcentreplus.As many of the advisors had thought in responding to this thread.

 

As far as he was concerned (that's if regulations have not recently changed) my payment is from a Group Income Protection Scheme,and as such should have no impact or affect on any ESA payment that I was in receipt of (not including WRAG 365 day limit,told him I was in support group so that wouldn't be applicable).

 

He has offered to speak to whoever is doing the investigation-that's if authorisation is granted-to explain the policies Terms and Conditions, who owns policy,who pays for it,how I receive payment etc,etc.

He has also requested that I scan and send all letters,communications that I have had or sent to DWP prior to him hopefully speaking to them.If a telephone explanation is not acceptable then I am hopeful they will let him write to them.

 

From what he has advised,I have requested a call back for Monday the 27th from DWP.

I hope to obtain a name,telephone number,office address,and although not mentioned by broker,the DWP regulations being used and - if the decision has been looked at again already-a request for a "mandatory reconsideration" appeal.

 

I think I have covered all the points and areas that I need to identify or confirm,but if any knowledgeable people can give me any advice or guidance it would be greatly appreciated.

 

I will post any developments (favourable I hope)as soon as I have them.

 

Yours,

Moving on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The most important thing is to ask for the reconsideration - up until that point all they are doing is explaining their decision, you want them to look at the decision again.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks estellyn,

 

I will formally request a mandatory reconsideration, either over the phone,if they return the promised call back,or by the way of a letter, hand delivered to the office dealing with this case.

 

If I am not well,or able enough,to do it myself tomorrow, then I will ask a family member to hand deliver it and get confirmation of delivery by getting a signed and dated signature off the person who takes receipt of the letter.

 

Many thanks,

Yours,

Moving on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Another case of the DWP misinterpreting the situation and the rules to benefit themselves. Its instances such as this which makes me question whether the DWP is actually here to hinder or help, my personal belief being to hinder.

 

I would write to them stating you disagree with their decision and give them the authority to deal with the insurance provider or ask your provider to provide a written statement of the facts outlining the terms and conditions, otherwise its off to a tribunal which in my opinion is unessacary if the DWP would only deal with the facts of the matter instead of purposely trying to misunderstand the facts for their benefit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hi

I read with great sympathy your problems with your ESA. Like you the DWP are calling a halt to my ESA due to my being in receipt of Group Income Protection payments through my Company. These were allowed under Incapacity Benefit rules (I go back over ten years) so I am learning by experience. Since Unum are deducting the ESA benefit from any payment they must be confident that it is allowable to have the two income sources or they would have to make up the shortfall. I agree that the Jobcentre/DWP seem to not know what they are doing on this matter since they told me to fill in a permitted work form!!

 

 

I wish you a good outcome as I tread wearily in your footsteps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Moving on and everyone else, I wondered how you got on with dealing with this? I too am paid PHI from my employer and have been on long term sick since jan 2010. I never paid the premium for the phi my employer did and I was never going to claim ESA but it was deducted from the PHI claim so I did. I was awarded ESA contribution based and received it ever since. Over the years I have googled to see if I was eligible for esa as I did worry that I had PHI too but I never found any info about PHI being deducted from ESA, only pensions. This year a friend said something to me so I googled again and saw a paragraph that said 'sometimes' PHI is deducted from esa. I went round and round in circles trying to find the correct info online and in the end I gave up and contacted the benefits office, they would surely know and be able to help, right? WRONG! I went round in circles with them too, one lady even told me I had nothing to worry about it would be classed as income from an employer so not deductible, another lady told me I wasn't due esa as got PHI etc etc..I sent a copy of my wage slip in 3 months ago and been waiting for an answer ever since. Then finally I get a letter from the Benefits office, the incorrect letter telling me I failed to work(!) nothing to do with my phi query. So I rang them to see what was going on, basically wrong letter sent out to me but as I have PHI I was never due any ESA. So the ESA has been stopped and what they paid me in error has been written off as it was their error as I declared everything to them. But I am still at a loss as to how my PHI paid thru my employer should be treated, salary income, phi, pension. I know this makes a difference to whether I can get esa or not, can anyone help me in pointing me to the correct legislation or something? Or even let me know what your outcome was in your situation. Where do I start? I want to be able to understand this properly and make sure Benefits have dealt with it properly.

Thank you

Edited by flowergirl01
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Moving on,

 

I have read your posts on here re PHI and ESA. I am in exactly the same situation as you and I wondered if you had got this matter resolved, if so I hope you don't mind me asking if it was in your favour or not. I added a post to the end of your thread so you will be able to read a bit more about my situation.

Thank you for your time.

Thanks again for your replies.

 

Update: e-mailed employer on Friday,employer contacted insurance broker who in turn called me back.I explained my situation to him and he seemed quite certain that there had been a mistake,misinterpretation, on the part of the DWP/Jobcentreplus.As many of the advisors had thought in responding to this thread.

 

As far as he was concerned (that's if regulations have not recently changed) my payment is from a Group Income Protection Scheme,and as such should have no impact or affect on any ESA payment that I was in receipt of (not including WRAG 365 day limit,told him I was in support group so that wouldn't be applicable).

 

He has offered to speak to whoever is doing the investigation-that's if authorisation is granted-to explain the policies Terms and Conditions, who owns policy,who pays for it,how I receive payment etc,etc.

He has also requested that I scan and send all letters,communications that I have had or sent to DWP prior to him hopefully speaking to them.If a telephone explanation is not acceptable then I am hopeful they will let him write to them.

 

From what he has advised,I have requested a call back for Monday the 27th from DWP.

I hope to obtain a name,telephone number,office address,and although not mentioned by broker,the DWP regulations being used and - if the decision has been looked at again already-a request for a "mandatory reconsideration" appeal.

 

I think I have covered all the points and areas that I need to identify or confirm,but if any knowledgeable people can give me any advice or guidance it would be greatly appreciated.

 

I will post any developments (favourable I hope)as soon as I have them.

 

Yours,

Moving on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best to ask for your own thread to be started, a mod can help with this.

 

But as a first step, request a mandatory reconsideration regarding the decision a stop your ESA and another one if they notify you of an overpayment.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you estellyn, I have put in a request for a mandatory reconsideration. I will post a new thread when I get a reply.

Best to ask for your own thread to be started, a mod can help with this.

 

But as a first step, request a mandatory reconsideration regarding the decision a stop your ESA and another one if they notify you of an overpayment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...